Saturday, December 13, 2008
Beamsville Then and Now: old farmhouse bites the dust
The old farmhouse that had stood on the south-east corner of Ontario St. and the South Service Rd. of the QEW in Beamsville was demolished on Dec.3, 2008.
above: Looking s/e at the farmhouse from across Ontario St. on Sept.2, 2008. Note the "Lincoln County Fair" sign to the left. Photo Series taken by R. Bobak.
above: demolition underway on Dec.3, 2008. Note new "Welcome to Lincoln" sign at the left.
above: Dec.9, 2008: farmhouse is now gone; the lot is vacant.
above: Dec.3, 2008, view looking south at the farmhouse from the S.Service Rd.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Geneva, N.Y. Then and Now: Goodbye to Patti's Diner
"We'll miss you Patti", "good luck", and painted hearts expressing fond farewell were drawn on the windows of Patti's Lakeview Diner, near the shore of Seneca Lake in Geneva, New York.
Photo by R. Bobak, taken May 29, 2004.
below: The early-1930's Bixby-built diner was located at 43 Lake St., on the north side, between Route 20 (Lakefront Dr.) and Route 14 (Exchange St.) Note the old gas station in the distance. Taken May 29, 2004 by R. Bobak
above: Patti's Lakeview Diner once stood where the car is parked in the distance. A hotel now occupies the site. View looks west from the former gas station. Taken by R. Bobak Aug.17, 2008.
above: View looking north-west across Route 20 and railroad tracks, May 29, 2004.
Photo by R. Bobak, taken May 29, 2004.
below: The early-1930's Bixby-built diner was located at 43 Lake St., on the north side, between Route 20 (Lakefront Dr.) and Route 14 (Exchange St.) Note the old gas station in the distance. Taken May 29, 2004 by R. Bobak
above: View looking north-west across Route 20 and railroad tracks, May 29, 2004.
below: Looking east towards Route 20 on Aug.17, 2008. Railroad crossing is in the background. The diner (as seen in the next below photo) once stood where the new tree and drive now are, at the left of the photo.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Bumbledore Dion, comedic conspirator of cuckoo-coup-coalition quits
above: National Post, Dec.3, 2008: Canada's Axis of Idiots, aka the three cobble-itionist conspirators, Jack Layton, Stephane Bumbledore Dion, and the separatist Duceppe. click on photo to enlarge.*
Stephane Dion announced today that he will be resigning earlier than he had planned... fittingly, he couldn't even carry out his own resignation plans properly, let alone stop global warming/climate change!!!
Why, just last Monday, Dec.1, 2008, he was going to take over Canada by sleeping with his mortal separatist enemies (!); this Monday, Dec.8, 2008, Bumbledore's waving bye-bye to his theatre of the absurd.
The curtains are finally coming down on the cerebral political comedy stylings of Stephane Bumbledore Dion.
What a run: we were treated to some of the funniest, classically preposterous political manoeuvres ever attempted in Canadian history - what an act!
Dion leaves behind a dramatic legacy of two classic videos exemplifying his comic genius, demonstrating his superhuman ability to stay in sustained character to the nth degree:
his famous CTV 'if am prime minister...when...now..?' video is a legendary, convoluted comedic achievement, of epic proportions. So underplayed... so... believable... Bumbledore makes you, makes everyone, think he's really a Liberal Canadian political leader.
The subtlety is pure genius. Move over, Borat, move over Spinal Tap - Stephane Bumbledore Dion takes the cake when it comes to pushing the envelope of delusional docu-comedies.
And who can forget the inspired 'clarity' of Dion's other masterpiece of interpretational political-situation-comedy:
his unbelievable, out-of-focus Gzowski Hot-Air farce of a video will be a knee-slapper for years to come - it's so earnestly serious, yet at the same time, so utterly laughable, that the audience is left wondering how this Dionist circus act they see unfolding before them can possibly be real. (This video can't be blamed on CTV this time! It was ALL a Liberal production - the whole laughable deal.)
The comedy-verite was so complete, it took on multi-layers of meaning, and other parties became unwitting bit players in this fantastic long-con - newscasters were waiting for it, Cuckoo coalitionists were hoping to see their nutty professor leader charge ahead with coherent plans to wrestle the government of Canada away from the rightfully elected ... everyone was waiting with great anticipation to hear the Grand Utterances of the Dion - and they got a video that looked as if it had been made in a cave.
Only true inspired genius could have come up with and pulled off such bold political satire... Bravo, Sir. For two years, you mesmerized many gullible Canadians to fall for your act, your method of madness will be studied for years to come. Take a well-deserved break. Your understudies circling in the wings are poised to take your place in the spotlight, but to knowing Canadians, you will be our one true Bumbledore.
*
Why, just last Monday, Dec.1, 2008, he was going to take over Canada by sleeping with his mortal separatist enemies (!); this Monday, Dec.8, 2008, Bumbledore's waving bye-bye to his theatre of the absurd.
The curtains are finally coming down on the cerebral political comedy stylings of Stephane Bumbledore Dion.
What a run: we were treated to some of the funniest, classically preposterous political manoeuvres ever attempted in Canadian history - what an act!
Dion leaves behind a dramatic legacy of two classic videos exemplifying his comic genius, demonstrating his superhuman ability to stay in sustained character to the nth degree:
his famous CTV 'if am prime minister...when...now..?' video is a legendary, convoluted comedic achievement, of epic proportions. So underplayed... so... believable... Bumbledore makes you, makes everyone, think he's really a Liberal Canadian political leader.
The subtlety is pure genius. Move over, Borat, move over Spinal Tap - Stephane Bumbledore Dion takes the cake when it comes to pushing the envelope of delusional docu-comedies.
And who can forget the inspired 'clarity' of Dion's other masterpiece of interpretational political-situation-comedy:
his unbelievable, out-of-focus Gzowski Hot-Air farce of a video will be a knee-slapper for years to come - it's so earnestly serious, yet at the same time, so utterly laughable, that the audience is left wondering how this Dionist circus act they see unfolding before them can possibly be real. (This video can't be blamed on CTV this time! It was ALL a Liberal production - the whole laughable deal.)
The comedy-verite was so complete, it took on multi-layers of meaning, and other parties became unwitting bit players in this fantastic long-con - newscasters were waiting for it, Cuckoo coalitionists were hoping to see their nutty professor leader charge ahead with coherent plans to wrestle the government of Canada away from the rightfully elected ... everyone was waiting with great anticipation to hear the Grand Utterances of the Dion - and they got a video that looked as if it had been made in a cave.
Only true inspired genius could have come up with and pulled off such bold political satire... Bravo, Sir. For two years, you mesmerized many gullible Canadians to fall for your act, your method of madness will be studied for years to come. Take a well-deserved break. Your understudies circling in the wings are poised to take your place in the spotlight, but to knowing Canadians, you will be our one true Bumbledore.
*
Labels:
Bumbledore,
Greensheviks,
jack layton,
Kyodiots,
Stephane Dion
State-run medicare assault on patient's rights
James Keller wrote this St. Catharines Standard (Oct.6, 2008) article, which, when you read it, was strangely mis-titled with the headline “Wait-time insurance seen as assault on health care”; yet, there are no details specifically describing any alleged "assault", just the usual leftist medicare hyperbole:
“A health insurance policy that sends people facing long waits for surgery to private clinics or the United States is the latest flash point for critics warning Canada is on a slippery slope toward for-profit health care.
But one health-care expert wonders whether there will be enough demand for such a service to have any impact on the public medicare system.
Calgary-based Acure Health Corp. has been quietly selling its so-called wait-time insurance for several years, but it made headlines recently after the British Columbia Automobile Association began offering the policy to its 800,000 members.
Under the policy, patients on waiting lists longer than 45 days for procedures ranging from MRI scans to heart bypass operations can be moved to private facilities in Canada or the U. S.
Opponents accuse the company of promoting queue-jumping and encouraging private clinics to poach public resources. B. C.'s health minister suggests the plan might be illegal.
But Prof. Terrance Sullivan, who specializes in health-care policy at the University of Toronto, says it's unlikely the insurance offers patients enough benefit to make much of a dent.
"I wouldn't rush to say that this is the nail in the coffin" of public health care, said Sullivan, who is also president of Cancer Care Ontario.
"The first question before you get to any sinister conclusions is: Is anybody going to buy this insurance?"
Acure started selling the policy as part of small group insurance plans in Alberta about three years ago. It has since expanded to B. C., Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario, and now offers it to individuals through private insurance brokers.
The company says monthly premiums average about $100, climbing to $200 for someone over 70 buying family coverage.
The policy covers 135 medical conditions and hundreds of diagnostic tests. A client who is put on a waiting list longer than 45 days can file a claim to be moved to private care.
Canadians are already free to pay for treatment in the United States, but Sullivan says statistics suggest few actually do so.
"Every patient has the opportunity to cross the border and get private care, (but) despite what everybody says, the numbers are minuscule," he said.
This approach is the latest example of private care to be called an attack on the public health system.
Private diagnostic clinics have been offering tests such as MRI scans for years. Corporations often pay for physical examinations for executives.
The False Creek Surgical Centre, which opened in Vancouver in the mid-1990s, runs an emergency room that charges patients for care. The centre is allowed to operate because doctors at the facility don't also work in public facilities that bill the provincial health-care system.
There are other clinics in Vancouver and elsewhere in Canada that are either privately run and paid for by the public system, or charge patients directly for certain procedures.
Perhaps the most significant development in recent years was a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada decision striking down Quebec's ban on private health insurance for private care. That ruling permits patients to use private care when faced with long delays.
Jim Viccars of Acure brushes off concerns that he's eroding public health care, insisting his insurance plan complements rather than competes with the public system.
"It's the exact opposite of queue-jumping -- this product takes you out of the line, and you get your services done elsewhere, so people in the line actually move up," Viccars said.
"Wait lists are a blight, and people are suffering and dying on wait lists."”
*
Interesting comment from Sullivan, saying "Every patient has the opportunity to cross the border and get private care, (but) despite what everybody says, the numbers are minuscule.” But WHY SHOULD WE have to cross the border in the first place, in order to access timely medical care, which is unavailable in Canada due to failed utopian government-run health-care promises?
We shouldn’t be forced, in Ontario, for example, to pay enormous taxes to the Liberal-government-run health-monopoly, then be told that, oh well, if the system fails you, you can always go to the States.
Why should McGuinty’s socialized Liberal ideology interfere with a patient’s payer/provider choices at all?
Taking Ontarian’s tax money with promises of universal government-run health care, then saying oh,well, you can go across the border if we can’t deliver, is a bait-and-switch routine. Why should we be forced to pay all these health taxes to prop up the Liberal health-monopoly, then have to pay again to obtain care in another country?!
By the way, the article’s unnamed 2005 Supreme Court decision was the very significant Chaoulli decision in Quebec. McGuinty’s Ontario Liberals are facing a similar constitutional challenge now before the court, the McCreith/Holmes health care challenge.
Sullivan claims that the number of patients going to “cross the border…are miniscule.” Is it the U.S. border he’s referring to? And, what specifically are these numbers which he sees are “miniscule”? What is the source of his data?
Sullivan does say that this insurance policy development is not the nail in the coffin of public health care. This article is actually talking about SOLUTIONS to government-run health care schemes. Why wasn’t it headlined as such in the Standard? The headline could have more aptly read “Single-payer, universal, state-run health monopolies are an assault on actual health care” or, "Wait time insurance seen as solution to state-run medicare failures."
I wonder if MPP Jim Bradley and his merry band of Liberal health-care-monopolists will assault patient's rights by assaulting this wait-time insurance idea in Ontario.
“A health insurance policy that sends people facing long waits for surgery to private clinics or the United States is the latest flash point for critics warning Canada is on a slippery slope toward for-profit health care.
But one health-care expert wonders whether there will be enough demand for such a service to have any impact on the public medicare system.
Calgary-based Acure Health Corp. has been quietly selling its so-called wait-time insurance for several years, but it made headlines recently after the British Columbia Automobile Association began offering the policy to its 800,000 members.
Under the policy, patients on waiting lists longer than 45 days for procedures ranging from MRI scans to heart bypass operations can be moved to private facilities in Canada or the U. S.
Opponents accuse the company of promoting queue-jumping and encouraging private clinics to poach public resources. B. C.'s health minister suggests the plan might be illegal.
But Prof. Terrance Sullivan, who specializes in health-care policy at the University of Toronto, says it's unlikely the insurance offers patients enough benefit to make much of a dent.
"I wouldn't rush to say that this is the nail in the coffin" of public health care, said Sullivan, who is also president of Cancer Care Ontario.
"The first question before you get to any sinister conclusions is: Is anybody going to buy this insurance?"
Acure started selling the policy as part of small group insurance plans in Alberta about three years ago. It has since expanded to B. C., Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario, and now offers it to individuals through private insurance brokers.
The company says monthly premiums average about $100, climbing to $200 for someone over 70 buying family coverage.
The policy covers 135 medical conditions and hundreds of diagnostic tests. A client who is put on a waiting list longer than 45 days can file a claim to be moved to private care.
Canadians are already free to pay for treatment in the United States, but Sullivan says statistics suggest few actually do so.
"Every patient has the opportunity to cross the border and get private care, (but) despite what everybody says, the numbers are minuscule," he said.
This approach is the latest example of private care to be called an attack on the public health system.
Private diagnostic clinics have been offering tests such as MRI scans for years. Corporations often pay for physical examinations for executives.
The False Creek Surgical Centre, which opened in Vancouver in the mid-1990s, runs an emergency room that charges patients for care. The centre is allowed to operate because doctors at the facility don't also work in public facilities that bill the provincial health-care system.
There are other clinics in Vancouver and elsewhere in Canada that are either privately run and paid for by the public system, or charge patients directly for certain procedures.
Perhaps the most significant development in recent years was a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada decision striking down Quebec's ban on private health insurance for private care. That ruling permits patients to use private care when faced with long delays.
Jim Viccars of Acure brushes off concerns that he's eroding public health care, insisting his insurance plan complements rather than competes with the public system.
"It's the exact opposite of queue-jumping -- this product takes you out of the line, and you get your services done elsewhere, so people in the line actually move up," Viccars said.
"Wait lists are a blight, and people are suffering and dying on wait lists."”
*
Interesting comment from Sullivan, saying "Every patient has the opportunity to cross the border and get private care, (but) despite what everybody says, the numbers are minuscule.” But WHY SHOULD WE have to cross the border in the first place, in order to access timely medical care, which is unavailable in Canada due to failed utopian government-run health-care promises?
We shouldn’t be forced, in Ontario, for example, to pay enormous taxes to the Liberal-government-run health-monopoly, then be told that, oh well, if the system fails you, you can always go to the States.
Why should McGuinty’s socialized Liberal ideology interfere with a patient’s payer/provider choices at all?
Taking Ontarian’s tax money with promises of universal government-run health care, then saying oh,well, you can go across the border if we can’t deliver, is a bait-and-switch routine. Why should we be forced to pay all these health taxes to prop up the Liberal health-monopoly, then have to pay again to obtain care in another country?!
By the way, the article’s unnamed 2005 Supreme Court decision was the very significant Chaoulli decision in Quebec. McGuinty’s Ontario Liberals are facing a similar constitutional challenge now before the court, the McCreith/Holmes health care challenge.
Sullivan claims that the number of patients going to “cross the border…are miniscule.” Is it the U.S. border he’s referring to? And, what specifically are these numbers which he sees are “miniscule”? What is the source of his data?
Sullivan does say that this insurance policy development is not the nail in the coffin of public health care. This article is actually talking about SOLUTIONS to government-run health care schemes. Why wasn’t it headlined as such in the Standard? The headline could have more aptly read “Single-payer, universal, state-run health monopolies are an assault on actual health care” or, "Wait time insurance seen as solution to state-run medicare failures."
I wonder if MPP Jim Bradley and his merry band of Liberal health-care-monopolists will assault patient's rights by assaulting this wait-time insurance idea in Ontario.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
C. Difficile outbreak in Niagara Falls
The St. Catharines Standard reported in “C. difficile outbreak at Falls hospital” (Dec.6, 2008):
“The Niagara Health System has declared a Clostridium difficile outbreak on one of the inpatient wards at Greater Niagara General Hospital.
C. difficile is a bacterial infection that causes diarrhea and more serious intestinal conditions.
Healthy people don’t usually contract the disease, but sick people and the elderly have an increased chance of infection. For that reason, it’s one of the most common diarrheal infections in hospitals and long-term-care facilities.
Because health-care workers and visitors can spread the disease from one patient to another, contact precautions have been put in place in the affected unit of the hospital.”
*
Will Liberals Dalton McGuinty, David Caplan, Kim Craitor, or Jim Bradley explain why these C. diff. outbreaks are still occurring in their government-run health-monopoly? These Liberals couldn’t be bothered to conduct an independent investigation into the continuing C. diff. outbreak in Ontario, which has killed over 500 patients, and which has now shown up in Niagara.
Take a look back not even three months ago to this story by Keith Leslie, “McGuinty rejects demands for investigation into C. difficile deaths in Ont.” (CP; Toronto Star; Sept.24, 2008):
“Premier Dalton McGuinty rejected Opposition demands for an independent investigation into C. difficile deaths in Ontario hospitals Wednesday, insisting there is nothing more to be learned about how to prevent the spread of the infectious disease.
Progressive Conservative health critic Elizabeth Witmer wanted to know why the Liberal government is "stonewalling" the public's right to know the full extent of the deadly outbreak by blocking an investigation.
"What are you afraid of?" Witmer asked McGuinty in the legislature. "We have over 500 deaths in just a fraction of our hospitals and you refuse to take action."
The Conservatives say C. difficile has killed more than 500 people in only 22 of Ontario's 157 hospitals, and they want a 30-to 90-day investigation to find the true extent of the problem across the province, noting the Liberals haven't backed away from other inquiries.
"They support the listeriosis inquiry (after 18 deaths). They called for the SARS inquiry - that was 44 deaths," Witmer said. "We know there were more than 500 deaths from C. difficile, and yet they don't want to get to the root cause.
"It demonstrates negligence and I think it demonstrates a lack of understanding that the public has a right to know why these people died. People are going into the hospital for elective surgery and they're dying of C. difficile. Why?"
McGuinty said hospitals now know how to protect against the spread of C. difficile, and he noted that medical experts say an inquiry would not tell them anything they don't already know.
"The experts that we hear from, both here in Ontario and from south of the border, (say) we have a good understanding of C. difficile and the manner in which it is spread," McGuinty told the legislature.
"The next thing that we could and must do is to make information public about the incidents of C. difficile in our hospitals, and that's what we plan to do."
All hospitals in Ontario will be required to report the number of C. difficile cases - but not deaths - starting later this month.
But Witmer said that should have been made a mandatory requirement when the infectious disease first appeared in the province five years ago, and it still won't reveal how the outbreak started.
"In Quebec they started this mandatory reporting four years ago," she said. "This government has known since the fall of 2003 when there was an outbreak in Peterborough that C. difficile was present in this province. They've been warned for five years to deal with it and they haven't."
The New Democrats want Ontario's ombudsman to have oversight of hospitals so he can look into complaints from families who have lost loved ones to C. difficile and help prevent more outbreaks in the future, but they may end up supporting the Conservatives' demand for an investigation.
"We're bordering on siding with the Conservatives; it all depends on how many new cases are unveiled and how much more we learn (when the mandatory reporting starts)," said NDP health critic France Gelinas.
"If we start to see other hospitals having similar problems ... then it would be warranted."
*
Who in Ontario - besides arrogant Liberals - can still seriously believe that the Ombudsman should NOT be allowed permanent investigative access to the Liberal-run health-monopoly’s hospitals?
Jim Bradley, the Liberal health-monopolist MPP from St. Catharines, refuses to call for the Ombudsman to investigate his health system’s hospitals. Bradley and his Liberals must be frightened at what might be uncovered: better to cover their Liberal asses by taking chances with patient health and keeping their hospital system operations shielded from outside scrutiny - and, naturally - protected from subsequent accountability.
Patients have no other hospitals to go to except the C. diff.-infected ones run by McGuinty and his secretive health-monopolists. Patients should have a reasonable expectation that their visit to a McGuinty-run hospital would not put them at risk of dying from C. diff!
McGuinty smugly claimed in September there is ‘nothing more to learn’ about how to contain C. diff. outbreaks, but it actually looks as if McGuinty learned nothing: now in December we have another outbreak, right in Niagara.
Why should we take McGuinty’s word that his claim is actually true? His word is prejudiced; it is the word of one who is in a conflict-of-interest: it is McGuinty and his Liberal majority government who for five years have legislated, funded, directed, and run Ontario’s health-monopoly - a no-other-patient-choice-by-state-decree monopoly - which has killed over 500 C. diff.-infected patients.
Why are McGuinty’s Liberals hiding their health-system from Ombudsman scrutiny?
What independent corroboration do Ontarians have that McGuinty’s Liberal-run health-monopoly has actually done its due diligence to mitigate the risks?
Did McGuinty’s single-payer health-funding model, along with his health budget rationing, impede a full and proper implementation of C.diff. prevention controls in his government-run system? How can anyone know?
McGuinty’s words can't be trusted.
McGuinty’s Liberal Healthcare Duplicity is glib ideological style over substance. (see also: Another C. dif outbreak in Ontario: why aren't Liberals held willfully negligent?)
If one more patient unexpectedly contracts C. diff. and dies – will any secretive Liberal be found liable for negligence causing death?
*
(see also here, story from 2011, almost three years later)
*
“The Niagara Health System has declared a Clostridium difficile outbreak on one of the inpatient wards at Greater Niagara General Hospital.
C. difficile is a bacterial infection that causes diarrhea and more serious intestinal conditions.
Healthy people don’t usually contract the disease, but sick people and the elderly have an increased chance of infection. For that reason, it’s one of the most common diarrheal infections in hospitals and long-term-care facilities.
Because health-care workers and visitors can spread the disease from one patient to another, contact precautions have been put in place in the affected unit of the hospital.”
*
Will Liberals Dalton McGuinty, David Caplan, Kim Craitor, or Jim Bradley explain why these C. diff. outbreaks are still occurring in their government-run health-monopoly? These Liberals couldn’t be bothered to conduct an independent investigation into the continuing C. diff. outbreak in Ontario, which has killed over 500 patients, and which has now shown up in Niagara.
Take a look back not even three months ago to this story by Keith Leslie, “McGuinty rejects demands for investigation into C. difficile deaths in Ont.” (CP; Toronto Star; Sept.24, 2008):
“Premier Dalton McGuinty rejected Opposition demands for an independent investigation into C. difficile deaths in Ontario hospitals Wednesday, insisting there is nothing more to be learned about how to prevent the spread of the infectious disease.
Progressive Conservative health critic Elizabeth Witmer wanted to know why the Liberal government is "stonewalling" the public's right to know the full extent of the deadly outbreak by blocking an investigation.
"What are you afraid of?" Witmer asked McGuinty in the legislature. "We have over 500 deaths in just a fraction of our hospitals and you refuse to take action."
The Conservatives say C. difficile has killed more than 500 people in only 22 of Ontario's 157 hospitals, and they want a 30-to 90-day investigation to find the true extent of the problem across the province, noting the Liberals haven't backed away from other inquiries.
"They support the listeriosis inquiry (after 18 deaths). They called for the SARS inquiry - that was 44 deaths," Witmer said. "We know there were more than 500 deaths from C. difficile, and yet they don't want to get to the root cause.
"It demonstrates negligence and I think it demonstrates a lack of understanding that the public has a right to know why these people died. People are going into the hospital for elective surgery and they're dying of C. difficile. Why?"
McGuinty said hospitals now know how to protect against the spread of C. difficile, and he noted that medical experts say an inquiry would not tell them anything they don't already know.
"The experts that we hear from, both here in Ontario and from south of the border, (say) we have a good understanding of C. difficile and the manner in which it is spread," McGuinty told the legislature.
"The next thing that we could and must do is to make information public about the incidents of C. difficile in our hospitals, and that's what we plan to do."
All hospitals in Ontario will be required to report the number of C. difficile cases - but not deaths - starting later this month.
But Witmer said that should have been made a mandatory requirement when the infectious disease first appeared in the province five years ago, and it still won't reveal how the outbreak started.
"In Quebec they started this mandatory reporting four years ago," she said. "This government has known since the fall of 2003 when there was an outbreak in Peterborough that C. difficile was present in this province. They've been warned for five years to deal with it and they haven't."
The New Democrats want Ontario's ombudsman to have oversight of hospitals so he can look into complaints from families who have lost loved ones to C. difficile and help prevent more outbreaks in the future, but they may end up supporting the Conservatives' demand for an investigation.
"We're bordering on siding with the Conservatives; it all depends on how many new cases are unveiled and how much more we learn (when the mandatory reporting starts)," said NDP health critic France Gelinas.
"If we start to see other hospitals having similar problems ... then it would be warranted."
*
Who in Ontario - besides arrogant Liberals - can still seriously believe that the Ombudsman should NOT be allowed permanent investigative access to the Liberal-run health-monopoly’s hospitals?
Jim Bradley, the Liberal health-monopolist MPP from St. Catharines, refuses to call for the Ombudsman to investigate his health system’s hospitals. Bradley and his Liberals must be frightened at what might be uncovered: better to cover their Liberal asses by taking chances with patient health and keeping their hospital system operations shielded from outside scrutiny - and, naturally - protected from subsequent accountability.
Patients have no other hospitals to go to except the C. diff.-infected ones run by McGuinty and his secretive health-monopolists. Patients should have a reasonable expectation that their visit to a McGuinty-run hospital would not put them at risk of dying from C. diff!
McGuinty smugly claimed in September there is ‘nothing more to learn’ about how to contain C. diff. outbreaks, but it actually looks as if McGuinty learned nothing: now in December we have another outbreak, right in Niagara.
Why should we take McGuinty’s word that his claim is actually true? His word is prejudiced; it is the word of one who is in a conflict-of-interest: it is McGuinty and his Liberal majority government who for five years have legislated, funded, directed, and run Ontario’s health-monopoly - a no-other-patient-choice-by-state-decree monopoly - which has killed over 500 C. diff.-infected patients.
Why are McGuinty’s Liberals hiding their health-system from Ombudsman scrutiny?
What independent corroboration do Ontarians have that McGuinty’s Liberal-run health-monopoly has actually done its due diligence to mitigate the risks?
Did McGuinty’s single-payer health-funding model, along with his health budget rationing, impede a full and proper implementation of C.diff. prevention controls in his government-run system? How can anyone know?
McGuinty’s words can't be trusted.
McGuinty’s Liberal Healthcare Duplicity is glib ideological style over substance. (see also: Another C. dif outbreak in Ontario: why aren't Liberals held willfully negligent?)
If one more patient unexpectedly contracts C. diff. and dies – will any secretive Liberal be found liable for negligence causing death?
*
(see also here, story from 2011, almost three years later)
*
Friday, December 5, 2008
Bumbledore Dion: Three Stooges on their own Gong Show
Layton, nyuk-nyuk, is playing Curly; Dion is the woefully hapless Moe, and Duceppe is the perennial doofus Larry. Coming soon to a riding near you.
*
Steve Deri wrote in “Coalition criticism for MP Allen” (Welland Tribune, Dec.3, 2008):
“Welland MP Malcolm Allen: I am sending this letter to voice my absolute dissatisfaction in what you and the rest of the incompetent opposition leaders are doing.
I am in your riding, and may I say that I did not vote for you. I do, however, accept the fact that you attained more votes than the other individual candidates in my constituency, and therefore earned the right to sit in Parliament. Such is our system.
On the national scale, you and your party garnered among the least amount of seats in Parliament, save for the independents.
How can you and your party honestly think you now have the right to cabinet seats with such low support. This is ridiculous. You cut backroom deals with a so-called leader who had the poorest showing in recent history, as well as chumming up with admitted separatists. All in the name of revenge.
This is not about the economic statement. This is simply about getting back at the Conservatives in a totally crooked fashion, just so you can pad the pockets of your union friends at Canadian Auto Workers and other such organizations.
If you honestly think that this three-headed Frankenstein is what is best for the country, why then did you not form the coalition prior to the election, and all of you run on that platform? Better yet, why not present this deal with the devil to the people, and let us decide.
My last question is this: what exactly did you give away to the Bloc to support you?”
*
Kate Miller wrote in 'Voters are being disenfranchised' (Welland Tribune, Dec.4, 2008):
"I am a college student, who is involved with politics, and it is unimaginable that such disregard to the democratic process is being put forward.
Stephane Dion received the lowest election numbers for the Liberals since Confederation; clearly Canadians have rejected him as a leader.
Stephen Harper won a majority within the provinces, except for Quebec. It is a shame that the popular vote means nothing in the house. If the popular vote means anything, Canadians do not want Dion, or Jack Layton or Gilles Duceppe as their leaders. The Bloc also have said that after the coalition ends, they would have the option to separate. This is not a concept that a prime minister should tolerate.
Harper won the election with a minority, but that does not mean that the opposition should be able to oust him within the first two months, or at all. He has done nothing unconstitutional, nor given any reason that he cannot govern.
Layton was clearly scheming well before the throne speech, so Harper could not lose confidence if Layton and the opposition leaders never gave it to him. Nor did the opposition hold the wishes of voting Canadians to carry much merit. Although they legally have the right to form a coalition, seeing that Layton started the process well before the throne speech, it should be deemed unacceptable. It proves that the opposition were never willing to compromise, as they said they would, nor would they give Harper the respect as prime minister. It is the right of Canadians to vote and those who did vote should not have to be disenfranchised and told who their prime minister will be, especially seeing that Harper won."
*
Fred Davies wrote in "Wingnuts on the rise" (Welland Tribune Dec.2, 2008):
"Let me see if I have this all straight.
The NDP had already hatched a plan for a bloodless coup d'etat prior to the economic statement by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.
It apparently didn't matter that Canadians just voted and elected Stephen Harper.
Jack Layton doesn't care that we just had a $300 million election. Stephane Dion announced his intention to step down as Liberal leader, but the coup will put him into the Prime Minister's office even though he got the fewest votes of any Liberal since Confederation.
The Bloc Quebecois holds the balance of power and the key to government stability.
Hang on, do I have this right? Gilles Duceppe is thede facto Prime Minister in this game of political monopoly?
So, to recap:
Mr. Harper won, but really lost the election. Mr. Layton lost, but actually won. Mr. Dion quit but is going to be Prime Minister. And Mr. Duceppe is laughing his backside off because he is the one who is really in charge of the stability of Canadian government while being committed breaking up the country.
Hmmm. I just wanted to make sure I understood all of it. Welcome to our new banana republic -land of the political wing-nuts. "
*
What a sickening sight to see on all the newscasts on Dec.1, 2008, the three stooges of Canadian politics pursuing their December Putsch greed-lust gambit for power.
Dion, the supposed Clarity act federalist, whored himself along with his credibility to the separatist Duceppe, and to Taliban Jack-Squat. Greenie May began squeaking for a senate seat…unbelievable. Parizeau has now arisen, giddy with the prospects of breaking up Canada anew. Even the bug eyed socialist Broadbent (cripes – wasn’t he dead??) was brought back to life, bizarrely singing ‘Happy days are here again’ to the camera as the TSX plunged 864 points on Dec.1, 2008. That would be a glory day indeed for a lefty. They’ll do anything to grasp for
power.
Doesn't Broadbent look like an escapee from One flew over the Cuckoo's Nest? And check out Taliban Jack-Squat's smug, shifty mug.
We know now that Taliban Jack-Squat has been cooking this plot with Duceppe for a long time. They didn’t give a damn since 2006 on a number of key parliamentary votes; but now they want us to believe that this is all due to the proposal that their election welfare cheques be cancelled? Forget about all the previous votes that Dion and his new buddies let pass – they now manufacture a constitutional crisis over a $1.95/vote subsidy?! Let political parties raise their own campaign funds from their own supporters. Now Layton the drama-queen is whining "He's put a lock on the door of the House of Commons" meanwhile, Jack-Squat forgets to mention he gave Harper the key. The opposition wasn’t going to give Harper a chance, no matter what they now pretend to say. Harper was correct when he indicated that the reason for the last election was because Parliament was fractured: now we clearly see what he meant.
Governor General Jean's decision on Dec.4, 2008, agreeing to Harper's request to prorogue Canada's Parliament was the right one in this case. The government can continue - as they had planned - to prepare and present their budget in January. The Dionist coalition of the greedy can then decide to topple the government on a confidence vote - at which point, we should have another election, not a hand-over of power to this craven gang.
It’s astounding how Stephane Bumbledore Dion can suck some Canadians into seriously believing his delusions of power. Dion’s disastrous arc of failure has flamed in final grasping desperation as he clutches to any devious means to gain power.
He simply didn’t get the message that he - along with his plotting conspirators - LOST the election which we had just a month and a half ago.
Obviously, Bumbledore Dion, Canada’s top political comic-genius is still looking for his “do-over”. ("What…? You mean if I am Prime Minister, when?… now?... or a month and half later..??" -- see: Yes..."Prime Minister": Stephane Dion's comedy act - truly not worth the risk. ; see: Bumbledore Dion's "epic disaster".)
As if that wasn’t funny enough, then came Bumbledore’s botched video fiasco of Dec.3, 2008 – the thing was delivered late to the waiting national media, was shot in grainy format, was badly edited and framed, and was even shot out of focus! Perhaps the videographer was passing artistic comment on Bumbledore’s out-of-focus political aspirations?! The CBC National News on Dec.4 reported an upset Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis likening Bumbledore Dion’s fumbling to something out of the Gong Show!
Precious! Stephane Bumbledore Dion: not only a self-appointed Green Shift Saviour Of God's Environment, and Canada’s Fool on the Hill, but also Head Coalition Stooge, part Mad’s Alfred E. Neuman, part Being There’s Chauncey Gardner, part Peter Seller’s bumbling Inspector Clouseau, part Woody Allen’s Fielding Mellish from Bananas, and now part Gong Show performer.
Seriously, when is the Dump Dion movement going to start?
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Niagara Health System: second-highest deficit in Ontario; third-highest death-rate in Canada: but why should Liberal MPP Jim Bradley care?
John Robbins wrote in “Hospital cuts put patients at risk: Tory critic”, (St. Catharines Standard, Dec.3, 2008):
“Ontario hospitals -- some running at or near 100 per cent occupancy much of the time -- are being forced into making decisions that put access to patient care at risk so that they can balance their budgets, Progressive Conservative Health Critic Elizabeth Witmer says.
"What we have now is we have hospitals who have been told by the Ministry (of Health) you have to balance your budget and if you can't balance your budget, you're going to have to find a way to do it," Witmer said.
"There is no process or plan. It's left up to the individual hospitals, who have now, in the past three years, cut all the low-hanging fruit and there's no more fruit to cut."
On Monday, Witmer's office issued a press release warning "hospital deficits are a provincewide health crisis" because the Liberal government of Premier Dalton McGuinty is forcing hospitals to balance their budgets while at the same the province is not offering hospitals a funding increase that keeps pace with inflation.
Witmer cited recent cuts to services at hospitals in Kitchener, Cambridge and Kingston as examples of what happens when hospitals are required to balance their books in the absence of an overall government plan for service delivery.
"It's very, very serious," said Witmer. "I think eventually we're going to see more hospitals being announced for closure, as well."
Witmer's office provided a list of 52 Ontario hospitals that posted a deficit during the 2007-08 fiscal year.
The Niagara Health System, which operates six hospital sites and one prompt-care centre, had the second highest deficit during that period.
The NHS deficit was $18.45 million last year, according to figures from the standing committee on estimates.
Only Brampton's William Osler Health Centre recorded a larger deficit: $20.57 million.
Witmer said even more hospitals are projecting deficits this year. While the ministry promised a 2.4 per cent funding increase this year and 2.1 per cent increase next year, hospital expenses are expected to increase by four to five per cent due to rising utility and salary costs, she estimates.
She accused the Liberal government of failing to develop a plan to deal with the demands of an aging population, even though they've been in power for five years.
Steve Erwin, a spokesman for Ontario Health Minister David Caplan, said Witmer is painting a false picture.
While the government is requiring hospitals to be accountable for their spending, funding has been on the rise and is "at an all-time high."
"We can't continue to have health-care spending rise at the rate it has in the past," Erwin said.
He said the government has asked hospitals to work with their respective Local Health Integration Network to identify savings.
Local Health Integration Networks are the agencies of the provincial government that have been given responsibility for health-care planning and funding, including approving hospital budgets.
He said hospitals contemplating cuts should start by reducing non-clinical costs.
"If there are other actions that are necessary, we want them to work with the LHINs to identify what services could be served outside of the hospital," Erwin said.
Last May, the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant LHIN ordered the Niagara Health System to develop a hospital improvement plan to deal with its deficit.
Among other things, the plan proposes consolidating some medical specialities into "centres of excellence" and downgrading emergency departments in Fort Erie and Port Colborne to urgent-care centres.
Critics say such measures will limit timely access to core hospital services for a large number of Niagara residents, particularly those living in the southern tier.
NHS officials said the plan will result in a better quality of care for all residents, and will help recruit more doctors and nurses to the area.
What only become apparent since the plan was unveiled in July is that it won't entirely solve the NHS's budgetary woes.
The plan was reviewed by Dr. Jack Kitts, president of The Ottawa Hospital.
On Oct. 28, Kitts reported the NHS is an efficient organization and it will require a permanent cash infusion from the government to successfully implement its plan and balance its books.
NHS president and chief executive officer Debbie Sevenpifer has said the health system requires $15 million to $20 million in additional operating funding.”
*
More threatened health care cuts and closures…that’s MPP Jim Bradley’s Liberal health care monopolists at work! Workin’ hard to better Tommy Douglas’s socialist legacy, not better health choices for patients; providing “symbolic” health-care in the same smarmy Liberal fashion as their laughable “symbolic” pay-increase-cuts (!) … this is all just Gritty sleight-of-hand; a Liberal parody of a farce, disguised as a charade.
It’s plain smoke and mirrors; good ole bait'n'switch Liberal Healthcare Duplicity.
Will Jim Bradley explain what Erwin means when he says that Witmer is painting a false picture – what specifically is "false"?
‘Funding has been on a rise’ claims Erwin: but, really, is it per-patient funding which is “at an all-time high”? Come on!
"We can't continue to have health-care spending rise at the rate it has in the past," Erwin says.
Hmm: “in the past”?
WHEN specifically "in the past": after 2003?
Or: prior to 2003 - the period in which Liberals like to chortle about supposed Conservative cuts?!
If Erwin's referring to after 2003, then he's admitting the Liberals are cutting down on their own spending!!
Let’s not forget that when then-Liberal Finance Minister Greg Sorbara stood to introduce his hated Health Tax in Ontario's Legislature on May 18, 2004, Sorbara noted in his budget speech that: "For the past five years, health care budgets in Ontario have grown by an average of 8% per year."
That's right: the Liberals actually complained that for five years the Conservatives spent TOO MUCH on health-care, and so the Liberals were now going to "control " that!
“To improve” health-care, Sorbara said , his Liberals had “to delist” previously-covered health-care! (see: Ontario medicare-monopoly 'riding on reputation', needs rebuild)
Since McGuinty's Liberals created the hated Health Tax in 2004, they have picked over 12 billion dollars from Ontarian's pockets, but continue forcing cuts and consolidations to their health-monopoly province wide. Where has the Health Tax money really gone? Bradley's Liberals are now in deficit and have led Ontario to a 'have-not' status.
Yet, "health care spending in Ontario has grown at a fairly constant rate, both before and after the imposition of the tax," wrote Kevin Gaudet of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. (National Post, Aug.11, 2008) "If the tax were really for health care then health care spending should have jumped. It did not. What did go up were projects like corporate welfare to American based multi-nationals and slush funds." Gaudet notes "The tax is not dedicated to or used for health care. It is a spend-happy government's way of lining the public treasury." (see: We cannot ignore glaring failures in Liberal monopoly health-care)
Echoing Sorbara, former Liberal Health Minister Smitherman alleged the NHS was in some kind of spending free-for-all which had to be reigned in; now current Liberal Health Minister David Caplan’s spokesman Erwin is also using the 'cut to save' mantra. Don't you like it how now Erwin is relying on the LHINs to "identify savings"?! Far be it for Bradley, Caplan, or McGuinty to actually get involved in that dirty work!
When Witmer says that patient care is at risk due to Liberal-instituted health budget constraints, why is the Liberal government claiming that as being false?!
In “NHS would be forced to make cuts if improvement plan not approved” (St. Catharines Standard, Dec.4, 2008) NHS CEO Debbie Sevenpifer again was reported saying that the NHS’s accumulating deficit shows it needs more money from the province.
She also said that even if the HIP plan is approved by the LHIN, the NHS will still need more provincial funding!!
The above story also reported that “The NHS has the second-largest annual deficit in the province.”
Interesting: long-term Liberal underfunding at the NHS, coupled with the Nov.29, 2007 CIHI revelation that the NHS’s largest hospital had the third-highest (and still unexplained) patient death-rate in Canada, and yet, Bradley’s Liberals deny there is a corresponding link between patient care and their under-funding model !!
Why are Bradley and his Liberal gang of health-care monopolists underfunding the NHS, then pretending that they’re not?!? Why are Liberals afraid to allow the Ombudsman access to investigate their hospitals and scrutinize their funding claims?
What an irresponsible, negligent approach towards patient health, especially given that Bradley’s ideological Liberals are health monopolists who purposefully deny Ontarians any other alternatives to the Liberal's parsimonious state rations. That's nothing short of criminal.
“Ontario hospitals -- some running at or near 100 per cent occupancy much of the time -- are being forced into making decisions that put access to patient care at risk so that they can balance their budgets, Progressive Conservative Health Critic Elizabeth Witmer says.
"What we have now is we have hospitals who have been told by the Ministry (of Health) you have to balance your budget and if you can't balance your budget, you're going to have to find a way to do it," Witmer said.
"There is no process or plan. It's left up to the individual hospitals, who have now, in the past three years, cut all the low-hanging fruit and there's no more fruit to cut."
On Monday, Witmer's office issued a press release warning "hospital deficits are a provincewide health crisis" because the Liberal government of Premier Dalton McGuinty is forcing hospitals to balance their budgets while at the same the province is not offering hospitals a funding increase that keeps pace with inflation.
Witmer cited recent cuts to services at hospitals in Kitchener, Cambridge and Kingston as examples of what happens when hospitals are required to balance their books in the absence of an overall government plan for service delivery.
"It's very, very serious," said Witmer. "I think eventually we're going to see more hospitals being announced for closure, as well."
Witmer's office provided a list of 52 Ontario hospitals that posted a deficit during the 2007-08 fiscal year.
The Niagara Health System, which operates six hospital sites and one prompt-care centre, had the second highest deficit during that period.
The NHS deficit was $18.45 million last year, according to figures from the standing committee on estimates.
Only Brampton's William Osler Health Centre recorded a larger deficit: $20.57 million.
Witmer said even more hospitals are projecting deficits this year. While the ministry promised a 2.4 per cent funding increase this year and 2.1 per cent increase next year, hospital expenses are expected to increase by four to five per cent due to rising utility and salary costs, she estimates.
She accused the Liberal government of failing to develop a plan to deal with the demands of an aging population, even though they've been in power for five years.
Steve Erwin, a spokesman for Ontario Health Minister David Caplan, said Witmer is painting a false picture.
While the government is requiring hospitals to be accountable for their spending, funding has been on the rise and is "at an all-time high."
"We can't continue to have health-care spending rise at the rate it has in the past," Erwin said.
He said the government has asked hospitals to work with their respective Local Health Integration Network to identify savings.
Local Health Integration Networks are the agencies of the provincial government that have been given responsibility for health-care planning and funding, including approving hospital budgets.
He said hospitals contemplating cuts should start by reducing non-clinical costs.
"If there are other actions that are necessary, we want them to work with the LHINs to identify what services could be served outside of the hospital," Erwin said.
Last May, the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant LHIN ordered the Niagara Health System to develop a hospital improvement plan to deal with its deficit.
Among other things, the plan proposes consolidating some medical specialities into "centres of excellence" and downgrading emergency departments in Fort Erie and Port Colborne to urgent-care centres.
Critics say such measures will limit timely access to core hospital services for a large number of Niagara residents, particularly those living in the southern tier.
NHS officials said the plan will result in a better quality of care for all residents, and will help recruit more doctors and nurses to the area.
What only become apparent since the plan was unveiled in July is that it won't entirely solve the NHS's budgetary woes.
The plan was reviewed by Dr. Jack Kitts, president of The Ottawa Hospital.
On Oct. 28, Kitts reported the NHS is an efficient organization and it will require a permanent cash infusion from the government to successfully implement its plan and balance its books.
NHS president and chief executive officer Debbie Sevenpifer has said the health system requires $15 million to $20 million in additional operating funding.”
*
More threatened health care cuts and closures…that’s MPP Jim Bradley’s Liberal health care monopolists at work! Workin’ hard to better Tommy Douglas’s socialist legacy, not better health choices for patients; providing “symbolic” health-care in the same smarmy Liberal fashion as their laughable “symbolic” pay-increase-cuts (!) … this is all just Gritty sleight-of-hand; a Liberal parody of a farce, disguised as a charade.
It’s plain smoke and mirrors; good ole bait'n'switch Liberal Healthcare Duplicity.
Will Jim Bradley explain what Erwin means when he says that Witmer is painting a false picture – what specifically is "false"?
‘Funding has been on a rise’ claims Erwin: but, really, is it per-patient funding which is “at an all-time high”? Come on!
"We can't continue to have health-care spending rise at the rate it has in the past," Erwin says.
Hmm: “in the past”?
WHEN specifically "in the past": after 2003?
Or: prior to 2003 - the period in which Liberals like to chortle about supposed Conservative cuts?!
If Erwin's referring to after 2003, then he's admitting the Liberals are cutting down on their own spending!!
Let’s not forget that when then-Liberal Finance Minister Greg Sorbara stood to introduce his hated Health Tax in Ontario's Legislature on May 18, 2004, Sorbara noted in his budget speech that: "For the past five years, health care budgets in Ontario have grown by an average of 8% per year."
That's right: the Liberals actually complained that for five years the Conservatives spent TOO MUCH on health-care, and so the Liberals were now going to "control " that!
“To improve” health-care, Sorbara said , his Liberals had “to delist” previously-covered health-care! (see: Ontario medicare-monopoly 'riding on reputation', needs rebuild)
Since McGuinty's Liberals created the hated Health Tax in 2004, they have picked over 12 billion dollars from Ontarian's pockets, but continue forcing cuts and consolidations to their health-monopoly province wide. Where has the Health Tax money really gone? Bradley's Liberals are now in deficit and have led Ontario to a 'have-not' status.
Yet, "health care spending in Ontario has grown at a fairly constant rate, both before and after the imposition of the tax," wrote Kevin Gaudet of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. (National Post, Aug.11, 2008) "If the tax were really for health care then health care spending should have jumped. It did not. What did go up were projects like corporate welfare to American based multi-nationals and slush funds." Gaudet notes "The tax is not dedicated to or used for health care. It is a spend-happy government's way of lining the public treasury." (see: We cannot ignore glaring failures in Liberal monopoly health-care)
Echoing Sorbara, former Liberal Health Minister Smitherman alleged the NHS was in some kind of spending free-for-all which had to be reigned in; now current Liberal Health Minister David Caplan’s spokesman Erwin is also using the 'cut to save' mantra. Don't you like it how now Erwin is relying on the LHINs to "identify savings"?! Far be it for Bradley, Caplan, or McGuinty to actually get involved in that dirty work!
When Witmer says that patient care is at risk due to Liberal-instituted health budget constraints, why is the Liberal government claiming that as being false?!
In “NHS would be forced to make cuts if improvement plan not approved” (St. Catharines Standard, Dec.4, 2008) NHS CEO Debbie Sevenpifer again was reported saying that the NHS’s accumulating deficit shows it needs more money from the province.
She also said that even if the HIP plan is approved by the LHIN, the NHS will still need more provincial funding!!
The above story also reported that “The NHS has the second-largest annual deficit in the province.”
Interesting: long-term Liberal underfunding at the NHS, coupled with the Nov.29, 2007 CIHI revelation that the NHS’s largest hospital had the third-highest (and still unexplained) patient death-rate in Canada, and yet, Bradley’s Liberals deny there is a corresponding link between patient care and their under-funding model !!
Why are Bradley and his Liberal gang of health-care monopolists underfunding the NHS, then pretending that they’re not?!? Why are Liberals afraid to allow the Ombudsman access to investigate their hospitals and scrutinize their funding claims?
What an irresponsible, negligent approach towards patient health, especially given that Bradley’s ideological Liberals are health monopolists who purposefully deny Ontarians any other alternatives to the Liberal's parsimonious state rations. That's nothing short of criminal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



