tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36924885496996588932024-03-14T09:18:48.328-04:00Right In NiagaraLooking from Canada to the United States, across Niagara's Horseshoe FallsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1209125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-878123574477815072021-03-23T12:05:00.013-04:002023-01-27T01:32:47.322-05:00Find the Fraud: fake news at the St. Catharines Standard! At the Toronto Star!<p> <a href="https://www.voanews.com/usa/washington-post-corrects-misquote-about-trumps-december-call-georgia-election-official" style="font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px;">VOA reported on Mar.16, 2021</a><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #222f3a; font-size: 18px;">:</span></p><p><em style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px;">"</em><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: medium;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a;">The Washington Post</em><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #222f3a;"> </span><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #222f3a;">has</span><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif"><span style="color: #222f3a;"> <i>corrected a major story</i></span></span><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #222f3a;"><i> </i>it published in January about the presidential election in the state of Georgia, saying it had “misquoted” then-President Donald Trump in a phone call with a state election official. In the December call, Trump was voicing his concerns about alleged fraud.</span></span></p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif">The original story, which was b</span><span style="font-family: arial;">ased on an a</span><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif">nonymous source, said that in the call, Trump had told Georgia's top election official to “</span><i style="font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif;">find the fraud</i><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif">” and that they’d be a </span><i style="font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif;">“national hero</i><span face="Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif">” if they did.</span></p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="color: #222f3a;">On March 11, the <em style="box-sizing: border-box;">Wall Street Journal</em> revealed audio of the conversation, which </span><span style="color: #222f3a;">showed Trump</span><i><span style="color: red;"> did not say</span></i><span style="color: #222f3a;"> those things. </span></p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">“Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator,” the Post wrote in its correction.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="color: #222f3a;">The recording revealed that</span><span style="color: #222f3a;"> the Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source. Trump did not tell the investigator to “</span><i style="color: #222f3a;">find the fraud</i><span style="color: #222f3a;">” or say she would be “</span><i style="color: #222f3a;">a national hero</i><span style="color: #222f3a;">” if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, asserting she would find “dishonesty” there. He also told her that she had “the most important job in the country right now.”</span></p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">"Numerous national media outlets repeated the erroneous quotes, citing <em style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Washington Post</em>.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">During the call, the former president did claim he had won Georgia and that “something bad” had happened with the election in the state.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">“I can assure you that our team and the (Georgia Bureau of Investigation), that we are only interested in the truth and finding the information that is based on the facts,” the election official replied, according to the audio released by the <em style="box-sizing: border-box;">Wall Street Journal</em>.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">Trump responded to the correction by calling the Post’s original reporting a “media travesty” but thanked the paper for correcting it..." </p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">-</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">A political lie was blatantly used, and then carelessly fluffed off. The Washington Post has again proven itself to be nothing more than a political propaganda outlet.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">In Canada, hundreds of MSM's eagerly and happily reprinted the WaPo lies.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">WaPo didn't need evidence, they just made it up. The Canadian lame-stream media lemmings didn't need evidence; they just mindlessly regurgitated the Wapo lies. The lies did the job. Just like the 'phone call to Ukraine's PM" which was used to {falsely} impeach Trump in early 2020: a lie based on nothing but Trump Derangement Syndrome. Just like Turdo's '3M mask ban to Canada' hoax: a baseless deception, diverting scrutiny of the negligent Turdo himself. </p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> So will the MSM, which repeated the WaPo lie, now also retract the disinformation which they published??</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> The leftist/corporatist {fascist} propaganda conglomerate in Niagara, the Torstar/Niagara Dailies gang, happily spread fake news in their smug Anti-Trump political hit piece on<a href="https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/opinion/editorials/2021/01/15/donald-trump-must-face-a-final-reckoning.html"> Jan.15, 2021 </a> in the pathetic St.Catharines Sub-Standard:</p><span style="font-size: medium;"> "...Trump then tried to intimidate Georgia’s Republican secretary-of-state, Brad Raffensperger, to “find 11,780 votes” to help overturn the election result. When that scheme failed, Trump appealed directly to the grassroots supporters he had misled and misinformed for the previous two months..."</span><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> Let's ask - seeing as this Niagara Dailies lie in the St.Catharines Standard was perpetrated only two months ago - <i>how</i> did David Peterson's corporate hit squad verify <i>any</i> of that?! It was a complete fabrication! </p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> The TorStar marxist-factory didn't verify ANYTHING - and they actually <i>COULDN'T </i>- as it in fact was a lie all along. WaPo never heard the tape - so how could David Peterson's hit squad know anything??!!</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> They were spouting bullsh!t. They MADE IT UP. No verified sources<i> COULD</i> be available, and <i>THAT </i>is what they were trading on: no real proof, just fake 'evidence'; just innuendo and conjecture portrayed as 'proof'. </p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> Got it? The liars at the sick St.Catharines Standard reprinted lies, with no proof whatsoever - just fuelled by vile Trump hate. <i>That </i>was all that was needed, for this fake David Peterson 'journalism' to exist.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><b><i>The St.Catharines Standard and Niagara Dailies were publishing FAKE NEWS</i></b>.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"> They were trading on the chance that NO evidence <i>could</i> possibly exist, which would show that in fact Trump DID NOT do what the WaPo claimed he did.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">(Just like Vindman claimed (falsely) that he had 'evidence' that Trump did something wrong in the Ukraine call, and the fool Schiff immediately jumped at this deception and started spouting his lies within hours of the call, relying on the calculation that neither Trump, nor the Ukrainian PM, would ever release the entire phone conversation tape. )</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">(Thankfully, the demented congenital liar Adam Schiff would finally get kicked off the Intel committee in Jan. 2023, soon after the newly-elected Republican-majority House of Reps. took office. Schiff got away with endless lies while in office, while sitting as the Intel chair. A pathetic, traitorous moron, Schiff was lionized by Niagara's f-cked up leftist media.)</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">But both leaders (Trump and Zelensky) <i>DID</i> release it the next day, and blew the wind out of Schiff's sick lie. The Demotards really had to go into their demented song and dance routine, to bolster their lie, after the tape was actually released. They were planning it would <i>NEVER</i> be released, and therefore, they'd have a path to an unchallengeable impeachment... all really based on a lie.)</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">Similarly, that's what WaPo did as well, and then, literally thousands of uninformed lemming hack msm's reprinted WaPo's lie - including the pieces of sh!t fake-news peddlers in Niagara.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;">-</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><a href="https://www.iheartradio.ca/610cktb/news/president-trump-on-tape-presses-ga-official-to-find-him-votes-1.14296037">610 CKTB AM "I heart radio" Jan 4, 2021 </a>in Niagara {a CORUS / Bell Media corporate propaganda outlet which bills itself as "newstalk" radio, but in this case, was "610 CKTB Fake News talk radio" or simply "CKTB BullCrap radio"} also cited "Canadian Press" lies about Trump, spouting this preciously smug headline: "PRESIDENT TRUMP, ON TAPE, PRESSES GA. OFFICIAL TO 'FIND' HIM VOTES". (The headline, the content, the entire story: simply bald faced lies!)</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222f3a; font-family: Lora, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 1.75; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> "<span face="Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #464646;">President Donald Trump pressured Georgia's Republican secretary of state to ``find'' enough votes to overturn Joe Biden's win in the state's presidential election, repeatedly citing disproven claims of fraud and raising the prospect of ``criminal offence'' if officials did not change the vote count, according to a recording of the conversation.</span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The phone call with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Saturday was the latest step in an unprecedented effort by a sitting president to pressure a state official to reverse the outcome of a free and fair election that he lost. The president, who has refused to accept his loss to Democratic president-elect Biden, repeatedly argued that Raffensperger could change the certified results..."</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><br /></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"610 AM I heart fake news" clearly claimed that they had evidence Trump did / said something "<b><i>on tape</i></b>".</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">But,<i><b> WHERE</b></i> was the evidence "on tape"?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Did the fakers from CORUS / Bell Media<i> </i><b><i>play</i></b><i> </i>the tape which they used to smear the U.S. President??</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Did anybody from "610 AM fake news radio" ever <b><i>HEAR </i></b>the tape, which they claim showed some kind of criminality by Trump??!!</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The "610 AM Misinformation Network" was citing a tape which neither they, not anyone else, had actually heard, and used this as their jumping off point to spew Anti-Trump propaganda, and thereby interfere in the U.S. election process.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Any apologies being offered by this corporate gang of fake news disseminators? </span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Ironically: it was 610 AM 's<i> OWN</i> FAKE NEWS THAT WAS A FRAUD.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">-</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> On <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/us/2021/02/26/georgia-prosecutor-investigating-trump-call-urges-patience.html">Feb. 26, 2021, the Toronto Star</a> (the same corporate fascist klan of the Niagara Dailies / St. Catharines Standard political propaganda machine) published lies written by AP's Kate Brumbach on the Trump/Georgia issue.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> On or around<a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/us/2021/03/15/correction-trump-georgia-story.html"> Mar 16, 2021, the Toronto Star </a> (hard to say when, as David Peterson doesn't specifically date the apologies for stories his fascist organization has to apologize for...) <b>had to write this<i> correction</i></b><i> </i>regarding what they FALSELY wrote back in another story (same Trump-Georgia issue) from Jan.9, 2021:</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"> "<span style="background-color: #f8f8f8; color: #333333; font-family: TorstarTextO3, Georgia, Times, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 20px;">ATLANTA - In a story January 9, 2021, about a phone call between then-President Donald Trump and a lead Georgia elections investigator, The Associated Press, based on information provided by a source, erroneously reported that Trump pressed the investigator to “find the fraud” and said it would make the investigator a national hero. A recording of the call made public two months later revealed that Trump did not say either and instead said that if the investigator looked into Fulton County the investigator would “find things that are gonna be unbelievable.” Trump also told the investigator: “When the right answer comes out, you’ll be praised.”</span> "</p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: 16px;"> </span> <span style="font-size: medium;">Yes: the fascists at the Toronto Star were caught peddling FAKE NEWS. </span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> Believe it, Kathy English: the <a href="https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2017/02/17/the-facts-about-fake-news-public-editor.html">Toronto Star happily writes FAKE NEWS</a>.</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> The utter irony of a fake-news-spreading organization projecting their virtue by not only denying that they do so, but doing it repeatedly while simultaneously presenting a façade claiming not only that they "don't make stuff up", but that they will somehow 'help' you in determining if news from others is fake or not!! </span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i> THAT</i> is some complicated, pretzel-ized, multi-level cognitive dissonance and intellectual fraud goin' on!! Or it could be just <i>plain ole propaganda.</i>..<i> <b>eh,</b> Kathy</i>? <i>Years</i> later, and the Toronto Star Fake News Factory is<i> still </i>spreading the fakery, and still peddling the lies!!! Looks like Kathy was spreading fake news about spreading fake news!!! 'Fake news' much, Kathy?? Doubling-down on the TorStar fakery?!!</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> For cryin' out loud - the TorStar Fake News Factory wasn't even capable of discerning the fake news<i> THEY THEMSELVES</i> were HAPPILY, UNQUESTIONINGLY, regurgitating from WaPo!!!!!!!</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #464646; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">-</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-48885708517189506682021-03-21T12:58:00.008-04:002024-02-16T02:50:52.082-05:00Chris Bittle's and Vance Badawey's latest Canadian Liberal government lie: blaming Mulroney for Justin Trudeau's covid incompetence <p> After Canada's Turdeau Liberals and their Liberal media friends created their 'mask ban' hoax in 2020, now in Mar. 2021 we see that Canada's Covid Killer Trudeau is lying about his role in creating the vaccine disaster in Canada, blaming everyone else but himself.</p><p> We see that Turdo could not understand what a virus was, back in early 2020, smugly ridiculing Trump for shutting down flights from China. Turdo was incapable of recognizing a pandemic - all Turdo and his delusional band of Libscum were able to recognize was a chance to <i>slime Trump</i> with their usual leftist-identity-politics attacks. Turdo only understood<i> politics</i>, not science. Turdo negligently kept Canada's borders open - even at Roxham Rd., where anyone could just walk in unchecked - while smugly deriding Trump as a xenophobe racist who didn't understand science. Yet - when Turdo finally did the SAME thing, no one called Turdo a science-impaired hatemongering black-faced xenophobe.</p><p>(...By the way, the <a href="https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lilley-roxham-road-sees-record-number-cross-into-canada-illegally-in-2022" target="_blank">Toronto Sun reported on Jan.23, 2023</a> that Turdo let in a total <span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: Martel, Georgia, serif; font-size: 16px;">of 4,689 illegals enter Canada at Roxham Rd. - and this is in ONE month, in Dec.2022!! </span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: Martel, Georgia, serif; font-size: 16px;">The Sun also reported that this one-month total for Dec. 2022 was MORE than had crossed Roxham Rd. during the entire year of 2021!! During the 2022 year, a total of 31,171 illegals crossed the Roxham Rd. border...)</span></p><p> Soon after, Turdeau's negligence in giving away Canada's stockpile of masks to China, directly led to a looming shortage - which the <i>Liberals (to deflect from Turdo's incompetence) created into another anti-Trump meme.</i> The Liberals and the press happily spread a conspiracy theory (not banned by Twatter... hahah!!) that 'Trump banned mask exports to Canada'.</p><p> In fact what happened, was that in Mar. 2020 Trudeau REFUSED to accept Honeywell's help in getting a reliable mask supply, but was gaming to make an insider deal with 3M . Creating a lie that Trump 'banned masks to Canada' was a MANUFACTURED POLITICAL DISTRACTION from Trudeau's OWN negligence. It was Trudeau's Liberals who in effect BANNED HONEYWELL MASKS FROM CANADA. We didn't know about this until <i>just recently</i> in early 2021 - that was kept as a handy secret by Canada's leftist paid-for presstitutes. Lots of bj's for dementia-laden Biden and fawning praise for 'hero' Turdo, though...</p><p> Every step of the way, from Jan. 2020 onwards, Turdeau's bumbling, negligent Liberals were failing Canadians.</p><p> So, it is NO surprise - again - to see yet ANOTHER covid-related fiasco cocked up by Turdo's Libscum, this time on the vaccine front. </p><p> And <i>again</i>, we see the <i>same</i> by-now-familiar-pattern of lies and deceptions shat out by Trudeau's Liberal Covid Criminals. </p><p> Now, the latest Liberal meme / lie is bizarrely blaming MULRONEY for Turdo's own incompetence.</p><p> This delusional, desperate behaviour is rather hard to believe, until you step back and realize that if Turdo's Liberals say something, it's bound to be a deception, where major other pieces of the story have been covered up. That has been Trudeau's standard operating procedure since day one. Always spouting some lie, some deception, some spin on the truth. </p><p> Licia Corbella dissected this latest Liberal deceptive meme in her <a href="https://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/corbella-15">Mar. 20, 2021 Calgary Herald </a>, story, headlined: </p><p><b> <i><span style="font-size: medium;">Corbella: Trudeau's blaming of Mulroney on vaccine problems delusional, say experts</span></i></b></p><p> "<span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">For months now, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has blamed everyone for Canada’s trickle of COVID-19 vaccines but himself.</span></p><p><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> Trudeau and his ministers have gone so far as to blame former Progressive Conservative prime minister Brian Mulroney — who was prime minister from 1984 to 1993 — for the privatization, or “</span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "the selling off", "Click Target URL": "https://financialpost.com/opinion/charlie-mayer-privatized-connaught-labs-is-still-going-strong"}" data-evt="click" href="https://financialpost.com/opinion/charlie-mayer-privatized-connaught-labs-is-still-going-strong" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">the selling off</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">“, of Connaught Laboratories. What he fails to mention is that Connaught Labs didn’t go anywhere. It’s now part of</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Sanofi", "Click Target URL": "https://www.sanofi.ca/en/about-us/sanofi-pasteur"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.sanofi.ca/en/about-us/sanofi-pasteur" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">Sanofi</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">Pasteur, the world’s largest manufacturer of vaccines. The</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Connaught Campus", "Click Target URL": "https://www.sanofi.ca/en/about-us/sanofi-pasteur"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.sanofi.ca/en/about-us/sanofi-pasteur" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">Connaught Campus</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">in Toronto accounts for one-fifth of the company’s global vaccine sales. </span></p><p><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> Experts in Canada’s innovative pharmaceutical industry — as opposed to the generic pharmaceutical industry — says Trudeau’s attempt to pin the blame on Mulroney or a more recent Conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, is ironic, because were it not for Mulroney, the innovative industry likely wouldn’t exist here at all.</span></p><p> <span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">Paul Lucas, who was president and CEO of</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "GlaxoSmithKline Canada", "Click Target URL": "https://ca.gsk.com/en-ca/"}" data-evt="click" href="https://ca.gsk.com/en-ca/" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">GlaxoSmithKline Canada</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">from 1994 to 2012, started speaking out and wrote</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "an opinion piece", "Click Target URL": "https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-why-were-not-doing-better-on-covid-vaccines"}" data-evt="click" href="https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-why-were-not-doing-better-on-covid-vaccines" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">an opinion piece</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">in the Financial Post after he heard federal Liberal Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Dominic LeBlanc being interviewed on CTV’s Power Play with Evan Solomon,</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "saying that GlaxoSmithKline had closed", "Click Target URL": "https://twitter.com/ctv_powerplay/status/1331722216896126989?lang=en"}" data-evt="click" href="https://twitter.com/ctv_powerplay/status/1331722216896126989?lang=en" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">saying that GlaxoSmithKline had closed</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">its manufacturing facility for vaccines during Harper’s Conservative government, which is false.</span></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “This facility didn’t close, it’s still producing most of the flu vaccine for Canada on an annual basis,” Lucas said during a recent telephone interview.</p><p><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;"> “I’ve been very concerned and frankly upset about the lies that are coming from </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">the federal government about this whole (COVID vaccine) file,” says Lucas, who was integral to the production and distribution of the Canadian vaccine for the H1N1 pandemic in 2009. All of the vaccine for that outbreak was produced in the GSK factory in Quebec City.</span></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “Trudeau has badly botched Canada’s COVID-19 vaccine procurement,” states Lucas.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “First, he <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "blamed Harper", "Click Target URL": "https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/canada-vaccines-trudeau-conservatives_ca_5fbedb65c5b66bb88c63f66d"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/canada-vaccines-trudeau-conservatives_ca_5fbedb65c5b66bb88c63f66d" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">blamed Harper</a> for his own failings. Then he blamed Mulroney and then he <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "blamed the provinces", "Click Target URL": "https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-frustrated-vaccine-rollout-1.5861875"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-frustrated-vaccine-rollout-1.5861875" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">blamed the provinces</a>. Then he actually turned on his own vaccine task force. He blamed them for about a day or two. Then he blamed the companies — Pfizer for delaying the delivery of its vaccines in January,” explains Lucas.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"><span style="color: #191919;"> “So, you know it’s been a blame game from their end, and he’s got, you know, 50 per cent support of the population in Ontario, so that’s absolutely astonishing to me,” says Lucas, “because </span><span style="color: #191919;">people are dying because of his government botching this so badly.”</span></p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Canada is at the back of the line in the industrialized world and is even behind some developing countries because Trudeau’s government signed a deal with <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "CanSino Biologics and the Chinese military", "Click Target URL": "https://healthydebate.ca/opinions/canadas-failed-vaccine-partnership/"}" data-evt="click" href="https://healthydebate.ca/opinions/canadas-failed-vaccine-partnership/" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">CanSino Biologics and the Chinese military</a> to develop a COVID-19 vaccine in partnership with the Canadian Centre for Vaccinology at Dalhousie University in Halifax. Given the toxic state of Canada-China relations and the propensity of China to steal intellectual property and break deals, it was a bizarre partnership.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> On May 16, 2020, Trudeau announced that the federal department of health had entered into a deal with <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "CanSino", "Click Target URL": "http://www.cansinotech.com/"}" data-evt="click" href="http://www.cansinotech.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;" target="_blank">CanSino</a>. According to documents obtained by Calgary Conservative MP and Opposition Health Critic Michelle Rempel Garner, three days later the government learned the deal fell apart.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Despite knowing on May 19 that China was breaking its deal with Canada, the Trudeau government waited until the end of August to enter into vaccine contracts with Pfizer, far behind other countries. On July 16, <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Trudeau pretended", "Click Target URL": "https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canada-still-working-with-china-on-covid-19-vaccine-despite-delay-trudeau-1.5027419"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canada-still-working-with-china-on-covid-19-vaccine-despite-delay-trudeau-1.5027419" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;" target="_blank">Trudeau pretended</a> that the partnership with China was still a go.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> According to <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Our World in Data", "Click Target URL": "https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations"}" data-evt="click" href="https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Our World in Data</a>, as of March 17, Canada ranks 51st in terms of the percentage of citizens (1.62 per cent) who have been vaccinated with at least one shot against COVID-19 — well behind Israel (48.68 per cent), Chile (13.22 per cent), the U.S. (12.18 per cent) and even Morocco (5.8 per cent).</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Lucas says not only did Mulroney not destroy the innovative pharmaceutical industry in Canada, he has really been its only champion by bringing in Bill C-22 in 1987 and later Bill C-91 in 1992.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> That legislation promoted intellectual property by protecting drug patents for up to 20 years, which led to billions of dollars of investment, research and development to flood into Canada, says Lucas.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> So vital were the Mulroney government’s regulatory changes in creating a modern and viable innovative Canadian pharmaceutical industry, that in 2007 he was awarded the <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Health Research Foundation\u2019s", "Click Target URL": "http://www.hrf-frs.com/en/home"}" data-evt="click" href="http://www.hrf-frs.com/en/home" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Health Research Foundation’s</a> <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Medal of Honour", "Click Target URL": "http://hrf-frs.com/view.asp?ccid=456"}" data-evt="click" href="http://hrf-frs.com/view.asp?ccid=456" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Medal of Honour</a> — placing him in the distinguished company of Nobel laureate Dr. Charles Best, co-discoverer of insulin; Sir Alexander Fleming, discoverer of penicillin; Dr. Wilder Penfield, founder of the Montreal Neurological Institute at McGill University; and other R&D heavy hitters.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Back in 1968, explains Lucas, then prime minister Pierre Trudeau got rid of patents for pharmaceuticals in Canada, which led to the decline of the innovative pharmaceutical industry in Canada and caused the growth of the generic pharmaceutical industry, “which was in the pockets of the federal Liberal party” and led to Canada having the highest generic drug prices in the OECD.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “The Liberal party was always very opposed to the innovative pharmaceutical industry and Mulroney was really the guy who tried to turn it around, and he did, but the Liberals came back in with (prime minister Jean) Chretien (in 1993) and we were back in the Dark Ages,” explains Lucas, who says he can speak openly because he retired in 2012.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> He says, “Harper improved things by passing new data protection laws, which helped the industry in terms of intellectual property protection.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “Now this Trudeau government’s come in and I mean, they’ve been anti-, anti-, anti-innovative pharmaceutical industry,” says Lucas.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> When Mulroney ushered in “Canada’s golden age for bio-technology in Canada,” he brought in the <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, (PMPRB),", "Click Target URL": "https://www.canada.ca/en/patented-medicine-prices-review.html"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.canada.ca/en/patented-medicine-prices-review.html" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, (PMPRB),</a> which ensured there was a balanced ceiling to what companies could charge for their new medicines to protect consumers but also to encourage more research and development.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Lucas says Trudeau’s government appears poised to put the final nail in the coffin of the innovative industry by making amendments to the PMPRB’s <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Patented Medicines Regulation", "Click Target URL": "https://www.canada.ca/en/patented-medicine-prices-review/services/legislation/about-guidelines/guidelines.html"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.canada.ca/en/patented-medicine-prices-review/services/legislation/about-guidelines/guidelines.html" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Patented Medicines Regulation</a>, which has been delayed twice, and is now expected to come into effect on July 1.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “This law may be the point of no return for Canada and the innovative pharmaceutical industry,” concludes Lucas. “I hate to say that, but it could very well be the last straw in the relationship between the innovative industry and this country.”</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Pamela Fralick, president of <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Innovative Medicines Canada", "Click Target URL": "http://innovativemedicines.ca/about/advocacy/"}" data-evt="click" href="http://innovativemedicines.ca/about/advocacy/" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Innovative Medicines Canada</a>, says as the industry’s representative in Canada, they have tried to get the ear of the federal government, to no avail.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “The cost containment measures in these new regulations are so extreme, as third-party assessments have determined them to be, it really is going to put Canadians at a huge disadvantage for gaining access to the most innovative drugs that are out there,” says Fralick, who was the president and CEO of the Canadian Cancer Society before joining IMC.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “This year alone, 39 new medications — for the treatment of cancer, Parkinson’s, and HIV, to name a few — have not been submitted to Health Canada for approval due to the uncertainty created by this proposed policy change,” she adds.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “It takes on average about $2.5 billion to bring a product to market and usually 10 to 15 years, so it’s a lot of time and a lot of risk,” she explains.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “Most of the research and the products these companies produce never make it, so when you make something that does, you have that 20 years of patent protection to bring it to market and recoup your investment.”</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> When was the last time, asked Fralick, that the generic pharmaceutical industry created a new vaccine? “Of course it doesn’t happen. That’s an oxymoron. They don’t do innovative work, so if you want innovation — vaccines for COVID-19, for example — you need to have the innovative pharmaceutical world being very functional and vibrant.”</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Thankfully, many other countries are not so antagonistic to the industry or the world would be stuck in COVID-19 lockdowns for years to come.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “Our concerns about the federal government’s new regulations is that they go far too far in cost containment and they don’t respect or I guess even accept that maybe Canada should want these companies to invest in this country. We already do invest a lot, by the way, but we could compete globally for a lot more investment if we had an environment that was a little bit more favourable to the innovative business,” said Fralick, adding that the industry employs 30,000 Canadians in high-paying jobs and contributes $19 billion to the Canadian economy.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> She says over a time span of two years, 30 global CEOs from multinational pharmaceutical companies have written to Trudeau four times seeking a meeting — from February 2018 to February 2020 — just weeks before COVID-19 started to wreak havoc on countries outside of China where it originated.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “Not only didn’t they get a meeting, the prime minister never even responded. For the first letter, what we got back was an unsigned memo from the correspondence unit of the strategic policy branch of Health Canada,” says Fralick. For the other three letters, Trudeau’s office never responded at all, neither did his health minister.</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Is it any wonder Trudeau was <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "so hesitant", "Click Target URL": "https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-pfizer-to-stop-all-vaccine-shipments-to-canada-for-one-week/"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-pfizer-to-stop-all-vaccine-shipments-to-canada-for-one-week/" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">so hesitant</a> to pick up the phone and <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "call", "Click Target URL": "https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1352419558511026179"}" data-evt="click" href="https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1352419558511026179" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">call</a> Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, when shipments of its COVID-19 vaccine were delayed in January as the company expanded the capacity of its plant in Belgium?</p><p data-async="" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “So, whether it’s Pierre Trudeau, or Justin Trudeau or whether it’s Jean Chretien, they just have not been open to the idea of a vibrant life sciences sector,” says Fralick, and that affects the entire “ecosystem” of the sector, from little startups, like Calgary’s <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "Providence Therapeutics", "Click Target URL": "https://www.providencetherapeutics.com/"}" data-evt="click" href="https://www.providencetherapeutics.com/" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">Providence Therapeutics</a> or Vancouver’s <a data-evt-typ="User Interaction Click" data-evt-val="{"control_fields": {"mparticle": {"keys": {"Click Source Type": "Click Source Type", "Click Source Name": "Click Source Name", "Click Target URL": "Click Target URL"}, "mp_event_type": "Navigation", "extra_keys": ["Click Source Vertical Position %", "Click Source Vertical Position Pixels"]}}, "Click Source Type": "in-page link", "Click Source Name": "AbCellera.", "Click Target URL": "https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/abcellera-antibody-therapies-opinion"}" data-evt="click" href="https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/abcellera-antibody-therapies-opinion" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919;">AbCellera.</a></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> One current pharmaceutical executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said: “Every time Trudeau tries to blame Mulroney for his own government’s failures in procuring COVID vaccines in a timely manner, my colleagues and I all think, ‘Can you believe this guy? He can say white is black and black is white and no one challenges him.”</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Lucas says you’d think Trudeau and his ministers would have learned about the importance of the innovative pharmaceutical industry as a result of this pandemic.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> “There’s no relationship between Trudeau’s government and the industry. It’s worse than non-existent — it’s hostile as a result of the federal government’s attitude,” says Lucas.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> So, not only are Canadians at the back of the line for life-saving and economy-boosting vaccines, but Trudeau’s hostility to the life-sciences industry is also killing off our potential of fighting off future pandemics and building a lucrative industry at the same time that can help the whole world.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Too bad there’s no vaccine to inoculate us all against this kind of government incompetence."</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;">-</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> We <i>have</i> an old and effective vaccine (of sorts): it's called voting. We have the chance to boost this inoculation every 4 years or so.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> We need to vote out the incompetent and dangerous clowns such as Justin Trudeau, Chris Bittle, Vance Badawey, and the rest of their negligent Liberal brigade. That's the only way to stop the infection of Liberal incompetence. </p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> The Liberal-besotted Borg-like Niagara press (the propaganda machine 'Torstar / Niagara dailies') will never ask Bittle or Badawey whether they too believe their Dear Leader's delusion that their collective Liberal incompetence was caused by Mulroney. We will go through an entire election where the Bittle/Badawey bullshi!t is buried. "</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;">*</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;">Into 2024, Canadians continue to suffer under the unbelievable incompetence of Trudeau's Liberals, who are aided and abetted by the scummy NDP. We see the Liberal's ArriveCan scandal boiling over (National Post, Feb.15, 2024, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BorglL-7coY) and we see also that Turdo's Liberal scammers are now being sued for their covid-mask escapades (Global News, Feb. 14, 2024, see https://globalnews.ca/news/10295442/covid-protective-equipment-makers-lawsuit-canada/)</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;">Remember how the Trudeau-loving-press happily pushed a bizarre covid lie that Canada - under Trudeau - was running out of PPE during the covid outbreak, and that Trump 'banned mask exports to Canada'??!?</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;"> Now, in 2024, we finally get to hear what the incompetent, negligent Liberals actually did, as far as the PPE manufacturers are concerned. That a story such as this would appear in the wake of the covid crisis is NOT unexpected. The fallout from Trudeau's Liberal covid disaster is monstrous.</p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; color: #191919; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 1.5rem; max-width: 100%;">We saw clearly that Trudeau and his Liberal lapdog-press were lying, manufacturing a fantastic fable that Trump was to blame for the mask shortage in Canada - and that Turdo was a hero who stood up against Trump. This hogwash was spread far and wide by the Canadian press, in order to deflect our attention from how incompetent Trudeau's Liberals were in maintaining Canada's PPE supply. Trump had nothing to do with it. Who did? Well, ask the Badabittle Boys. </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-17164456898738408162019-10-08T17:43:00.004-04:002021-09-11T17:56:16.136-04:00JustinTrudeau lies - AGAIN - on CBC's televised debate, Oct.7, 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
It's debatable whether there was an actual debate held on the CBC's two hour-televised 'election debate' show on Oct.7, 2019. The format was not conducive to debate, but to mere sound bites. Allowing 40 seconds or so for any candidate to provide an informative answer on <i>anything </i>isn't helpful for a debate. The format ought to have been better, on that almost anyone who saw the debate could agree.<br />
<br />
At any rate, it is interesting to note how the majority of main stream media refused to highlight portions such as where Scheer zinged Trudeau, telling him that if he's so enamoured with provincial politics, there is an opening in the Ontario Liberal party for him. The studio audience behind Trudeau sat stone faced - appearing that they were insulted at this !!! - while others in the audience raised a cheer.<br />
<br />
Of course, this was in reference to Trudeau's incessant references to Doug Ford (who WAS NOT running for anything!!), but who had won a decisive majority in Ontario, reducing Ontario's Liberal party to a rump without even official party status. (Yes: that's how badly Jim Bradley and his gang of Liberal liars did in Ontario)<br />
<br />
Ignoring that Jim Bradley's Liberal Ontario-destroying disaster was fomented by the same buttholes who are now helping Trudeau destroy Canada, Trudeau was bizarrely infatuated with Ford (and Harper!) on the campaign trail.<br />
<br />
When Scheer brought up the fact that Trudeau had lied about the SNC <i>Globe and Mail </i>story (which broke on Feb.7, 2019) being false, Trudeau <i>AGAIN</i> lied about it on the debate,<i> again </i>saying - as he had originally in Feb. - that the <i>Globe and Mail </i>story <i>STILL</i> IS a lie!!<br />
<br />
It was an unbelievable statement - completely detached from reality.<br />
Trudeau's lying and his cognitive dissonance here is stunning.<br />
Yet: the imbeciles who love Trudeau's coloured socks and coloured shoe-polish and ignore this clown's blackface racism, can't get enough of his interpretation of reality.<br />
<br />
He was found guilty of violating Canada's ethics laws twice - and <i>still refused</i> to actually acknowledge that he did anything inappropriate. He fired JWR for "protecting jobs"?! That's a lie which even SNC refuted!!<br />
<br />
That Trudeau is <i>STILL lying</i> in October, insisting that February's<i> Globe </i>story was false (...and therefore, that reporter Fife is a liar... <i>really</i>, Justin?) - despite what we since learned, that it clearly <i>was not</i> false - immediately raises questions about Trudeau's mental stability.<br />
<br />
Why did Canada's MSM not follow up on Trudeau's insane doubling down on his original lie?!<br />
MOST Canadian media <i>ignored</i> Trudeau's continual lies and distortions.<br />
<br />
I noticed that Andrew Coyne brought this very same observation up on the CBC's <i>At Issue </i>panel (CBC nightly national news, Oct.8, 2018) the next day after the televised debate. But boy, did they ever quickly gloss over <i>that </i>- the host Rosemary Barton said<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> nothing</span></i>, Chantal Hebert said<span style="color: #990000;"> </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>nothing</i></span>, and Althia Raj <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">said nothing</span></i> about Trudeau's desperate, long-running lie, either.<br />
Coyne was there with 3 mutes beside him.<br />
Althia was there last night when Trudeau lied - she was one of the debate moderators - and it was <i>on</i> the CBC!! Barton was there as well, and she was one of the moderators!!<br />
Yet; wow - now, a day later, it's as if it <i>had never</i> happened.<br />
<br />
Canada's blackface-pasted Prime Minister LIES AGAIN - during CBC's nationally televised debate, 2 weeks before the election - and, yet the very next day, <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">not one of the other CBC panellists had anything else to add </span></i>to Coyne's quick observation. (...it's surprising that Coyne didn't later find a horse's head in his bed, courtesy of the Libranos...)<br />
Then of course, the CBC merrily went on to interview imbeciles who clearly hated Scheer and said they'll vote for Trudeau. (Yep - Fake news much, Andrew Chang?! C'mon!!)<br />
<br />
The green succubus Elizabeth May also seemed impaired, not only infected with GreenFear-doomsday paranoia, but crazily accusing Singh of wanting to build an oil refinery in Alberta - yet, the confused May (...was she drunk? High on Trudeau's spliffs??) was actually citing <i>HER OWN </i>party's platform... wtf was <i>THAT</i> all about?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5320262/green-party-alberta-foreign-oil/">Global reported May's claim back on May 27, 2019</a> that<i> her </i>Green Party wanted to build oil upgraders for Alberta bitumen!!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRr78llvmb54s7ew5Np0jfZpE9yL5QGvCLV7wtB26AcIC82e0elPZsRwmJVjFiQ-6tP-6h_EYEC7fvCdaTxqtM30LYY-QP0v8JFP4upUivaKNjtbP0IVLW5X3gP9iHeoYbecvUHTpjoKo/s1600/MAY+upgraders+for+Alberta.JPG" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="515" data-original-width="699" height="293" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRr78llvmb54s7ew5Np0jfZpE9yL5QGvCLV7wtB26AcIC82e0elPZsRwmJVjFiQ-6tP-6h_EYEC7fvCdaTxqtM30LYY-QP0v8JFP4upUivaKNjtbP0IVLW5X3gP9iHeoYbecvUHTpjoKo/s400/MAY+upgraders+for+Alberta.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Yet, Canada's MSM refused to examine what the confused May was saying.<br />
Hey Lizzie: we bet YOU aren't going to be PM anytime soon.<br />
<br />
Then, we learned through the <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2019/cbc-sues-the-conservative-party-over-copyright-journalists-moral-rights#comments-area"> Oct.11, 2019 National Post</a> that the piece of sh!t CBC suddenly, 10 days before the election, decided to sue the Conservative party for using clips from the CBC debates in their ads. Unreal. The CBC was specifically suing on behalf of Rosemary Barton: the SAME host who REFUSED to discuss Turdo's doubling down (which he did during the Oct.7, 2019 CBC nationally broadcast debate) on the original lie he made in Feb. 2019, that the Globe and Mail SNC story was"false".<br />
<br />
Yep: Turdo <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">lied on the CBC</span></i>, and Rosemary Barton<i> refused to even comment on it</i> when Coyne happened to mention it on the <i>At Issue</i> news segment the next day. (Barton, the hack host, quickly moved on from Coyne's comment)<br />
NOW, the CBC on behalf of this clown Barton, is suing the Conservatives - for using content which every Canadian paid for. The CBC is rife with phony reporters who aren't journalists, but are propagandists who are 'news shapers'.<br />
By the way, CBC uses video clips of Scheer and other politicians all the time. Maybe the Conservatives should sue the CBC and Barton - for using 'unauthorized videos' on the news.<br />
This is the bizarre fascism which Canada now faces under the Dark Days Of Turdo, when the desperate bolsheviks and their gang members try to consolidate power.<br />
Nasty FLICKIN' stuff.<br />
<br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;"> As Howard Kirshenbaum commented </span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">"</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">This lawsuit and the claims by the CBC are nonsense for exactly the same reasons that the CBC, or a talk show, can't be sued for excerpting and quoting Scheer or the Conservative Party. Their opinions of Trudeau or specific policies are public interest, subject to fair comment, not insulated from scrutiny or use or even satire, a political right, by le "droit moral" or copyright. It in any event was paid for by the public, in any event is partisan and political opinion, not art; and to suggest it is immune to re-publication and use, even abuse, is beyond arrogance to idiocy ie pure CBC</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">"</span><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Barton the disgusting hack should be counter-sued<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> for not doing her job as a journalist.</span></i><br />
The Prime Minister of Canada lied on a CBC media event which Barton MODERATED - and yet, the very next day, Barton sat as the CBC's 'news' host of the <i>At Issue </i>panel<i>, and she REFUSED</i> to delve into what Turdo had done!!<br />
Barton and the CBC are just propagandists!!<br />
WTF are we paying Barton's fat cat salary for???<br />
This was pure dereliction of duty by Barton; purely politically motivated: as was this subsequent CBC lawsuit.<br />
<br />
The (phony) journalist Barton refused to go there, because it would make Justin look bad. The CBC NEEDS CASH from the Liberals, and NEEDS to have Liberals in power. It is in the CBC's favour and in their self-interest, to play down anything negative about Trudeau, as much as they can.<br />
<br />
Let's remember that Barton, on the Oct. 8 <i>At Issue</i> segment, <i>did not mention a thing about Trudeau lying again </i>regarding the G and M SNC story being untrue. It was Coyne who brought it up - unprompted by Barton nor any of the other 2 panelists.<br />
Barton DID NOT bother to follow up on Coyne's observation.<br />
Why?<br />
And then we find out that this hack Barton several days later went on to sue - at taxpayer's expense?!!!! - the Conservatives?! Yet, LOOK AT THE INHERENT BIAS WHICH BARTON was demonstrating here on Oct.8!<br />
<br />
How long had this lawsuit been in the works, BEFORE it was made public?<br />
When Barton was doing her <i>At Issu</i>e hosting on Oct.8, had she a<i>lready started legal proceedings</i> against the Conservatives??<br />
If so, BARTON SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BEEN REMOVED FROM HER JOB until the lawsuit she initiated, had been settled. (..and now that the lawsuit IS public, BARTON should be removed from all duties immediately.)<br />
Everything the propagandist Andrew Chang lies about, Barton has just undermined.<br />
You can't believe a word Chang says, when Barton's down the hall in her office creating fake news and suing politicians during an election and pretending there is no built-in bias at the CBC!!<br />
<br />
Biased Barton has tainted and discredited herself completely. This stank ain't gonna wash off; this is a permanent stain. What an effing CBC joke this is.<br />
This is a seriously demented perversion of the free press going on here. Barton's gonna libel-chill the Conservatives - - - while she herself thinks nothing of censoring news and commentary about the sitting PM's lies - news and commentary which may be favourable to the conservatives - <i>and</i> to <i>EVERY OTHER</i> federal political group, as well!<br />
<br />
Any counter lawsuit against Biased Barton and the CBC should definitively cite Barton's biased incompetence as shown on the Oct. 8 <i>At Issue</i> segment.<br />
BARTON SUPPRESSED THE NEWS!! (...anyone not seeing the actual debate the night before, who watched the <i>At Issu</i>e panel for an impartial summary, was given a deceptive, dishonest view by Barton's handling of the subject - just the way the CBC likes it --- no fake CBC 'news' eh, Andrew Chang?!<br />
BARTON BUTCHERED THE MEANING of news and of journalistic integrity.<br />
BARTON REFUSED to further examine Coyne's observation, and just moved on, almost as if she didn't hear what Coyne had said.<br />
<br />
But she had heard, didn't like it, and refused to do any follow up, refused to ask Hebert and Raj to specifically comment on Trudeau's double-down. Barton essentially censored the story by squelching any possible further discussion, as it was happening.<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Of course, as all this goes on, the CBC has also been flooding the tv airwaves with ads using Andrew Chang to earnestly tell us oh how great and wonderful and wise and helpful the CBC is, in order to 'help' us make the right, informed decision on election day!! This is laughable if it wasn't so pathetically and blatantly calculated.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Chang's vomitous lies and distortions are backed up with nonsensical visuals, among which are <i>images of melting glaciers!!</i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> YEP: <i>that's </i>what it has come to - pure CBC lies and chicanery. And fraudsters like Chang - </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> who just recently in a (fake) news story, was telling us nonchalantly that "climate change is real", in order to boost some deceptive climatalarismist story he was introducing. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> That's urinalism, not journalism: and <i>that's </i>today's CBC - selling political piss disguised as news!!! </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Chang's another creep that ought to be fired along with Barton, and literally hundreds of other CBC GreenFear-infected political hacks.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Then there was good ole Dwight Drummond, hosting his <i>Our Toronto </i>CBC tv segment on Oct 12, 2019, blabbing with 4 GreenFear-infected bobble heads whining about AGW climate change as if it was real. Dwight (...again, note how the textbook lies are perpetuated) is also taking a political piss here, never asking any of his climate alarmist/doom spreaders to actually provide their "evidence" of AGW. Dwight doesn't ask, because his employers directed him to pretend that "it's all settled" and therefore, these idiots blather on about their shared delusion and their fantastic socialist 'solutions' (to a 'problem' which has nothing to do with AGW, but has a lot to do with marxism)</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> So while Rosemary Barton and the CBC sue Conservatives, the CBC, using Drummond and others, just keeps keep doubling down on the GreenFear lie. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> What is the CBC's underlying message, which Drummond, Barton, Chang and the GreenFear gang are ALL peddling: it's their 'green virtue', their elitism, their politics, their not so well hidden hate for conservatism. They peddle this vitriol openly on the public CBC broadcast network. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Drummond had no intention of even hinting at balance or truth or impartiality here - it was a joke, and, it illustrates what the CBC has become, an insulated choir of climate change infected clowns singing a cacophony of doom to themselves in a silo.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Without challenge, their delusions are self reinforced to the point where they become detached from reality. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> There is a mass-hysteria at play here, with wild alarmist claims being thrown around about 'extinction' and the 'end of the world' and the 'dying planet is on fire' and 'climate crisis emergencies'... all conjured up in the GreenFear-infected mind <i>as if</i> it was a a reality. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Sacks of crap such as Elizabeth May and Jagmeet Singh (and Turdo, Climate Barbie... let's not forget Good Ole Grampa Of GreenFear, Jim Bradley!) live from the avails of prostituting GreenFear-paranoia. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Drummond <i>didn't question the premise of AGW</i>, and wasn't interested in anything of substance. (By asking questions, he could have very quickly brought to light the insane climate paranoia which was bubbling within his panelists). </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> But Drummond didn't bother; he encouraged and enabled the climate lie to fester, unquestioned, and let the deluded participants continue building their hoax-based narrative. He's as fake as his guests.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> But the CBC is not the only broadcaster doling out GreenFear: on TVO, the day before, on Oct.11, 2019, Steve Paikin was busily spreading... (again... and again... and again...) the climate change hoax as well, with his cabal of GreenFear-spreaders, including Abreau. It was the usual climate claptrap, the usual marxism, the usual politics disguised as being 'science'. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> On Oct 12, 2019, in this fast moving story, the CBC apparently changed the story, now saying that it -the CBC - is the<i> only</i> party suing the conservatives, and that Barton is <i>NOT</i> involved!!!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Whether Barton was originally part of this action or not, isn't clear. We'll never know whether Barton was privately filing lawsuits against a political party, while the CBC was peddling a lie that they are 'impartial'. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Very scummy way of dealing with things. </span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">It certainly would have raised huge issues of impartiality had Barton continued with this, and it is a good thing she isn't. Doing so would have sealed the coffin on her 'career'. </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">She is now free to smear conservatives once more! Hurrah!! Great move, CBC! </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> haha: the CBC will never sue Trudeau for lying on their debate!!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Of course, this doesn't in any way change the fact that Barton was acting in biased manner in her <i>At Issue</i> hosting duties, and doesn't change the fact that pretty much every CBC 'personality' exudes hates for conservatism and for anyone who disagrees with their 'virtuous' stand on climate change. That's the inherent undercurrent, the subtext, in practically ANYTHING the CBC does. </span></span></div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span style="font-family: georgia, times new roman, serif;"><br /></span></div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span style="font-family: georgia, times new roman, serif;">Update: the SNC affair came up again on Sept. 11, 2021, during the federal election. YES: the same thing, the same arc of smug Liberal obfuscation, the same Turdo lies repeated again - in 2021!! </span></div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span style="font-family: georgia, times new roman, serif;">This was prompted by a<a href="https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/trudeau-says-he-did-not-want-wilson-raybould-to-lie-as-snc-lavalin-affair-re-emerges/ar-AAOjYTM?li=AAggXBV&ocid=mailsignout"> release of an excerpt from Raybould's upcoming memoir</a>. She wrote: <i>"</i></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px;"><i>I knew what he {Trudeau} was really asking. What he was saying. In that moment, I knew he wanted me to lie — to attest that what had occurred had not occurred. ... Lie to protect a Crown government acting badly; a political party; a leader who was not taking responsibility.”</i></span><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 1.9rem; padding: 0px;"><i>Wilson-Raybould resigned from cabinet the next day and was followed out the door by then-health minister Jane Philpott before the two were booted from the Liberal caucus. The affair later led to the resignation of Trudeau’s principal secretary, Gerald Butts, and Privy Council Clerk Michael Wernick."</i></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 1.9rem; padding: 0px;">Yes: Canada's Covid Criminal, Canada's Blackfaced Boy Blunder, Canada's ethically-challenged Clown Ponce, wants us to forget about his incompetency, and still even on Sept. 11, 2021, Turdo <i>continues </i>to slime Raybould as a liar. </p>
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">-</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It was hilarious to see the deceptive spin which Adam Carter was trying to peddle on Global's <i>Focus Ontario</i> joke of a show on Oct.13, 2019. Carter was making a big deal of asking 'where is Doug Ford' in Scheer's campaign'. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Yet, urinalist Carter <i>did not</i> similarly ask 'where is Kathleen Wynne in Trudeau's campaign?' or 'Where is Dalton McGuinty in Trudeau's campaign'?!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">You know, Adam: those Liberals, those great pals of Trudeau's, whose focus was to destroy Ontario; those Ontario Liberals whose party self-destructed and crashed down in flames to non-party status? Those Ontario Liberals {whom Turdo loved to hug}, who had the same Butt-holes advising them to destroy Ontario, who then moved on, like a plague, to help Blackface Turdo destroy Canada? </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i>THOSE</i> Liberals, Adam: <i><b>where are they during Blackface's campaign</b></i>?!?!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">How many Telford bucks went into producing this Global slime? <i>At Focus</i> is out of focus.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Carter also claimed that 'housing was a top issue' during the federal campaign, when really, IT WASN'T, and ISN'T.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">This is more deceptive Global spin. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The MAIN issue - almost<i> every day</i> - is about incessantly pushing the "<i>climate change" </i>hoax - <i>not</i> healthcare, <i>not</i> out of control immigration,<i> not </i>out of control debt, spending and taxation,<i> </i>and<i> not</i> housing! These are all minor footnotes in the 2019 election campaign; the over-riding issue has been manufactured and presented to us as a phony 'climate crisis', Adam. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Did you examine<i> that</i>, Adam?! Global has been spreading climate change GreenFear for years now. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Check your employer's records, Adam; then, check even YOUR OWN records, Adam: count all those "housing crisis stories" which you and Global... <span style="font-size: x-small;">umm</span> reported... and then compare them to <i>ALL THE CLIMATE CHANGE </i>hoax stories which Global has shat out!!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> And why are you even on this program, Benzie?! Have you no <i>real journalism</i> to practice, instead of participating in this televised pablum??</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">-</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It's darn funny how the CBC, on their Oct. 14, 2019 nightly nationally broadcast news, was showing video clips of some guy walking into an advance polling station, talking with the clerks, and going up to the screen to vote, then waving his folded ballot around in the air as he returned it back to the ladies at the desk - when we have all been told that NO CAMERAS are allowed inside polling stations. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> This apparently was in one of the 2 Burnaby B.C. polling stations, at the desk where the vote in poll 116 was being held.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The face of the voter (who was the CBC subject) was clearly shown at the poll, as were the clerk's faces. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Unless this was a staged video, how is it that the CBC can waltz into an advance poll and do this? This was clearly done during business hours, when the polling station was open to the public fro voting purposes.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Simply by having their cameras and CBC logo right there inside - or even near - the polling station, the CBC is casting political bias and influencing votes - seeing as the CBC lies about 'climate change' on a daily basis, and slants their political 'news' to reflect that - eh, Catherine Tait?! </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The CBC <i>isn't</i> impartial, as it pretends to be, no matter what Andrew Chang has been 'forced' to say. The Liberal elitist disdain is <i>always there </i>in the background. The CBC hates conservatives privately as much as Blackface Boy and Khalistinian Singh hate conservatives publicly.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Did the poll supervisor at that location give the CBC permission to film within the polling station?! </span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Yet: hey - Rebel media wouldn't be allowed to do the same thing, would they?! </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Is this another Telford media bucks-financed production?! </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> And yes: <i>Rosemary Barton was the CBC host </i>for this segment: after the video was shown, the broadcast went directly back to her. Apparently, Barton had no problem with this either.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">-</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> As Oct.15-16-17 went by, with the federal election mere just days away, we saw the Telford media bucks extremely hard at work, pushing Turdo's Liberal lies over and over again, story after story, fear mongering about Doug Ford, about Harper, about evil conservatives... lie after lie after lie, dutifully 'reported', with <i>no actual</i> analysis. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The lies uttered by Trudeau are repeated and re-amplified, <i>but remain mostly unchallenged, and the take-away to the viewers is, that whatever the issue in the segment had been about, it is portrayed as 'fact'</i>. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> At the same time, anything Scheer says, is parsed and picked over and c<i>ounter views are immediately presented on cue </i>- just look at Katie Simpson's reporting on Scheer. Simpson's reporting is at odds with other CBC election reporting - because there is almost always a negative slant to the Conservative candidate and the party inherent in Simpson's sneering and instantly-editorialized commentary - while other CBC reporters with other candidates have mostly a fawning role: <i>non</i>-questioning, <i>non</i>-parsing, <i>non-</i>instant-counterpoint-providing opinioneering in their reports. {...same kind of delivery and performance seen with CTV's Smug Tom Walters and CBC's Twitchy Paul Hunter, whose 'reports' palpably seethe with Trump hate}.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Think of the day the Turdo Blackface racism scandal was revealed, how Katie Simpson immediately was asking when did Scheer know about it, and if Scheer had done the same thing!!! Seriously: it takes a sick CBC mind to offer <i>that</i> up as a narrative - considering that the Katie and CBC <i>NEVER BOTHERED </i>- in 5+ years - to look up Turdo's quite-public Blackface racist past. Anyone ask what Simpson and Tait were doing, as Canada's Blackfaced Sock Puppet was prancing around the PM's office?!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> That's what bought political 'reporting' is these days - propaganda helped nicely by greasy Telford greenbacks.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Phony media "truth checkers" - employed immediately after any conservative says anything - are suddenly nowhere to be seen when Blackfaced Boy Blunder spouts his inanities. Or when the no-visa-from-India Khalistinian Canadian spouts his divisive deceptions, or when the green succubus hisses out hers. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> I wonder if Turdo, after he's flushed down the toilet several days from now, on election day, will immediately resign, or stay on and pretend that somehow he had heroically 'saved the day'. The internal Liberal plans must already be afoot for replacing Trudeau, considering how much 'support' he's lost. </span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">And - to that - we actually don't know how much he really had, in the first place, for it all might have been illusive hype. What we see is that Turdo's ego interfered with his perception of reality.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It's clear a week before the election that Canada will undergo a much-needed Liberal enema. One term Turdo is already's caught in the swirl flushing down the drain. (Unfortuneatley, the national enema wasn't strong enough, and the Liberal wastrel hasn't been fully flushed yet.) </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It may well be that most of the support which Turdo may have had pre-Blackface Revelation Day, quickly evaporated quickly thereafter. In the following days, the bought media tried very hard to downplay the enormity of what the lying PM had done (...and, had kept secret), desperately trying to whitewash Turdo's tattered, shoe-polish stained 'reputation'. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">It was astounding to see the spin, the hypocrisy, and the instant attempts to rehabilitate the racist PM's deeds. You'd have to be<a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2019/kelly-mcparland-trudeau-is-blind-to-his-own-divisive-politics"> thicker than a brick</a> - a <a href="https://torontosun.com/news/national/election-2019/kinsella-why-i-cant-vote-liberal-on-oct-21#comments">cult </a>member - to vote for any Turdo Liberal. </span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoWkfINgeow0JhcOht7FI99NzGGejRIvHeQN5GJckM50UHqn9AbXQsuVhu3UR0kk4WafnA4yBVugZJBOB1w1bxSbmTwlypNpco1hUMzYJScXiXPyZ78C1i0GcnvCDLTwBsNZvud92NAEA/s1600/Turdo+in+blackface+2001.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="492" data-original-width="740" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoWkfINgeow0JhcOht7FI99NzGGejRIvHeQN5GJckM50UHqn9AbXQsuVhu3UR0kk4WafnA4yBVugZJBOB1w1bxSbmTwlypNpco1hUMzYJScXiXPyZ78C1i0GcnvCDLTwBsNZvud92NAEA/s400/Turdo+in+blackface+2001.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"></span></div>
Canada's budding future First Blackface Prime Minister, Justin Turdeau, seen preening in all <strike>his</strike> its festooned, post-national, peoplekind-like glory.<br />
Also on Oct 16, 2019, the <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/obama-trudeau-endorsement-1.5323097">bucket of yank stank Obama </a>interfered in Canada's federal election by endorsing Blackfaced U.N. Sock-Puppet Trudeau. Yep: as long as a racist is also a 'progressive'{ie, a socialist}- then it's OK: Obama's on board the hypocrisy train!<br />
There was Aldous Huxley-level propaganda on full bizzaro display on TVO on the evening Oct.23, 2019, when there was a segment hosted by an indigenous woman, going on about racism, while showing a photo of Stephen Harper in Indian head-dress gear. This is sadly funny - pathetic - seeing as TVO's next segment right after this one, was their much-self-touted "documentary" about propaganda.<br />
It's 'funny', because it's pretty certain that the TVO documentary about propaganda, would not be including<i> their own</i> <i>previous segment about racism</i>, because that segment was<span style="color: #cc0000;"><i> itself</i> </span>propaganda - in that it was showing images of Harper in head-dress gear which was <i>gifted by, </i><i>provided by, </i>and <i>worn with</i>, local indigenous groups themselves, in a ceremonial setting. It's not as if Harper was doing this for laughs at some frat party.<br />
There was no parody nor any disrespect attached here whatsover.<br />
The false inference TVO was peddling (...<i>purposefully </i>peddling...) was that Harper was a racist for wearing it.<br />
Missing in this one-sided narrative was the <i>context of the real story.</i> Giving half the story, spiked with false and deceptive imagery, is part and parcel of manufacturing a purposeful lie.<br />
This was pure skewed propaganda - <i>exactly as defined</i> in TVO's own subsequent segment - shown<i> by</i> TVO, in t<i>heir own</i> immediately-preceding segment!<br />
TVO <i>itself </i>was spreading propaganda, while also at the same time producing sanctimonious documentaries about others doing it!<br />
And by refusing to acknowlege that they themselves were propagandists, TVO doubled down on the propaganda factor!! Add in Propagandist Paikin's lies about climate change, and TVO's credentials as a propaganda peddler go through the roof. No hypocrisy at TVO, eh?!<br />
Justin Trudeau wasn't given shoe polish by black people, or forced by anyone, to wear it and to make fun of black people. Turdo did this HIMSELF.<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-16887480291888532202019-09-20T18:37:00.022-04:002023-12-08T13:16:11.890-05:00When will Canada's Cagiest Climatologist call out Crime Minister Justin Blackface Turdo's climate hoax? CHAPTER 37<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>CHAPTER 37</b></span><br />
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>(See FULL article at:</b></span><br />
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b> </b></span><a href="https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2017/02/calling-on-canadas-cagey-climatologist.html">https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2017/02/calling-on-canadas-cagey-climatologist.html</a><b style="color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-style: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-variant-ligatures: inherit;">)</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: inherit; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> When <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/opinion/climate-change-parenting.html#commentsContainer">Prof. Scranton</a> (see Chapter 36) wrote that:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> <span style="color: red;">“…the only truly moral response to global climate change is <i>to commit suicide</i>. There is simply no more effective way to shrink your carbon footprint. Once you’re dead, you won’t use any more electricity, you won’t eat any more meat, you won’t burn any more gasoline, and you certainly won’t have any more children. If you really want to save the planet, you should die...”</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> ...then why haven't the purveyors of climate change bolshevism done <i>just that: </i>put their 'money where their mouth is', and heroically commit suicide for Mother Gaia?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> These green charlatans, preaching and signalling their moral virtue, cannot abide by what their own science-fiction-based conceit ultimately demands: that they show their so-called 'virtue' through <i>their own</i> mortal sacrifice {...ie that THEY walk their talk...)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> But instead, these same green fascists project THEIR OWN demented 'sins' onto others. The same GreenFear-infected illness which Scranton peddles, has been alive and well in Niagara and in the rest of Ontario for years, where the population has been cudgelled relentlessly by the elitist green virtue-signallers and their media acolytes. Let's go back to story I wrote in 2010, to see that the nihilist green climate-change insanity which Scranton is spouting in 2018, has been regularly peddled for years:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif"><br /></span><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Julie </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Greco</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> wrote in </span><a href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2866929" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">"Lighting up a green Christmas"</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> (St.</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Catharines</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"></span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Standard</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, Dec.2010):</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">"If the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Griswolds</span> of Vacation fame went green, their house might resemble the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Bloms</span>' during the holidays.<br />"Christmas is when we go crazy," says Andrew <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Blom</span>, who has spent countless hours over the past month transforming his front lawn at 41 Senator Dr. into a dazzling holiday wonderland.<br />About 10,000 lights take the shape of Christmas trees, wrapped presents, reindeer and snowmen, all programmed to blink to the beats of seasonal songs.<br />The beacon of light generated from the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Bloms</span>' postage stamp-sized lawn at the corner of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Macturnbull</span> Dr., makes it one of the neighbourhood's main attractions during the holidays.<br />"Last night, we had people dancing on the sidewalk in front of our house," said Andrew's wife Jamie.<br />At first glance, it might appear the family's spectacular light show is a drain on energy resources -- not to mention their hydro bill. But that's not the case.<br />Energy efficiency has been their focus for the past five years, thanks to their son Zack, now 14.<br />When Zack was in Grade 5 at Power Glen School, he became interested in environmental issues. One day, he came home from school and told his parents how they had discussed energy and waste in class.<br /><span style="color: #cc0000;">"My teacher said when my parents were born, people didn't really know what they were doing to the environment," he said.<br />His parents remember it a different way.<br />" 'Energy pigs' was the word he used," Andrew remembered with a chuckle.<br />"He told us we were personally responsible for the demise of the Earth and that we had to fix it."<br />That was a dramatic turning point for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Bloms</span>.</span><br />As owners of an energy business, they had always researched new, cutting-edge products and alternative energy sources such as solar and geothermal, but until then they hadn't practised what they preached at home.<br />"I was the type of person who never wanted to recycle. But since Zack came home that day, we're huge into it now," Jamie said.<br />Now the family has solar panels on their roof and their water is heated through solar power.<br />The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Bloms</span>' shift to environmental awareness happened to coincide with their decision to get charged up about the holidays by going all-out with their light display.<br />"You wouldn't believe it but before, he was like the Grinch. He didn't want to do anything," said Jamie.<br />"I said, 'Is this what you want Zack to remember?' That's when he turned into this."<br />But Andrew didn't want to sacrifice his environmental consciousness for his <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">newfound</span> festive spirit. By opting for LED lights, his whole Christmas light display is powered by the same amount of energy it takes to run five 100-watt light bulbs.<br />"People always assume that our hydro bills must be out of control, but it's less than it was before," said Jamie.<br />"The only energy it really consumes is all the hours and hours he spends putting up the lights and programming the music -- human energy."<br />But the effort is worth seeing the faces of local children light up during the holidays, said Andrew.<br />Zack agreed.<br />"At first, I thought it was obnoxious. But after all the people who come to see it, I feel like we're helping them enjoy Christmas a little more."<br />The clock is ticking for St. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Catharines</span> residents interested in participating in the city's sustainability study, to draft a sustainability strategy in 2011. The deadline for filling out the online survey is Tuesday. To take the survey or for more information about the study, visit www.stcatharines.ca"</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">*</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Why didn't the Standard's reporter Julie Greco bother to identify this apparently-heroic Power Glen "teacher" who was - and perhaps still is - propagandizing his/her own </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/04/reds-green-show-into-heart-of-darkness.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">green bolshevism</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> to impressionable fifth graders? </span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Apparently, neither the Standard's reporter nor editor had <i>any</i> concerns or questions about this teacher's methods. What an example of journalistic malpractice.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">The entire point of Julie Greco's article was to peddle climate-change propaganda - and this is a typical example of what the result looks like.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Even a link to a "sustainability study" was oh-so-conveniently included in this one-sided story! How thoughtful. It's as if Greco was working not as a journalist, but as a fifth-columnist, a bought and paid for propagandist for the Liberal government. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> No 'journalism' or balance or objectivity is seen here - just a plain blatant peddling of the GreenFear agenda.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> {...note - in fact, this report, from back in 2010, and this kind of utterly slanted, biased kind of phony 'reporting' (...actually, outright propaganda disguised as 'news') was what only <i>later -</i> after Trump's election - would be <i>finally</i> brought into the open and categorized as FAKE NEWS. </span></span></span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">This kind of phony reporting WAS COMMON at the St.Catharines Standard and in many msm outlets</span></i><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">...</span></i><span style="color: #3372b6;">} </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3372b6;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Is this </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> now officially part of Ontario's </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/05/inconvenient-gory-truth-fraudulent.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Liberal-approved greenshevik provinial school curriculum</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">? </span></span></span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;">That - and watching endless reruns of Al Gore's Book Of </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;">Inconvenient</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"> Climate Deceptions? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Don't ask local Liberal </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">MPP</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Jim Bradley for an answer - </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">this is exactly</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> the kind of </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greensh!t</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> doomsday GreenF</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">ear-mongering</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> which Bradley and his Liberals encourage: see </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2009/05/shiny-new-hospital-same-old-monopolist.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Bradley's "greener ways to live" propaganda.</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Were the kiddies also given </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">recommendations</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> by their kept-secret-by-the -press </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">ClimateFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> teacher on who their parents should vote for, as well?!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Yep - apparently </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Blom</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> is personally held responsible for helping save the Planet, because his parents were "energy pigs". And Obama was personally going to halt the 'rise of the oceans'! Praise be upon them.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> But isn't the use of thousands of lights - even if they are </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">LED's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> - </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">still offensive</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> to some dour </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2007/12/david-suzuki-dangerous-pest.html" style="color: #b67733;">Suzukiite</a></span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, somewhere? Degrees of perception, eh... or is it degrees of deception?</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Aren't suicide and sterilization the best methods for </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">achieving</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevik</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> goal of </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2007/12/liberal-jim-bradley-greenliness-is-next.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">population control</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> in order to save the Earth from exploding/flooding/melting/burning?</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Someone - just</span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> go and ask</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberal MPP Jim Bradley to explain what the FLICK was being "taught" in <i>his </i>city's schools, in his Liberal government's classes, in 2005! Which approved Ontario provincial curriculum was this mysterious, un-named </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">PowerGlenGreenshevik</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> teacher using - the belief in </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2010/02/liberal-jim-sir-kyodiot-bradley-still.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Kyoto</a> <span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">and the </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2010/07/lets-examine-jim-bradleys-graphic.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Mann-made</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> hockey stick graph?!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Scaring the sh!t out of children in Liberal Ontario might be fine for </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberals, but they are probably itching to do even more, like showing the latest United Nations 'educational video' where teachers </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><span style="color: red;">BLOW UP STUDENTS who don't obey the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28">Greenshevik </span>Commandments</span></em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">.</span></span></span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Yeah, that's right - maybe </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> isn't going far enough in scaring the kids to repent for their collective '</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-crimes' - maybe it's time </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberals now show the kids how it feels </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9;">to die for their parent's carbon sins</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9;">.</span></span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">"Seriously??" you ask?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Well: read for yourself Peter Foster's column "</span><a href="http://www.financialpost.com/climate+killers/3634488/story.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">U.K.'s Climate Killers</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">" (National Post, Oct.7, 2010):</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">"The uproar over the “<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32">eco</span> snuff” video put out by British climate alarmist organization 10:10 is more than a minor embarrassment for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33">warmist</span> cause. Ten ten is not just any old bunch of hysterical radicals. It is virtually a propaganda arm of the U.K. government. Moreover, thousands of corporations, local councils and schools have signed on to the group’s Orwellian “pledge” to reduce carbon emissions by 10% by the end of 2010.<br /><br />The “satirical” video — which 10:10 posted last week but had to withdraw in the face of an angry backlash — consists of four segments in which, respectively, school kids, corporate employees, former French soccer ace David <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34">Ginola</span>, and X Files star Gillian Anderson are told that there is “no pressure” to get onside with the carbon reduction program. Then, those who refuse to sign up (including Messrs. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35">Ginola</span> and Anderson) are blown up, with a great deal of splattered blood. Side-splitting! Literally.<br /><br />When I first saw it, I thought it had to be a spoof of the insanities of environmental extremism. Who would believe that any green organization would cast themselves as potentially murderous <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36">eco</span>fascists? What message could one take from the movie but “Those who fail to agree with us will die,” even if we’ll just kill them tongue in exploding cheek. But the video, which was written by Richard Curtis, who penned Four Weddings and a Funeral, was <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37">comedically</span> dead serious.<br /><br />Ten ten was set up by Franny Armstrong, who found instant St. Joan of Noah’s Ark status last year after making an hysterical movie called The Age of Stupid. The film featured a lone archivist looking back from a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38">dystopian</span> future and wondering how humanity could have gone so terribly, terribly wrong.<br /><br />Virtually the entire UN turned up for the film’s New York premiere. And since Ms. Armstrong’s message was not a million miles from the suicidal climate-change stance of the British Labour Party, the movie’s London debut was attended by a gaggle of politicians, including then environment minister and now opposition Labour party leader Ed <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39">Miliband</span>. “Red Ed” was ambushed by the film’s star, Pete <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40">Postlethwaite</span>, who threatened to march up to the gates of Buckingham Palace and give back his Order of the British Empire if new coal-fired plants <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41">weren</span>’t stopped.<br /><br />Abasing himself further in order (obviously successfully) to further his political career, Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42">Miliband</span> then agreed to “debate” Ms. Armstrong. The only problem was that they were both on the same side. Not to worry. Ms. Armstrong used the occasion to launch the 10:10 campaign.<br /><br />Since “10% by 2010” is the kind of target beloved of those who delight in moving in (and leading) intellectual flocks, the entire British Cabinet had soon signed on, along with a raft of corporations, soccer clubs (such as <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43">Tottheham</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44">Hotspur</span>, whose players appear in the movie) and miscellaneous trendies and publicity hounds. Since coming to power, Tory leader David Cameron’s new coalition government has also signed on. Presumably now he wishes it <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45">hadn</span>’t.<br /><br />The 10:10 organization issued an apology for the video. Sort of. “With climate change becoming increasingly threatening, and decreasingly talked about in the media, we wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines whilst making people laugh.”<br /><br />Make ’em chuckle all the way to the child psychologist.<br /><br />Ms. Armstrong was more combative. She told The Guardian (a powerful 10:10 supporter) “Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody’s existence on this planet? Clearly we don’t really think they should be blown up, that’s just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start?”<br /><br />A little amputating.<br /><br />Ms. Armstrong went on to provide her idea of perspective. “We ‘killed’ five people to make No Pressure — a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change.”<br /><br />Here was a wonderful example of Ms. Armstrong’s facility with numbers. I counted at least seven people who were offed in the movie. As for those 300,000, that’s a whopper manufactured by former UN secretary-general <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46">Kofi</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47">Annan</span>’s private <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48">NGO</span>, the Global Humanitarian Forum. In fact, there is no way of linking a single death to the impact of humans on the global climate.<br /><br />What seems to have been utterly exploded is 10:10’s credibility. The video was designed to coincide with a series of events at next Sunday’s (10/10/10) “Global Day of Doing.” These included “sumo wrestlers cycling to training in Tokyo.” But now major corporations such as Sony, and climate “prophets” such as Yale’s Bill <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49">McKibben</span>, are leaving the sinking 10:10 ship, and climate skeptics are having a well-deserved field day.<br /><br />According to Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50">McKibben</span>, another mystic numerologist who claims the world is doomed at any level of atmospheric carbon dioxide beyond 350 parts per million, the video “represents the kind of stupidity that really hurts our side, reinforcing in people’s minds a series of preconceived notions, not the least of which is that we’re out-of-control elitists.”<br /><br />Right on! But the problem is that free-floating <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51">moralistas</span> such as Ms. Armstrong have been inflated by the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_52">alarmism</span> peddled by the likes of Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_53">McKibben</span>. Still, Ms. Armstrong did have some support. The child actor who played one of those spectacularly eviscerated declared: “I was very happy to get blown up to save the world.” " </span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">*</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Unreal: figurative </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-snuff films for the kiddies!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">'Blowing up' children to teach them a </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">climatalarmist</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> lesson! It's all fun!! We're supposed to believe it's "satirical"; it's more like satanic.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">This</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> is the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevism</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> of the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_57" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">kyodiots</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, writ large.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">So, dear </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_58" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">sheeple</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, contact Jim the Liberal </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_59" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Kyodiot</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Bradley, and </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_60" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> education minister Leona Dombrowsky, with demands that this extreme </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_61" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-fascism be brought to Ontario immediately!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">The </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_62" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_63" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">warmists</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> have no time for energy pigs anymore - killing off the non-green heathen is the new </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_64" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> tactic.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">The Power Glen </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_65" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Prophet of Doom would love this, eh, what with the picking of victims based on </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_66" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">gaian</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_67" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevist</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_68" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_69" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">moralism</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, shaming and 'killing off' sinful students who don't worship at the Green Altar of Gore, Dion, Suzuki, Bradley, and Ban Ki-Moon.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">It's only a movie, eh... </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">for now...</em></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-</em></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Interesting comment by Maureen Matthew (<a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/thousands-mobilize-around-the-world-to-protest-fossil-fuels-and-growing-threat-of-climate-change#comments-area">National Post, Sept.20, 2019) </a> </span></span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;">regarding those brain-washed, GreenFear-infected children and their 'handlers' who were led on marches{...depicting imagery such as "<i>die - ins</i>", where children are told to pretend that they are laying dead in the street, or scenes of people dressed in black with nooses on their neck, like at the Brandenburg Gate...} of mass self-delusion by the marxist left's latest manufactured icon, St. Greta:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></div>
<span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i> " This is nothing more than child abuse. In 1968 I was in grade 8 (13 year old girl) in Edmonton. Our grade 8 science teacher was a handsome 23 year old who was big in Pollution Probe. He used the classroom to promote his views and of course being Grade 8 girls, we were all enthralled with him. He had convinced all of us, but mainly the girls - the boys thought he was a wanker (on reflection, the boys were correct), that by the time we were 30 we would not be able to go outside without respirators on because of the pollution. And of course, we MUST do something NOW. He had us writing to MLA, mayors, MPs etc to take action now.</i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;"><i><br style="box-sizing: inherit; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; margin: 5px 0px 0px;" /><span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif">Well I'm long past 30 years old and not a respirator in sight. On reflection he was using children for his own purpose - t wasn't sex abuse, but it still was abuse as he was using his position of authority to control the actions of others (especially minors). He should NEVER have been a teacher and I'm sure none of his 'teachings' were in the curriculum. But at that time, principals didn't supervisor staff as closely as they do today and parents really didn't know what was going on in the classroom. None of the girls thought this was wrong because he was soooo handsome and cute!</span></i><span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif"><i>Any teacher that is supporting this 'strike' should be written up and disciplined, but unfortunately there are too many who are afraid to confront these abusers".</i></span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><br /></em></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><em style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #3372b6;">-</em></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3372b6;"> Let's flash forward to this</span><span style="color: #3372b6;"> <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/david-suzuki-foundation-18-to-8_ca_5d642971e4b01d7b5293a8d9">Huffington Post propaganda by Ryan Maloney</a>, Aug.26, 2019, about how creeps at the David Suzuki Foundation are inculcating children to act as willing dupes for Suzuki's brand of climate alarmism, having children act as conduits for Suzuki's "Kids against extinction" campaign.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #3372b6;">Quite sickening on many levels. </span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #3372b6;">Where are the parents as the left preys on minors? Are they looking the other way as Suzuki's gang has their way with the kids, perverting their minds - or are they willingly on-board and openly enabling this to happen?? {In poor Greta's case: <i>yes</i>}</span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: white; clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvMwc-PI1yWigDBrxSAkTVEHlbx1xOasuSFmVScaqcU6m4-J1qUXNMPGuMFesaOINzBE5xHi7aHDyJGi20aUfCk50wCxd0GtG8hqkcSBjzVGjqc2Z01xszdvkQtTE-7bBmH8jObqCK128/s1600/greenfear+suzuki+using+children+as+green+fear+useful+idiots+-+Copy.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="925" data-original-width="656" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvMwc-PI1yWigDBrxSAkTVEHlbx1xOasuSFmVScaqcU6m4-J1qUXNMPGuMFesaOINzBE5xHi7aHDyJGi20aUfCk50wCxd0GtG8hqkcSBjzVGjqc2Z01xszdvkQtTE-7bBmH8jObqCK128/s640/greenfear+suzuki+using+children+as+green+fear+useful+idiots+-+Copy.JPG" width="451" /></a></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;"> ".</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">..</span>A Vancouver-based environmental charity is making a satirical push to lower the voting age to eight to underscore the importance of protecting future generations from the effects of climate change.</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The David Suzuki Foundation launched the campaign Monday, dubbed “18 to 8,” with a </span><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">website</span><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> calling for voters to listen to young voices and “prioritize a livable climate over all other issues” in this fall’s election.</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">“When you get into the voting booth on October 21, vote with your inner child,” the site reads.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The group has also released a video that, while humorous, shows kids taking to the streets to protest against their extinction. The clip opens with two girls playing patty-cake, asking how many years they “have left.”</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">“Climate scientists are saying we now have only 12 years left to act if we want to avoid catastrophic damage,” a boy says in the ad, referencing a </span><a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/10/09/canada-climate-change-un_a_23555891/" style="border: 0px; box-shadow: rgb(13, 190, 152) 0px -2px 0px inset; box-sizing: inherit; color: black; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: all 0.3s ease-out 0s, all 0.3s ease-out 0s;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">2018 report</span></a><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> from the </span></span><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change calling for dramatic action to cut greenhouse gas emissions...</span><span style="background-color: white;">"</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The sickeningly sleazy Suzuki-ite bullsh!t goes on and on. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">A 12 year old boy is told to say 'we have only 12 years left..' ...blablah bla bla ... all the while, being a pawn in Suzuki's spiderweb of Green Bolshevism. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> And this is also supposedly being defined as "satire"?! The propaganda-peddling <strike>reporter</strike> enabler Maloney cannot consider that these are minors being used as pawns, purposefully polluted with political propaganda. When you're already drinking the GreenFear-laced koolaid, you've traded away your credibility as a journalist, and just become another climate change propaganda pushin' hack.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> (About this "<span style="color: #cc0000;">12 years left</span>" doomsday lie which David Suzuki is having children spout for his political agenda - on Sept.20, 2019 (during the federal election) the green succubus Elizabeth May, while campaigning in Calgary, was babbling in a long-winded, almost incoherent rant on CBC / CTV during their noon tv news broadcast, where she claimed that the world would basically end if 'nothing is done <span style="color: #cc0000;">in 18 months</span>' {!!!!}. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">C'mon: can't these GreenFear-pushing Bolsheviks even get their phony "tipping point" doomsday propaganda in order?!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> The <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/greta-thunbergs-un-speech-falls-on-deaf-ears-as-worlds-largest-emitters-dodge-sweeping-climate-commitments#comments-area">Sept.25, 2019 National Post</a> had an 'interesting' (well: it's from the Trump-hatin' WaPo, so...) take on teen clown Greta Thunberg's climate-change gong show, where commenters like Louise Fribance hit the nail on the head: </span><br />
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<i><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;"><b><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">"T</span><span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif">his young girl has serious mental problems, all described in her parent’s book, and all blamed by her and her parents on climate change. Says it all for me."</span></b></span></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"> This young girl has been manipulated beyond all belief. Lord: where's child services when they are really needed to intervene and stop her abuse at the hands of her parents and of the GreenFear cult that her Antifa-lovin' parents (...and </span><span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;">Canadians</span><span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"> such as Jim Bradley, Justin Trudeau, Catherine McKenna, Stephane Dion, Dalton McGuinty and his twin Kathleen Wynne, Sicko Suzuki, Elizabeth May... etc etc...) all happily endorse and promulgate? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> It is these aforementioned pieces of crap which helped create the likes of Greta Thunberg. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> This is<i> their</i> GreenFear-laced religion of hate, lies and abuse, distilled into yet another one of their </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">guinea</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">-pig pet-project robots. Greta ought to be understood not as a hero, but as <i>a victim</i> here, in the truest </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">sense</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> of the word, an abused child trained like a monkey/parrot to mimic her abusers' GreenFear religious beliefs. But at 16, she's an adult now right...? (...yet, she is dressed in costume to make it appear like she's 10 or 12... wtf is that all about?) </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Does poor hate-filled Greta really even understand what she is saying and doing, and how she got there to that UN podium?! It's like the UN is now a pathetic parody of the Grand Ole Opry. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Greta Thunberg is just another Green Bolshevik vaudeville act in the Climatalarmist Festival's freak-show. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> I bet Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips was overjoyed at Thunberg's sad act. (...oh, hey: where's the Canadian media scrum with Cagey Dave, asking<i> him</i> about Greta's climate change lies???!! </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">bwahahahah</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">... keep the lie alive, Davo; keep the lie alive!!!!!!!!!!!)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> A Sept.23, 2019 story by <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-from-innocents-to-anxious-activists-what-are-we-doing-to-our-kids">Terence Corcoran in the National Post</a> also mentioned the glaring child abuse angle of the left's appropriation of Greta:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><span style="background-color: white;"> </span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"...</span></span></span><span face="helvetica, arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: 17px;">Climate terror, it seems, is one of the most common problems among children and teenagers. In a letter to Maclean’s magazine in response to the publication’s recent sensational cover story on the looming climate-driven destruction of the planet, a mother from Toronto said she “had a recent conversation on this topic with my teenage daughter, and the look of pure anguish and frustration on her face is something I can’t get out of my mind.”</span><br />
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">A new <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/most-american-teens-are-frightened-by-climate-change-poll-finds-and-about-1-in-4-are-taking-action/2019/09/15/1936da1c-d639-11e9-9610-fb56c5522e1c_story.html?wpisrc=al_news__alert-hse--alert-national&wpmk=1" rel="noopener" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(0, 94, 156); border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-top: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #005e9c; cursor: pointer; font: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Washington Post/Kaiser Foundation poll</a> found that 70 per cent of American teenagers live in some kind of fear about climate. A 16-year-old is quoted saying “It’s like a dystopian novel. To grow up seeing the world fall apart around you and knowing it’s going to be the fight of your lives to make people stop it.”</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">It should come as no surprise: That’s what they’ve been told to fear and taught to believe...</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">...Whether children from six to 16 have the neurological and psychological capacity to deal with the radicalization of their education is, at minimum, a debatable subject. In her book The Teenage Brain, University of Pennsylvania neurologist Frances Jensen notes that while the brain of a 16-year-old is learning at peak efficiency, “much else is inefficient, including attention, self-discipline, task completion, and emotions.”</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">That adolescent brains are not quite up to a full grasp of the information they are exposed to is perhaps indicated in the picket sign held by a climate-striking Vancouver student: “BURN INCENSE NOT COAL.” That’s cute, but impractical if you’re cooking a meal or heating and lighting your home...</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">...Greta and her young disciples, on the other hand, are reacting to alarming streams of agitprop on many subjects and from many sources targeted at children and teens these days.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The CBC Kids News podcast, aimed at children aged nine to 13, promotes climate alarmism, <a href="https://twitter.com/cbckidsnews/status/1146820535931822090?lang=en" rel="noopener" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(0, 94, 156); border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-top: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #005e9c; cursor: pointer; font: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">drag culture</a> and other themes, including an item on “Why your back-to-school outfit could be bad for the planet.” Girl Guides of Canada recently released <a href="https://www.girlguides.ca/WEB/Documents/GGC/media/thought-leadership/girlsonjob/GirlsOnTheJobRealitiesInCanada.pdf" rel="noopener" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(0, 94, 156); border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-top: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #005e9c; cursor: pointer; font: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">a study</a> on the gender pay gap among 12 to 18 year olds, with girls who babysit being paid $15 an hour while boys get $18 for maintenance and gardening work.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">While McMaster’s Giroux continues to warn about the menace of “corporate culture” and the “appropriation of innocence” for corporate purposes in a market-driven world, much of the educational and media effort today seems dedicated to manipulating children and turning them into agitators, and giving 16 year olds the right to vote, to bring about a radical re-ordering of society.."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Of course, 9 years ago, the St.Catharines Standard's Julie Greco, writing of the Bloms' experience, could not - <i>would NOT</i> - dare examine the veracity nor the tactics employed locally in Niagara by climate-change-infected charlatans. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> THAT <i>was </i>the real story - but it was ignored, and instead, the GreenFear bolshevik narrative was employed, to PROMOTE, to GLORIFY, to PROPAGANDIZE - but NOT question - what occurred!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> The exploitation of children such as Blom was NOT brought up, was NOT examined - on purpose - by the phony 'reporter': it was just accepted as <i>being normal</i>, with complete indifference, not a single question asked. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> After all, THIS WAS NORMAL at the time, in Niagara, a region perverted by the ideology of Liberals such as Jim Bradley and Dalton McGuinty. The St.Catharines Standard sought and approved of such examples of climate change 'progressivism' (ie, political marxism). That this was being peddled to kids in Niagara's schools was apparently of no concern at all.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 1.125rem;"> (How many</span><i style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 1.125rem;"> more</i><span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 1.125rem;"> students did this mysterious 'teacher' manipulate and indoctrinate in the years since 2009, eh, Julie?! You can bet Julie doesn't care to know - the entire point of her propaganda piece was to promulgate another page of GreenFear to her fellow climatalarmist-kool-aid-choir at the Standard, not to ask real questions.)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> The abuse of power and position and the exploitation of children was actually being celebrated here in Niagara's press, <i>without any analysis</i> nor hint of inquisitiveness nor concern, all happily done under the warm glow of the perverted politics of Liberal MPP's Jim Bradley and Ontario's Premier Liberal Liar Dalton McGuinty, and of course, in context of the influence of Obama's politics in the States. In 2009, '<strike>reporters</strike>' GreenFear-infected propagandists everywhere were happily drinking Al Gore's GreenFear-infected semen by the bucketful - and these presstitutes <i>still</i> continue to do so: and so, in 2019, we have the latest lefty flash in the propaganda pan, Side Show Greta.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Greta is just today's weaponized update of Blom... talk about a bizarre version of '<i>Boys From Brazil</i>', where little GreenFear-infected puppets are weaned everywhere to later be employed {</span><span style="font-size: 18px;">activated</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">, triggered, exploited...} as brain-washed political pawns!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">-</span></span><br />
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"> In Niagara, Grant LaFleche peddled Suzuki Foundation-linked crap in the </span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Sept.19, 2019 edition (pg.44) of <i>Niagara This</i></span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><i> Week</i> (a propaganda outlet of the Toronto Star's propaganda factory).</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> The story was about "the future majority" of voters, a quasi GOTV (...get-out-the-vote, which all parties strive to do during an election...) attempt to get, in this case, students, to vote. Claiming to be "apolitical" {<i>...bwaaaaahahaha..!!!!!!</i>}, this gotv push is primarily focused on - what else - "climate change"! </span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> If a political party wants to get out the vote, it has to spend limited </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">resources</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> to do so. W</span></span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">ouldn't it be nice to have some, </span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">ahem,</span><span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> "apolitical" help do that for you during the </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">election</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> period, which </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">doesn't</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> really have to report to any stinkin' election officials!!?! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> And who are the "apolitical" groups funding this supposedly "apolitical" organization - during a federal election? Oh, it's just Environmental Defense Canada, the Ivey Foundation, and the David Suzuki Foundation! bwahahaha</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Imagine <i>THAT</i>, eh?! </span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Absolutely <i>no bias</i> there eh - during an election, no less!! </span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> The stink of the mere words 'David Suzuki' is in itself enough to quantify anything it does as <i>PHONY 'APOLITICAL</i>'!!! Who are they kiddin' here? It's a charade of 'apolitical'!! It's a perversion of 'apolitical'!! It's the polar opposite of 'apolitical..!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> (Take a look at the kind of two-faced climate claptrap which the laughably "impartial" David Suzuki Foundation involves itself in: see this <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/youth-to-sue-canadian-government-for-climate-change-harms-discrimination-1.4654147">Oct 25, 2019 CTV CP story "Youth to sue Canadian government for climate change harms":</a> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
"...A lawsuit that's expected to be filed Friday claiming young people disproportionately suffer the effects of climate change is potentially precedent setting but also a tough case to argue, legal experts say.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The David Suzuki Foundation, which is acting as a partner in the case, outlined in a news release the general arguments in the case being filed by 15 youths who allege they have suffered "specific" injuries due to climate change.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-size: 1.125rem;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It calls on Ottawa to stop conduct that violates their charter rights and to implement a plan that reduces Canada's greenhouse gas emissions "in a manner consistent with what best available science indicates is needed for the federal government to protect young Canadians, do its fair share to stabilize the climate system, and avert the catastrophic consequences of climate change."</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The news release does not explain the injuries and no one involved in the lawsuit would comment before it is filed with the Federal Court.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
None of the claims made by those arguing a violation of their charter rights have been tested in court.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Canada's attorney general has not responded to a request for comment.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Maureen Killoran, a litigator at Osler law firm with expertise in energy and resource law, said the suit is part of a global trend but only a case in the Netherlands has been successful in holding a government responsible for its domestic contributions to global greenhouse gas emissions..."<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Now, <i>t</i><span style="font-weight: normal;"><i>hat's</i> pretty 'impartial', isn't it?! Suing Canadians for imaginary injuries based on imaginary causes, based on the 'it's all settled' lie, using selective "science" to force marxism onto a nation.</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> And in <i>his</i> article, the ever-so-helpful Lafleche even handily threw in the site link to this outfit! (Did TorStar demand you do that, Grant? Or are you just givin' the 'apolitical' chameleons free advertising?!)</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.75rem; list-style: none; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Grant's just <i>gotta</i> get anudder award fer this - maybe <i>a medal</i> !! - for such heroic "urinalism"!!! At least an <i>atta boy</i> from </span><span style="font-size: 18px;">Canadian</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Crime Minister Justin Blackface Trudeau, or from Climate Barbie... or... or... Great Gaia...</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> oops, I guess it's now Great Greta -</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> maybe Grant'll get a NOBEL PRIZE for this great urinalism!!! Kinda like the one which Obama got - for doin' what, no-one knows... ....oh: as a 'pay-forward' reward for Obama's future delivery of pallets full of billions in CASH to Iran in the middle of the night... <i>gosh</i>, what spin an award-winnin'-urinalist such as Grant can do with <i>that </i>narrative!!!!...</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">blame Trump, Harris, Diefenbaker, Bush, Doug Ford, Harper...</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">!!!! After all, Grant'll be eligible for a fkn Giller Prize - </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">won't he?! </span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">- when he pens his "factual account" of how Obama's Benghazi fiasco unfolded - - included the re-heaping of false-blame onto a YouTube video (...instead of on Democrat incompetence!) ...man, when ya think of it, a Grant Lafleche Award For Propagandistic Urinalism oughtta be created and awarded to all eligible Niagara urinalists - kind of like an anti-Edward R. Murrow award - for their endless work on pushing marxism through 'climate change' and innate hate of conservatism. Yes, yes... Grant might say that just by being associated with the Great Heroic Atkinsonian Ideals Of The Toronto Star, is reward enough for him; that he is grateful to be working within such a highly vaunted propaganda-peddling organization. But, come now, Grant: your esteemed efforts DESERVE praise and recognition; they can be Beacons Of Hope, they can be an inspiration, and every erstwhile marx-lovin' Jimmy Olsen and post-modern globalist Lois Lane would have a Goal Of Greatness to be inspired by!!! </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">Oh, the humanity...</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"><br /></span></span><span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Lafleche's next piece of award-winnin' urinalism might be an in-depth look at how wearing blackface can stop global warming... <i>and </i>win an election in Canada (but <i>ONLY </i>if yer a leftist)!!</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> ...or, Grant can provide a breathless in-depth look at how a sheep's bladder can be used as an eco-friendly method to predict earthquakes... </span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> (...and by the Power Granted To Grant Through His Keyboard, Lafleche could concurrently de-bunk the myth that Monty Python was doing a parody of using sheep bladders to predict earthquakes, and that in fact it was TRUE that sheep's bladders can be used to predict earthquakes... ... ..!) whew... <i>bam</i>: two-fer-the-price-of-one... wow,<i> there's </i>some good ole urinalism fer ya, writ LARGE!! </span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> How about this "ground-breaking" AND "award-winning" Grant Lafleche urinalistic story, claiming that "new evidence released by Liberal Jim Bradley shows that duct tape can used to prevent global warming"??<br /></span>
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Note: a urinalist is a parody of a journalist. There is an innate underlying tragedy there: either they can't recognize it, or, they DO at some point recognize it, but nevertheless CHOOSE to pursue urinalism anyway.)</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> ...or, Lafleche can let loose and give us a scoop on how a new Turdo Worm Poop Tax can stop climate change by <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/earthworms-climate-change-carbon-research-1.5370724">FORCING EARTHWORMS TO STOP POOPING</a> (...</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">y</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">ep: <i>this</i> is the insane milieu of deluded Green bolshevism...</span><span style="font-size: 18px;">)</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> or... Grant can grant us plebes his authoritative thesis into how... (seeing as Turdo's carbon tax successfully 'stopped climate change' </span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">{bwahaha}</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> and how Turdo's Worm Poop Tax stopped worms from pooping) ...then yet <i>another </i>Turdo tax could be used to stop gravity... </span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> ...and later on, Grant can offer us anudder breaking story of how other Turdo Climate Taxes can be used to stop time...</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> ...and to change earth's orbit...</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> . ...and to move the sun from the middle of our solar system and...</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> ...and... </span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> and... <i>ohhhh gosh:</i> there is just <i>SO MUCH </i>more to do... <i>so much</i>... </span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">...yep... you <i>go gittim</i>, tiger... </span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">-</span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Was it a surprise to <i>anyone</i> that Greta would be nominated for a Nobel peace prize (<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/greta-thunberg-nobel-nomination-1.5449664">CBC, Feb.3, 2020</a>)?!!</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Really - now that they're just givin' these 'prizes' away{they are now easier to obtain than a cracker jack 'prize'... (</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">Too bad, Lafleche: ya missed yer chance this year!! Maybe ya can get Jim Bradley to nominate ya next year...</span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">} ...it even demeans the joke of a fact that Obama had got one, too: y'see - Greta is now lauded <i>as great</i> as the Holy Wholly Deplorable Obama, Praise Be Upon Them Both. </span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> When a CBC commenter, Marlene Lauder, wrote "</span></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i>What has she done to promote peace? Greenery is not peace. This nomination is ridiculous</i>", David Lawrence responded with typical GreenFear Bolshevik rhetoric: "<i>She has been promoting a recognition especially among young people of an existential threat to human civilization and the complex ecosystems of this planet. That is what she has done to promote peace</i>".</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> Yeh, David, <i>suuurre</i>... Professor Greta's all about defining the 'complex ecosystems of this planet..." !!! WOW: talk about the Audacity of Leftist Trope!!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">-</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> The Sept.23, 2019 <a href="https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/news-story/9611831--how-dare-you-teen-environmental-activist-greta-thunberg-scolds-world-leaders-at-un-climate-talks/">Niagara Falls Review</a> (which is another Atkinsonian TorStar-puppet propaganda paper polluting the planet with eco-marxist lies) published a piece of climate crap by Associated Press hack Seth Borenstein, who drools over children such as the abused-Greta <i>and</i> slimes Trump. Borenstein says Trump 'denies climate change' - yet, Borenstein (as all GreenFear-infected propagandists purposefully do) conflates and confuses the term, ignoring that Thunberg is a climate change denier, seeing as she denies that the earth's climate changes - and always <i>has</i> changed. Y'see how that works?!</span></span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Borenstein's AP-distributed story is but another example of how the "it's all settled" AGW built-in-bias lie works. </span></span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Borenstein and his deluded subjects all peddle this same unquestioned lie - it is their jumping-off point. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">Borenstein here is not a journalist - he's just a GreenFear-infected fellow climatalarmist hack; like the other 'urinalists' we see on a daily basis at the CBC, at Bell Media/CTV, at Global, at TorStar...)</span><br />
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">-</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;"> Steve Henschel wrote in the Sept.24, 2019 edition of <a href="https://www.niagarathisweek.com/news-story/9612709-community-to-rally-for-climate-friday/"><i>Niagara This Week</i></a>: </span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: white;"> "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">...Last Friday a small group of elementary students gathered in front of St. Catharines city hall to demand action on the crisis that will define their futures.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">They joined students across the world striking for action to curb the continued impact of human-driven climate change, kicking off a week of activism that has seen youth activists around the world slamming politicians at the United Nations and in US Congress, for their continued inaction. That effort will continue this Friday as even more students gather, from Brock University, Niagara College and high schools, in downtown St. Catharines alongside adult activists with a Climate Strike Day and Rally hosted by Fridays for Future Niagara and Extinction Rebellion Niagara.</span></div>
<div class="thirdPrg" style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The rally, featuring speakers, music and calls for action will take place in the library courtyard across from city hall, focusing on driving action to curb climate change.</span></div>
<div class="desktop-subscription-wall" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“We want to make it an energizing thing,” said Desmond Sequeira of Extinction Rebellion Niagara. The rally, he said, caps off a week of activism that has seen student strikes across the world as youth call leaders for shameful inaction on the crisis that will, should nothing be done, rob them of their futures.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“As Greta Thunberg has put it so succinctly our house, which happens to be the world, is on fire,” said Sequeira.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Even ahead of this week’s rally a small handful of elementary-aged students gathered last Friday to make their voices heard.</span></div>
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">“If our earth isn’t going to exist there is no point (in) going to school,” said 12-year-old Elena Soukop, who said she was inspired by teenage activist Thunberg to spend the day away from studies, fighting for her future and that of the planet..."</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<div style="font-size: 1.1em;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Yep: 'what's the point of going to school', eh, when you are going to be... </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">um</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">... extinct next week? Talk about GreenFear-mongered students who've been robbed of their capacity for critical thinking by their unionized teachers, and reporters who've been robbed of theirs by TorStar editors.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
You're writing of a 12 year old girl who's been scared shitless by leftist eco-terrorists that she's going to die soon, Steve... <i>this </i>is how you earn your salary, exploiting already-exploited children to help propagate their abusive psychosis? </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
Did you or your <i>Niagara This Week</i> / TorStar editor report this clearly disturbed / distressed / paranoid / confused / manipulated child - or the child's circle of systemic abusers - to Niagara's child welfare authorities? Or (as Julie Greco did 9 years ago, and countless other reporters have since then) did you just print the propaganda and happily walk away from the GreenFear-infected, exploited child - 'cuz ya <i>agree </i>with the methods and the message? Henschel essentially made an advertisement for the so-called "rebellion"; who cares <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/montreal-toronto-vancouver-to-participate-in-global-climate-strike-with-dozens-already-arrested">what these GreenFear-infected eco-zealots end up doing </a>- right, Steve?<br />
<span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Henschel's story - placed in context to the demands also most likely made by his leftist TorStar overlord-employers seeking 'local examples of children randomly spouting climate change slogans', reminded me of Terry Ponick's article written on the same day, </span><a href="https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/st-greta-thunberg-fake-climate-change-childrens-crusade-123089/" style="font-size: 1.1em;">Sept.24, 2019, CDN</a><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">:</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 1.1em; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> "... <span face=""fira sans", sans-serif" style="color: #313131; font-size: 16px;">Wrong terms are bad, but exploitation of the vulnerable is good?</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.8; margin-bottom: 17px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Which leads to the current issue of Greta Thunberg and her inflammatory public remarks. Her exploiters chose to incorporate her vulnerability as an organic part of their latest PR stunt. This possesses the hallmarks of a well-funded, worldwide propaganda movement that chose to exploit Greta Thunberg and elevate her to the level of secular saint. These evil clowns have clearly taken advantage of a vulnerable young woman and have managed to weaponize her condition. That’s considerably worse than what got Michael Knowles exiled to Fox News Purgatory for life.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.8; margin-bottom: 17px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> Even worse, far from any opponent using Greta’s Asperger’s condition as an opening for ad hominem attacks, at least one hard left publication – <em style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">The Guardian </em>– chose to <a class="external" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/23/greta-thunberg-autism" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #950202; cursor: pointer; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; transition: all 0.3s ease 0s;" target="_blank">shamelessly exploit the situation</a> to add even greater levels of virtue signaling to this already appalling case of child exploitation..."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.8; margin-bottom: 17px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">
<div style="font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #313131;"> Hey: isn't </span><i style="color: #313131;">THAT</i><span style="color: #313131;"> exactly what Henschel, <i>Niagara This Week,</i> TorStar, Greco and the St. Catharines Standard were doing... signalling THEIR virtue by shamelessly exploiting some already-vulnerable kid for political purposes? These kids were SHAPED, FORMED and GROOMED into becoming useful dupes acting as conduits for the GreenFear industry's lies - </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">outright fodder designed and bred to be fed TO and consumed BY the hungry media</span></i><span style="color: #313131;">. </span></div>
<span face="lato, sans-serif" style="color: #313131; font-size: 16px;"> And there was NO concern, question, or outrage in our local press - they </span><i style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">loved</i><span face="lato, sans-serif" style="color: #313131; font-size: 16px;"> that; looks like </span><i style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Niagara This Week</i><span face="lato, sans-serif" style="color: #313131; font-size: 16px;"> / TorStar and Henschel (and others) still do. </span><span face="lato, sans-serif" style="color: #313131;">Re-exploiting these marxist dupes is how Steve Henschel and his TorStar overlords earn their money! </span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.8; margin-bottom: 17px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
As Ponick notes:</div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span face=""fira sans", sans-serif" style="color: #313131;">"</span><b style="font-family: "fira sans", sans-serif;"><span style="color: red;">The amoral left will victimize anyone, even a teenager, to advance its totalitarian cause</span></b><span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif">" </span></span></div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif"> - and not only that, the amoral left now shamelessly utilizes children to fear-monger <i>other</i> children... yet, <i>Niagara This Week / TorStar </i>and their climatista-employees are more than happy to help the GreenFear victimization continue. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif"> (Niagara This Week continued their TorStar-enema-fed Green fascism unabated. Especially funny (ie pathetic) was NTW's editorial the week of Nov 16, 2019 - again: evangelizing Grenshevik Greta; lying that children don't have time to finish school because the planet will vanish in 12 years... yes, this evil, sick propaganda is openly published in TorStar media. Nothing but climate change lies, over and over, week after week. It's not just Henschel: his employers DEMAND that their Green fascist religion be disseminated, ALL THE TIME. It's always there. Never ANY OTHER viewpoint, except for the phony "it's all settled" lie... and so - because "it's all settled" - then there's no point in TorStar hacks having any other discussion, is there, so, they don't have to get any other viewpoints. THAT'S THE MAN-MADE "CONVENIENCE" UNDER WHICH HENSHEL'S GANG OPERATES. There <i>can't be</i> any other viewpoint except their own perverted Atkinsonian viewpoint, eh, Steve?!)</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif">-</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif">Niagara This Week, unsurprisingly, published another GreenFear-propaganda-laden editorial in their Dec.26, 2019 issue. Kelly Montague publishes this garbage, but it's not clear if the "managing editor", Melinda Cheevers, writes it, or whether it's leftist sewage just piped down from head office at TorStar, to be regurgitated by the robots at NTW; nevertheless, the 'it's all settled man-made-climate-change' hoax, with its baked in bias, is still doggedly propagandized in Niagara. The disgusting Torstar scumbags at Niagara This Week doubled down on their own re-exploitation of children, using them as nothing but political pawns to push climate propaganda. </span></span></div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif">-</span></span><span face="roboto, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"> Tiana Lowe wrote in "</span><span style="background-color: transparent;"><i>This Greta Thunberg thing is child abuse"</i> (</span><a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/this-greta-thunberg-thing-is-child-abuse" style="font-family: montserrat, serif;">Washington Examiner</a><a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/this-greta-thunberg-thing-is-child-abuse" style="font-family: montserrat, serif;"> ,Aug.29, 2019):</a></div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif;">
<span class="ArticlePage-articleBody-firstLetter" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"> "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">...A</span></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;">dolescent climate change protester Greta Thunberg has stage parents, literally. Her mother sang opera internationally until the teenager</span><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"> </span><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/sep/01/swedish-15-year-old-cutting-class-to-fight-the-climate-crisis" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none; touch-action: manipulation;" target="_blank">convinced</a><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"> </span><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;">her to quit due to greenhouse gas emissions from flying, and her father and grandfather both gained fame through acting and directing.</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.8; margin-bottom: 17px; outline: none; padding: 0px;">
<div data-dy-embedded-object="true" id="dyIdc740616d8a61a8cc" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;">
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Now, they've pivoted into the parental act of every stage parent looking to secure the next generation of fame. Apparently, the Swedish version of a Teri Shields is pimping her kid out, not to Penthouse, but to the cause of climate apocalypse.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: montserrat, serif; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #212529;">For all that, conservatives have rightly griped at the performative pointlessness of Thunberg's schtick, and for all that, liberals have rightly griped that a </span><a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/231530/global-warming-concern-steady-despite-partisan-shifts.aspx" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none; touch-action: manipulation;" target="_blank">waning</a><span style="color: #212529;"> but still significant segment of conservatives deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change;</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"> the biggest travesty lost in the hype about the Swedish activist who recently sailed to American shores is that her parents, the media, and the climate alarmist Left are basically engaging in child abuse.</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Cases of kids entering public discourse out of sheer discourse, such as Parkland survivors Cameron Kasky and Kyle Kashuv, are sometimes inevitable and sometimes valuable. Some political causes require spokesmen with lived experiences. But even as we saw in the aftermath of Parkland, putting children in the public spotlight is <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/we-cant-stop-politicizing-the-trauma-of-children-20-years-after-columbine" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none; touch-action: manipulation;" target="_blank">more likely to backfire on them than not</a>.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The case of Thunberg is even more egregious. She <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/11/greta-thunberg-schoolgirl-climate-change-warrior-some-people-can-let-things-go-i-cant" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none; touch-action: manipulation;" target="_blank">began</a> suffering from depression as a child, by her own admission, in part because she learned about climate change at age 8. She was later diagnosed with autism and obsessive compulsive disorder and gradually became despondent as she obsessed over her fear of climate change. She <a href="https://quillette.com/2019/04/23/self-harm-versus-the-greater-good-greta-thunberg-and-child-activism/" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none; touch-action: manipulation;" target="_blank">developed</a> mutism and an eating disorder so severe that she once went two months without food, and she stopped going to school. Her only sibling, a sister named Beata, also suffers from Asperger's and OCD, as well as ADHD.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Now tell me, does it seem healthy to place a child with this many mental illnesses under the spotlight of public scrutiny, with a sole focus on the very phenomenon and associated alarmism that triggered her in the first place?</span><span style="background-color: white;">..."</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"> --</span></span><br />
The entire Greta episode is a long-running tragedy, really. This kid was essentially a pawn, primed and pimped out by her GreenFear-infected handlers, and by her adoring cabal of enablers, acolytes, and hangers-on, to create mass hysteria (...note: a hysteria for which the only answer is - of course -political socialism... not science at all). Clearly, Canadian clowns such as dipper jerk Jagmeet Singh and Green Succubus Elizabeth May <i>chose to ignore</i> Greta's abuse, and instead, <span style="color: #cc0000;">enabled and condoned the abuse because<b> </b><i><b>it suited their perverted purpose</b>;</i> </span>they glorified Greta for becoming a climate-change propaganda pawn.<br />
<br />
The 'Great' Greta Gong Show circus didn't go to Communist China (!!) to lecture the commies on AGW; but made sure they hit Canada <span style="color: #cc0000;">to interfere in <i>our federal election</i></span> - and <i>that </i>kind of exploitation, too, is OK to TorStar and their fellow travellers. They support that kind of election interference!! {Remember, no leftist Canadian media outlet complained when the despicable Obama interfered in Canada's 2019 election!! That was OK to Canada's lefties! Yet, had Trump done the same thing, cheering for a particular candidate during the Canadian election, he would have been excoriated by a raging Canadian leftist media mob.}<br />
<br />
When Henschel - or ANY of his cadre of TorStar Atkinson Principle-perverted propagandists - wrote about this march, why wasn't any mention made or photos shown of the communist hammer and sickle signs - symbols of death and murder, on par with swastikas - that are prevalent at these marxist climate-coven demonstrations?! He didn't see one?!!? He and his fellow media accomplices don't look too deeply into <i>that,</i> eh?! Wonder how many TorStar employees love wearing their Che tshirts around the office, y'know, adorned with the red stars and hammers and sickles and such...?!<br />
<br />
The <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/jason-kenney-says-he-didn-t-attend-climate-strike-because-manifesto-was-radical-left-1.5316012">CBC's Padraig Moran (Oct.10, 2019) </a>just <i>had </i>to report - with indignant shock! - Jason Kenney's position on why he didn't participate in Greta's Great Climate Commie-con:<br />
"<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Alberta Premier Jason Kenney said he didn't attend September's day of global action on climate change because "much of it" was "coming from the radical left."<br /> "There were communist hammer-and-sickle flags out there — I wouldn't go to a rally with a hammer and sickle flag any more than I would to one with a swastika, quite frankly," he told The Current's guest host Kathleen Petty.<br /> Thousands marched in cities all over the world on Sept. 27, demanding world government's take action on climate change.<br /> Kenney argued that "the manifesto for that day of action was essentially to shut down the entire industrial economy, virtually overnight."<br /> "These are not mainstream voices, this is not helpful," Kenney said.<br /> "The way we're going to make a difference is through technology that reduces carbon emissions in practical ways, and that is what we are focused on as a government..."</span>."<br />
<br />
CBC and Moran must been incensed and triggered to report Kenny's position - and to spin it as if <i>it</i> was abnormal, but the Great Greta freak show <i>wasn't!!</i><br />
<i> </i>Note - again!! - carefully note the default bias built into Henschel's NTW report... and Moran's CBC report... and Greco's 9-year old Standard report... and thousands of others... which demands that <i>NO OTHER viewpoint may be presented</i>, other than <i>the expected</i> skewed leftist GreenFear narrative. There is <i>no</i> impartiality,<i> no</i> sense of journalistic inquisitiveness, of objectivity, or of integrity. Any subject expressing another view, other than the "<i>it's all settled, so no further questions need be asked</i>" lie, is to be diminished, ridiculed, shamed, or outright dismissed.<br />
Commie influence? Whaaaat? I no see aneee steenkin' commy influence!!<br />
Of course, this kind of straightforward answer by Kenney is anathema, is shocking, is seen as bizarre, to GreenFear-infected, prejudiced, TorStar, CBC, and assorted other MSM media hacks, who spin, bob, weave and essentially lie in order to paint what amounts to a <i>non</i>-journalistic (underhandedly biased) picture, <i>PRETENDING</i> it is a journalistic (unbiased) picture.<br />
It's NOT journalism at all - it's fake journalism disguised <i>as if</i> it's real - - "<i><span style="color: #990000;"><b>As if </b> </span></i>" - got it?! In other words, it's <span style="color: #cc0000;">a <i>bait and switch</i> </span>con-game, where fraudulent "news" is intentionally manufactured and substituted for, and falsely presented and orchestrated as, real news.<br />
It is opinion professionally perverted by paid propagandists, to appear as 'actual journalism'. It's how the left launders its propaganda. (TVO and Paikin know this quite well.)<br />
The bias is so-built-in, so ingrained, in the media's structure, from the producers to the editors on down, that it's <i>organizationally, institutionally, biased. </i>They operate in their own ecosystem, in their own silo.<br />
It's <i>congenital</i> and<i> structurally </i>biased; the GreenFear-kool-aid has been BAKED INTO their minds, therefore, to them, there is no - <i>can be no</i> {!!!} - other viewpoint: hence the "<i>it's all settled"</i> meme-narrative-lie is perpetuated and <i>never examined</i>.<br />
{...Note a similarity of process and politics, in that these are the same kind of leftist hacks who never, ever thought to ask where the "Steele dossier" came from!! In order to flame their deluded hate of Trump, these hacks peddled a lie that this "dossier" somehow proved Trump was a compromised agent of Russia who 'stole the election' from Poor Old Crooked Hillary.!! [Lookit - we got a <i>DOSSIER</i>, folks!! Ya see: a DOSSIER!! <i>It's all settled, ya see: </i>Trump's guilty, ya see, cuz it sez so in <i>the DOSSIER</i>...!] This narrative played out in Niagara pretty much on a regular basis for some 3 years: it was portrayed AND peddled as 'accepted fact', which, like with their climate change hoax, the basis <i>was never</i> to<i> </i>be challenged!!! The fact that the 'Steele dossier' was a hoax created by Crooked Hillary just doesn't compute in the minds of those infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome...}<br />
All their climate change stories are based on the <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>'it's all settled </i>s<i>o you cannot ask any questions about it'</i></span> lie.<br />
It is from this fundamental lie{from this delusion; this psychotic long-term break from reality}that all subsequent GreenFear-pushing 'reports' originate and from which the myriads of GreenFear-pushing writer/propagandists are given cover, given free reign, to continue and build upon the lie, and psychotically not consider themselves as also being liars and propagandists.<br />
They must believe in their original lie, at all costs. Existing within their fish-tank of GreenFear-induced delusion, they can claim that they are 'credible journalists reporting credible news', and, they can subsequently say and do ridiculous things because in their (GreenFear-muddled) minds, they are 'held harmless' from scrutiny - by the original big lie!!<br />
After all: look at the convenient cover their lie offers: How <i>can </i>they be lying, when "<i>it's all settled</i>" and when "<i>no further questions need be asked</i>"?! See: it's an endless self-perpetuating circle of deceit: lie / cite fake evidence; lie / cite fake evidence... over and over - it's a formula of deception which 'works' every time! [...<i>as long as it's NOT questioned</i>!!!]<br />
(That same kind of delusional process was brazenly promulgated by Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and the rest of the Demotard Coup Crew during their phony impeachment fiasco. "It's all settled - Trump's guilty!!!" the witch-hunters incessantly proclaimed. "The evidence is incontrovertible! Just trust us! It's all settled!! We don't need to ask any more questions! Don't ask for cross-examination in the House!!")<br />
The "<i>it's all settled, just trust us; we've manufactured some new 'evidence' </i>" lie is designed to absolve the GreenFear peddlers of accountability, and to absolve their friendly cling-ons in the press for their pretense that they are accountable journalists.<br />
(See any of the hundreds of climate change 'interviews' with Canada's Cagiest Climatologist David Phillips, to see how the lie was consistently employed in their clever Cagey Climate Tango don't-ask-don't-tell phony 'interviews'.)<br />
The lie encourages them to smear and ridicule other facts (or opinions) contrary to their lies. Their GreenFear Gospel original lie encourages them <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">to deny</span></i> that earth's climate <i>is </i>changing - while they accuse others of being "deniers"!! Yet the perverted Green Bolsheviks are the actual, true deniers, denying that earth's climate <i>has</i> changed since there was an earth, since BEFORE MAN, since time immemorial, and that planetary and universal forces are at play here.<br />
The "<i>it's all settled</i>" lie gives GreenFear-pushing cultists the convenient incentive to freely propagate their lie, all the while secure {...'secure' in a deluded way...} that no-one can question their lie-based-claims; this urinalism is shaped, formed and biased <i>from the start</i>.<br />
These MSM urinalists are sent out to get a desired, pre-determined 'half-the-story', as it already has been decided that there will be NO NEED to question that which already fits into their expected, pre-ordained ingrained narrative; so, they are acting not as journalists, but as biased stenographer-propagandists {urinalists...}, unquestioningly regurgitating what they were sent out to get - <i>no questions asked</i>. (...see how Canada's pathetic media dances the <a href="https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2017/02/calling-on-canadas-cagey-climatologist.html">Cagey Climate Tango with David Phillips.</a>..)<br />
Anything which <i>disrupts</i> or <i>challenges</i> or <i>questions</i> the expected GreenFear-induced narrative is purposefully and deftly downplayed/swept under the rug/ masked/ ignored/ ridiculed/ dismissed, and buried... get the point?<br />
Which is why Greco and Henschel (and others... many others...) can carelessly, unquestioningly even interview <i>children</i> infected with climate change propaganda, and essentially glorify and enable their abuse, by propagating the GreenFear-battered child's force-fed paranoia - and <i>think nothing of it </i>!!<br />
These creeps will even re-exploit abused children if it will get them another GreenFear-laced story.<br />
Having inculcated kids spouting this GreenFear-cult mantra just confirms the MSM employees' own biases; what these kids are blabbing about, and why, is<i> NEVER</i> questioned. {"How dare <i>you</i>", Steve Henshchel... how dare you, indeed.}<br />
Yep: GreenFear-infected children who are climate-change tools (...fools... mules...?) are <i>eagerly re-exploited</i> by CBC, TorStar, and other confirmation-bias fake news MSM, who have <i>not </i>been truthful about the Communist influence underlying the grotesque Greta freak show.<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: large;">-</span></div><div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Miranda Devine wrote in "</span></span><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: large;"><i>Irresponsible adults have caused the climate fear plaguing Greta Thunberg</i>" </span><a href="https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/devine-irresponsible-adults-have-caused-the-climate-fear-plaguing-greta-thunberg/" style="background-color: white; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: x-large;">(New York Post, Sept.25, 2019</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: large;">)"</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif; font-size: large;">"</span><span style="color: #2a2a2a; font-size: 16px;">...</span>You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words . . . We are in the beginning of a<span style="color: #cc0000;"> mass extinction</span>, and all you can talk about is the money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!”</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Her words and demeanor are <span style="color: #cc0000;">those of a totalitarian dictator</span>. She says people who don’t act on climate change are “evil.” The United Nations and Congress should never have given her their platforms.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">She has taken literally what irresponsible adults have told her, that<span style="color: #cc0000;"> the planet is going to end in 11 years</span> unless we stop using fossil fuels.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Her parents and the climate industry have exploited her youthful idealism and rigid obsessions. They <span style="color: red;">have frightened her out of her mind </span>and now are exposing her to condemnation and ridicule</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">They should be ashamed of themselves.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">They have indoctrinated her into believing a childish fantasy, one that has captured the imagination of <i>millions of susceptible children all around the world,</i> and is causing them to suffer, like Greta, what psychologists call eco-anxiety.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">One British report found growing numbers of children and young adults are being treated <span style="color: #cc0000;">with psychiatric drugs to alleviate climate anxiety.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Some are so certain the planet has no future that <span style="color: #cc0000;">they’ve sworn off ever having children</span>.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">As irresponsible adult Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told her 2.5 million Instagram followers this year, <span style="color: #cc0000;">it is “legitimate” </span>for young people afraid of climate change to ask, “<span style="color: #cc0000;">Is it OK to still have children?”</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Terrifying children with exaggerated stories about the threat of climate change </span>is a deliberate strategy of<span style="color: #cc0000;"> eco-totalitarians</span>. It is <span style="color: #cc0000;">child abuse</span>.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">What Greta does not understand is that it also is a deliberate ploy by climate alarmists to advance their hidden agenda of <span style="color: #cc0000;">destroying capitalism</span>.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">AOC’s former chief of staff let the cat out of the bag last week about her Green New Deal:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“<i><span style="color: #cc0000;">It wasn’t originally a climate thing at all . . . we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy,</span></i>” Saikat Chakrabarti told The Washington Post..."</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
Yes: <span style="font-size: large;">and<i> there you have it</i>: </span>the <i>climate change lie has always been a<span style="color: red;"><b> political agenda</b></span>, couched in<b> <span style="color: red;">ersatz-science</span></b>, </i>masking the left's inherent marxism; the exact same GreenFear climate fraud applies in Canada. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
'<b><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;"><i>"Terrifying children with exaggerated stories about the threat of climate change is a deliberate strategy of eco-totalitarians. It is child abuse" </i></span></b>- did ya hear <i>that</i>, Steve Henschel, Julie Greco and company?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<b><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">'What Greta does not understand is that it also is a deliberate ploy by climate alarmists to advance their hidden agenda of destroying capitalism'</span></i></b> -.hmm, did ya hear <i>that,</i> Steve and Julie, <i>Niagara This Week</i> and <i>St. Catharines Standard</i>? Dija hear <i>that</i>, Bell Media? CTV, Global, Corus, TorStar, CBC, TVO...??<br />
-</div><div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> Astounding story by Don Henderson in the </span><a href="https://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/9623944-opinion-my-retired-mother-got-an-earful-for-supporting-free-exchange-of-ideas-at-bernier-event/" style="font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em;">Oct 1, 2019 Hamilton Spectator </a><span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> regarding a masked gang who attacked passersby - including an elderly lady (Henderson's mother) - in front of a Bernier campaign event at Mohawk College in Hamilton, Ontario. The lady, using a walker to cross the street to get to the building, was accosted and called nazi scum - by the black-masked nazi street thugs - the kind of 'antifa' thugs which Great Green Greta's lovely parents root for.</span></div><div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><div style="background-color: white; color: #2a2a2a; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif;">
<br />
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif">An<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/climate-change-protesters-block-eastport-drive-at-burlington-canal-lift-bridge-1.5324121"> Oct.17, 2019 CBC story</a> had this comment from Alexander Borgia: "</span></span><span face="roboto, sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 14px;"><i>Hallam is on video calling for the violent overthrow of the government, and indicating that there would be deaths.</i></span></div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif"><span face="roboto, sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 14px;"><i>They don't like steel or oil, but have no trouble wearing clothes made by steel machinery, with plastics made from oil...</i>"</span></span></span></div>
<div style="color: #313131; font-family: lato, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #313131;"><span face=""fira sans", sans-serif"><span face="roboto, sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 14px;">Will CBC reporter Samantha Craggs now cover this covered-up part of her "peaceful" fake story?! Funny how THAT was conveniently NOT in the 'story"!! Why did she COVER UP relevant facts?</span></span></span></div>
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"></span><br />
<div style="color: black; font-size: medium;">
<span face="roboto, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Will Niagara This Week's Steve Henschel revisit </span></span><i style="font-family: roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">his 'Extinction Rebellion' </i><span face="roboto, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14px;">story, and now actually practice some journalism?! </span></span></div>
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">-</span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span>
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> A story by Anton Roberts on CTV's early morning tv news, Oct.25, 2019, had Roberts showing that the GreenFear Queen Greta Thunberg was still gallivanting across Canada, this time hiking in BC's mountains with some guy Pomeroy, who was happily telling us (and her, apparently) that the glaciers are melting due to climate change.</span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> </span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> But - the phonily-impartial host Roberts <i>ALSO</i> actually stated, after showing the clip of Pomeroy and GreenShevik Greta walking together, that the glaciers are melting due to climate change - an <i>editorial</i> statement which he has no basis for; it wasn't news, nor factual - that was <i>his opinion</i>, inserted and offered <i>as </i>news, pretending <i>to be</i> news, presented <i>as </i>news - yet it was <i>fake news</i>. (Let's remember that Climate Crap peddler Andrew Chang was doing this same kind of thing over at CBC tv prior to the 2019 federal election, shamelessly and smugly editorializing his stories by telling us "climate change is real" - which is a political opinion, NOT news. CBC employees can get away peddling green bolshevism like that.)</span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> </span><span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> CTV's Roberts, too, was spreading </span><span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">GreenFear, substituting personal conflated GreenFear-infected views for fact and journalism; a bait and switch con job.</span><br />
<br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"><i> So, there it is: that's what GreenFear propaganda looks like - </i></span><i style="color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em;">show a biased one-sided half-a-story, then confirm the bias afterwards as if it was fact.</i><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span>
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> That was his <i>green religious cult belief</i> which Roberts inserted into the story.</span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> He had <i>no intention whatsoever </i>of questioning what he had just shown, thereby revealing this is <i>not</i> a journalist, but a propagandist, and this <i>wasn't</i> news, it was propaganda, deceptively disguised as 'news'. </span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> (...this is yet another example of <i>real </i>propaganda which WILL NEVER be shown by the hypocrites over at TVO on their documentary <i>about </i>propaganda!!!! <i>oh the irony</i> of TVO smugly airing 'documentaries' about propaganda, when TVO does NOTHING but propagandize lies about climate change!! Deliciously bitter irony...)</span><br />
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif" style="color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;"> Wonder if Roberts knows that mile high ice sheets had formed, existed - and melted - several times - throughout Canada, over the ages? Does that have any bearing on this Bell Media / CTV employee's deceptive, ignorant claim - a claim that isn't even scientific, but is a <i>political claim</i>? Or any bearing on the standard of lies so easily and casually conflated and spread by Bell Fake News Media / CTV?</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: lato, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em;">
-</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span face="lato, arial, sans-serif"> </span><span style="font-family: inherit;">On Jan.5, 2020, CTV was broadcasting a very odd television ad, where news hosts Ken Shaw, Downer and Dube were sitting at a table, and apparently, Shaw was announcing to the other two that there are changes being made and that he's handing down his news host duties over to them. Then he says to them something along the lines of '...but, I'm not leaving, I'll still be around, doing more in depth segments... <i>like pieces on </i><b><i>CLIMATE CHANGE</i>...</b>'!!!!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> WOW!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> WTF is Ken Shaw gonna do NOW?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> Hey Ken: will you first assemble and re-examine ALL the climate change crap lies which CTV/ Bell has shat out over the years? (You will need to assemble a massive staff to gather all that info...!!) We all know that CTV / Bell <i>ain't gonna </i>pay ya to investigate their own corporatized climate deceptions!!!!!!!!!!! CTV makes good money spewing climate change deceptions! Just like the CBC, TVO, Corus, and TorStar - they will NOT pay their own GreenFear-infected employees to dig into their own organization's lies!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> WTF is going on at CTV / Bell?! They've been lying, fear mongering, spreading climate alarmism for YEARS!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> So, what's Ken's mission now; and why'd he specify 'climate change'?!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> If his mission isn't to actually examine the climate change hoax </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">fairly</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> and </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">squarely (...which in itself is the <i>polar opposite </i>of what CTV / Bell have been doing... and which would prove embarrassing to myriads of staff who had been willingly peddling, or been forced to peddle, climate change hysteria...) then what <i>is</i> he going to be doing?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">Creating and overseeing <i>MORE</i> CTV Climate Crap?!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Will Ken's 'department of climate crap' be tasked with 'out-climate-crapping' the other 'climate-crappers', like TorStar, CBC, TVO, Global /Corus... where every hurricane, every storm, every wild fire, every flood, almost every natural bit of Canadian weather, is eagerly, breathlessly, ominously (deceptively!!!) portrayed as a </span><b style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">MAN-MADE DISASTER </b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">-</span><b style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> </b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">right out of the leftist "<i>it's all settled</i>" playbook?! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> "Climate Change" - specifically </span></span><i style="font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">MAN MADE</span></i><i style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> climate change, </i><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">as defined by the left and the leftist media, including CTV - was ALWAYS presented and insinuated as the <i>only </i>underlying cause - a cause whose 'solution' was a </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">political</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> one.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> CTV and its fellow horde of leftist GreenFear-tainted-koolaid-drinkers</span></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> perverted science and presented a set of built-in biases as 'facts' - as "<i>all settled</i>" 'facts', no less - which were essentially </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">manufactured</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> POLITICAL PROPAGANDA, </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">deceptively</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> presented as factual 'news'.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Every "climate change" story was in fact a biased-from-the-start </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;"><i>political</i></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><i style="color: #333333;"> </i><span style="color: #333333;">story, deceptively presented </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if</span></i><span style="color: #333333;"> it was real 'news', </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if </span></i><span style="color: #333333;">it was "all settled" that 'climate change' is caused by man.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> (Funny how the "Steele dossier" was similarly falsely presented as 'real news' to the public, for years, by nearly every MSM outlet, touted as "</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;">irrefutable</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> proof of Trump's guilt" of 'something'; (witch-hunter Mueller spent $millions 'looking' for "Trump's guilt" but couldn't find it) yet those same MSM outlets, infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, could not bother to discover that the entire "Steele dossier" was a massive propaganda effort financed by Crooked Hillary's Democrats as a counter-intelligence plot to destroy a candidate running for Presiden; and then - to continue their sedition by morphing it into treason - attempting to undermine and subvert the legitimate results of the 2016 American election - - all covered up by an enabling cabal of Democrat-loyal crooked </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;">government</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> officials and a corrupt biased media. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><span style="color: #333333;"> The narrative of MSM news reports (in Canada as well) was not to get at the truth, or provide impartiality or balance, but to just <i>incessantly repeat the original lie</i>, to slime Trump, </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if</span></i><span style="color: #333333;"> he was already "guilty of something"...) CTV's Richard Madman liked doing that! </span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><span style="color: #333333;"> The "<i>Steele dossier is true</i>" lie is quite parallel to, and similar with, the tactics of the earlier-established "</span><i style="color: #333333;">it's all settled</i><span style="color: #333333;">" climate change lie. The original lie is not questioned; only one side of the story (the false one) is told; all media reports carry the false narrative and absolve themselves - under cover of said original lie! - from having to make ANY effort that could be confused with journalism or objectivity!!)</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 1.1em;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> CTV has <i>NEVER </i>presented ANY CAVEATS before its ominous and breathlessly political "climate change" fake-news reports!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> The slick CTV "news" shaping starts with the presentation of a fact (...a snow fall, a storm, a drought, a flood...) which is then instantly transformed into a <i>mis-</i></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"><i>representation</i> of </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">that same fact. The original fact is essentially transmogrified into something OTHER than the fact it had just previously been!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> CTV (and many, many other MSMs follow the same template) perform a feat of illusion, a deceptive sleight-of-hand, a bait-and-switch; they perpetrate an act of </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">journalistic</span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> alchemy, where </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">journalism</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> devolves into urinalism, where fact becomes fake, where a bit of fact is perverted and converted through conflation, innuendo and false causation into propaganda, which then is reported breathlessly as "real news".</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> So any weather-event is re-manufactured inside CTV's propaganda factory, and instantaneously becomes imbued with ominous innuendo that </span></span><i style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">it was caused by "climate change"</i><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> - note again: the conflation, the lie, being that it was all caused </span></span><i style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">by man</i><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> - <i>NOT</i> by nature. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">The underlying message{the propaganda} </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">purposefully</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> meant to be obediently conveyed (and <i>not </i>questioned) by this </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">deceptive fake-news</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> presentation, is that only carbon taxes can "stop" earth's climate from changing.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> CTV has </span></span><i style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">NEVER </i><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">prefaced their fake-climate-change 'news' stories with warnings...</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> (...</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">and why <i>would</i> CTV give us a warning?! They <i>don't want</i> us to know that </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: x-small;">their biased</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> "climate change" stories are not actually news at all, just Climate Crap..!</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><span style="color: #333333;"> ...by openly stating that those 'weather-events-morphed-into-deadly-man-made-climate-change' stories, which they breathlessly present as 'news', are <i>biased</i>, not based on </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>natural</i> climate change</span><span style="color: #333333;"> (which has been ongoing since earth had a climate <i>to </i>change, btw..!) but on a </span></span></span><i style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">political belief</i><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><span style="color: #333333;"> of '</span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-style: italic;">man-made</span><span style="color: #333333;"><i> </i>climate change'</span><span style="color: #333333;">.</span></span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> CTV peddles GreenFear-based Climate Crap<i> as if </i>it was real news. Therefore, CTV purposefully peddles FAKE NEWS.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> And there you have the bait and switch: the terms are </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">deceptively</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> employed, and a purposefully intended bias is baked right into CTV's core narrative. Goebbels would be impressed by this kind of green propaganda.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Great Gaia: can you imagine, several thousand years ago, what today's Jim Bradleys and CTV-ers would have been saying </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">when the lands around Ontario were occupied by giant ice sheets, melting to form the Great Lakes?! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> "We must STOP CLIMATE CHANGE" the ancient proto-Bradleys would indignantly, smugly, roar, and the ancient proto-stenographer-CTV-ers would eagerly re-roar!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> "LOOK AT THAT MELTING ICE!! LOOK AT THOSE PUDDLES OF WATER - THEY'RE GONNA TURN INTO great lakes if we DON'T STOP THE MELTING! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> We need a new tax to STOP THESE GREAT LAKES from forming!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> We need to STOP THE FLOODING! </span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> They'd be running with T-shirts and red ball caps emblazoned with the MICA logo: "Make it Cold Again"...</span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> ...crying "We only have...<i> umm</i>... </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: x-small;">uh</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">... 12 years... no wait... </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: x-small;">umm</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">... 8 years... yeh, that's it: only 8 years left, before we REACH THE DREADED TIPPING POINT OF NO RETURN!!"</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> If we don't stop it, we will PUT THE PLANET IN PERIL. There are TOO MANY people on this flat planet; these people have caused this Great Ice Sheet to melt into Great Puddles and Ponds, and we as proto-Liberals cannot let them get away with it!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> We MUST SAVE THE ICE SHEET..." (</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">cue the sound of clucking chickens</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> The ancient proto-Bradley morphed into the same squawking real Bradley, still spreading climate change deceptions. And those </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">ancient</span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> proto-CTV-stenographers still drink Bradley's GreenFear-infected </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">diarrhea,</span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> still happily re-amplifying and regurgitating it </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;">ad nauseum</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Climate change fear-mongering is directed by the UN - Turdo's favourite place - from the stink hole of Guterres himself. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Will Ken Shaw re-assess the climate garbage which CTV Bell Media crapped out in <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/un-chief-warns-of-point-of-no-return-on-climate-change-1.4710249?cache=yes%3FclipId%3D89531%3FclipId%3D104059%3FautoPlay%3Dtrue%3FclipId%3D89925%3Fot%3DAjaxLayout%3Fot%3DAjaxLayout%3Fot%3DAjaxLayout%3FautoPlay%3Dtrue">this Dec.1, 2019 piece , written by some AP hacks named Artiz Parra and Frank Jordans</a> ?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Of course he won't!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> This is YET MORE - in a long. long line - of the typical Climate Crap garbage which has <i>regularly</i> been shat out by CTV over the years, where the story is lop-sided and reeking of leftist bias. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Ken: CTV / Bell publishes mountains of this fetid Climate Crap, all the time! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> So what are <i>YOU</i> going to do, Ken, on the 'climate change' file now - add yet <i>more</i> climate crap to the huge amount of climate crap which CTV already peddles? Are you going to issue a mass network apology to the audiences which have been deceived by years of CTV Bell Media Climate Crap-peddling?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Will you be suddenly now providing a studied, scientific rebuttal to each climate story which CTV publishes? {</span><i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">hahahaha</span></i><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Great Gaia: if so, then CTV better just stop publishing their Climate Crap stories altogether!!! Half-heartedly providing <i>actual </i>scientific information <i>alongside</i> the GreenFear industry's lies, just helps glorify and normalize the GreenFear lies!! The real solution would be to just stop publishing the Climate Crap lies in the first place, and just stick to actual science!!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">Never are CTV's Climate Crap reports balanced. It's always the same old climate crap lie. CTV UNQUESTIONINGLY regurgitates what the GreenFear-kool-aid drinkers spout, no questions asked!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> Why are no questions asked?? Because "<i>it's all settled</i>" you see!! {So; why bother to question anything, if "it's already been settled"?!! Y'see: brilliantly constructed, circular, self-sealing, self-perpetuating circular propaganda: a cover-up repeatedly justified upon an earlier lie, in an endless loop!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;"> It would be shocking indeed, if Ken Shaw and CTV / Bell did an about face regarding <i>their own </i>GreenFear mongering, and started depoliticizing 'climate change', revealing it for the leftist hoax which it is.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> But, what </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">hoaxter will ever admit to their role in peddling the hoax? </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> GreenFear-mongering </span></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">brings these media corporations a tidy stream of green cash.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> They won't rock the boat to disrupt their cash-cow; if anything, it's likely they'll double down on the climate change fear mongering.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">-</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> Then on Jan.30, 2020, we saw Elizabeth </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;">Fauxcahontas </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1.1em;">Warren, that sad she-ain't-right-in-da-haid Demotard clown, </span><a href="https://www.diamondandsilk.com/blog/2020/01/30/warren-unbelievably-blames-trump-climate-change-for-disease-outbreak-like-coronavirus/" style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em; font-style: italic;">blaming </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">(who else?!!<i>)</i></span><span style="font-size: 1.1em; font-style: italic;"> Trump</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> - and </span><i style="font-size: 1.1em;">climate change</i></a><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> - for the coronavirus outbreak!!! What can one say in response to such idiocy?! What else would we expect from these sick Tards?! (Thankfully, Elizabeth Fake-Ahontas Warren finally quit her pathetic 'presidential bid' on Mar 5, 2020)</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> These GreenFear-infected Bolsheviks are delusional, grasping at and spouting bizarre paranoid theories without concern for facts. The Democrats' perverted Trump </span></span><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">impeachment</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> fiasco {ie the Pelosi-Schiff abortion} clearly </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">demonstrated</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> that their penchant for propagating delusions and paranoid rhetoric far </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">outweighs their ability to understand reality.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"> Speaking of abortions, that disgustingly evil Demotard creep Chuck Schumer uttered public <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/tom-cotton-dems-depraved-abortion-views-schumer">threats against two U..S. Supreme Court Justices </a>on Mar 4, 2020 while trying to incite a pro late-term / post-term-abortion-crazed mob outside of the Supreme Court building. The devolution of the deplorable Democrat party is in full display. By Oct 2020, this scumbag Schumer was attacking Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. We saw disgusting vile creatures such as Dianne Feinstein sliming Barrett - a SECOND TIME - for allegedly oozing religious 'pro life' 'dogma'. What insanity from hack Feinstein. Has anyone asked about Feinstein's <i>own </i>oozing of 'pro-death' 'religious dogma'?! Does this kind of religious bashing and trashing only apply to Christians, or is it a two-way street?? What ignorance and hypocrisy from the deluded democrat left.</span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 17.6px;">-</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">On <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/coronavirus-covid-19-feb-29-1.5481048">Feb,29, 2020, some mentally ill Trump-hating CBC commenter</a> (following in the mentally deluded footsteps of Fauxcahontas, and other Greenfear-infected Demoncrats) , 'Beatrice Darlene', spouted this garbage:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"> "</span></span><span face="roboto, sans-serif" style="font-size: 14px;">Trump has slashed funding for public health and jobs and resources at the CDC.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"><span face="roboto, sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 14px;">His abandon the vulnerable/we don't need gov't ideology is clashing with reality..."</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"> But: Trump did NOT cut CDC funding at all, nor abandon "the vulnerable". It is a lie by the mentally-ill left, whose own ideology is clashing with reality, and they cannot deal with it.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">The left has politicized the COVID-19 virus, and mentally-ill leftards regurgitate the lies. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;">It's always tough for the TDS-infected leftards to comprehend reality.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 17.6px;"><br /></span></span></div>
It's funny how often the CBC simply closes their comments sections on any story that's possibly capable of shedding bad light on any Liberal or Democrat - yet, the comments are open wide when it it suitable to lay blame on Trump! That's an old and frequent tactic of the scumbag censors at the CBC!<br />
<br />
Anyhow, let's <a href="https://apnews.com/49de80242dd8b58bd34af7cb19f1323a">read what the AP </a>( yes: the<i> leftist </i>AP!) wrote:<br />
<div>
</div><div> <i><span style="color: #0b5394;"><b style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"... MIKE BLOOMBERG: “There’s nobody here to figure out what the hell we should be doing. And he’s defunded — he’s defunded Centers for Disease Control, CDC, so we don’t have the organization we need. This is a very serious thing.” — Democratic presidential debate Tuesday.</b></span></i></div>
</div>
<div>
<i><span><b style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><br /><span style="color: #0b5394;">JOE BIDEN, comparing the Obama-Biden administration with now: “We increased the budget of the CDC. We increased the NIH budget. ... He’s wiped all that out. ... He cut the funding for the entire effort.”</span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0b5394;">THE FACTS: They’re </span><span style="color: red;">both wrong </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">to say the agencies have seen their money cut. Bloomberg is repeating the false allegation in a new ad that states the U.S. is unprepared for the virus because of “reckless cuts” to the CDC. Trump’s budgets have proposed cuts to public health, only to be overruled by Congress, where there’s strong bipartisan support for agencies such as the CDC and NIH. Instead, financing has increased.</span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0b5394;">Indeed, the money that government disease detectives first tapped to fight the latest outbreak was a congressional fund created for health emergencies.</span></b></span></i></div>
<div>
<i><span style="color: #0b5394;"><b style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Some public health experts say a bigger concern than White House budgets is the steady erosion of a CDC grant program for state and local public health emergency preparedness — the front lines in detecting and battling new disease. But that decline was set in motion by a congressional budget measure that predates Trump.<br /><br />The broader point about there being “nobody here” to coordinate the response sells short what’s in place to handle an outbreak.</b></span></i></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><i><b style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The public health system has a playbook to follow for pandemic preparation — regardless of who’s president or whether specific instructions are coming from the White House. Public-health experts outside government have praised the CDC’s work so far and noted that its top scientific ranks have remained stable during the past three years..."</b></i></span><br />
So - despite the facts, which <i><span style="color: red;">even AP had to grudgingly admit</span></i>, that the CDC funding was NOT cut, the CBC was just hoping that their comments section on this story would have mentally ill people pretending that the opposite was true. And hey: it worked! The CBC got its propaganda! The CBC provided the setup, and the drooling Trump hatin' liars crawled out of the woodwork to spew their politicized hate. These commenters don't give shit about the victims: they're just using ANY victims, for their own political gain.<br />
<br />
When John Colford asked "where's Trudeau in all this", the same hack Beatrice Darlene answered "Trudeau is not a doctor. Cheers". Wow - see <i>that</i>?! See how it works?! Cover up for Canada's Blackface Prince; yet, blame Trump (...why? because Trump <i>is </i>a doctor...? or because Trump <i>isn't </i>a doctor?!!!) Is Blackfaced Boy Blunder Turdeau "a doctor"?!!hahahahha!</div><div>oh the hypocritical stances of the deluded left.<br />
<br />
Hey: whaddabout the old 'harper and science' meme -- well look no further: "David E Lee - The Stephan Harper school of science communication.- -" yes: the Trump-haters were even rolling out that old chestnut again ('Harper supposedly muzzling science' ) - when the AP fact check clearly did not find that this applied to Trump. <br />
*<br /> John Ibbitson in his Mar 14, 2020 Globe and Mail column, pretty much gave Turdo a blowjob, right there in the Globe's pages, panting heavily over Turdeau's supposedly masterful direction of Canada's Covid 19 response, while sneering at Trump's response!! Truly unbelievable propaganda!</div><div> In similar fashion, on Oct.15, 2020, at the <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/abc-george-stephanopoulos-avoids-hunter-biden-joe-biden-town-hall">ABC fake interview with Biden,</a> George Stephanopoulos was down on his knees performing political fellatio on Burisma Joe,<b><span style="color: #cc0000;"> not once asking him questions</span></b> about the<a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-corruption-and-abc-news-11602794575"> new Hun ter laptop revelations,</a> and purposefully refusing to question Joe's previous positions, which point to a massive Democrat corruption and influence peddling scheme, with Obama's buddy Ole Joe in the middle all the lies and coverups. </div><div> (NOTE: it would not be until Dec 7, 2023 - yes: <i>2023</i> - that Hunter Biden was FINALLY indicted on a slew of tax charges. Even the <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/hunter-biden-tax-charges-1.7052852" target="_blank">CBC FINALLY had to report </a>on this bit of the "Biden Brand's" fiasco activities. So, yes: the Hunter laptop was real all along, but the lefties (drooling with seething Trump-hate) denied it for years.</div><div> Walt Disney must be so proud of the propaganda-spreading fantasy-machine that his company (ABC) has morphed into! (...hmmm, btw... several years later, Disney went horribly 'woke', and lost billions; by the end of 2023, Disney was trying desperately to shed its pathetic foray into sick wokeness.) </div><div> Stephanopoulos has literally morphed not just into a cartoon character - but into a parody of a satire of a stereotypical cartoon character!! (Seriously, look at this sad jerk Stephanopoulos: he had a perfect opportunity at the time to ACTUALLY practise journalism - but instead he chose to practise urinalism; he chose to be a toady Biden bootlicker.)</div><div> The formula of fake journalism is not new nor exclusive - CBC has done the same kind of thing for years, protecting Liberal hacks such as Trudeau, and the sick<i> St.Catharines Standard </i>has done it for DECADES for Liberal hack Jim Bradley and his gang.</div><div> On Oct 18, 2020, the phony news show "Washington This Week" with Bob Costa as lead liar, PURPOSEFULLY IGNORED the Hun ter laptop revelation story - as if it never happened!!</div><div>Instead, their lead 'story' on Oct 18 was spreading lies about some fictitious 'Biden blue wave' that was supposedly sweeping the southern states!! </div><div> What utter rubbish!!</div><div> The Demotards are on a 'code blue' course, oblivious that they are to be swamped out by a massive RED TIDAL WAVE!!! The 'blue wave'/ 'Biden is leading by a massive margin' memes are all month's-long lies, false narratives, fake polls, just like in 2016, when Kankles' s phony 'leads' were breathlessly reported as 'facts' until the very last minute - even AFTER Trump had won!!</div><div> What a Disney-eque fantasy - a perfect real-life representation of media-instigated censorship/delusion that ought to exist in Disney's Fantasyland, not in actual reality. These shitheads are promoting lies as if they were true. Twatter and Farcebook have just interfered in the American election - if a foreign actor had done what domestic political-censors Jack and Mark have just done, there'd be hell to pay, if not deserved jail time.</div><div> Another WTW hack on Costa's cartoon hour, Ayesha, once again brazenly - ignorantly - LIED that Trump doesn't disavow 'white supremacy'.</div><div> How many times does it take for mentally challenged, thick-headed / cognitively impaired race-baiting leftist simpletons to understand that Trump<i> has</i> disavowed it, FOR YEARS now?!! Blacks are hopping onboard the Trump Train straight outta Biden's sick Democrat plantation.</div><div> NO-ONE bothers to go to those pathetic Biden, Kommy Kammmy or sad Obama 'disco-rally covid-superspreader-events'. Jon Bon Jovi had what is likely the most pathetic, depressing 'rock star' appearance anywhere, when he showed up to play for a Sleepy Joe snoozefest in Pennnsylvania in front of<i> essentially an empty house</i> - compared to Trump rallies in the same state and throughout the country drawing<i> tens of thousands </i>of supporters <i>every day </i>of the campaign! Lady Gag Me also embarrassed herself by performing for Biden and dismissing Biden's sexual assault allegations raised by Tara Reade. Bias much, Gaga?</div><div> Have Kommy Kammy, Burisma Joe or Ayesha herself, disavowed all the 'peaceful' Burning, Looting, and Murder being carried out on behalf of Joe Biden's criminal klan Demoncrat party?? It's one thing that Biden is a cognitively challenged fool running for President, and it's another thing to have fellow cognitively-challenged propagandists - cartoon 'journalists' - merrily tagging along for the ride.</div><div>There is a massive Trump Tidal Wave in motion which will flush Bolshevik Biden's d'tards down the toilet hole of oblivion. Yes: the TRUMP TSUNAMI IS UNDERWAY. BYE-BYE BIDEN. </div><div>JOE and the HOE CRUSHED BY TRUMP LANDSLIDE!!</div><div>-</div><div><p>CTV / BELL MEDIA propagandist Joy Melbon peddled her deceptions about Trump on a You Tube misinfomation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkmvB0JHrO0, titled "<span color="var(--ytd-video-primary-info-renderer-title-color, var(--yt-spec-text-primary))" face="Roboto, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: #f9f9f9; font-size: var(--ytd-video-primary-info-renderer-title-font-size, var(--yt-navbar-title-font-size, inherit));">Trump expected to attack Biden's family during debate</span>", posted just an hour prior to the Trump/Biden scheduled debate on Oct 22, 2020.</p><p>CTV / Bell Media/ Joy Melbon purposefully distort the real news - they create fake news, with fake distorted headlines, and publish it <b><i>as if</i></b> it was "news" on You Tube.</p><p>CTV lies and perverts the meaning of the word "attack": claiming that it is an 'attack' for Trump to ask Joe about Hunter Biden's laptop revelations. CTV is a network which has profited from peddling 'fake news' Trump attacks for years now.</p><p>Security agencies should be notified of the massive corporatist propaganda / foreign election interference effort underway by billionaire fifth columnists in Canada, such as CTV / Bell Media.</p><p>-</p><p>It was great to watch America's demented politician Joe Biden babbling and drooling in July 2020 (see <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWnwfSmdHjo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWnwfSmdHjo</a>) spreading more climate change lies!! Dementia-laden Biden now claims that <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">"science tells us we have 9 years before the damage is irreversible".</span></i> <span style="font-size: x-small;"> (...Also, regarding the Surfside condo collapse in 2021, Biden declared that it was all caused by - ya guessed it - 'climate change'...!...Y'see, Biden immediately 'knew' that it was NOT caused by '<span face=""Google Sans", arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: rgba(80, 151, 255, 0.18); color: #040c28;">design failures, shoddy construction, damage and neglect over the past 40 years' - but by <i>global warming</i>!!!!!!!!!!!!...</span>)</span></p></div><div>This is exactly the kind of excrement that Justin Trudeau and Climate Barbie said, and believe! Liberal climate-crap pushers such as Chris Bittle and Vance Badawey believe Biden's bullsh!t. So does St. Catharines mayor Walter Sendzik - doesn't he?!! </div><div>So does the local NDP hack Jennie Stevens - doesn't she?! </div><div>So does the disgusting hack Jim Bradley - doesn't he?! </div><div>Well, we don't know - because the local Niagara media have their rear ends filled with Liberal cash and propaganda, so, they <i>dare not ask</i>.<br />
Hey: maybe Canada's Cagiest Climatologist David Phillips knows - - - ohh... but <i>no-one bothered</i> to ask Cagey Dave either!!</div><div>(hey: maybe David Phillips should have been questioned on "climate change" by that sick hack Kamala Harris?! Maybe she'd have pried the smug climate caginess outta Cagey?!}<br />
The demented fool Biden is singing their tune! They utterly believe in their sick climatalarmist scenarios, and therefore, will never question Biden's insanity.<br />
*<br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333;">It's hilarious to now see the<i> corporatist GreenFear-mongering billionaires </i>at RBC - the Royal Bank of Canada - suddenly pushing the Bolshevik's phony "climate change is real" propaganda meme in a new set of commercials in mid Oct 2020. May the lie fester.</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">-</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">The demented Joe Biden, America's blundering doofus-fascist-in-chief, babbled that <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/biden-twisted-inside-claims-people-211800596.html">tornadoes are not called tornadoes anymore (Sept,7, 2021).</a> The lies, the deception, the insanity just rolls on unchecked. Not a comment on that from the usual TorStar / CBC/ TVO cabal of global warming climate / change propaganda pushers! Will they now stop referring to tornadoes as tornadoes??! Why haven't they asked Canada's cagiest Climatologist, David Phillips, to confirm Biden's deluded assertion that tornadoes aren't actually tornadoes any more?! The St.Catharines's Standard didn't eagerly go panting to former Liberal climate change deceiver Jim Bradley's office, and demand answers on what happened to the tornadoes!!!</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">What asshat clowns.</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">-</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">During the federal election in Sept. 2021, CTV was running ads on You Tube showing Lisa LaFlamme blabbering something about CTV being a trusted source on the election.... yah, <i>suuure.</i> CTV has proved themselves to be trusted tools peddling fake news. There's little to trust in CTV / Bell Media/ or in LaFlamme and her gang of news-shapers. They have become main stream urinalists, with little difference from the rest of the presstitutes in Canadian msm.</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">-</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">"Dr Green" from "Unity" was spouting a lot of the typical GreenFear garbage on CHCH (Hamilton) at the end of Apr. 2023. GreenFear slime poured out of her piehole while the zombie phony-interviewer swallowed it all with relish. 'Quite embarrassing', as 'Anonymous', the lunatic fascist, would not ever say!</span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;">*</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-71042594404350931092019-09-06T18:40:00.009-04:002021-03-21T15:20:33.272-04:00Calling on Canada's Cagiest Climatologist to provide evidence of AGW, Chapters 58 and 59<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><b>CHAPTER 58 </b></span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Interesting column by Danielle Smith in the <a href="https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/smith-i-almost-felt-sorry-for-trudeau-until-i-came-to-my-senses">Sept. 6, 2019 Calgary Herald</a>, regarding an interview which Canadian Crime Minister Justin Turdeau had on Netflix with a so-called 'comedian', Hasan Minhaj: </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">..."Minhaj praises post-nationalist Trudeau for inviting the world to Canada’s doorstep with his welcome-to-Canada tweet heard around the world, then seems shocked that it resulted in an immigration backlash, particularly in Quebec with its secular law banning religious apparel in public service jobs.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">He even points out that Trudeau’s 32 per cent popularity is lower than Donald Trump, who is at 41 per cent.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">As much as I can revel in a bit of schadenfreude for our pompous prime minister getting his comeuppance by an even more pompous American, about halfway through it stops being funny. Minhaj’s interview may have been bad for Trudeau, but it is even worse for Alberta.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj saved his most devastating blows for talking about Alberta’s oilsands, which he acknowledges is the third-largest oil reserve in the world, and which he calls the tarsands because they “are dirty and gunky, mixed in with sand, and refining it causes a ton of pollution.” To his credit, Trudeau does a good job explaining how pipelines are a better way to transport oil than rail or trucking and talks about how Canadians know we can balance the environment and the economy.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj would have none of it, though, and he proceeds to damn Trudeau with his own words, saying Trudeau sold himself hard as the guy who would “get the Paris agreement done,” calling him a “climate hero,” a “one-man PR team for the environment,” pointing out that climate change was his “signature issue,” and even saying he would be what the Green New Deal would be like “if it had piercing eyes and wanted to read you poetry” — whatever that means.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">For Canadians, it’s jarring to hear an American complain about the twinning of an existing pipeline when the U.S. has <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pipeline101.org_Where-2DAre-2DPipelines-2DLocated&d=DwMF-g&c=Am4olr3RQAhYSZwlSDwaRA&r=lbYPz6yGQvcpqCCvNDTcXL9MXaXhQ40ekt5pcOyCkFU&m=EsHTGarXXDl_cHzvlnqcqeMZRrmmXzSiPtVL8PE-IXg&s=ZHpaZEOAGlbP1vKSBT0UgabyCdytLBYE6qEQXvB6tU8&e=" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">116,000 kilometres of crude oil pipelines,</a> the largest network in the world. It’s shocking to hear an American complain about the expansion of Trans Mountain to carry 890,000 bpd, when the U.S. <a href="https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/as-canada-dithers-the-u-s-approved-3-oil-pipelines-to-carry-2-4m-bpd-by-2020" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">approved three new pipelines in the last three years that will carry 2.4 million bpd</a>. And it’s beyond belief an American would be outraged by our tanker shipments going from 60 to 400 a year from Burnaby, when tanker <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com_LL1126329_US-2DGulfAsia-2DVLCCs-2Ddrive-2Dglobal-2Dtanker-2Dpatterns&d=DwMF-g&c=Am4olr3RQAhYSZwlSDwaRA&r=lbYPz6yGQvcpqCCvNDTcXL9MXaXhQ40ekt5pcOyCkFU&m=EsHTGarXXDl_cHzvlnqcqeMZRrmmXzSiPtVL8PE-IXg&s=5Chhudu6_WLqpoygUMrN-ePGRPV1IT-6dhu2ds0ZqeQ&e=" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast are now at their highest ever</a>.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj joins a long list of celebrity hypocrites that includes Al Gore, David Suzuki, James Cameron, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jane Fonda and the like — acting as if Canada is solely to blame for the world’s use of crude and expecting us to bear the sole obligation to stop producing it.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I’ve been perplexed for some time about why it is that wealthy, fossil-fuel guzzling stars target us. Minhaj finally explains why we in Canada are held to a higher standard than anyone else.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In an homage to the Black Panther comic book hero, Minhaj ends the segment by telling Trudeau he is the White Panther presiding over WaKanada and that our country is “a proving ground for whether progressive policies can work.”</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Think about that: the progressives of the world want Canada to be a demonstration project, proving that we can support mass immigration, eliminate poverty, offer free health care to all, maintain pristine landscapes, while choking off the principal source of wealth that allows us to accomplish all those things.</span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">As I said, I almost felt sorry for Trudeau. But he’s to blame for the pickle we find ourselves in, by raising expectations that could never possibly have been met. No wonder celebrities think we live in a movie."</span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The yankee left's obsession with Canada as a political laboratory experiment is quite clear. Politically challenged Demotards continually demand and expect that Canadians (mainly left-lib bolshies) obediently obey the left's moral-virtue signals, and obediently submit to being manipulated by U.S. GreenFear social-engineering experiments. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Of course, it's not only yank leftists, but Canadian ones as well who desire to oppress their fellow Canadians - y'know, GreenFear-pushing scumbags such as Jim Bradley, Justin Turdeau, Catherine McKenna, Stephane Dion (heck: </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">all </i><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Liberals...) as well as Canada's gaggle of commy dippers and green eco-fascists. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">We see how American organizations (Tides) openly conspired "to land-lock the Tar Sands"; to choke off Alberta's oil industry. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">We see Trudeau's federal Liberal links to these U.S. efforts through the activities of Butts - who was also McGuinty's chief of staff provincially during the Liberal's eco-terror reign in Ontario.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The cancer of Jim {The Godfather of GreenFear} Bradley's Liberal eco-terrorism - having helped destroy Ontario - metastasized and sought another host to feed upon, and so spread from Ontario to infect Ottawa. That same cancer had also earlier spread provincially to Alberta with the election of Notley's commy dippers.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> We know that during his election campaign, oil-hater Trudeau had happily accepted Obama's 'Dream Team' agents / 'political advisors' to 'assist' </span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">the spread of globalist eco-terror in Canada. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Yep: Turdo</span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> invited foreign actors to help interfere in a federal election. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Even back in 2012, Susan Delacourt reported in the <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/11/12/justin_trudeaus_campaign_looks_to_obamas_team_for_lessons_in_winning.html">Toronto Star, Nov.12, 2012</a> how Justin Trudeau, still an MP, was drooling over Obama and seeking influence from yankee Democrats:</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> "...</span><span style="background-color: #f8f8f8; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px;">The outreach to the Obama campaign by the Trudeau team shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.</span><br />
<div id="contentMiddleBreakPoint" style="background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
<a class="text-block__link" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/a/david_axelrod/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 4px solid rgba(100, 205, 245, 0.45); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">David Axelrod</a>, Obama’s senior strategist, worked a decade ago with Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty, when the Liberal politician was still in opposition and looking for ways to take power from the Conservatives. And some of the top people in the Trudeau leadership campaign, including Gerald Butts, also worked in the Liberal leader’s office when Axelrod was offering his <a class="text-block__link" href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/293731--mcguinty-and-obama-share-strategist" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 4px solid rgba(100, 205, 245, 0.45); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">wisdom to McGuinty</a> from 2000 to 2002.</div>
<div class="seo-media-query" style="background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><a class="text-block__link" href="http://theagenda.tvo.org/blog/agenda-blogs/guest-post-campaigning-obama" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="border-bottom: 4px solid rgba(100, 205, 245, 0.45); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Marie Bountrogianni</a><span style="background-color: #f8f8f8; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px;">, a former Ontario Liberal cabinet minister who is supporting Trudeau, was in Chicago and Iowa to help out in the final days of the U.S. presidential election this month and even stayed overnight at Axelrod’s country home in Michigan, along with a dozen other volunteers.</span></span><br />
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
She said she was “blown away” by the high degree of sophistication in the Obama organization — the technology, the discipline and its ability to execute large shifts in strategy. Bountrogianni was initially assigned to be part of a get-out-the-vote (GOTV) brigade in Wisconsin, but dozens of volunteers were suddenly rerouted to Iowa, where they were greeted with new packages of call orders and scripts to follow. “I couldn’t believe how organized they were,” she said.</div>
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
Liberals are in the midst of a large effort here to raise their own game in gathering databases and building <a class="text-block__link" href="http://liberalist.liberal.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 4px solid rgba(100, 205, 245, 0.45); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">home-grown technical sophistication</a>, with hardware purchased from the Obama Democrats. Bountrogianni says Liberals should pay close attention to how the Obama team has pulled this off, especially among disengaged voters and with the help of masses of micro-donations.</div>
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
Taleeb Noormohamed, who was also a federal Liberal candidate in the last election, went to Nevada to campaign for Obama in the final days of the presidential election too.</div>
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
He said he was impressed by how much the Democrats had done to identify the vote before the election even began, and how much they knew about their potential voters. Noormohamed said Liberals could take some lessons from the Obama campaign in staking out strong positions on issues that will engage disaffected progressives — “stop being afraid to say where we stand” — and in doing as much as possible before the election to amass lists of possible Liberal support.</div>
<div id="fsk_splitbox" style="background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div class="text-block-container" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: subpixel-antialiased; background-color: #f8f8f8; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: torstartexto3, georgia, times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility;">
The new class of voting delegates for the federal Liberal leadership — “supporters,” as opposed to paying members — will be a big help in building that stockpile of information, Noormohamed said.<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">"</span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Yep: the Democrat Obama cancer that infected McGuinty and which destroyed Ontario in the process, was then purposefully utilized by Turdo to destroy Canada.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Of course, in 2012, this article by Delacourt was meant to be a <i>compliment</i> to Turdo, to McGuinty, and to Obama's Democrats. The America-hatin' TorStar was more than happy to suspend its vitriol, if a demoncrat was helping interfere with a Canadian election! (Say it ain't so, Susan!!) And clearly, many Canadian Liberals happily entered the United States to interfere in theirs.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This was ALL SEEN AS <i>GREAT</i> by the Star back then!</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Funny how disgusting all that looks, <i>now</i> in 2019, after the horrors under McGuinty and Wynne in Ontario, and then 4 years of disaster federally under Turdo. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Turdeau was in bed with Obama, and Obama's disgusting Democratic socialism, from way back. It destroyed Ontario and helped destroy Canada. (No wonder the Liberal hack Bill Morneau </span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">was seen skulking around the Javits center on election day in the US, drooling at the prospect of kissing Crooked Hillary's anticipated-victorious claws.) </span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Delacourt had unwittingly back then provided the clear links and the undeniable evidence of foreign political interference in Canada<i> at the invitation of Canada's Liberals</i>, and foreign interference in the States by Canada's Liberals, by invitation of Obama. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> (...all this while Vivian Krause, also in 2012, was reporting on other U.S. interference and subterfuge in Canada, see further below, which was ridiculed by scumbags such as Liberal David McGuinty and NDPeer Claude Gravelle)</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> In 2015, the fetid stench of Obama was perfume to Turdeau. This cancer existed<i> RIGHT IN TURDEAU'S OFFICE</i>; its goal: to create disruption in Canada's economy, through the propagation of GreenFear eco-terrorism.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> On Oct.16, 2019, Obama <i>further interfered</i> in Canada's federal election by endorsing his blackfaced sycophant Trudeau. Not one Liberal complained about 'U.S. interference', as they of course </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">would have</i><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">, if Trump or Bush had said anything similar during Canada's federal election.</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> See how yankee eco-terrorists attempted to interfere with the provincial election in Alberta, as detailed in this <a href="https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/vivian-krause-rachel-notley-the-rockefellers-and-albertas-landlocked-oil">Apr.12, 2019 National Post column by Vivian Krause</a>. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> You can bet that ignorant clowns such as Minhaj - those sanctimonious believers of "Trump-Russia" conspiracy theories - couldn't care less when it is THEIR country openly meddling, openly interfering, with elections held in Canada. </span><br />
<br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> That American GreenFear-mongers are meddling in Canadian affairs (despite the ignorance of Minhaj and his audience) is not a new thing; seven years earlier, Vivian Krause had appeared before a </span><a href="https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/41-1/RNNR/meeting-25/evidence" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Feb.9, 2012 Federal House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources</a><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> hearing, delivering this statement:</span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> "...I will be making my remarks in English, but I would be happy to answer any questions in either French or English.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> My name is Vivian Krause. Over the past five years I have followed the science and the money behind environmental campaigns. I've written a series of articles published in the <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Financial Post</i> and elsewhere. I also write a blog called <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Fair Questions</i>. I'm not part of an industry, political party, or a campaign.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> As I prepared to testify today, I watched a short video at the website of the joint review panel for the Northern Gateway project. In that video, the chairperson of the panel, Sheila Leggett, says the decision that the panel will be making is on whether the Northern Gateway is in the public interest of our country. She emphasizes that public participation is important, and that the panel is focused on making sure it has a process that is open, fair, and transparent. With the backing of government and the oil industry, one of the most powerful industries in the world, it's expected the proponents of the Northern Gateway will have significant resources at their disposal. This is common knowledge. When the public hears from the spokespeople from the ministry and government, we consider the source.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> What hasn't been known until recently, however, is that some of the opponents of various pipeline projects and the campaigns against the Canadian energy sector also have some deep-pocketed supporters south of the border. I believe that in order for the joint review panel to conduct its work in a manner that is open, fair, and transparent, funding on all sides should be out in the open. In my review of the American tax returns of the foundations funding the environmental movement both in the U.S. and in Canada, I've traced $300 million that has gone from American charitable foundations to environmental campaigns affecting our country. Most of my analysis is based on American tax returns because the IRS requires greater disclosure than the CRA.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The $300 million is from roughly 850 grants that I've traced from ten foundations. In addition to these foundations, an additional dozen or more American foundations have granted substantial funds to Canadian environmental groups. By my analysis, American funding from the foundations that I've followed has increased tenfold over the past decade, from about $4 million in 2000 to $50 million in 2010. Of the $300 million in American funding that I've traced, at least $30 million is specifically for campaigns targeting the oil and gas industry in Canada.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> As I see it, the campaign against Canadian energy is one side of a two-sided coin. The other side of the coin is the creation of the renewable energy industry. In trying to understand the campaign against Canadian oil and the pipeline projects that are the lifeline of the Canadian energy sector, I think this is perhaps the most important insight that I can offer. This thinking is reflected in the strategy paper entitled “Design to Win”, which is prepared by the California Environmental Associates and funded by all of the big American foundations that are funding the campaign against Canadian oil. In that document, there's a diagram that clearly spells out that consumer and voter campaigns are funded in order to influence politicians to create the context for, and I quote, “massive shift in investment capital from dirty to clean energy”.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Of course, the dichotomy between dirty and clean energy is a bit of a false dichotomy in the sense that the so-called clean energy industry also has some negative environmental impacts. Underneath this dichotomy is another dichotomy, which of course is between energy that has historically been largely or partially from foreign oil imports and an industry that has been created that is primarily domestic.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The campaign to shift from dirty to clean energy, as it appears to me, is also about reducing dependence on imported oil, and increasing energy independence. In fact, if you read the fine print, you will find that American foundations say this themselves in their strategy papers, that one of their interests is in increasing American energy security and American energy independence.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> In the media coverage in the public debate over the last few weeks, there have been several recurring questions. I'd like to speak briefly to each of these. The first question is, so what? Environmentalists have downplayed the extent of their American funding by saying the oil industry has foreign investors, and the environmental impacts of the oil industry are global, so it's fine for the environmental movement to source its funding globally. These are valid points. I will argue, though, that at the heart of the funding matter is not just the foreign nature of the funding; it's the fact that the money involved is big, and that it's coming from billion-dollar foundations, and in one case a hedge fund billionaire. And the funders that are funding this strategy are funding science as a marketing tactic to sway market share, to manipulate markets, and in some cases to protect trade interests. If thousands of Alaskan families say they are giving $25 or $30 to B.C. environmental groups, that would be foreign funding, but I don't think it would bother us, because in fact if there is a major oil spill, Alaska would be affected.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> What we see here is the opposite of that. It's not small amounts of money from a large number of foreign sources; it's very large amounts of money from a very small number of billion-dollar foundations. Actually, my blog and most of my writing has been about the science and the money behind environmental campaigns. Really, it's the use of the flawed science and some of the exaggerated claims that are my biggest concerns. Some of what the environmental organizations are saying is simply untrue. This brings me to ask who is funding these campaigns and why.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Another question that comes up is the question of who is calling the shots. Environmentalists insist that they're in the driver's seat. However, this does not quite ring true for me, because most of the foundations funding these campaigns don't accept unsolicited proposals. In other words, they have their own ideas.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The third issue is what we might call the constituency issue. This is an important question for the joint review panel. When an organization receives a substantial portion of its funding from foreign sources, who does that organization represent? For example, RAVEN, a small first-nations group that campaigns heavily against the proposed Prosperity Mine in B.C., reported in its tax return for 2009-2010 that 83% of its funding is from outside Canada. When an organization is that heavily funded by foreign funding, whose interests is it representing? Are they Canadian interests or the interests of its foreign funders, or perhaps both?</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Incidentally, I've also seen grants that mention specific mines and other specific projects. In one case, it was a ski resort, the Jumbo Glacier ski resort, in British Columbia.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> When billionaire funders are involved in influencing public opinion and public policy on a major issue of national importance, I think the money should be out in the open, whether the billionaire funders are American or Canadian. I believe that this applies to foreign investment and philanthropy, as well.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Going forward, I hope that the CRA will require the same level of disclosure as the IRS. If that had been the case, this would have been out in the open over the last ten years. I also hope, as I've said before, that government and industry will begin a dialogue directly with the American foundations that are funding the campaign against Canadian energy. These foundations give away $1 billion a year. I don't know that they can be outspent, even by the oil industry. They've already spent hundreds of millions of dollars in our country, so I think it's clear that they're serious about what they're doing.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> I think the time has come for dialogue directly between the Canadian energy industry and the American foundations that are funding the campaign against it.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Thank you very much..."</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"> <span style="color: #0b5394;">Panelist David Anderson begins to question Krause</span>:</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546096" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> </span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">"I want to thank our witnesses for being with us today.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696526" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Ms. Krause, I'd like to start with you. I wish we had a little more time to explore deeper some of the things you've talked about here.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696527" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Most of us assume that the battle we see against pipelines and oil sands is an ideological one. It was very interesting this morning to hear you talk about the economic aspects of that. It's also interesting that we see these socialistic obsessions being funded by billionaires.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696528" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Who are the key players in the foreign funding that's coming into Canada? Can we track the money a little bit? How does the money get into Canada? What organizations does it comes through, for the most part?</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> The main funders are the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Oak Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. The Rockefeller Family Fund funds things south of the border. There's also the Wilburforce Foundation, the Brainerd Foundation, and the Bullitt Foundation. Those are the main ones.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">The big five are Hewlett, Packard, Moore, Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Those foundations have $20 billion in assets and give away about $1 billion a year. </span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Many of them made their money from the oil and gas sector. </span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> For example, the wealth of the Pew Charitable Trust originates from oil, as does Rockefeller's. </span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> How are they able to get that huge amount of money you're talking about into Canada?</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> To finish up, I think it's important that there is a plan here. In fact, Tides Canada was funded by the Hewlett Foundation to develop “a strategic plan to address oil and gas development in British Columbia”. That was in 2004 that Tides Canada was paid $70,000 to develop this plan by the Hewlett Foundation. Since then Hewlett has poured in $26 million. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
I think it's fair to ask what the plan is. Does it involve funding a large number of environmental groups that campaign in concert against Canadian oil? Does it involve the creation of the Great Bear Rainforest? Does it involve funding the first nations on the strategic north coast of B.C.? Does it involve funding a particular scientist, politician, or political party? Those are fair questions. What's the plan? </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Secondly, of the $300 million I've traced, far and away the largest recipient is Tides Canada and its sister organization the U.S. Tides Foundation. I've traced $60 million of American money that has gone through Tides Canada over the last ten years.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="arrow-circle-down" style="background-position: -128px -192px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #37651f; display: inline-block; height: 18px; position: relative; top: 4px; width: 18px; zoom: 1;"></span><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Do you know what percentage of that has gone into this project in Alberta or B.C.? Is that too difficult to find out?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Just to give you one example, the Hewlett Foundation and the Packard Foundation together have granted $90 million towards B.C. environmental groups. Of that $90 million, about $80 million was specifically for projects to create the Great Bear Rainforest, and also to address the energy sector. It's interesting that here we have $55 million that's specifically for the creation of the Great Bear Rainforest, but of course that isn't called the Hewlett Packard Rainforest, it's called the Great Bear Rainforest. Now, in the name of protecting the Kermode bear, environmentalists are arguing that oil tanker traffic needs to be banned on the entire gateway portion of the B.C. coast. The interesting thing about it is that the Great Bear Rainforest goes from the northern tip of Vancouver Island all the way to the southern tip of Alaska, every square inch of the coastline.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> So were they to get their way, they would shut down any possibility of moving supplies out of that area.</div>
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546181" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546181" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Ms. Vivian Krause:</span></b></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Whether it was the intention or not, I don't know. But the Great Bear Rainforest has become the great trade barrier. I do find it interesting to note, though, the tax returns of the Wilburforce Foundation. Of course the Wilburforce Foundation was created by Gordon Letwin, who is one of the original founders of Microsoft. Gordon Letwin has put nearly $100 million through the Wilburforce Foundation, some $60 million of which came in Microsoft shares. So Wilburforce in turn has granted $16 million to B.C. environmental groups.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696541" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> One of their grants was specifically to devolve control of land on the B.C. coast to first nations and local communities in the interest of protecting the Great Bear Rainforest. I find it interesting that an American foundation saw fit to empower Canadian aboriginal people, of all the aboriginal people in the world. Having worked with the United Nations in Guatemala for six years and in Indonesia, I would have thought that there are other aboriginal people in the world who could also have used those resources. It does strike me as interesting that so much American money has gone into the creation of this park, a no-trade zone specifically on our strategic gateway to Asia.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> It's interesting, because some of the environmental groups would agree exactly with what you're saying. I've got a quote from Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, where he said:</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546203" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; width: 612px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<tr style="box-sizing: border-box;" valign="top"><td align="right" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px;" width="30"></td><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px;"><small style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span style="font-size: large;">The effort to stop Keystone is part of a broader effort to stop the expansion in the tar sands. It is based on choking off the ability to find markets for tar sands oil.</span></small></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696544" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> So it sounds like that's actually the political activity behind what's really going on here..."</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Later at this hearing, another panellist, socialist Claude Gravelle, starts questioning Krause. </span></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">It is instructive to witness Gravelle's inherent bullying, antagonism and disrespect towards Krause throughout their entire interaction - truly a disgusting</span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> representation of scumbag socialist fascism: </span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">"We go now to the official opposition, to Mr. Gravelle, for up to seven minutes.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="arrow-circle-down" style="background-position: -128px -192px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #37651f; display: inline-block; height: 18px; position: relative; top: 4px; width: 18px; zoom: 1;"></span><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle (Nickel Belt, NDP): </b> </span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms. Krause, you've made some pretty serious allegations impugning the motives of U.S. charitable foundations, suggesting that they are pawns in some economic strategy.Do you have any real evidence that there are U.S. commercial interests funding the Canadian environmental movement efforts to protect our wilderness and our coasts? Do you have any real evidence?</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> With respect, sir, you're putting words in my mouth that I haven't said. What I can tell you is what is written down in the tax returns--</div>
</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546304" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546304" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Can I just stop you for a minute here?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546666" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546666" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="personSpeaking" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Please do.</span></span></div>
</div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546668" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546668" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b>I just want to quote Peter O'Neil from <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Vancouver Sun</i>, who has you as saying, “I have seen no glaring evidence of commercial interests in the U.S. that are funding the campaigns against the Northern Gateway.” Yet today you've made all kinds of accusations here. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Yes, well I understand commercial interests to be a particular company, and I don't see any evidence of that. What I do see is--</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So you haven't seen any evidence of this happening?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546310" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546310" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Would you let her answer the question, please, Monsieur Gravelle? </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> She's made some pretty serious accusations here. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Go ahead, Ms. Krause. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I'd be glad to respond to your question.</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> What I do see is that wealthy Americans have the interest of their own country at heart, as, I think, do we. My impression is that perhaps what is driving this is the overall broad interest of the American economy. I think one of the best things that any country can do for itself is to give itself a good secure supply of energy and to cut the competition off from having that. So I've never suggested, and I would not suggest, that there is a particular oil company or any particular commercial interest behind this. But it is clear--and the foundations have said themselves--that they are interested in increasing the energy security and the energy independence of the United States and also in weaning the United States off imported oil.</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So what you're saying is you have no evidence.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546326" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546326" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I'm saying that I believe that the--</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546327" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546327" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Okay, so you have no evidence. You just have accusations.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546328" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546328" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Monsieur Gravelle, do give the witness--</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546838" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546838" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> She doesn't have any evidence.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546842" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546842" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Do give the witness a chance to answer, and you can ask another question later.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696582" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Go ahead, please, Ms. Krause.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546334" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546334" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> I would say I do have evidence, but not of commercial interests. I think there is evidence of the motivations. They're clearly written down. I think they are mixed and that there is a real true interest in protecting the environment and addressing the true environmental impacts of the energy sector. But I think the interest is not purely in protecting the environment, because the foundations themselves say that they're also interested in issues of energy security, national security, and energy independence.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So you've only targeted environmentalists with your crusade. If we look at your background, we see that you've worked for a Conservative MP, you've worked in the salmon farming industry, and you've been paid on at least one occasion by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. It doesn't take much of a conspiracy theorist to claim that the real hidden agenda is coming from you.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546342" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696585" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Have you conducted any research about the remaining secret backers of the Enbridge pipeline and what interests they are silently promoting?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Well, sir, first of all let me say, just to give you the right numbers, I did work for a Conservative MP for four weeks, and I was fired.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Some hon. members:</b> Oh, oh!</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> I worked for the United Nations in the poorest countries of the world for ten years.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546347" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546347" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> I'm not surprised.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547126" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547126" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I also worked for the salmon farming industry. That was ten years ago. For the last five years, I've been working on this unpaid. I'm not paid by anybody, okay?</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696591" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Could you remind me again what your second point was?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> We'll go on to another question.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">An hon. member:</b> He forgot.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547151" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696594" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</b> Oh, we'll go on to another question. You've been trained as a nutritionist-- </span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Never mind. You've been trained as a nutritionist?</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Yes.</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b></span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</span></b> We've had some pretty highly qualified people come to our committee, with expertise on subjects like industry, labour.... We've had government officials and leading academics testify on the decline in the refinery industry and the loss of jobs. So as a nutritionist, you're not an expert. Why are you...?</span></span></div>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547222" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547222" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> Why am I doing this?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547224" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547224" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a class="PersonSpeakingPopup" href="https://apps.ourcommons.ca/ParlDataWidgets/en/intervention/6547224" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(128, 128, 128); box-sizing: border-box; color: #300000;" target="_blank">Mr. Claude Gravelle</a>:</b> Yes.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> I'll be glad to answer your question. The reason I'm doing this, sir, is that no one else did. Frankly, the work I've done I think is important. It shouldn't have been done by an unpaid lay blogger working on her dining room table using Google. It should have been done by the media--this is investigative journalism type of work--but that wasn't happening. I felt it was an important issue, and that if I didn't do it, it just wouldn't get done. So that's why I did it.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Do you not agree that it seems more concerning that a foreign-state-owned company like Sinopec has not only bought up large swaths of oil sands, but is now trying to push the pipeline through? You hardly even need a conspiracy theory to imagine that they aren't looking out for Canadian interests, because they also have a veto on new refineries in Canada. Don't you find that kind of odd?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> If you are saying that foreign investment in a Canadian industry should be out in the open, I agree with you. When foreign funding to the critics of industry is coming from a hedge-fund billionaire and billion-dollar foundations whose expressed interest is the energy security and energy independence of their own country, I think that should be out in the open. I think all funding should be out in the open.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</b> </span> If you think this should be out in the open, why aren't you researching these companies that are backing Enbridge?</span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span> Many other journalists have already done it. It's already out there. No one was looking into the foreign funding of the environmental movement, and that's why I did.</span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b>
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </span></b> There is a chart of the Prime Minister with Ethical Oil, the two ministers and a bunch of staffers. I think maybe your picture would fit in quite well, because that's what you're defending: Ethical Oil. I just can't believe what you've been saying.</span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I think it's obvious that they have used my research in their campaign, but they have done so without my permission. Frankly, in some cases they have inaccurately quoted my research, and I've insisted on having the record corrected. I'm not part of that campaign.The point I'm trying to make is that we have money coming here from foreign billionaires. In the public debate--</span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></span></b>
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </span></b> We also have money coming in from billionaires supporting the pipeline.</span></span><br />
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></b>
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">The Chair: </b><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Your time is up, Mr. Gravelle</span><br />
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></b>
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> I was just going to say that in the public debate the emphasis has been put on the fact that the money is foreign. I've been trying to put the emphasis on the fact that it's big. If you look at my blog, you'll notice that I've also drawn attention to the money from big sources in Canada. For example, the Bronfmans have contributed $6 million to the David Suzuki Foundation: $2 out of every $25 of funding to the David Suzuki Foundation has come from the Bronfmans, the Claudine and Stephen Bronfman Family Foundation. </span><br />
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> I haven't looked only at American money; I've looked at big money on both sides of the border.."</span><br />
<span face="verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face="verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> NOTE that, instead of being concerned about what Krause actually </span><span face="verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">revealed</span><span face="verdana, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">, this disgusting NDP hack Gravelle did his utmost to personally demean her, and to dismiss and discredit her findings! This f****r didn't give a damn about what she had brought to his attention in 2012. As long as someone - even Americans - were out to destroy Alberta, well, that was <i>good enough</i> for Clod.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546445" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><br />
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="verdana, sans-serif"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>This</i> is how GreenFear fascism presents itself in Canada - and asshat c</span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">lowns such as Minhaj have no fu*kin' clue, either.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="verdana, sans-serif"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="verdana, sans-serif"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> L</span></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">ater panellist Blaine Calkins asked Krause some questions: </span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546819" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">"My last question is for you, Ms. Krause. I would like to know exactly what the difference is between the reporting mechanisms that you found in Canadian reporting through CRA and the tax reporting in the United States. Could you give us a little bit of detail on what the difference was that allowed you to do your investigation?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696698" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> The other question I have for you is an opinion question. In your opinion, if it was found that large Canadian charitable foundations were seen to be heavily investing in charitable organizations, or transferring massive amounts of money from Canada into the United States to influence United States domestic policy, what do you think the reaction would be of the United States Congress?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> To answer your first question, in what are called 990 tax returns of 501(c)(3) charitable foundations, they're required to report a couple of things. One is the grants that they make—the recipient, the stated purpose, the amount, and the date. If that information were publicly available from Canadian foundations then, for example, we'd know what Tides Canada has done with the $60 million that it got from American foundations.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Another important piece of information is who is being paid, in terms of the PR firms and other for-profit businesses that are funded. In the U.S., charitable foundations are required to report the five highest payees or contractors, and the amounts that they were paid. They're also required to report the names and the exact amount of the salary of the five highest-paid employees. So it's those three things—the grants and the details of the grants, the details of the highest-paid contractees, and the details of the highest-paid employees.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Perhaps I could answer your second question by telling you that in July of last year I was invited to New York by a small American think tank, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. They convened a meeting with some of the top American journalists in the New York area who cover the energy sector—people from <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Forbes</i>, <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Fortune</i>, the <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Wall Street Journal</i>, and others. They said to me, “What's going on? Don't you have any lawyers in Canada? Why aren't you suing these foundations?” They couldn't believe that we were just letting this happen. One guy told me that unless you get your lawyers down here, they're just going to be laughing all the way to the bank.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> That was their reaction. As far as Congress, I don't know, but I can tell you that was the reaction of the journalists around the table when I met with them in New York.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Thank you, Mr. Calkins and Ms. Krause"</span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Later, more questions for Krause from panelist Brian Jean:</span></span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 14px;">"Mr. Brian Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca, CPC):</b></span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 14px;"> Thank you, Mr. Chair.</span><span style="font-size: 14px;"> Thank you to the witnesses attending today.</span></span></span><br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 14px;"> I do believe, Ms. Krause, that these radical foreign interest groups that you speak of threaten our economy and our national sovereignty. There's no question that I firmly believe that Canadians want an independent Canadian decision by Canadians in the best interests of Canadians. These groups' interference in our national agenda does not help anything.</span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547030" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696746" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> I will say I am from the oil sands. I am from northern Alberta. I'm a registered trapper. I also have a science degree. My big thought in life was that I was going to be an environmental lawyer. I was a lawyer but I returned to the oil sands and practised there for many years. I have a trapline within three miles of an oil sands plant. I have a trapline cabin three miles away from Nexen, which operates up there. I can assure you, based on what I've seen, the environmental integrity of the oil sands is much superior to that found in the United States, especially in California, Venezuela, Africa, and just about any other place I've seen pictures of and visited first-hand. They are doing a great job up there.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696747" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> And they are doing a great job employing Canadians. Many Canadians from right across the country work up there. When I moved there in 1967, there were 1,500 people there. Today there are over 150,000. People from the Nickel Belt, in fact.... Maybe that's why Mr. Gravelle is so angry, because a lot of people from his riding have moved up there temporarily or part-time. Indeed, these people make $150,000 per year and take the money back. In fact 5,000 Quebeckers and many others live in my riding.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696748" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> I do have some questions in relation to these charities. I had a chance to meet with Tides Canada last week. They told me in no uncertain terms that they do not have anything to do with Tides USA and they did not receive money from them. I talked to CRA last week as well. They told me that on the website they have in Canada they do list the salaries of the ten highest-paid people, but not the people in particular, and they don't list contractors, which I suggested they should do.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696749" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> How do they get the money into Canada? I don't know who they do it to; I'm not a forensic accountant. But I'd like to know who they get the money to, whether it's other charities, as you mentioned, or whether it's bands or chiefs or lobbyists, and how they get it into Canada. Certainly I would like to look at legislation to stop these people from bringing in the money, doing so either through disclosure or otherwise stopping them from interfering in Canadian interests.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> I can show you—in fact, it's posted on my blog—the excerpts of U.S. tax returns showing that the U.S. Tides Foundation has paid Tides Canada over $4 million. You can also go to the website of Bullitt Foundation and you can see for yourself that the Bullitt Foundation has paid Tides U.S. over half a million dollars for projects of Tides Canada. </span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Brian Jean: </b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
Okay. Does Tides Canada get directly involved in opposing these applications, for instance the Northern Gateway in particular? Right now we sell our oil for $12 per barrel less than what we should get for international pricing. As we have no other route to sell this oil to, we sell it to the United States. So we sell it at a $12 discount, and that has to stop.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> The second question you asked me was how does the money get into Canada. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
What I see happening is that some Canadian charities, including Tides Canada, have equivalency status in the U.S., so essentially they're like American charities. What happens is, the American foundations make grants to Tides Canada to its U.S. side. They take money in on the U.S. side. Now, in Canada, Tides Canada has two entities. It actually has three, but two of them are active. One is the Tides Canada Initiatives Society and the other is Tides Canada Foundation. So the Tides Canada Foundation takes money in from the U.S. and then transfers it over to the Tides Canada Initiatives Society. Now, that doesn't report back to the U.S., so the activities of Tides Canada Initiatives Society, as I understand it, are not reported to the U.S., which raises another whole set of questions. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Brian Jean: </b> So how do they disburse the money to interfere in our interests?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I see two things happening.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
One, the vice-president of Tides Canada did an interview with CBC <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">As it Happens</i> a couple of weeks ago, and she said that Tides Canada does not have a position against the Alberta oil sands. I regret to say that doesn't ring true for me, because I look at the projects that Tides Canada is funding, and I also look at the places it accepted donations from. For example, Tides Canada has accepted, if I'm not mistaken, almost $1 million, at least five grants going back at least five years, from the Oak Foundation. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
Now, the Oak Foundation, just to give you one example, has funded ForestEthics to get at least ten Fortune 500 companies to disavow Alberta oil and to put pressure on American regulators to create disincentives for the Canadian oil industry. Tides Canada has received money from many American foundations that are funding the tar sands campaign, the campaign against Canadian oil. I don't see how they can say they have no position against our energy industry, yet they're accepting funding from the foundations that obviously do. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
Secondly, they have funded the groups that are running the campaign. For example, just one grant to ForestEthics was for over $700,000. Now, ForestEthics, the CEO of Tides Canada said a couple of weeks ago, is a project of Tides Canada. Another three groups are funded under the name of the Rainforest Solutions Project. Tides Canada funds Greenpeace under the Rainforest Solutions Project.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="arrow-circle-down" style="background-position: -128px -192px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #37651f; display: inline-block; height: 18px; position: relative; top: 4px; width: 18px; zoom: 1;"></span><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;"><b>The Chair</b>: </span><span style="color: #333333;"> Thank you, Mr. Jean.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">Mr. Brian Jean: </b><span style="color: #333333;"> I know my time is up, Mr. Chair. On a point of order, though, I'm just wondering, if the witnesses have any solutions on what legislation to propose to stop this type of funding or disclosure, if they could provide that to the chair and it could be circulated to the members.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">The Chair: </b><span style="color: #333333;"> Certainly. The witness is free to do that at any time."</span></div>
</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Later, panellist Hon. Laurie Hawn asked Krause questions:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> "</span><span face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" style="font-size: 14px;">Ms. Krause, I have a question for you, and obviously it's going to be an opinion question, or an opinion on your part. With the money that's coming into Canada to influence the process, and we've talked about who that money is targeting, is it targeting politicians--and I'll put an opinion in your mouth and you can agree or disagree--or is it targeting first nations specifically to get them to resist, because they can be much more effective resisting something like this than other groups? Who's the target for that money?</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547305" style="background-color: white; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696820" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="personSpeaking" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 5px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> I think what I've seen is that the target is to influence politicians indirectly by shaping public opinion and by getting media coverage that puts pressure on politicians to make certain decisions. I think I have seen grants specifically to influence regulation. One that comes to mind, and I testified about it last time I was before the committee, is that the Bullitt Foundation funded the Dogwood Initiative and other projects supported by Tides Canada, and I quote, “to mobilize urban voters for a federal ban on coastal tanker traffic”.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696821" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Days after I testified to this committee about that grant, the Bullitt Foundation rewrote the grant. Since I've been doing this research, seven foundations have rewritten or removed their grant information about specific grants.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Thank you, Ms. Krause, and thank you, Mr. Hawn. Your time is up"</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Then Hon.David Anderson again had a chance to ask Krause:</span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">" </span><b style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Mr. David Anderson: </b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" style="font-size: 14px;"> I'll go back to Ms. Krause. The U.S. has an interest.... Mr. Jean made a comment about our oil going into the United States at a discount. The Alberta government has said that if we get access to another market, the difference in that amount for which we'd be able to sell our oil is going to be in the tens of billions of dollars. When you talked this morning about economic interest, you talked more about the renewable energy industry being involved perhaps in some of this discussion, about their concern about U.S. energy security. Have you heard anything, or do you get any impression that some of this lobbying is being done in order to maintain that discounted price they get on their oil?</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547475" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547475" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div class="personSpeaking" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 5px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Nothing, no.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696866" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> If I may, I would just like to mention one thing. Looking at my notes in response to Mr. Hawn's question earlier, I think it's an important point for the committee. I mentioned that the Oak Foundation had made several grants to Tides Canada. In fact it was four grants since 2005, for almost $900,000. But here's the thing. The Oak Foundation specifically funded the West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation, and I quote, “To constrain the development of Alberta's tar sands by establishing a legislative ban on crude oil tankers on British Columbia's north coast”. Then they say: “The desired result would be a permanent legislative tanker ban and cancellation of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline.”</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696867" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span>
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Also, they funded Greenpeace for something called the “Stop the tar sands campaign”. The Oak Foundation says: </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<tr style="box-sizing: border-box;" valign="top"><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px;"><small style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 11.9px;">This will result in the withdrawal of two institutional investors from the tar sands by 2012; the disengagement of Norway's Statoil and Britain's BP from the tar sands project; the end of tar sands subsidies from the Government of France...</small></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"> Thank you. And thank you, Mr. Anderson.</span></span><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> "</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0.5em;"> Then later, the disgusting dirtbag Liberal David McGuinty (...the scumbag brother of Ontario's Lying Liberal Douchebag Dalton McGuinty...) decided to attack Krause, in the same fashion as Gravelle had done earlier:</span><br />
<br />
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">"Mr. David McGuinty:</b></span></span></div>
</div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547653" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> I wasn't going to return to this, Ms. Krause, but I'm going to return to it. You said that Canadian environmental foundations are funnelling money through American subsidiaries. Is that right?</span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No.</span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b>What did you say? </span></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I've said a lot. I'm not sure what you're referring to specifically.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> You said that foundation money coming from the United States is actually going into receiving entities in the United States that are effectively wholly owned by Canadian environmental foundations. Did you say that?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Yes.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> Under what tax structure in the United States are those foundations...what part of the code? Where is it under the United States code for tax? How are they structured?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I'll give you an example. Tides Canada--and the same applies with the Living Oceans Society--has equivalency status in the United States as a 501(c)(3) charity. Because they have charitable status, American foundations made grants to them, and as American charities, they report to the IRS. The information I have about Tides Canada's spending is all from its American tax returns.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b>Is this illegal?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I believe so.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> You believe so. Are you a lawyer? </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> Are you an economist?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No, I'm a nutritionist.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> Are you a transfer pricing expert?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> Are you a tax lawyer? </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No. What's your question?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> My question is, is it illegal? You say you believe so.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I said I believe so, but that's what I believe. I'm not giving you an opinion as a legal expert. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> You don't know, do you? </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> No.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b>Okay. You believe. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
You've been asked repeatedly by Conservative members of Parliament to give your opinion. Are you an expert?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Sir, I was asked to come to this committee and provide answers to your questions. I'm doing my best.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> I understand. You're down as an individual; you're described as a witness who's coming here and appearing as an individual. Are you an expert? Are you a professor of law? </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I believe I've answered your question. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Point of order, Mr. Chair.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Yes, Mr. Anderson.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b>This is asinine. Mr. McGuinty should know better than to try to bully witnesses. He should at least show some respect for her. She has come here with information today for the committee. He can at least have the decency to treat her in a civil manner. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Thank you, Mr. Anderson. Mr. McGuinty, you asked your question. It was answered. You have to be reasonable in dealing with witnesses</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> You're right, Mr. Chair. I think that's why it's important. I'll change the line of questioning, because we have ascertained that Ms. Krause is not appearing today as an expert on any field related to this whole question of foundation structure or American tax law.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
I think she's offering opinions. It's good to know that she's offering mere opinion, which is not expert opinion.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
Monsieur Caron, you said earlier that NEB is only able--</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Point of order, Mr. Chair.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Mr. Anderson. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> I think out of decency Mr. McGuinty should give Ms. Krause an opportunity to respond to what he had to say there. She's done work for five years on one subject. I'd say that makes her probably more of an expert than anyone else in this country, and we've heard that today. Give her an opportunity to respond.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Thank you, Mr. Anderson. Okay, Mr. McGuinty, go ahead.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David McGuinty: </b> Time is of the essence. I have some important questions for the other witnesses.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> It's up to you. Go ahead, please. Each member directs his questions within reason. You need to give a reasonable amount of time for a response.</div>
</span></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
At this point, having been exposed for the indecent, abusive stinking piece of horsesh!t that he is, Liberal Douchebag David McGuinty slithered off his assault upon Krause. <br />
<br />
Who knows what McGuinty would have done, had Anderson not intervened. McGuinty was acting like some kind of psycho here. <br />
<br />
This treasonous Liberal couldn't care less about the meddling which American leftists were perpetrating in Canada - BECAUSE HE AND HIS OIL-HATIN' LIBERAL PARTY INNATELY APPROVED OF THIS!!! <br />
<br />
Douchebag David showed absolutely no interest into what Krause had uncovered, because McGuinty was more than happy to let that kind of foreign meddling continue. After all, Krause had uncovered foreign fifth columnists who shared McGuinty's Liberal-party hate for Canadian oil. <br />
<br />
McGuinty didn't like his Liberal biases challenged, so he chose to figuratively just beat up the woman who came to Ottawa to try to tell the government about what she had uncovered. <br />
<br />
(...and hey: let's not ask where Turdo's puppetmaster Gerald Butts was hanging around in 2012...}</div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="color: #b45f06; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: xx-large;">CHAPTER 59</b></span></div><div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
Following up on the subject (detailed earlier in Chapters 37 and 46) of Green Fascist Doomsday scenarios, another typical insane example comes our way as seen in <a href="https://www.friatider.se/f-rslaget-i-tv4-ta-m-nniskor-f-r-att-r-dda-klimatet">this Sept.4, 2019 </a></span>report in Sweden's Fria Tider, where the idea was presented that humans should practice cannibalism to 'save the planet'.</div>
Yep... ...THIS is what GreenFear-pushers such as Turdo, McKenna, Jim Bradley, etc. are all about.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
This is the kind of far-left extremist GreenFear fascism which the lib left has been fanning and drooling over. The TV4 report reads:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
"Can you imagine becoming cannibal and eating other people to save the climate? That issue was seriously discussed in yesterday's After Five in TV4.</div>
</div>
</div>
Anyone who watched TV4 After five on Tuesday may have <br />
<div>
<br />
been, to say the least, surprised. There, the idea was presented to start eating people.<br />
<br />
The feature is about the fair "Gastro Summit - about the future of food" in Stockholm, where the behavioral scientist Magnus Söderlund holds seminars on the possibility of eating human flesh - to "save the climate".<br />
<br />
- What makes most of us react instinctively with disgust when talking about eating human flesh to save the climate ?, wonders host Tilde de Paula.<br />
<br />
Magnus Söderlund answers:<br />
<br />
- First of all, it is that this person who is to be eaten must be dead.<br />
<br />
One problem could be that dead bodies overall are taboo. In addition, criticism arises against defiling a dead body. Another explanation, says Söderlund, is that many are "slightly conservative" when it comes to eating something they are not used to, ie other people.<br />
<br />
The conclusion is that it can be difficult to get the Swedes to become cannibals for the sake of the climate. However, according to the researcher, it is important from a sustainability perspective to discuss different options for the future.""<br />
-----!!!!!!-----</div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "open sans", "lucida grande bold", "helvetica neue", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="background-color: transparent;">When are Turdo and McKenna going to advocate for this Green Policy Initiative, the Turdo Soylent Green Plan For Canadians?! </span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div>
<br />
Funny that the St.Catharines Standard hasn't asked Liberal hacks such as Turdo, Jim Bradley, or Chris Bittle, about their reactions to implementing this Green Friendly method of cannibalism to 'Battle The Climate Crisis', to 'Save The Planet From Peril'! <br />
<br />
Who will Jim Bradley eat first?! Or maybe Suzuki will feast on Bradley first?! Maybe Elizabeth May will eat Climate Barbie, as a tasty example of Planetary Climate Stewardship?<br />
<br />
So many questions remain unanswered from Canada's provincial and federal Liberal Parties!<br />
<br />
"Cannibalism For The Climate" can be Trudeau's signature policy - the newest, stylish 'Final Liberal Solution For Earth's Climate Emergency Crisis' !<br />
<br />
Gosh, all Justin Trudeau has to do is sneak in a quick approval and Canadians can soon be legally 'Saving The Earth' in kitchens across We The North-istan.<br />
<br />
So, "it's all settled" then - the Liberals are all for it... after all, that's their own default answer, isn't it: 'it's all settled, don't ask any questions'?! <br />
<br />
If these Liberals are against cannibalism, well, then, they are denying 'Solutions To The Climate Emergency'!! <br />
<br />
If Liberals are against eating human corpses in the name of Mother Gaia, then they are 'Impeding Progress To Save Mother Earth From Doom"!! <br />
<br />
If these Liberals are against cannibalism, well, then they are nothing more than 'Climate Change Deniers'!!!<br />
<br />
Isn't THAT how the Liberal's own narrative works - when they apply it to others?<span face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">* </span></span></div>
Strange claims were made by Evan Solomon during his Nov.13, 2019 radio show on Toronto's 1010 AM (former CFRB) regarding climate change and how it should be taught in schools, because kids (...who, in Ontario - which had been ruled for 13 years by rabid climate-change infected Liberals) apparently didn't know enough about climate change; and didn't know the difference between climate and weather... yeh, sure... nor <i>critical thinking</i> either, eh, Evan...???!!}</div>
<div>
Funny eh?</div>
<div>
Yeah: but the Liberal angle wasn't even mentioned. That the McGuinty/Wynne Liberals in Ontario screamed and lied about climate change <i>for over a decade</i>, but, apparently, according to Evan, this didn't register to students?! </div>
<div>
WOW, Evan: please see<b><i><span style="color: #b45f06;"> <a href="https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2019/09/when-will-canadas-cagiest-climatologist.html">Chapter 37</a></span></i></b> . I mean, ya can't go on prattling about this without the background...<br />
Evan, were <i>you cognizant </i>of the climate propaganda which the Liberals were spreading in Ontario's schools for 13 years??!<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
Lookit this: suddenly {now that Doug Ford is Ontario's premier} the newly minted narrative is being trotted out that Ontario's schools have NOT DONE ENOUGH climate brainwashing, and that Evan wants MORE??!!</div>
<div>
What were those eco-terror school walkouts, just several weeks ago {...conveniently<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> (hahaha)</span> just before Canada's federal election..!} all about, Evan, which were organized to pay homage to Greenshevist Greta?!!</div>
<div>
Weren't those children 'activated' by the<i> same unionized teachers</i> who had been indoctrinating their students, spreading climate fear in Ontario <i>for years</i>?! Evan, are ya sayin' that the teachers haven't done their climate change fear-mongering properly?!</div>
<div>
Evan also stated something to the effect that there are people out there who are afraid of having children because that would 'endanger the planet'. {such as the GreenBolsheviks in the States}</div>
<div>
On that point, Evan is correct - there are people brainwashed into believing this.<br />
But then, Evan fails to pinpoint exactly <i>how and why </i>students have been manipulated into these beliefs.<br />
(In other words, eco-terrorists in Ontario's schools have frightened children into believing marxist climate hogwash - so, what is Evan's solution? MORE eco-terror-marxism?! Or <i>no more </i>political marxism and <i>no more</i> GreenFear-based religion masquerading as 'science' ?????)<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
Evan then goes into a nonsensical tangent, starting by basically saying that these students should grow up not being afraid of having children (...if we stop <i>right here</i> at this point, Evan is - again - correct... ...) but then, he goes off the rails to say that they should have kids BECAUSE THEIR KIDS ARE THE ONES WHO WILL SOLVE "CLIMATE CHANGE"!!!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
WOW!!!! What bunch of convoluted climate crap!!</div>
<div>
Evan makes these at-first-salient points, but then introduces these bizarre side angles - almost like non sequiturs, really....) <i>which neutralize his own points</i>.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Evan should have stated clearly the eco-marxist concept underpinning the 'climate change' hoax, which vilifies humankind as causing weather and climate, claiming that <b><i>MANKIND IS THE ENEMY - including CHILDREN.</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i>Controlling earth's population</i></b> is the underlying tenet of the fascistic GreenFear movement; that fact is as old as the hills. It's like having a discussion about how 'great' the Good Ole Democrat party is in the States, without even acknowledging that the Klan was the Democrats' own 'military wing'. Yep, talkin' 'bout<i> that</i> will spoil the narrative...</div>
<div>
Scaring children into believing they shouldn't have children of their own when they become adults, is part and parcel <i>of </i>the GreenFear propaganda campaign.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
The misanthropic claim that <i><b>MANKIND IS A THREAT TO PLANET EARTH </b></i>is the <i>underlying tenet</i> of the climate change-global warming lie. </div>
<div>
A GreenFear-monger just can't 'half believe' this claim, yet then nevertheless continue to still blab on about climate change!</div>
<div>
If you traffic GreenFear climate lies, you <i><b>MUST</b></i> also 100% believe that <b><i>MANKIND IS THE PROBLEM</i></b>. </div><div><br /></div><div>This<b><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> extreme anti-humanism/ nihilsm is the foundational bedrock </span></i></b>of the GreenFear lie. </div><div><br /></div><div>You<i> must</i> despise mankind to promote GreenFear; these are NOT mutually exclusive concepts; they are inseparable. </div>
<div>
You cannot traffic the GreenFear lie, yet ignore the actual rest of the story: that the lie also demands that <i>you <b>believe</b> </i>that '<b><i>man caused the weather and the climate to change</i></b>'. </div>
<div>
This 'leap-of-faith' becomes a <b><i>religious and political</i></b> belief, but isn't science.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
We are told time and again that <b><i>MANKIND CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGE.</i></b></div>
<div>
We are told over and over that <b><i>MANKIND IS DESTROYING THE PLANET.</i></b></div>
<div>
We have been inundated with the lie that <b><i>CLIMATE CHANGE IS MAN MADE.</i></b><br />
We are told constantly that<b style="font-style: italic;"> TIME IS RUNNING OUT.</b></div><div><span> We are frightened by phony <b><i>'TIPPING POINTS'.</i></b></span></div>
<div>
We are told repeatedly that <i><b>IT'S ALL SETTLED.</b></i></div>
<div>
<b> </b>We are told these doomsday lies, every day, by essentially every Canadian politician and media outlet, where <i>any</i> rain/wind/sun/snow/storm - really, <i>any</i> weather, <i>any</i>where on earth - is suddenly conjured up and conflated as being 'proof of man-made climate change'! </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Mankind's <i><b>very existence</b> </i>is cited <b><i>AS THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE.</i></b> </div>
<div>
<br />
<b style="font-style: italic;"> </b>We are being told that<b style="font-style: italic;"> PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM - </b>Prince-No-More Harry and his wife are just a few of these GreenFear-infected anti-natalists, who in the summer of 2019 claimed great supposed-virtue by signaling they will have 'just 2 children'. Well isn't THAT precious? (<i>Umm</i>, are ya gonna <i>adopt</i> them, Harry..? <i><span style="font-size: x-small;">oh</span></i>...are ya gonna <i>abort</i> the others...? ...? ...?)</div><div> American demoncrats such as<b style="font-style: italic;"> </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "libre baskerville", georgia, serif; font-size: 15px;">Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blithely demonized birth as being an immoral act against the Planet. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "libre baskerville", georgia, serif; font-size: 15px;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
Evan got some points across, but the idea that students could be educated about 'climate change' is seriously both a worthy, and flawed, idea.</div>
<div>
That any teacher in Ontario would ever be reprimanded for propagandizing their classes with one-sided political science-fiction /GreenFear-religion disguised as real science, is hardly believable. The GreenFear propaganda is so ingrained in Canadian media culture, that a rational discussion and dissection of the issue can hardly be made anymore. </div>
<div>
Any Ontario teachers who'd dare question the GreenFear orthodoxy would quickly be attacked as figurative 'Uncle Toms', shamed, ostracized, labelled as 'deniers', etc.<br />
We saw some GreenFear-spreading bolsheviks do just that in Niagara in Jan-Feb 2020, when a cabal of climate commies helped oust a member of the Niagara Conservation Authority, where the bolshies called the board member a climate denier... a sad, but, true... and common tactic of the green fascist left.<br />
We know and have seen the drill by now - attacks carried out by climate fascists <i>who deny </i>that the earth's climate has changed forever, before man was even around.</div>
<div>
Spreading GreenFear Gospel is a political act, where religion is disguised as 'science', and is then politicized.<br />
If you thought that Ontario's public school system was '<i>secular</i>' - look again.<br />
Maybe Solomon can do an entire segment on what happened at the Niagara Region Conservation Authourity??!! We know that TVO and the Paikin won't dare examine the role of green fascism in this incident!!</div>
<div>
*</div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: #333333;">
Chapter 39</span></b><span style="color: #333333;"> (update continuation) </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
..." Niagara This Week didn't 'dig deeper' at all. <br />
<br />
They DIDN'T EVEN TRY - because THEY DON'T KNOW <i>HOW</i>. </div><div>This is not a journalistic organization: it's a TorStar PROPAGANDA outlet, masking itself as a 'news' organization.</div><div>These are not journalists, they're urinalists.<br />
<br />
*<br />
<br />
More polar bear GreenFear was spread by <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/6590250/polar-bears-climate-change-2020/">Global News</a> in a 'report' by Corne van Hoepen, on Feb.27, 2020, who wrote:</div><div><br /></div><div> "...In recent years, there has been confusion over whether polar bear numbers are increasing, or they’re on the brink of extinction.<br />
“<i>Confusion over polar bear numbers is justified, as some populations are increasing, while others are declining,” said Brandon Laforest, a senior specialist of Arctic species at WWF Canada.</i>..."</div><div><br />
Hmm: so, um, <i>who </i>has been sowing that confusion... and <i>why</i>?! </div><div><i>Who's</i> been telling us that polar bears are about go extinct???????????????????????!<br />
Strange how confused Corne <i>JUST CAN'T GET AROUND TO TELLING US</i>!!<br />
Can't be the WWF GreenFear-sheviks, can it!!!!!!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?</div>
<div>
*</div><div>We can see how the sad Greta was brainwashed by green bolshevik propganda. in <a href="https://polarbearscience.com/2019/05/04/stop-lying-to-children-about-dying-polar-bears-as-a-way-to-achieve-action-on-climate-change/">this May 4, 2019 report</a> <span face="arimo-1, arimo-2, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><i>"Stop lying to children about dying polar bears as a way to achieve action on climate change".</i></span></div><div>*</div><div> How about that "climate change" gotcha-question-attack sprung by Kommy Kammy Harris against Judge Amy C Barrett at the Supreme Court confirmation hearings in Oct 2020?!!! Kammy has just officially 'jumped the shark' with that sick amateur rank stunt - there's <i>no</i> effing credibility left,<i> anywhere</i> in the Demotard party.</div><div><br /></div><div> Yet for months, from the late summer 2020 into late Oct, daily phony poll reports on the MSM (Marxist Socialist Media) have been repeatedly claiming that Biden and Harris are in some kind of massive lead over Trump!! The looming Democrat disaster is palpable - yet the MSM liars continue to peddle their anti-Trump hate and delusions of a 'Democrat blue-wave' victory! Canadian MSM dutifully report the same lies and peddle the same misinformation, with the help of censors such as Twatter and Farcebook.</div><div> Biden has maybe what, a dozen people show up at his almost-deserted phony 'rallies' (...most of whom are camera techies and reporter/propagandists) while Trump holds peaceful protests overflowing with capacity <i>crowds of thousands </i>of supporters, where thousands more can't even get in. Trump supporters line the streets waiting to cheer on Trump, while no one bothers to show up for Burisma Joe's pathetic motorcade. This happens all over the country, yet the MSM censor it or downplay it.</div><div> On the ABC phony townhall (Oct 15, 2020), Disney cartoon-journalist George Stephanopoulos showed himself to be nothing more than a propagandist, when he <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">refused to ask demented Joe about the breaking 'laptop revelations' </span></i>and the Bidens' activities in Ukraine, while Ole Joe was Obama's point man in Ukraine. (Had this been Trump, the hack George would have been asking about it) But George just acted like a typical Biden c*ck holster, basically giving Quid-Pro-Joe a free ride and a free hour-long commercial on primetime network TV. Joe was coddled, as if he was aa delicate child. How the hell can this be a presidential contender???!</div><div>*</div><div><br /></div><div>Below is a repeat of Chapter 16, with added updates from 2020 building upon the same theme of climate change lies and Lake Ontario/Great lakes flooding:</div><div><br /></div><div><div style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: 700;"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 16 </span><br /><span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large; font-weight: 700;"> </span>Speaking of the 'political manifestation of climate-change', on Apr. 29, 2017 we saw AGW-infected Niagara politicians such as Carlos Garcia and St.Catharines mayor Walter Sendzik immediately link spring flooding at Lakeside Park with climate change - with no AGW evidence provided, and with <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">no questions asked by reporter Allan Benner</a>!<br /> These two GreenFear-mongering politicians<br /> "agreed that climate change is to blame for the problems.<br />“When someone says, ‘What does climate change look like, and what does it mean to a city like St. Catharines?’ This is what it means,” Sendzik said. “It means a higher rate of erosion on our shoreline, it means flooding in areas like Port Dalhousie and Lakeside Park, and it impacts the yacht club.”<br /><br /> So: what does GreenFear propaganda look like?! <br />Well: look no further than Benner's biased 'report' about 2 smug local clowns peddling Al Gore's and Jim Bradley's climate-change-paranoia!! <br /> You'd think by reading this St.Catharines Standard crap, that the water levels in the Great Lakes watershed had never deviated in the last... oh... thousand years! (....or, even since Jim Bradley was first elected!) <br /> Apparently, we are to believe that there had never been any rate of erosion in the Great Lakes - until this week!! Apparently, prior to April of 2017, the entire Great Lakes ecosystem was always in a comfortable stasis, where nothing had ever changed !<br /> (The Standard did not bother to ask Mayor GreenPants why his city approved a condo building being built beside Lakeside Park literally feet from the flooded lakeshore!! I guess the mayor and the Standard need future 'climate-change victims' to justify this GreenFear-mongering) <br /> The Standard plants a biased half-story without the context; keeping the GreenFear propaganda alive a little longer, rehashing the phony narrative whenever possible - kudos all around for a great team effort of fake-newsmanship!<br /> Report the AGW lie, don't question the liars pushing the AGW premise. Don't ask, don't tell, nudge-nudge wink-wink - that's how the national media typically dances with Cagey, and those same jive moves are copied locally. <br /><br /><br /> Compare mayor Walter Sendzik's GreenFear-mongering on Apr.29, 2017, to <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">t</a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">his May 5 CBC story by Laurene Jardin </a> (headlined "St. Lawrence River could rise if N.Y. request to lower Lake Ontario is approved") reporting New York State Governor Cuomo's request to open up the dam at Cornwall to drain off more of Lake Ontario's water. This is completely relevant to the issue - yet, it's funny how Sendzik (the Agenda-21-infected mayor) never made any mention of any dam, nor its effect on the water levels in Port Dalhousie! The local yokels were left with the (intended) scary impression that this was all due to 'climate change'. <br /><br /> And reporter Allan Benner didn't bother to ask about that, either (...remember: the point is to play up and propagate the false impression of AGW, not to question its false premise... to propagate the 'climate-change' agenda by spiking the appearance over the substance.)<br /> Jardin wrote:<br />"Jean Aubry-Morin, a Canadian member of the International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Board, said it's a balancing act... <br /> Aubry-Morin said that the board would take current water levels in Quebec into consideration before adding any water into the St. Lawrence. <br />Because of the snow melt and spring showers, the international board redistributes water into the appropriate body of water every year.<br />What's abnormal about this year, Aubry-Morin says is the amount of precipitation the provinces have seen in the last six weeks.<br />"It's a one-in-20-year situation," he said".</div><div><br /></div><div><div><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large; font-weight: 700;"> </span> Yet, mayor Sendzik and councillor Garcia acted as if they'd never heard of any kind of 'once in a 20 yr situation' - to them, this was 'evidence' of drastic climate change (which probably in their minds, was also directly and personally caused by Donald Trump!)<br /> No one in Benner's story mentioned the Cornwall dam's existence, let alone its purpose!<br /> No one mentioned the dam's systemic effects, downstream and upstream, upon the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence watershed, and its effect locally, upon the beach at Lakeside Park!!! <br /> And Benner didn't bother to ask about any of this, either. <br /> It's interesting to note that in her story, CBC reporter Jardin did NOT make any of those expected, typical, obligatory, false-causation references to 'climate change'. That was an unexpected, refreshing move.<br /><br /><br /> SO: now let's see what cagey ol' David Phillips saying about all this!!<br /><br /><br /> Let's look at <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Stephen Smith's May 4, 2017 CBC story </a>(headlined "Mix of 'rare events' led to rapid rise of floodwaters in Montreal's West Island, prof says"):</div><div><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: large; font-weight: 700;"><span style="background-color: white;"> </span></span>"David Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada, said another factor adding to the problem is the repeated occurrence of storm systems over the last five weeks that didn't just come and go, but stuck around for days.<br />"They haven't been hit and run," he said. "They've had more time to linger and spread more of their misery. Instead of one day of rain, we're seeing maybe two or three days of rain from the same system."<br />April had 19 rainy days in total, Phillips said, and many of those days saw heavy amounts of rainfall.<br />"It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day," he said."<br /> There goes Cagey again, with his oft-repeated, very scientific "gully-washer" rhetoric...<br /> It's funny how the CBC reporter Stephen Smith - when he had the chance to do so - DID NOT BOTHER TO ASK David Phillips if the flooding along the Great Lakes confirms Al Gore's Inconvenient Truths about Climate Change. <br /><br /> Isn't THAT what every leftist infected with AGW wants to know?!? <br /> They want confirmation from Environment Canada's TOP CLIMATOLOGIST that this flooding <i>is </i>caused by AGW!<br /> They want to know that the Trudeau government's "it's real, it's all settled" climate change policy is based on science.<br /><br /><br /> When David Phillips blurted to reporter Stephen Smith that "It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day", why didn't reporter Smith immediately ask if this gully-washer of rain was an example of 'man-made climate change'?? <br /> Was this an "inconvenient" question for the reporter ask? <br /> Or did Smith - anticipating that it would be an "inconvenient" question for Cagey to answer - decide to self-censor, to HEROICALLY MUZZLE HIMSELF and to<i> not ask</i> it, in order to protect and not embarrass Cagey??!<br /><br /><br /> Why ignore such an obvious follow-up question??<br /> Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith simply ASK Canada's Senior climatologist to directly confirm that all this flooding is due to AGW?<br /><br /><br /> After all, isn't that a simple, straight-forward question for a reporter to logically ask, after he's just been told by Canada's Senior Climatologist that a half-month's worth of rain fell in one day??<br /><br /><br /> Wouldn't a reporter reasonably ask, following-up on Phillips' own gully-washing rhetoric: 'Mr. Phillips, you cite lots of rainfall - a half-month's worth of rain in one day... is that an example of man made climate change, Mr. Phillips?'<br /><br /><br /> Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith follow-up on what Phillips said?<br /><br /><br /> Even small town mayors are apparently convinced it's all due to climate change - so what is preventing BOTH Canada's top climatologist, and Canada's national broadcaster, from publicly providing what should be such a straightforward answer, to such a straightforward question??<br /> Trudeau's Liberals (and Turdo's hacks never lie..) have told us that 'climate change is real'; so why does the CBC shirk from asking Environment Canada about confirming 'climate change'??<br /><br /><br /> What prevented the CBC's Stephen Smith from asking David Phillips this question?<br /><br /> Let's ask (... yes.... again... ...):<br />- was David Phillips "muzzled" by anyone?!<br />- did anyone prevent or suppress David Phillips from answering such a question?!<br />- is it an unspoken belief that it would be beneath the dignity of David Phillips to be asked such a direct question?!<br />- did any one "muzzle" Stephen Smith (or any other CBC reporter, for that matter?!)<br />- did anyone prevent or suppress reporter Smith (or any other CBC reporter) from asking David Phillips to confirm that the flooding IS INDEED the direct result of AGW?!<br />- is it beneath the dignity of any CBC reporter to directly ask Philips such a question?!?<br /> <br /> <br /> Now - let's continue from the above, by looking at this Dec.15, 2020 report from the Watertown Daily Times, which deals with the very same subject which Sendzik, Garcia and the St. catharines Standard hack Benner were propagandizing about in 2017:<br /><br />"IJC gives green light to increase Lake Ontario outflows to prepare for possible flooding</div></div></div><div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;"><b>12/15 - Watertown, NY </b>– In anticipation of high volumes of water entering Lake Ontario next year, the International Joint Commission has granted pre-emptive permission to deviate from its controversial Plan 2014.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">On Friday, the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Board announced the IJC gave the green light to increase outflows beyond those outlined in Plan 2014 from the Robert Moses-Robert H. Saunders Power Dam in Massena, even though Lake Ontario water levels as of Friday remain at about its seasonal long-term average. The lake’s levels have been on their seasonal decline since June.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">But the levels of Lake Erie, as well as each of the upper Great Lakes, remain feet above their average water levels — water that’s coming toward Lake Ontario and threatening even more lakeshore flooding for the north country.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">The deviation will begin Jan. 1 and continue through the end of February. This regulation strategy will be reassessed at that time and could be revised with a request for further deviation from Plan 2014.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">The main driver of a “high-water event” for Lake Ontario next year, according to the IJC, will depend on various seasonal factors such as precipitation and snowpack runoff. The winter season has been rather mild so far this year, but the lake and river board is adopting this deviation plan now to prepare.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">The lake and river board has automatic permission to increase outflows past the Plan 2014 threshold when water levels hit a certain high, and usually doesn’t occur during the winter months. But Lake Erie’s rising water level poses a serious threat.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">“There remains considerable uncertainty in the weather and water supply conditions between now and next spring,” a release from the IJC reads. “These natural, uncontrolled hydrologic factors are the primary driver of water level fluctuations on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">“If basin conditions are extremely wet, and similar to those observed in 2017 and 2019, no deviation strategy will prevent water levels that can cause flooding and damage shoreline properties,” the release continues. “Providing those types of benefits are beyond the reach of water regulation and are more reliably addressed through coastal resilience and planning.”</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">Plan 2014, IJC’s plan for managing water levels, was implemented in December 2016, but came under fire after mass flooding in 2017.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">In 2017 and 2019, the lake and river saw what people refer to as once-in-100-year flooding less than two years apart. The flooding caused severe damage to the lake and river shorelines, costing shoreline property owners and the state millions of dollars.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">Watertown Daily Times"</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">-</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;"> So we see that in 2020, the<i> same</i> arc on the <i>same</i> subject continues - but here we now see by contrast HOW SENDZIK and GARCIA were LYING in 2017!</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">THIS IS WHAT the Standard urinalist hack Benner refused to report in 2017!!</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">They just lied by claiming it was ALL DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE!! To hell with the fact that "<i>natural, uncontrolled hydrologic factors are the primary driver of water level fluctuations on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River </i>" - right?!!</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">Because pos like Jim Bradley and Turdeau insist that 'Climate change is man made', and because GreenFear enablers in the media believe it, therefore "<i>natural uncontrolled hydrologic factors</i>" <i><b>CANNOT EXIST</b></i> !!!</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">These Green Fear propagandists just lied in 2017, and the press lackies enabled them. What a cosy set up.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">Benner could have EASILY dug into Sendzik's and Garcia's GreenFear lies - the IJC 2014 report was already in place and known - and Benner should have acted as a journalist and NOT as a stenographer / urinalist parroting climate change lies<i> WITHOUT</i> examining them, <i>without </i>bothering to provide a shred of context or of journalistic integrity.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">It's a blatant fraud by ALL involved. The political left ejaculate lies; the eager press monopoly happily licks it all up. </p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">When will the St.Catharines Standard apologize for its phony 'reporting'; for its journalistic malpractice? When will the St.Catharines Pathetic SubStandard ask Canada's Cagiest Climatologist David Phillips to DISPUTE that "<i>natural, uncontrolled hydrologic factors are the primary driver of water level fluctuations on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River"</i>???!!!!</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;"> How about asking that Liberal scumbag Jim Bradley (now with a year-long phony Niagara Regional 'climate emergency' law in place!!!!) to dispute that "<i>natural, uncontrolled hydrologic factors are the primary driver of water level fluctuations on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River".</i></p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">Bradley - like Sendzik and Garcia - when pressed, would have to also pretend that all Great Lakes water levels are are <i><b>NOT </b></i>natural, but are<i> all man-made</i>, <i>all due to AGW!! </i>So, it's best to <i>NOT</i> dare ask Ole "Climate Emergency" Jimmy anything about umm... ahh... the real causes of the 'climate change' that Sendzik and Garcia are lying about!! </p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">When will the St.Catharines Standard follow up with Sendzik and Garcia, including a discussion on this 2020 report, comparing it in contrast to what they were all saying in 2017? (answer:<i> never - </i>their job as propagandists is to<i> PRETEND</i> 'man-made climate change' exists<i>, </i>not to<i> PROVE </i>it exists, by all means possible).</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;">How f*ckin sad.</p><p style="color: black; font-size: 13.3333px;"><br /></p></span></div><div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div><div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">*</span></div><div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div><div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">More 'extreme' climate caginess coming soon!</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-4833207128233781392019-08-16T15:26:00.001-04:002019-08-16T15:26:35.906-04:00Google search censoring Trudeau criticism?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Providing a <a href="https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2019/08/justin-trudeau-found-guilty-again-of.html">link back to my previous post</a>, regarding Trudeau's ethical breaches, which has been censored by google search.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-77514662833996505562019-08-14T13:23:00.000-04:002019-10-17T17:32:47.057-04:00Justin Trudeau found GUILTY - again - of ethics violations. FLUSH TURDO 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
NOTE: THIS POST IS CENSORED and BANNED by GOOGLE SEARCH!!!<br />
<br />
On <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5764034/justin-trudeau-snc-lavalin-broke-ethics-rules/">Aug.14, 2019, it was announced</a> that Canada's ethics watchdog has found Canadian Liberal Crime Minister Justin Turdeau has - once again - violated Canadian ethics standards, this time a conflict-of-interest in the SNC - Lavalin scandal.<br />
Let's remember that back on Feb.7, 2019, Liberal liar Turdo claimed nothing happened, nothing was wrong, and that stories about what his Liberals had been doing were false..<br />
We now see that Canada's Liberal Crime Minister Justin Turdo was directly involved in attempting to influence and to pressure Canada's then-Attorney General (Jody Wilson Raybould) to try to gain a favourable (non-criminal) outcome in the SNC scandal.<br />
In other words, what Turdo wanted to do, was HALT THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of SNC-Lavalin - and furthermore, he wanted his AG, Ms. Raybould, to do the dirty work for him. She refused to kneel before Trudeau's attempts at criminality - so Trudeau fired her by demoting her, and installed bumboy Lametti, who would gladly kneel for his master.<br />
The Liberal stench of corruption permeating this pathetic Canadian Prime Minister's stained and dishonoured office has been revealed.<br />
The ethics commissioner's report raises <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/andrew-coyne-conflict-of-interest-the-least-of-concerns-raised-by-snc-lavalin-affair">even further,</a> still-to-be investigated issues: whether Turdeau and some of his Liberal klan members <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE </span></i><span style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">by interfering in the criminal process</span></i><span style="color: #111111;"> dealing with SNC-Lavalin. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #111111;"> Two-faced Turdeau and his Liberal klan were even conspiring AGAINST their own AG (Raybould), keeping her in the dark on many issues <i>while themselves having exclusive contacts with SNC</i>!!!</span></span></span><br />
Will Canada's Clown Prince Justin Trudeau - the smug moral-virtue peddler -<i> now</i> (Aug 14th) do the right thing and step down? If not - why not?!<br />
(Well, it turns out the lying piece of shit Trudeau did NOT resign, and refused to apologize for his ethical breach - which is why an RCMP investigation into Trudeau's activities would be warranted, to follow up on the Ethics Commissioner's findings.<br />
Even the Ethics Commissioner, Mario Dion, <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">was obstructed </span></i>in his investigation by Trudeau and his Liberal klan!<br />
Clearly, not only were Turdo and his co-conspirators originally lying about what they were doing: pressuring AG Raybould to approve the Deferred Prosecution Agreement for SNC, but Turdo and his Liberal klan-members then attempted to cover up what they had done.<br />
<br />
It's important to note that this DPA had <i>ALREADY</i> been previously denied by Canada's Director of Public Prosecutions, who had <i>ALREADY </i>refused to negotiate a remediation agreement with SNC-Lavalin which would have allowed it to avoid a criminal conviction.<br />
So, Turdo's interference was<i> not</i> just with Raybould - but ALSO he was interfering with the previous original decision by the DPP.<br />
.<br />
How can {some!} blinded Canadians<i> still</i> continue to trust this <a href="https://www.straight.com/news/1226351/martyn-brown-whither-liar-who-wasnt-trudeau">incompetent Liberal liar</a>?<br />
<br />
Will Liberal MP's demand Turdo step down, or will they deflect and defend their Corrupt Lying Liberal 'Leader' to the end?<br />
If Liberals want to win the upcoming federal election, will they eat their own, and remove Tainted Turdo out of the way<i> now,</i> asap, before the writ is dropped, in order to show Canadians that Liberals aren't Canada's perennial crime party?<br />
How can any Liberal <i>still </i>support Crooked Turdo now??!<br />
Note that while the Liberal liar Turdo was speaking {lying} in NOTL there were two Liberal hacks standing solemnly behind their Lying Hero: MP Chris Bittle and MP Vance Badawey.<br />
Funny that the local Liberal-lovin' Torstar rag, the St. Catharines Standard, didn't bother to ask these two local Niagara Liberal clowns about why they continue to support their crooked leader!<br />
No questions emanated from Niagara's local media Liberal ass-kissers, asking Bittle and Badawey 'Was your boy Turdo lying on Feb. 7, 2019, when he called the story about his involvement in the SNC-Lavalin scandal "false", or is your boy lying today, on Aug.14, 2019, when he said he took full responsibility for the scandal - the scandal which 6 months ago he called false?! Do you <i>still </i>trust Trudeau? Why should anyone trust Turdo now?<br />
Of course, such questions would have been <i>immediately</i> and <i>relentlessly</i> asked by the frenzied local media if this was a Conservative caught lying the way Turdo was caught lying.<br />
Great 'reporting' job - again, Grant Lafleche!!<br />
There's' <i>gotta</i> be annuder 'award' comin' yer way soon, isn't there?!<br />
Maybe at least a nice Telford 'giftbasket', eh... or, a nice little Liberal 'taxpayer-funded subsidy' in your paycheque?!!<br />
Isn't it nice to see how Turdo's giving media outlets millions in taxpayer subsidies works wonders in the leftist propaganda department?! As<a href="https://www.blacklocks.ca/bailout-worth-115k-a-week/"> Blacklock's Reporter wrote on Aug.1, 2019</a>:<br />
the<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> money-losing Torstar</span></i> revealed to its shareholders that their leftist rag has so far netted a whopping -get this -<b><i> <span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times new roman" , "times" , "freeserif" , serif; font-size: 15.4px;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">$115,385</span></span></i></b><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "times new roman" , "times" , "freeserif" , serif; font-size: 15.4px;"><b><i> A WEEK</i></b> </span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , "times" , "freeserif" , serif;"><span style="font-size: 15.4px;">from Turdo's cozy little Liberal media bailout, stating </span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times new roman" , "times" , "freeserif" , serif; font-size: 15.4px;">“<i>We recorded an estimated benefit of $3 million for the first half of the year in respect of a new refundable labour tax credit for qualifying journalism organizations</i>”!!! In Niagara, Trudeau's NEW PRAVDA peddlers are the Torstar's bumwipers <i>St.Catharines Standard </i>and <i>Niagara This Week</i>.</span><br />
<br />
...Hey ho, hey ho, Justin Turdo's gotta go...<br />
Flush Turdo 2019<br />
<br />
Read the FULL REPORT on Crime Minister Turdo's 2nd ethics violation here:<br />
<a href="http://ciec-ccie.parl.gc.ca/EN/InformationFor/Pages/NRTrudeauII.aspx?utm_source=AnnouncementPage&utm_medium=Website&utm_campaign=Trudeau2Report">http://ciec-ccie.parl.gc.ca/EN/InformationFor/Pages/NRTrudeauII.aspx?utm_source=AnnouncementPage&utm_medium=Website&utm_campaign=Trudeau2Report</a><br />
<br />
The pre-election campaign event which Turdo attended, was held at the Library/community centre grounds in Niagara on the Lake. It was packed with Liberal shills, Liberal operatives, and Liberal politicians, including NOTL mayor Betty Disero (yep: the Liberal hack formerly in Toronto city politics, who essentially drooled and fawned over Turdo) and of course, Ontario's Godfather of GreenFear, the disgusting Grit hack Jim Bradley.<br />
<br />
Update:<br />
We then saw that on Aug.15, 2019, Turdo went to campaign in Fredericton, New Brunswick, where {despite his Aug.14th lie in NOTL that he"took full responsibility" for his actions} he <i>refused to apologize</i> for his purposeful ethics violation, again using the discredited canard of "jobs" as his reason to break the law.<br />
Also while in New Brunswick (at the National Acadian Day event in Dieppe) Turdo actually had a <a href="https://twitter.com/CPC_HQ/status/1162318083115159552">very brief 10-second interaction with Andrew Scheer.</a> Turdo saw Scheer at the festival and approached him; they quickly shook hands, at which point Scheer told Turdo: "<i><span style="color: red;">You have to stop lying to Canadians. You have to come clean</span></i>"!! Turdo response was a bizarre "Oh, this is a good day today" and he walked way. CBC <i>DID NOT</i> report this interaction at all - but at least <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5777349/scheer-liberal-snc-lavalin/">Global News did</a>.<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 28px;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/philpott-snc-report-1.5247792">CBC's Catharine Tunney reported on Aug.15, 2019:</a>:</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
"...Prime Minister Justin Trudeau remained dogged Thursday that he doesn't need to apologize for his role in the SNC-Lavalin affair, a day after Canada's ethics watchdog found he violated the Conflict of Interest Act by trying to influence the former attorney general while she was dealing with the SNC-Lavalin case.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #222222;"> During an announcement in Fredericton on Thursday morning, Trudeau was asked by a reporter</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> how he can take responsibility, but not apologize</span></i><span style="color: #222222;">. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
"I'm not going to apologize for standing up for Canadians' jobs because that's my job — to make sure that Canadians, communities and families across the country are supported, and that's what I will always do," he responded.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
Trudeau's comments echoed his resolve Wednesday, following the release of the report by Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion, that while he takes full responsibility for the SNC-Lavalin affair, he refuses to apologize.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
The report found the prime minister violated the Conflict of Interest Act by trying to influence Jody Wilson-Raybould and get her to overrule a decision to not grant a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) to the Quebec-based engineering firm..."</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
-</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "open sans" , sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">This Prime Minister has shown willful contempt for the law. He has lied to break the law, and lied and obstructed to cover up his actions - and was caught twice in the same subterfuge. This is a reckless Liberal, unfit to govern.</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">By Aug.16, the usual disgusting Liberal hacks popped up proudly vowing allegiance to their morally-challenged hero Turdo - including hacks such as MP Freeland and MP Catherine McKenna - such good, proud, decent and supportive 'Liberal sisters' to Raybould and Philpott; such post-national Tru-gropian faux-feminist people-kinders!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">On Aug.19, 2019,<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9_7EcDl4AY"> CBC reported</a>... </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> {... by the way, in the above CBC story, watch and <i> listen</i> to one of CBC's panel guests, Yolande James, a former Liberal hack. It was ASTOUNDING <i>and pathetic t</i>o witness the blatant ignorant dissembling emanating from this Turdo defender. It's like James was from some other planet, spinning, bobbing and weaving, deflecting from the points raised by the other two panelists. It was a most sickening performance, very troubling indeed under the circumstances, when the TRUST of the Canadian Prime Minister is at serious issue. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> James presented herself as if she was cognitively impaired, unable to reconcile the very idea that her dear Liberal leader <i>lied publicly</i>, and <i>was </i>found to have pressured the AG in a criminal proceeding, and then <i>also</i> obstructed the ethics commissioner's investigation!! What a job to <i>willingly</i> come out and defend this indefensible creep - and then try to somehow blame Scheer for calling on the RCMP to investigate!! </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">James' attempts to downplay all this was revolting.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Until 5 days ago (when the EC's report came out) <i>NOBODY even knew</i> the scope of Trudeau's activities nor of his deceptions and cover ups!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Liberal hack James full well knows that Dion's report could not lay criminal blame, as his mandate was to determine ethics violations. But along the way, Dion discovered - and reported - that there was a huge pile of Liberal stink <i>still not yet revealed</i> due to Trudeau's attempts to <i>obstruct the investigation</i>! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Which is why the call <i>now </i>to ask the RCMP to investigate further into Trudeau's criminality is necessary.)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Andrew Scheer has officially asked the RCMP to look into the allegations of Turdo's interference in the SNC DPA process, and how Turdo's attempts to influence the Attorney General to interfere in that process, was a criminal act... (... allegations revealed in the Ethics Commisioner's <i>own report</i>, not pulled out of thin air; and not "false" as Canada's Lying Liberal Crime Minister originally claimed!) The CBC immediately sent out a 'reporter' to say on the noon televised news to say that Scheer was doing this <i>as a political stunt</i> (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?) - - - as if WHAT THE LYING PIECE OF CRAP TURDO was doing was somehow <i>not </i>political - and somehow <i>not</i> criminal??!!?!!! Looks like Liberals have a hard time understanding their own criminality. </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Ah, you dedicated commies at the CBC: Turdo thanks you for your loyal Liberal c*ck-holstering!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> That same day, another disgusting McGuinty hack, <a href="https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/warren-no-trudeau-shouldnt-apologize-and-heres-why#comments">Jim Warren at the Sun</a>, once again brought out the misogynist card {...really: can ya <i>believe</i> it???!} - and BLAMED Jody Wilson Raybould for the mess which Trudeau created!!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Talk about cooking up a batch of perverted Liberal propaganda to deflect from Justin Trudeau's well-deserved self-made criminality!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">*</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #222222;"> By Sept.11, 2019 (the first official day of the 2019 federal election campaign) Turdo had not only refused to continue looking the ethic's commissioners findings, (ie: Turdo shut the inquiry down), but now Turdo has</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> also refused </span></i><span style="color: #222222;">to allow the people who were involved in the SNC ethics breach and subsequent cover up, to speak freely about what they know. So this is the second (or now third??) cover up by Crime Minister Turdeau in relation to the fall out of his original ethics crime.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Here's a <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5887824/snc-lavalin-rcmp-inquiry-canada-election/">CTV report by Amanda Connolly, from Sept.11, 2019</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #111111; font-family: , "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<span style="color: #111111; font-family: , "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">Trudeau "...was questioned repeatedly by reporters on Wednesday {Sept.11, 2019} about the Globe and Mail report that the government is blocking the RCMP from examining whether there was obstruction of justice and declined to answer.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
When asked by a Globe and Mail reporter why he was not lifting cabinet confidentiality, Trudeau offered a one-line talking point.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<i><span style="color: red;">“We gave out the largest and most expansive waiver of cabinet confidence in Canada’s history,” he said</span></i><span style="color: #111111;">.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
That referred to the limited waiver that allowed Wilson-Raybould to testify about what she experienced as attorney general — but that also barred her from discussing anything to do with what happened after she was removed from her position.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
Reporters continued to push Trudeau to give a clear answer, with another asking him to explain what mistakes, exactly, he believes he made in the scandal.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
Trudeau said his job is to defend Canadian jobs but stood silently when pressed two more times with the specific question: “Which mistakes?”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
The Globe and Mail report does not indicate who, specifically, was telling the RCMP they could not discuss the matter.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
But Wilson-Raybould told Global News earlier in the summer she had also been contacted by the RCMP when the scandal first emerged this spring..."<br />
_</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
Note that CTV and reporter Connolly COMPLETELY IGNORED Trudeau's brazen lie, when Trudeau falsely stated that "<i style="color: black; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="color: red;">We gave out the largest and most expansive waiver of cabinet confidence in Canada’s history</span></i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> This is patently an outright lie by Crime Minister Turdeau.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> The largest waiver of cabinet confidence occurred when Liberal PM Paul Martin allowed the RCMP full access to ALL sensitive Liberal govt documents in the Gomery inquiry! </span><br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">This was verified as being the case by the Globe and Mail's Robert Fife, even on radio, as was heard on the afternoon of Wed. Sept.11, 2019, in an interview with Newstalk 1010 AM host Evan Solomon. Trudeau DID NOT issue any "expansive" waiver at all, in regards to his SNC scandal!</span><br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">What Trudeau <i>did</i> do was conspire in a cover up of his own original ethics violations.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Does Connolly not know this? Did Connolly not bother to check Turdeau's daily emissions, for ACTUAL FACT?? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="color: #111111; font-family: , "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> CTV's job is just to peddle Turdo's lies, not to actually ask questions - much like they do regarding the "climate change emergency" hoax. Hey:Liberals don't lie!! All we have to do to earn our fat media salaries is to stenograph what they say, and not ask about anything - - like the St. Catharines Standard did with Ontario Liberal MPP Jim Bradley for several DECADES!! No need to ask pesky questions... it's all settled folks, so, g'wan... we know what we're doin'- move along now...</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> HOW in f*ck's name did this ignorant reporter NOT BOTHER TO CATCH THE LIES DRIPPING FROM THIS LIBERAL's MOUTH?? These are Telford-bucks at work here! Hey hey, look the other way!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Turdo is EVADING the law, now blocking a CRIMINAL inquiry into his initial crime(s). This is an abuse of the highest order,a complete disregard for the rule of Canadian law.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Turdeau is behaving EXACTLY like the Chinese despots he so admires.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><i> What exactly</i> did Trudeau provide regarding SNC? Scant little! Trudeau spent his time hiding, obstructing and deflecting rather than being transparent and open. This is not just a charlatan, but a Librano criminal. </span></div>
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> But CTV is not the only media outlet performing their dereliction of duty as journalists: CBC ALSO completely ignored Turdo's lie on the CBC news that night, on Sept. 11, 2019!</span></div>
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> CBC's Rosemary Barton even showed that exact video clip of Trudeau - at his press conference held on the walkway right in front of the Governor General's Residence - presenting his lie as 'fact'. YET - Rosemary Barton DID NOT even bother to examine if this was in fact true! She DIDN'T SAY a word about Turdo's claims!! </span></div>
<div style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Barton refused to point out to CBC viewers that Trudeau was already lying on the first day of the campaign!</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="color: red;">Barton looked the other way </span><span style="color: #111111;">when Canada's Crime Minister Trudeau lied!! </span></span><br />
<div style="color: #111111;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> This is EXACTLY what Fake News is: repeat the lie, and make sure you DO NOT question it or analyze it. </span></div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Let the lie stand,unchallenged and unquestioned, AS IF it were actually true (...which is the typical media gameplan for the climate-change hoax, as well, what with all that tiresome Cagey Climate Two-Step Tangoin' going on...) </span></div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Barton may claim with scorn and mirthful derision that she and the CBC are not peddling fake news, but providing half-to-less-than-half of the story IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH - Barton's just showed herself to be a propagandist, not a journalist!! Her job {...supposedly... hahahaha!} IS to provide 'Canadians with what they need to know about the election campaign'...</span></div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> (...at least that's what the CBC is now claiming in their own advertising - falsely, we see - with all those smug Andrew Chang ads... what a load of utter CBC crap...)</span></div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
....yet, the CBC's PLANNED FAILURE to ACTUALLY EXAMINE what Trudeau said, completely negates the CBC's own claim - the CBC IS NOT 'giving us all we need to know'!! </div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<br />
It didn't take long, did it, for the FAKE NEWS CBC to reveal their bias - Turdo's FIRST campaign-day speech, right in front of the GG's residence, and his lies go UNCHALLENGED already!!!!</div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
The CBC is setting THEIR OWN biased agenda, and the evidence is clear in this case. And this is just DAY 1 of the campaign!! {Welcome to the fake-news perversions paid for by Turdo's friendly Media Fund}</div>
<div style="color: #111111;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<span style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Later that same night Sept.11, 2019, on the CBC's national tv news broadcast, Barton had her <i>At Issue</i> panel on, with Chantel Hebert, Andrew Coyne and Althia Raj and believe it or not, NOT ONE of them actually questioned Justin Trudeau's claim either, that his Liberals "</span><i style="color: black; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="color: red;">gave out the largest and most expansive waiver of cabinet confidence in Canada’s history</span></i><span style="color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">".</span><br />
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> You'd think that ONE OF THEM would have analyzed what Trudeau had said earlier that same day, and pointed out Turdo's deception when he was cornered, pretending that he had done something of great transparency, of great honesty, that he had cooperated honestly and openly - - - when in fact, he had <i>not</i> done so; all Turdo had done, was continually lie, obfuscate and obstruct.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Good gawd: Coyne's like the Brian Linehan of Canadian minutia politics - so how could even Coyne not have known that Turdo was lying?! </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Coyne well knows what happened in the Gomery inquiry, and how Paul Martin's Liberal government provided unprecedented access and documentation - which overwhelms anything that Turdo has <i>ever</i> provided!! </span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Also, during the CBC Sept.11, 2019 tv news broadcast, Rosemary Barton had not yet reported that Turdo's airplane was damaged shortly after it landed in Victoria, BC, when a bus full of reporters drove under its left wing and scraped it. Turdo had already left the plane when this occurred late on Sept. 11, so it must have happened after 10:30 pm Toronto time.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Fitting start for the End Of Prince Turdo's Incompetent Reign - start the day by lying in front of the GG residence that your govt is the most open in Canada, then end it by having your left wing clipped - by the media...haha - in your 'second home' on the left coast.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">So many other nuances to DAY 1 here: it was sickening to see Turdo and Soph (hey: are we <i>STILL</i> paying for the Turdo kids's nannies?) kissing GG Julie Payette (another disgusting climate-change hoax peddler) in front to the GG's residence, before Turdo went inside to get the GG's blessing for the election. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">It was afterwards, when he exited the residence, that Turdo gave his FIRST campaign speech to the small crowd and assembled press. CBC - later the same day, Sept. 11 - falsely reported that Turdo's first campaign speech occurred hours later, in BC, after the plane-bus incident. </span><br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">But clearly, Turdo's first campaign speech was held in front of the GG's residence in Ottawa - so CBC was spreading fake news on this front, as well. It was after this speech when Turdo took questions from some reporters, and had uttered his </span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">"</span><i style="color: black; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><span style="color: red;">We gave out the largest and most expansive waiver of cabinet confidence in Canada’s history</span></i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">"</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> lie.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">But Turdo had also made other lies at his Sept.11, 2019 speech in front of the GG's residence, such as when he claimed that:</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;"> </span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #393939; font-family: "montserrat";">“</span>We respect the decisions made by professional public servants..." - except of course, when he DOESN'T respect those decisions, and then bullies them and interferes with them!!</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #393939; font-family: "montserrat";"><br /></span>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">So what we see is that ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE 2019 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN, CANADIAN CRIME MINISTER TRUDEAU HAS ALREADY LIED!!!!</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> Trudeau and every Liberal scumbag </span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">deserve</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> to lose the election due to what they and their party represent: corruption, interfering with a decision by the AG, obstruction of justice, obstructing a subsequent inquiry into the earlier obstruction of justice, fraud, lies and </span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">deceit</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">On Sept.12, 2019, the CBC was completely ignoring Turdo's 'we are really really open trust us, really we are' lie, and ignored the media-bus-hits-Turdo-plane circus. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Like it never happened!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">On Sept.12, Suhana Marchand, on CBC's noontime "Canada's 24 hour News" tv broadcast, did not bother to examine Trudeau's lies, which had only occurred less than 24 hours earlier!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">ALL THAT was now swept under the proverbial rug.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Marchand also had interviewed some hack called Martin Patriquin - who called Bernier's policies, including his views on climate change, repugnant.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Marchand <i>did not </i>intercede to ask for a clarification, nor ask Patriquin to rescind his biased, unfounded, personal-vitriol-filled statement; in fact at the end of this slimy segment, Marchand made sure to chuckle and to compliment Patriquin on his smear job!! She DID NOT end the interview by clearly stating that the CBC did not condone what Patriquin's poor brain had shat out of his mouth.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Nope: the take-away left (intentionally, of course) for the audience by CBC's fake-news-creators was that CBC officially condones Patriquin's nutjob statement.</span><br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Maybe Patriquin would or wouldn't have retracted his idiotic attack, but certainly, <i>if</i> Marchand was {haha!}an unbiased host/reporter, ostensibly practicing fair and balanced journalism, she <i>herself </i>would have immediately called Patriquin out for what he's said, and also clearly distanced herself from Patriquin's outburst.</span><br />
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">But no: Marchand let it slide, said nothing, and let Patriquin's hate-filled slime fester unchallenged.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">THIS is the kind of fake "reporting" which the CBC covets. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Patriquin himself is repugnant and his views malignant. His are not views of a journalist, but of a skewed propagandist - perfect for the fake news mandate at the CBC. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.03em;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Patriquin did not address Turdo's SNC lies, as that would be an affront to those Liberals in Crooked Kwebek, Turdo's vote-rich "hedge fund".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Patriquin attacks Bernier - who has been barred from even debating with the others, yet the coward Turdo won't even attend half the debates, anyway! But bully Patriquin focuses on easy prey, thereby taking the heat off the truly repugnant sack of crap Turdo.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Funny that Patriquin is a repugnant, deluded climate change denier: denying that earth's climate<i> has</i> been changing since the earth formed. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">The CBC and Suhana Marchand should publicly apologize for their atrocious, incompetent "news" broadcast standards. Funny that NO OTHER candidate - ANYWHERE IN CANADA - is being called repugnant on national tv news!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">-</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Finally, Andrew Coyne is using the appropriate word for Justin' Trudeau's scandalous SNC- related actions: it is, as I have maintained for months, "a cover up":</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"> . </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Coyne wrote in the <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/andrew-coyne-the-question-of-what-is-trudeau-hiding-is-not-going-to-go-away">Sept.11, 2019 National Post</a>:</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"...But the issues involved in the SNC-Lavalin affair are too important to be treated so flippantly. This isn’t about whether to raise or lower taxes or some other question of policy on which people of goodwill can differ, but whether we are to have an impartial system of justice, or one in which powerful corporations can wriggle out of prosecution by lobbying the right politicians.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">It is beyond dispute that, at the very least, the prime minister and his officials pressured the former attorney general to instruct the director of public prosecutions to settle out of court with SNC-Lavalin, a process known as a remediation agreement, rather than prosecute it on charges of fraud and corruption. While it is up to the public to decide how much weight to attach to this in their voting calculus, they should be allowed to do so in possession of all of the facts.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"></span></span><br /></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">If the behaviour in question was not merely a violation, as the ethics commissioner found, of the principle of prosecutorial independence and section 9 of the federal Conflict of Interest Act, but a criminal offence, that is surely relevant information. And if that information has been kept from the public by the spurious invocation of cabinet confidentiality — by, <span style="color: #cc0000;">in short, a cover-up</span> — that takes the whole business into darker territory yet..."</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">-</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #111111; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Anything that Justin Trudeau says during this election campaign should be taken as worthless garbage from a fu*king Liberal liar. That the RCMP are going to let Turdo get away with this criminal behaviour is disgusting - but, hey, who's the RCMP's boss? oh yeah: Ralphie Goodale, who knows a thing or two about previous RCMP investigations - into </span></span><i style="color: #111111; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">him</i><span style="color: #111111; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">Since Trudeau REFUSED to willingly cooperate and willingly obstructed investigation into the SNC scandal, he and his Liberal Party should simply be viewed as a criminal organization. There is a chance the Liberals could still win the election, and Trudeau could still at some point in the future be found guilty of a SNC-related crime, and possibly have to resign - but, the government would not fall and would just continue under some other greedy Liberal hack. By having the RCMP back off during the election is a convenient benefit to the Liberals.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">You can bet that this kind of police leniency <i>would not be given </i>to most other Canadians.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">-</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">And and now let's see what <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/christie-blatchford-when-trudeau-talks-about-snc-lavalin-it-looks-like-hes-afraid-of-the-truth#comments-area">Christie Blatchford wrote in the Sept.12, 2019 National Post,</a> dealing again with that waiver lie which Turdo had been peddling. She wrote about another answer which Turdeau gave, this time on Sept.12th: </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;">"...</span></span><span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">When reporter Michelle Zilio of The Globe and Mail, which has led the coverage of the SNC-Lavalin issue, asked why former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould and former Treasury Board boss Jane Philpott shouldn’t be able to talk to the RCMP about the Trudeau government’s fulsome efforts to get SNC a plea bargain “without being muzzled by cabinet confidence,” Trudeau replied: </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">“<span style="color: #cc0000;">We actually took an unprecedented step in giving out a waiver that allows for all issues related to this matter to be discussed, investigated and followed up on. … This is something we did that is unprecedented because we know that it is important for people to examine what happened in this matter. And that’s why we took this step</span>.”</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"> So, we see that on Sept.12, Turdo basically doubled down on the lie which he had told yesterday (Sept.11th) when he was standing in front of the GG's residence.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">Yet: it was still a lie! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-variant-ligatures: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">Trudeau's phony waivers weren't "</span><span style="font-size: 17px;">unprecedented" -</span><span style="font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-variant-ligatures: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"> - - - what</span><span style="font-size: 17px; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-variant-ligatures: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"><i> is</i></span><span style="font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-variant-ligatures: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"> unprecedented is the enormity of Trudeau's lies, and the breadth of his incompetence.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">Blatchford continued:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;">"... </span><span style="font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">Alas and alack,<span style="color: #cc0000;"> that’s not true</span>, though he’s been singing the unprecedented tune a while now, on Wednesday describing it as “the largest and most expansive waiver of cabinet confidence in Canada’s history.”</span></span><br />
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">True, his government’s waiver for Wilson-Raybould included the waiving of solicitor-client privilege (necessary because of the nature of the dual portfolio she held, AG plus justice minister).</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But the waiver was<span style="color: #cc0000;"> not unprecedented</span> in the way that Trudeau suggested Thursday and said outright Wednesday — i.e., that it was both broad and freeing for those, such as the nine witnesses Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion believed had relevant evidence to give but could not because of cabinet confidence, who wanted to tell him the truth.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The waiver allowed JWR and other witnesses to disclose only conversations up to and including Jan. 14, when Wilson-Raybould was moved from the dual AG/justice portfolio to veterans affairs (after, insultingly, being offered the one job, the Indigenous file, that as a woman who has opposed the Indian Act her whole life, she couldn’t accept).</span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">Both JWR and Philpott have said there’s much more to the story that should be told, but that these conversations with either Trudeau or his senior staff which will tell it happened after Jan. 14.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 17px;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">This is the waiver Trudeau refuses to give</span> — even for his own ethics commissioner and even, stunningly, for the national police.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">(The Clerk of the Privy Council, Ian Shugart, apparently made the decision not to grant a broader waiver on his own, and the Liberals say they only learned about it later. The PM could have over-ruled him, but didn’t.)</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The most liberating waiver — plural actually — dates back to Adscam, the Gomery inquiry into the sponsorship scandal.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">I covered much of the public hearings — they revealed such base and venal conduct on the part of Liberal government ministers, deputy ministers, staff and even volunteers (some of whom cheerfully cashed cheques from companies they’d never heard of) that I actually wept hearing it — but didn’t remember the intricacies of the waivers.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">There were two — both approved by then Liberal PM Paul Martin and former Liberal PM Jean Chrétien — issued so former Justice John Gomery could have “a full inquiry” and learn how certain decisions were reached at the highest levels.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The waivers were dated Feb. 20, 2004 and Sept. 14 the same year. Together, they allowed witnesses to talk freely and relevant documents to get into the judge’s hands.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">In the final chapter of his first report (there were two), Gomery also had this to say: “The concentration of power in the office of the prime minister is a phenomenon of modern Canadian government which has been noted with concern by academics and commentators…</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“The dangers created by that concentration are demonstrated by the ‘Sponsorship scandal”.”</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">From 1994 to 2003, the federal government spent $332 million — almost half of that going to the various private communication and public relations agencies, which inexplicably were given the reins of control and dished out the dough, usually to themselves.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">That doesn’t begin to speak to the damage done to democracy, and government accountability and transparency.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Interestingly, the reporter who blew the lid off the sponsorship inquiry with his access to information requests, was the Globe’s Daniel LeBlanc. He is also one of the authors on this week’s story that JWR was interviewed only this week by the RCMP on a possible obstruction of justice charge.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Team Trudeau may have got a new plane Thursday, after the team bus drove under and damaged the wing of the old plane at the Victoria airport Wednesday night. They ought to need more than that.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Give Martin and Chrétien their due: They at least let slip the choke chains of cabinet confidence, born of a need to do the right thing (Martin) or a sublime self-confidence (Chrétien). By not going to school on those examples, and offering instead the frequent nose-stretcher of “unprecedented,” Trudeau looks like he’s afraid of the truth"</span><span style="background-color: white;">.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
-</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The above reporting by Christie Blatchford is the most spot on of any I've yet read on Trudeau's waiver lies. Most news reports COMPLETELY avoid mentioning, let alone explaining, Justin Trudeau's continuing string of lies on this waiver issue. As I wrote earlier, it was shocking to see CBC's <i>At Issue </i>panel yesterday (Sept.11), where Rosemary Barton and her panelists - including Andrew Coyne and Chantal Hebert - completely failed to broach the subject of Trudeau outright lying about his pathetic waiver 'accomplishments'. </div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So this report from Blatchford - a rare piece of proper journalism in Canada - is a welcome summation indeed, nailing all the points. </div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Most of Canada's main stream media seems to be actually helping Trudeau along in his obstruction of justice, by refusing to actually examine Turdo's lies. (Richard Madan kinda tried to cobble something together today on CTV, but it was a convoluted mess. It looked as if he was forced to 'try' to explain Turdo's lies, but he really didn't explain anything.) They report <i>what </i>Turdo says, but <i>DO NOT actually question</i> or analyze it, or give it any context - thereby allowing Turdo to freely build upon his unchallenged repertoire of lies.</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Trudeau looks like he's afraid of the truth, Blatch opines, but well, let's face it: there is <i>NOTHING</i> TRUE IN TRUDEAU. Never was. "Budgets balance themselves..."... bla bla bla...</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
What there<i> is,</i> is endless Liberal deceit and corruption.<br />
<br />
Speaking of Liberal deceit, apparently no-one in Canada (hahahah) knew that Turdo was flying around the country in not just one fuel guzzling jet, but he was using TWO fuel guzzling jets! With ALL those Telford-bought media toadies accompanying Turdo on the campaign, ALL of them swore they 'didn't know' anything about Turdo using 2 jets on his campaign! Just like for 5 years, no-one in Canada's media 'knew' about Justin's love of blackface!! Apparently the second jet was needed for Justin's make-up, costume changes, and an entourage of actors to play the roles of Liberal-besotted Turdo fans at various campaign stops!!!.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
-</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Need more evidence of Turdo's hypocrisy? Look no further than the <a href="https://election.ctvnews.ca/trudeau-s-campaign-in-turmoil-how-international-media-is-covering-trudeau-s-racist-brownface-blackface-photos-1.4600708">Blackface revelations of Sept 17-18-19!!</a> (CTV, Adam Frisk,Sept.19, 2019)</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Turdo was asked (on Sept.18) whether there were ONLY 2 of these photos - Turdo REFUSED to answer the question. ('Open and transparent', eh?) Yet, more images<i> did </i>come out overnite of Sept 18-19. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<div style="font-size: 17px;">
So, we see that Turdo LIED AGAIN. Turdo knew there was more out there - he just LIED by OMISSION. He was hoping - like with his SNC LAVALIN criminality - that he won't get caught. </div>
<span style="font-size: 17px;">And Canad's mainstream media also </span><b style="font-size: 17px;">lied by omission</b><span style="font-size: 17px;">: for 5 years, they did NOT bother to look (...therefore, they could not find... </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">y'see how it works</span><span style="font-size: 17px;">?!} anything in Turdeau's sordid groping blackfaced past!! It was just purposefully covered-up and ignored!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
It was hilarious to see the CBC fake news peddlers on their Sept.19th noontime tv "news" cast, trying to deflect from their hero Turdo.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Suhana Marchand seemed confused as how to spin the story on behalf of the Liberal hero which her media organization so-eagerly co*kholsters for. Suhana would know EXACTLY how to peddle the FEAR and SMEAR if a <i>conservative</i> had done this!!<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Look what the CBC had Katie Simpson saying on Marchand's "news" show - Simpson was trying to deflect by asking if SHEER had ever done this, as well!!</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Amazing: THAT is what Telford dollars BUY!!</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Then the CBC raises questions like "when did Sheer know about this" and "why did he release this now"!!</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Let's consider this CBC Fake News act: the question is <i>when did the CBC know about this</i>?!! </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
And: <i>why did the CBC NEVER release or question ANY of this</i>, IN THE LAST 4 years!!! The CBC is packed with thousands of conservative-hatin' hacks: not one of them bothered to expose their golden boy. </div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">Lying by omission much, Catherine Tait?! </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">And her job is to supposedly "build social cohesion in Canada"??! What Tait's CBC klan are doing is <i>sowing social DIVISION in Canada</i>.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<br />
Get it now, how insidious Canada's msm is??</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Hey Katie Simpson: what did YOU do in the last 4 years to find out about Turdo's background??!!! When did YOU find out, Katie??!! C'mom Katie: tell us! Why weren't YOU and YOUR CBC employers doing <i>your</i> jobs - as supposed 'journalists' - during the last 4 years?! And NOW, you're suddenly called upon by your CBC bosses, at noon on Sept. 9, to SMEAR SCHEER, coughing with embarrassment as you do so?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
These blackface photos and videos ARE NOT in fact new - these were already in existence years prior to the 2015 election; clearly, in the public realm - - - it was just PURPOSEFULLY censored. Turdo's 'reputation' had to be protected at all costs. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
The point is, CBC and their media cabal REFUSED to actually look into their golden boy's actual past, neither in the 2015 election, nor during his previous years as MP, and still not <i>now</i>, in the 2019 election!<br />
Sounds impossible to be the case: but there it is: lying by omission; looking the other way, to make sure you don't see anything that could cast a shadow on YOUR favourite sockboy. You didn't look into it, therefore you could not find it, therefore, dear Canadians - for 5+ years, how <i>could</i> there be anything<i> to</i> report!!!<br />
These are Pravda-quality CBC tactics here. High level manipulation covered up by propaganda from hack mouthpieces such as Andrew Chang and the gang.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: 17px;">Turdo was treated as an earth-saving messiah. The CBC, which gets MILLIONS from the taxpayer, conveniently was... </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">umm</span><span style="font-size: 17px;"> ... 'unable' {</span><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">bwahahahaha</span></i><span style="font-size: 17px;">} to find ANY of these Turdo blackface images!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Think about the conspiracy here. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Like with Turdo's climate change hoax, the MSM just REFUSED to actually act as journalists, and look into Turdo and his 'it's all settled' claims. With Turdo, it was a continual 'ah, he means well... let's give poor Justy a pass...'. But everyone else though, especially any conservative, was of course, fair game for the media's drive-by smear campaign.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
Just not Justin. </div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 17px; letter-spacing: 0.51px;"><br /></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-22712482324944861962017-02-14T14:09:00.005-05:002023-05-02T17:49:37.645-04:00Calling on Canada's Cagey Climatologist to reveal proof of man-made climate change<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b>CHAPTER 1</b> </span><br />
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Looks as if Ray Spiteri (in the Dec.22, 2011 St.Catharines Standard story "White Christmas? Dream on") engaged Environment Canada's senior climatologist David Phillips to determine whether a not-yet-snowy December in Niagara is proof of "climate change".</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Spiteri reported Phillips' reply: " <span style="color: #b45f06;">"Climate Change? Could be" said Phillips "We don't know what it is." </span>"</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><em>Pardon?! "<span style="color: #b45f06;">Could be</span>" </em>climate change<em>???</em></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"<span style="color: #b45f06;"><i>We don't know what is is</i></span>" ??!? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><em>Yikes</em>... that's probably<span style="color: #b45f06;"><em> not</em> </span>the answer which the GreenFear-mongering St.Catharines Standard was really hoping for!! <span style="font-size: xx-small;">hahaha: it's supposed to be "all settled"!!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">[...see some of my favourite Cagey Climatologist David Phillips stories <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2009/12/another-greenscam-snowjob.html">here</a>; <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2009/12/canad.html">here</a>; <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2010/02/five-feet-of-snow-proves-global-warming.html">here</a>; <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/01/al-gore-lookin-out-his-back-door.html">here</a> !]</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Spiteri <i>didn't bother t</i>o ask Phillips about the 'toxicity to The Planet' of the heat-trapping <em>water-vapour cloud</em> which Niagara Falls has been constantly releasing for some 12,000 years! [Huh? <i>Wh</i><em>aat</em>? Whaz<em>zzat</em> 'bout? Whaddaya <em>mean</em>..?]</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Why didn't Spiteri or his Standard editors <em>also</em> provide readers with Liberal MPP Jim Bradley's response to Phillips' "<span style="color: #b45f06;">we don't know</span>" answer, about climate change??</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Did Spiteri <em>even bother</em> to ask Niagara's Greatest GreenFear-monger, Jim 'Kyodiot' Bradley - who, by the way, is Ontario's Environment Minister?!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">You'd think that Bradley would have a completely opposite point of view than Phillips on the matter!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Jim Bradley and his entire Liberal party believe that the causes of, the existence of, and the political solutions to, the issue of "climate change" <em><span style="color: #b45f06;">HAVE ALL BEEN SETTLED</span></em>!!! Spiteri surely knows about the Liberals' GreenFear peddling, doesn't he?!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Bradley personally claims that man made climate change/global warming is real, and, obviously, Bradley's been blabbing that way for at least twenty years. Of course, Bradley has <em>never provided</em> any specific scientific basis for his claims, going back to at least 1991. The St.Catharines Standard, meanwhile, has gladly <span style="color: red;"><i>never asked!!</i></span> [see: <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/10/liberal-jim-bradley-shoots-crap.html">Liberal MPP Jim Bradley shoots crap</a>]</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Bradley most certainly claims to believe that <em><span style="color: #b45f06;">he knows what climate change is</span> - </em>though strangely, a <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/08/jim-bradleys-sack-of-potatoes.html">secretive Jim Bradley has never publicly revealed</a> his supporting 'scientific basis' for his climate change beliefs - scientific evidence which he clearly must have<em> already had</em> twenty years ago! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Yet now in 2011 - when Cagey claims that "<i>we don't know</i>" if cold weather is "climate change", while Jim Bradley's Liberals claim that "it's all settled" and that they <i>do </i>know it is "climate change" - why didn't</span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> reporter Spiteri investigate this inconsistency in the GreenFear narrative?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Isn't that EXACTLY what the (obviously phony) "wrong writers" at the St.Catharines Standard smugly boasted that they were all about?!! (hahaha) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Nah: the aim here was to look away and not look too closely at the inconsistent GreenFear narratives being peddled here! In order not to jeopardize the Standard's years/decades of Bradley ass-kissing, the first order of business was to protect Bradley from any controversy and isolate him from scrutiny; best then, to not to even link the two disparate memes; and to suppress/downplay/overlook any connection to the inconsistency! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Reporter Ray Spiteri had the opportune time to ask Liberal hack MPP Jim Bradley <em>all about</em> his Liberal global warming AGW "evidence"!! Spiteri <i>could have</i> asked<em></em></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- <em>all about</em> ClimateGate (# one and two);</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- <em>all about</em> the Mann-made hockey stick climate hoax;</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- <em>all about</em> the dismantling in Durban of Bradley's GreenFear weapon Kyoto, and why Bradley (McGuinty's supposed environment minister) <em>did nothing</em> about it; and... oh, yeah...</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">to ask <em>all about</em> Phillips' <span style="color: #b45f06;">'we don't know'</span> answer about climate change!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But Spiteri ASKED <i>NONE </i>OF THAT!!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Conveniently, the deceptive, biased <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2011/09/stcatharines-standards-phony-calls-for.html">wrong-righters</a> at the St.Catharines Standard only brought us<i> half the story</i>, if that. (...this is an example in 2011 of what - to the leftist media's chagrin - would become more clearly known and revealed as "FAKE NEWS" after Trump was elected in 2016).</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">There are a lot of other GreenFear-mongers in Niagara - why didn't Spiteri talk to<i> any </i>of them, either, so they could, once and for all, <em>prove</em> that Phillips is just 'full of steamy Justin Trudeau sh!t'?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 2</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In the <a href="http://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/2017/02/22/record-warm-weather-in-niagara">Feb. 22, 2017 Niagara Falls Review and the St.Catharines Standard,</a> Ray Spiteri <i>again</i> 'interviewed' Cagey, and <i>again</i>, Spiteri <i><span style="color: red;">did not bother to ask </span></i>David Phillips if what Phillips was saying was the direct result of man-made (AGW) climate-change. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The GreenFear-mongering i</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">nsinuation</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> t</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">hat this </span><i>was </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">all due to 'climate change', was palpably present in Spiteri's piece, as Cagey Dave told Spiteri how: </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>“These records go back to 1901. It’s hard to break a record when you’ve got over 100 years of records. I think (Thursday) could very well be (a record), especially if we get a little bit more sun than the fog that we’ve seen in some parts of southern Ontario.”</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><br style="background-color: white; color: #333333;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">Phillips said he doesn’t recall such a sustained stretch of warm weather in February such as this year.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #333333;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #333333;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">“I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February. </span></i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">What’s so interesting about this heat wave in February is that it is so persistent. You often will get one or two days where spring has arrived, and then you’re back into the cold winter weather. This has gone on. It went from (last) Saturday to this coming) Saturday"</span></i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Spiteri just obediently stenographed whatever Cagey said, <i>without question</i>. Spiteri <i>could have </i>asked: </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - 'David, regarding this '100-yr-old record breaking February temperature' which you just mentioned, is this definitive evidence of man made climate change, the kind that Liberals such as Justin Trudeau and Jim Bradley say it is? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - David, you make all this innuendo about hundred year records being broken, but as Canada's Senior Climatologist, what do these records have to do with AGW climate change?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> - David, when you say to me </span><i><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">“I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February",</span></i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">are you specifically referring to the period from 1901 to Feb. 2017? Could there have been a warmer February week anytime earlier, say, oh... in the last 10,000 years? And, why is it that you "don't think there's been a warmer week in February" - don't you know these things for sure, before you say them?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Either it has been 'the </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">warmest February week since 1901', or it hasn't - why allude to this, if you don't know? Do you want me to sensationalize the story, and spike it with GreenFear?'</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Sadly, Spiteri sold himself out as a journalist and simply danced the tired old Cagey Two Step Tango with David Phillips. Spiteri <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">did NOT</span></i> ask any questions, just lapped up David Phillips' sputum and regurgitated it in the St. Catharines Standard and in the Review.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">This was again re-confirmed in a <a href="https://www.pressreader.com/canada/the-niagara-falls-review/20171230/281638190582787">Dec. 30, 2017 Niagara Falls Review</a> story, where Sellout Spiteri was writing about the COLD weather (-14C - -18C) being predicted for the New Year's Eve concert in Niagara Falls, Canada; and<i> AGAIN</i>, Spiteri, for some reason, trotted out his Cagey Tango dance partner David Phillips to provide some good ole GreenFearmongering. And again, <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">Spiteri DID NOT bother</span></i> to ask Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, whether the weather which Spiteri and Phillips were reporting on, was CAUSED BY MAN!!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Spiteri quoted Phillips saying that the weather in Niagara Falls was "<i><span style="color: #cc0000;">almost inhospitable</span></i>" and the cold temperatures were "<i><span style="color: #cc0000;">near record levels</span></i>" - YET, even after all this, </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Sellout Spiteri COMPLETELY AVOIDED ANY MENTION of climate change / global warming / AGW {...you know, the same GreenGarbage which is spouted by Niagara Falls' own mayor, Jim Disgusting Diodati, and, by Canada's Prime Selfie Prince, Justin Turdo!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Spiteri (if he had been acting as a journalist...) had a GREAT opportunity to get David Phillips to PROVE that the cold weather right in Niagara <i>was </i>evidence of man-made global warming (...as Liberals claim) - but instead, Spiteri and Cagey hooked up to carry out just another typical version of the evasive <i>Cagey Climate Tango</i> stage act. They were both there NOT to prove 'climate change', but to PROPAGATE the perception<i> of '</i>climate change'.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The intent was to sow GreenFear, to show scary 'extremes' of weather, to create a pretense (using Cagey as a willing 'front man' veneer) that this cold weather somehow <i>is </i>evidence of "AGW climate change" without actually saying it, nor showing any evidence.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This was just another media report in a GreenFear panoply of propaganda.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 3</span><span style="color: #e69138;"> </span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's look at 2016, at yet more in a long string of pathetic instances where David Phillips happily pops up in some alarmist climate-change propaganda piece, spouting what amounts to essentially pseudo-scientific baffle-gab.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">There was the <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2016/01/17/we-hate-the-weather-we-love-dave-phillips.html">piece of hagiograhy in the Jan.17, 2016 Toronto Red Star</a> where Amy Dempsey fawningly writes:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"During the Harper era, when scientists were routinely restricted from speaking to the press about their research, reporters could call Phillips and ask him about anything at all."</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {Nice try at deflection Amy: Your hero Cagey Dave STILL can't prove climate change is caused by humans - even in 2017, under Turdo. Get it?! Enough with your 'scientists were muzzled' Liberal bullsh!t propaganda! That's also Grant Lafleche's parroted meme! haha - pathetic.}</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey: </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">“Canada’s going to be a warmer country, there’s no question about it,” he said in a January 2014 interview with Peter Mansbridge that aired on national television." </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {Pardon me, Amy: your deflective slant in<i> not questioning</i> Cagey's assertion {that 'there is no question'} belies your bias. It's laughably taken by you as gospel - and not something to be questioned! It's just that there'd be" NO QUESTION ABOUT IT" from CBC hacks, such as Mansbridge then, or from Toronto Star hacks such as Amy Dempsey now - you see, their default position is the false "it's all settled" meme, so therefore, that conveniently<i> precludes</i> having to ask <i>any </i>inconvenient questions.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In Amy's Greenshevik-infected mind, there <i>cannot be</i> room for questions. The GreenFear propaganda house of cards relies on blind adherence to the "it's all settled" narrative; the GreenFear pushers require that their meme be <i>parroted</i>, not questioned; that the GreenFear narrative be <i>amplified,</i> not analyzed.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is the basis of the Cagey Two Step Climate Tango, which occurs in each Cagey Climatologist 'interview'. The intent of the dancers - of David Phillips and his partners - is never to <i>prove '</i>climate change' (AGW); the intent is to continually propagate a (false) <i>perception</i> that it is 'proven'. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Canada's Cagey Climatologist here plays to the GreenFear-infected choir - no challenge is really expected, to whatever he may blurt! If Cagey says '<i>there's no question'</i> - well, then, why would the Toronto Star's Amy Dempsey ask any questions? Why disturb the mutually convenient narrative?! She's there to <i>obediently propagate</i> the GreenFear narrative, like a stenographer (certainly not like a journalist...)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">That's the choreographed Cagey Tango: the media coyly <i>don't </i>ask, Cagey coyly<i> doesn't </i>tell. It's all about the conflation, insinuation, innuendo, false causation, and hyperbole of 'climate change' - - without any actual <i>evidence</i> of AGW. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">There ARE a lot of questions that Cagey's media sycophants just (conveniently!) can't think of asking, since they've been programmed by Al Gore, David Suzuki, Stephane Dion, Jim Bradley, Justin Turdo etc to believe 'it's all settled'.}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey: </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How did he get away with talking about climate change, of all things? “I think it’s because I try to stick to the science,” he says. “I stay away from the politics and the policy.”</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {Hmm: 'stick to the science' eh? Swell, Dave - so, what specific "science" shows that AGW causes "climate change?? Anyone been asking you about<i> that </i>little <i>detail</i> - proof of AGW from Canada's Top Climatologist?!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Hey David Phillips: Provide your AGW evidence, or stop with the fake climate-change propaganda!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The Toronto Star happily publishes horseshit like this from the likes of Amy Dempsey, yet, there is no substantiation for the GreenFear innuendo being spread. It remains innuendo, fluffed and puffed by the idolizing press. Amy Dempsey - like hundreds of reporters before her - had a clear chance<i><span style="color: red;"> to ask David Phillips to show his evidence for AGW climate change</span></i>; but, not surprisingly - like those hundreds of others - she <i>didn't</i> ask. She refused. She chose not to challenge whatever shifty gospel she may have believed that Cagey Dave was preaching, and instead, did the usual Cagey Tango} </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">“The other thing, too, is I never told Ottawa when I was asked for an interview. Because we were supposed to say when the interview took place, give a list of the questions, and the answers, who was it, how long was it …” Sometimes he gives 12 interviews a day. Logging that information would have eaten up much of his week. So he didn’t do it. “And they never really asked me,” he says. “They never rapped my knuckles.”</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {Wow: so Cagey Dave <i>refused to do what his employers asked him to do</i> - gosh,<i> what a hero. </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Similarly: Amy Dempsey refused to do what journalists ought to do - ask questions. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Instead, she simply propagandized to her GreenFear-infected TorStar echo chamber.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But let's get back on track to the real issue being whitewashed here: Turdo is now PM - so, where is Amy's story NOW. asking Cagey Dave Phillips for official evidence from Environment Canada, proving AGW?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Y'see - it was<i> never</i> about proving AGW; it was about dutifully extending and propagandizing the hoax; and it was about sliming Harper.<span style="color: red;"> <span style="color: #990000;">They couldn't prove AGW before Harper; they couldn't prove it during Harper, and they can't prove it after Harper</span></span>. But, oh, how the innuendo machine cranked out the GreenFear!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Even though Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips HIMSELF intimates that he was<i><span style="color: #e69138;"> </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="color: #b45f06;">NOT</span><span style="color: #e69138;"> </span>in any way muzzled or reprimanded under Harper</span></i>, somehow his claim was either misinterpreted or purposefully misunderstood by Amy - because his<i> phony muzzlement was a fake lib stor</i>y from the beginning. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And here we see that Amy just used the phony "scientists are muzzled" meme AGAIN here in this story - really, for no other purpose than to slime Harper... - even though Turdo is in power, and <i><span style="color: red;">even though Cagey just told her he wasn't muzzled!</span></i> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So - even though Cagey sang Amy a different tune - Amy <i>ignored</i> him, as her mind was preoccupied with the 'it's all settled' GreenCrap agenda}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Perhaps it’s because he walked the line without stepping over it, stating facts without casting blame or offering his opinion. Or maybe after 48 years and all his achievements, he’s untouchable". </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{GreenFear pushers eagerly <i>want</i> Cagey to crow on about climate change. Over the years, hundreds of them tried to spin Cagey's facts about weather into innuendo-laden GreenFear doomsday stories - - - like Amy does</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> If Cagey is 'untouchable', it is only because propagandists such as Amy Dempsey <i>allow </i>him to be! Do you understand your own willing role as an enabler here, Amy? Do you get <i>your own</i> role in <i>your own</i> self-fulfilling prophesy?!}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Phillips acknowledges that colleagues may have felt he didn’t use his platform to take a strong enough stand on climate change". </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {You were getting close, here Amy - but you chose<i> not</i> to cross the line from being a biased GreenFear propaganda peddler to acting as an impartial journalist!}.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"And indeed, his friend <span style="color: #b45f06;">Phil Chadwick</span>, who speaks admiringly of Phillips, says: “I wish sometimes he would have been a bit more definitive on climate change, but I totally understood what his circumstances were.” </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{Hey, maybe Cagey <i>doesn't have</i> the 'definitive' evidence which his mysterious admirer Chadwick thinks he has!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How much more climate change innuendo would Chadwick like Cagey to peddle? Does he want Cagey to lie??</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Let's ask AGAIN, since Chadwick (like Amy) seems to have had his ears full of GreenCrap: </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">WHAT<i> exactly</i> did Chadwick "<i>totally</i> <i>understand"</i> about Cagey's "<i>circumstances</i>"?!?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey<i> wasn't muzzled</i>; Cagey makes that clear himself. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet, that just cannot register in Chadwick's or Amy's GreenFear-packed skulls!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So, what the f*ck is Chadwick talking about?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What <i>exactly</i> were these ominous <i>'circumstances</i>' which Chadwick mentions - other than the <i>already false innuendo</i> of 'muzzlement'?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What were these mysterious "circumstances" which, in some unexplained-by-anyone way, held back Cagey?!???</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Amazingly, Ole Chadwick<i><span style="color: red;"> doesn't really say</span></i>, and Amy <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>doesn't bother to ask </i></span>Chadwick!! Great <strike>journalism </strike>propaganda, eh??! Furthermore, neither did Amy ask Cagey himself, to explain what <i>he</i> thought his Ole Pal Chadwick meant!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yep: Amy's goal was simply to paint an image of innuendo!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Amazing: Amy's story - without questioning - just piles on innuendo BASED ON <i>OTHER </i>INNUENDO!! Sort of like Climate Gate was all about, BTW!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In fact, the case can strongly be made, that Cagey WASN'T ASKED by Amy about proving AGW, because it would require him providing <i>actual evidence</i> (rather than loquacious innuendo).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So, he couldn't very well risk having anyone actually pinning him down with unexpected specific questions on climate change, which would soon show that the "climate change" aspects of any of Cagey's claims were essentially conflated, glorified, weather garbage.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Does Chadwick really think that David Phillips isn't cagey enough to avoid getting caught in a climate change lie? Cagey's moniker ain't fer nothin', you know!!! There's slippery grease, and then there's Cagey.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">There is a pretension to uphold here for the AGW-infected community, which would not hold up under scrutiny.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's best for the media just to play along with the Cagey Tango, and NOT ask for AGW specifics; beat around the bush all ya want, conflate this with that, throw in some irrelevant innuendo together with some homespun homilies, mix it all with great heaping dollops of false causation - just <i>DON'T ask</i> Canada's Senior Climatologist for the Chadwickian "definitive"<i> evidence </i>of AGW!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The hoax itself <i>must not</i> be challenged. (Read Chapter 17 below, to see how CTV did it - it's the <i>same</i> template, over and over...)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">TorStar's Amy skillfully, dutifully, and obediently abides: deflect, peddle innuendo, slime Harper - but DO NOT ask the real questions!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What a heroic effort to add to the FAKE NEWS gallery!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Does Chadwick prefer that Cagey just out and out peddle climate change lies???</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Would that satisfy Chadwick - having Cagey become an outright GreenFear-monger?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey's slicker than that: Cagey peddles climate innuendo!!! Your perception of what Cagey peddles is YOUR problem, make of it what you will. Hey, it's hot - is it climate change, or weather... who knows? Hey, it's cold - is it climate change or weather... who knows?! And Cagey's trademarked folksy caginess just rolls on.}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Torstar propagandist Dempsey:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Phillips strives for balance. The doom-and-gloom perspective of some environmentalists has never sat well with him. “Why would we change if the world’s going to end in 2056?” he says. “I think you’ve gotta give people hope. And so what I try to do is to say you know it’s not necessarily doom and gloom. It’s not the end.”"</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{"Phillips strives for balance"??!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Now <i>that's</i></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> a fetid lump of crap dumped out by Dempsey! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet, </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">unbalanced</i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Liberal GreenFear pushers - y'know, the carbon-tax pushing doomsayers who </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">always tell us</i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> that we're past some imaginary 'tipping-point' - <i>WANT</i> you to believe that '</span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">it's the end</i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">'!! This is an integral basic underlying tenet of the entire climate-change hoax!!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What outright dis-ingenuousness from a severely conflicted, in-denial </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey - <i>and</i> from his climate-tango-dance-partner/ propagandist / hagiographer!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey has allowed himself to be used BY THOSE SAME "DOOM and GLOOM" climate-change bolsheviks for years!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And Dempsey's <i>own</i> Torstar propaganda organization - which has never been balanced - has happily PROPAGATED THAT EXACT SAME DOOM & GLOOM climate-change hoax FOR YEARS!!}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">-</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Just to show how GreenFear propaganda (which Torstar's Amy Dempsey dumped out in 2016) still infects the political narrative, here's an example of the <i>same</i> "muzzled" lie <i>still </i>being perpetuated by GreenFear-infected climate bolsheviks in 2019 - like this comment by 'Joe Smoe' in the National Post on July 26, 2019:</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKtoRjIM7_DrshcMUQlRE5hg-OR6KDy7kD0bVW53xeQE5yAaC1jVGPYNHBfJ5dk2q2UUQKqEvVnGDLo2W3q9_8j8yDjIcRBtls8liWgcGWhEiJ9XH1QX3_Ugz-N_2eq6KzUYq8VlSiIsQ/s1600/muzzled.JPG" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="861" data-original-width="720" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKtoRjIM7_DrshcMUQlRE5hg-OR6KDy7kD0bVW53xeQE5yAaC1jVGPYNHBfJ5dk2q2UUQKqEvVnGDLo2W3q9_8j8yDjIcRBtls8liWgcGWhEiJ9XH1QX3_Ugz-N_2eq6KzUYq8VlSiIsQ/s640/muzzled.JPG" width="535" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">(click photo to enlarge)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">At least now, other commenters have stepped up to the plate and called out the GreenFear bolshevism of propagandists like 'Smoe': "Funny how those scientists had nothing more to say when they were un-muzzled"; "Your buddy{Turdo} has them even more muzzled and not telling the truth when they do".</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">(See Chapters 8 and 9 for more on the 'scientists were muzzled' lie.)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="font-size: xx-small;">CHAPTER 4</span> </b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Another example of <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/be-prepared-for-more-extreme-rainfalls-think-biblical-floods-u-s-climate-scientists-warn"> classic GreenFear crap appeared in Joseph Brean's Dec. 7, 2016 National Post story</a>:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">"...Environment Canada’s senior meteorologist {...note: some some reason, Phillips was referred to as a '</span>meteorologist<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">' in this NP story, yet in other past publications he was referred to as 'senior climatologist'...} David Phillips said the main effect of this increasingly moist warm air is that when it rains, more falls in less time, as in the kind of deluge Phillips called a "Texas gullywasher"...</span></span></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Canada is second coldest and first snowiest country in the world, so it is hard to convince Canadians that climate change “has some evil to it,” Phillips said. Many simply look fondly to a future of milder winters and longer summers. A bit of flooding might seem like a small price to pay.</i></span><br />
<div style="color: #333333; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.83em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>But as he described it, this is not your grandfather’s flood, the classic river backup caused by melt water and ice blockage. It is a modern artifact of a highly urbanized society in an era of warming climate, when a single flooded road can leave people stranded and at risk of death.</i></span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #333333;">“That’s the kind of thing that scares the bejeebies out of insurance people,” he said. “</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b>You could have floodier floods and droughtier droughts</b></span><span style="color: #333333;">.”</span><span style="color: #333333;">”</span></i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6;">So, there you are:</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">the Jim "Liberal Gullywasher Of Bullshit" Bradley Scientific School Of <i>Floodier Floods</i> And <i>Droughtier Droughts</i>... Now MORE STEAMIER and MORE CRAPPIER than ever!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">There you have it: </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">the National Post reporter Brean </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>DID NOT </i>ask </span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6;">David Phillips to <i>provide actual specific evidence of AGW</i>.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Instead - as many other reporters have similarly done with Cagey Climatologist David Phillips in the past - the National Post simply fear-mongered and spread fake news about climate-change, using David Phillips' silly, homey - but ultimately non-substantive - pontifications as a 'legitimizing' cover. </span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white;">The Cagey Climatologist Fan Club just loves Phillips. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #b45f06;"><b><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 5</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></b></span></span></span><br />
<b style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">DID the CBC and ENVIRONMENT CANADA employee David Phillips conspire to create fake 'climate-change news'?</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's continue with Cagey's Climate Saga:</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">In a Sheena Goodyear story written Dec. 7, 2016, the CBC happily, obligingly published an outright lie with their deceptive, GreenFear-laden headline<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/weather-winter-holiday-outlook-1.3885241"> </a></span><span style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/weather-winter-holiday-outlook-1.3885241">"</a></span><span style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/weather-winter-holiday-outlook-1.3885241"><i>The weather outside is frightful thanks to climate change and the polar vortex",</i></a> (scary eh?! - apparently, Canada <i>never had</i> cold and snow before...<span style="font-size: xx-small;">umm</span>... 'climate change'...) </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6;">The CBC, naturally, had to run to Canada's Cagiest Climatologist for a bit'o'GreenFear-mongering:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6;"><br /></span><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif">"... </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">"Instead of a bungee cord, it looks like more of a roller-coaster. It dips and dives. It kind of goes up over British Columbia and then dives down across the Prairies down to the United States and then comes swooping up towards eastern Canada," he says.</span></i></span><br />
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Sometimes, it brings warm air from the United States, giving Canada the warm November it just had. But then it swoops down and brings cold Arctic air, which is what's happening right now in western Canada.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And the cold tends to linger.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"It's hard to kick the cold air out. It's like molasses — it's thick, it's heavy, it's dense, it hugs the ground," Phillips said. "So when it becomes entrenched, well, you get that pattern set up and it just doesn't move, you see. You get day after day and week after week and then, my God, month after month with the same kind of flow."</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
</div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
</div>
<h3 style="line-height: 1.25; margin-bottom: 1rem; margin-top: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The polar vortex </i></span></h3>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So how does climate change come into all of this?</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Arctic and Antarctic sea ice have reached record lows, declining by an area twice the size of Alaska, according to recent measurements.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>"We're seeing the Arctic ice cap is melting. We're seeing more open water. The ice is thinner and so there's more heat getting up from the water into the air in the Arctic," Phillips says</i><i>..</i></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This causes the polar vortex — a swirling area of low-pressure cold air over the North Pole — to weaken.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Therefore, it leaves home. It migrates," Phillips says. "It's sort of like Canadians going to Florida for the winter. The polar vortex comes south, and it hangs out down in the South and, of course, it brings its cold wind with it."</span></i></div>
<h2 style="line-height: 1.25; margin-bottom: 1rem; margin-top: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The bright side?</i></span></h2>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The good news is the wobbly jet stream means there will most likely be periods of respite this winter. What's more, meteorologists predict this La Nina will be a weak one. </span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"We don't think it's going to be, as they say, a punishing winter, in spite of what the west are seeing right now," Phillips says.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #9fc5e8;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"I'm not saying it's going to be the Goldilocks of winters but ... if you can remember the toughest winter you ever lived through and then remember last year, it might be something between those two."."</span></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yep: 'My God, it might be this, or... uhh... it might be that... it's a roller coaster, it dips, it dives, it swoops, it's like molasses'... blah bla bla...</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">Phillips' blathering completely evades the issue that 'climate change' is being used here as political propaganda. Phillips <i>never says</i> (but more pointedly, he is<b> </b></span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b><i>NEVER ASKED</i> </b></span><span style="color: #333333;">by hack CBC reporter Sheena Easton to prove) that the 'climate change' they are referring to, is caused<i> by man</i> (AGW). </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">After all, isn't <i>that </i>what it's all about?? That man is to blame and that all we need is to pay bolsheviks cash to stop 'climate-change'??!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What a bait-and-switch Cagey Tango dance of conflation going on here!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> 'The ice is melting' they both fear-monger - but without revealing their underlying {emphasis on the '</span><i style="color: #3d85c6;">lying</i><span style="color: #3d85c6;">' part...} built-in-bias: that they both believe </span><i><span style="color: red;">this melting is caused BY MAN - not by nature</span></i><span style="color: #3d85c6;">.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">It's imperative that this deceptive nuance in the presented narrative be fully understood. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">The agenda is to provide a blanket bait-and-switch "it's all settled" narrative which fraudulently ascribes that ALL weather - and therefore all of earth's climate - is man-made.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">It denies that earth's climate changes naturally - and denies that earth's climate has constantly changed, from even before the ascent of man.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">There's the con: they carefully construct and "report" a one-sided storyline here (it's NOT impartial: it's propaganda - it's a Cagey Tango, rigged by the dancing-partner-'reporters' with Cagey in the lead, all spinning to further THEIR mutual narratives. They need to create - to manufacture - the impression (and to endlessly repeat this impression...) that <i>EVERYTHING</i> to do with the weather - including, of course, 'the climate' - <i>IS </i>'man-made'! </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>That </i>is their starting-off point: the "it's all settled" lie is essentially built into the core narratives of both the gov't financed CBC and the gov't financed Environment Propaganda Ministry front-man here; the aim of their GreenFear propaganda is to make it seem that there can be no other reason for ice to exist or to melt, or for the jet stream or the polar vortex to exist, or to <i>ever have existed</i>, prior to the footsteps of man soiling upon the virgin green Utopia of Earth, the GreenFear crowd's Great Gaia's Garden of Man-less Eden.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The Toronto Star prints a false headline ominously blaming "climate change" - - - for causing winter weather! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">In this CBC report, David Phillips happily makes the (deceptive) case for an even-happier CBC, that the 'polar vortex' was a certainty, and that it was caused by climate change, which was caused by man. The take away {the con-job} being peddled for CBC's viewers, is that the polar vortex<i> is </i>man made - why, look: 'we even have David Phillips here', proving this to be true!!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The "climate change" being referred to here was NOT defined, by either party here, as being of a natural origin, of natural drivers - this was <i>purposefully </i>left out (...censored by omission) of the story. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So CBC only peddled the 'it's all settled' GreenFear-based 'conclusion': purporting that what BOTH David Phillips and the CBC are saying, is that they are BOTH talking about 'man made climate change' here. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{Why did the ice melt? 'Climate Change'! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Who caused climate change? </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">'Man'! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Did man create the polar vortex? </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">'Yes'! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Did man create the weather? </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Yes - because he also created climate change and the polar vortex!!! Geez: c</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">an't you read the CBC's headline??! It's all right there; <i>and </i>David Phillips said so - so it's gotta be true!!}</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">However, b</span></span><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">ecause David Phillips, </span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #333333;">Environment Canada's SENIOR Climatologist {who's acting as somekind of "scientainer"<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> TM</span>, a hybrid mockery /parody of a scientist / entertainer...!}</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> did NOT bother</span></i><i style="color: #333333;"> </i><span style="color: #333333;">to try to make a clear distinction here himself in CBC's story; and furthermore, because Phillips </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">did NOT </span></i><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="color: #333333;">issue any post-story clarifications himself, nor make any calls for retraction or raise any subsequent issues about the CBC's spin, then Phillips </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">clearly allowed and approved </span></i><span style="color: #333333;">the CBC to utilize his tax-payer-funded position as Environment Canada's senior climatologist </span></span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">to 'legitimize' their climate deception. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">David Phillips<i> allowed</i> himself to be used as a political shill!!</span></span></div><div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia, times new roman, serif; font-size: large;">{Come to think of it - <i>no wonder</i> Cagey (as he had boasted in his Jan 2016 TorStar interview with Amy Dempsey) decided, on his own, to NOT report his media activities to his employer... his phony-baloney climate-shtick Climate-tango escapades would be exposed. This story here was from Dec.2016, and his interview with TorStar's Dempsey had already been done in Jan 2016 - so Cagey was apparently by now on a free-for-all roll, spewing whatever climate-mumbo-jumbo he wanted.}<br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How can this example of climate-change-conjob collusion be a one way street here? After all: how can it be said that poor ole Cagey somehow didn't know what the CBC was doing with HIS information - information which was given BY Cagey Dave, in his role as Canada's Senior Climatologist; information which was paid for by the Canadian taxpayer?!</span></div><div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It takes two to tango - and this is a blatant example of Cagey's duplicitous Two Step Climate Tango. </span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">BOTH parties participating in Cagey's dirty tango are NOT 'honest brokers' - they are <i>both </i>compromised and tainted. (...and both are state-sponsored)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">David Phillips agreed without reservation to have the CBC use him as a 'face', a stooge, a front, a willing dupe, to provide a fraudulent 'cover' so CBC could peddle their political climate scientainment<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> TM</span>/propaganda! (because, it wasn't science..!) Cagey Dave was just laundering climate science, converting it into GreenFear propaganda!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">This demonstrates that</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Phillips (a federal government employee) had no problems using his tax-payer-funded 'celebrity', his 'stature', to directly support CBC's unsubstantiated climate propaganda. He did not dis-associate himself from CBC's fraudulent bait and switch climate change tactics.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">Phillips gave this CBC story his blessing, and willingly looked the other way when his own participation was perverted by CBC's spin; tellingly, the climate stooge Phillips did not bother to correct or disavow CBC's unsubstantiated spin, neither before nor after the story appeared, even though CBC</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> fraudulently traded on Phillip's image and reputation</span></i><span style="color: #333333;"> to peddle their climate lies. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips' image and reputation was paid for by tax-dollars.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips participated WILLINGLY in this CBC bait and switch climate-change propaganda effort... yet, neither David Phillips nor the CBC had any proof that the polar vortex is man-made; nor any proof that "climate change" is man made.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">(Let's remember this deception, and compare it to Cagey's contorted "polar vortex" future 'explanation' in </span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Chapter 32</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> )</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Yet <i>no one asks </i>Ole Cagey Dave <i>to prov</i>e that "climate change" caused by man, caused winter... get it??!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Get the ridiculousness of their scam now?</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif">I</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">sn't it the spectre of AGW {...which is the GreenFear movement's underlying tenet, their touchstone, their foundation; their unshakable premise; their supporting pillar, their all-pervading, 'all-settled' undercurrent...} which the CBC and others are hoping that our Cagey Climatologist will confirm through loquacious innuendo (...yet without<i> actually </i>saying so, nor providing proof..!) that 'climate change'<i> is</i> ALL MAN-MADE,</span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> and, that it can <i>only</i> be mitigated by lots of new taxes being instituted and spent by 'well-meaning' Liberals to 'save the planet'?!</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Phillips seems more than happy to oblige as a cover, a beard, a shill, for GreenFear-traffickers who act as if for millions of years, some kind of fictitious <i><b>climate stasis</b></i> had always been the norm, and that 'climate change' (...which, of course, we have been all indoctrinated 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink' to believe was caused by Harris, Harper, Bush... now Trump... and those denying deniers...) is somehow the new kid on the block, as if the climate, before man, had <i>NEVER</i> changed before (!!)... and furthermore, that 'climate-change' can not only be stopped, but can even be REVERSED (<i>wahoooo</i>!!) simply by voting for creeps such as Justin Trudeau, Elizabeth May, Jim Bradley, and Kathleen Wynne!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's Phillips and his interviewers who seem to 'dip' and dive' for the cause, peddling their pattern of entrenched views, trying their best to soft-peddle Jim Bradley's Liberal Green Fear delusions.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">CBC's slick propaganda peddled here is in the hazy 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink-y'know-what-we mean-and-who-is-to-blame' assumptions being made, and the definitions remaining purposefully fuzzy and unspecified. It's just great all-purpose, typical climatalarmist propaganda - no other way to describe it, is there?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Sadly, Canada's Cagey Climatologist, by abiding in this effort, has shown which way his wind blows.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 6</b></span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> On the CBC nightly news (Dec.23, 2016) there was another sacred confirmation of how far global warming and climate change has been shoved up CBC 'reporter's' asses, and how they dutifully shovel their GreenFear onto their loving, appreciative, sheep-like audience. </span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wendy Mesley and that creepy CBC 'science' guy Bob McDonald were in a smug sanctimonious lather about Trump referring to THEIR beloved climate change religion as a hoax. You could see the seething hate/shock/disdain in their eyes; their non-comprehension of how anyone could challenge their GreenFear gospel. It was revealing, it was a teachable moment, it was precious and above all, it was sad. It wasn't news that these two CBC clowns were reporting, it was Green Bolshevik agit-prop.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> And no; they</span><span style="color: red;"><i> did not bother </i></span><span style="color: #3d85c6;">to ask Cagey the Canadian Climate King about why Environment Canada hasn't proven the very "climate change" which they themselves were just sneering at Trump about.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Is somebody at CBC "muzzling" Mesley or McDonald, to stop<i> them</i> from obtaining all the "climate change" proof they could ever want, from Canada's Chief Climatologist, David Phillips???</span></div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">(hahahah.... as if Wendy and Bob were really ever going to go to Cagey to PROVE CLIMATE CHANGE once and for all... hahahah)</span><br />
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Or, is someone "muzzling" Ole Cagey, stopping<i> him </i>from revealing the actual evidence of climate change, once and for all??!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Funny how these GreenFear pushers continually spout their climate fear agenda, yet somehow can't get/won't provide the actual evidence, which supposedly exists right under their noses at the now-supposedly-un-muzzled Environment Canada!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> All the CBC reporters had to do was<i> ASK </i>CAGEY to <i>show them the climate change proof - -</i> but that is NOT the point is it? The point is to keep the GreenFear charade afloat,<i> not </i>to really prove it; the point is to spread endless innuendo and confuse and conflate cherry picked weather with meaningless climate projections, with hints that "progressive" saviours such as Liberal charlatans Jim Bradley or Justin Trudeau can PREVENT the climate from changing, if only they could have an endless supply of taxes.</span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> To closed-minded CBC clowns, their GreenFear-based religion is 'all-settled' and cannot be questioned. It was a typical drive-by anti-Trump smear, but, apparently it's mandatory for the CBC to keep flailing Liberal climate change deceptions.</span></div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><br /></b></span><br />
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 7</b></span><br />
<div style="font-size: 14px;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">But let's get back to Cagey's bountiful loquaciousness, which has no bounds (!) - here's yet another piece, this time by</span><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> </span><a href="http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/the-opening-act-winter-weather-just-getting-started-across-canada-1.3198810?autoPlay=true">CTV's Taline McPhedran, Dec.11, 2016)</a><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> :</span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: black;">"According to Dave Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada, the weather system moved from the northwestern part of the United States and over to the Great Lakes, heading northeast. A majority of areas in southern Ontario are expected to get anywhere from 10 to 15 centimetres of snow by Monday morning.</span>“That’s more than we had all of last year and this is only the first big one,” Phillips told CTV News Channel on Sunday.."</span></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">WHAT UTTER CRAP FROM CANADA'S CAGEY CLIMATOLOGIST DAVID PHILLIPS!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">OMG: Canada's SENIOR CLIMATOLOGIST is warning us this is <i>only the first big one </i>---- that means, there will be more <i>Big Ones</i> ---- Ohhh Great Gaia... what to do? --- <i>what to do?!</i>? --- can we get Liberal hacks Trudeau and Jim Bradley to <i>prevent </i>all this???</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We MUST STOP THE CLIMATE FROM CHANGING - NOW!!! </span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We don't want any 'Big Ones' anymore!! We want <i>nothing to change</i>!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">There was not much snow at all in St. Catharines during Dec. 11 - Dec 12, 2016!! A little bit of snow fell overnight - WAY<i> LESS</i> than what fell during "</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b>ALL OF LAST YEAR</b></span></i><span style="color: #333333;">", as David Phillips fear-mongered about, and got completely wrong.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">Cagey easily, glibly and WILLINGLY fear-mongered - </span><i>simply on speculation</i><span style="font-family: "arial";">.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Canada's Cagey Climatologist CANNOT GET THE WEATHER right, a DAY in advance; yet, this is the same darling go-to guy when the media needs a booster-dose of Climate Change GreenFear.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But... oh, yes... Slick Cagey always has an out {...hence, the nick name!} He did say "a <i>majority </i>of areas are<i> expected</i> to get <i>anywhere from</i> 10 15 cm..." so, there ya go: ya can't pin Ole Cagey down! Ya can't make the crap stick to Cagey, there's always some indecipherable home-spun connotation, some weasel word, an asterisk, an 'expectation', a qualifier, a generalization, a 'potentially' this, a' likely' that, a 'possibility' here, a 'probability' there...</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">After all, in Cagey's world, some snow was bound to fall somewhere, right!? </span><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Point is: was this man-made climate change at work??? The CTV reporter </span><span style="color: #cc0000;">NEVER ASKED.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Was there some unspoken rule that, in literally hundreds of interviews over the years, prevented anyone from asking Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips to provide evidence of 'climate change' caused by man? Why isn't anyone actually asking Cagey Dave about that?! Why isn't ANYONE asking David Phillips if the 'climate' can be prevented from 'changing', and if so, how?! What is it with this phony dance, this Cagey Two-Step, which the media continually performs with David Phillips?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";">Gosh: if we gave ALL of our treasury's dollars to Justin Trudeau and to Kathleen Wynne to 'Save The Planet', will that Stop And Reverse Climate Change???????! Will we finally get rid of this horrible changing climate once and for all, and just go back to a good ole static climate, where {apparently..!!!}<i> nothing ever changed</i>, like we once had for millions of years when everything was good, when </span>there was no climate change... <span style="font-family: "arial"; font-size: xx-small;">heh heh</span>... to scare us - - - until that Harris came along and ruined it all?<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"> Seriously... this is what Liberal MPP Jim Bradley - Ontario's Godfather Of GreenFear - wanted us to believe...</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Politics and weather are conflated for political purposes.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">The cumulative work is in conflating weather with GreenFear, using elements of the former to 'hint at' (but not prove) the latter.</span><span style="color: #333333;"> </span></span></div>
<div>
<br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 14.4px;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 8</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 14.4px;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Another instance: </span><a href="http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1021093">Dec.21, 2016 CTV News</a><span style="color: #333333;"> presenter (reporter??) Erin Paul had the apparently-mandatory-because-it's-the-start-of-winter TV interview ("</span><i style="color: #333333;">The real deal is coming"</i><span style="color: #333333;">.... ohh... </span><i style="color: #333333;">ohhhh</i><span style="color: #333333;">... are you afraid yet of the ominous GreenFear being peddled??!) with the "expert" Senior Climatologist David Phillips, and there was a lot of the typical homey banter.</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Yet, Bell Media / CTV reporter Erin Paul </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i> did NOT ask</i></span><span style="color: #333333;"> the "expert":</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> 'David, is this climate change? Is this all caused by anthropogenic, man-made global warming? Do you have any evidence that this is man-made 'climate-change'?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #333333;">I'm asking you this specifically, because also today - Dec. 21, 2016, the same day that we are interviewing you - <a href="http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1021093">CTV reported</a> Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau saying that <i>'c</i></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><i>limate change is a fact</i>'.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David, what <i>'climate change fact</i>' is the Prime Minister referring to here?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Do you - as Canada's Senior Climatologist - have any evidence of the 'climate change fact' which Justin Trudeau is talking about? Don't the pipelines, which Trudeau was approving today - while telling us that 'climate change is a fact' - carry oil which supposedly causes climate change??!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David can you please expand on these specific definitions, and reconcile these assumptions, which have become political memes without scientific bearing?'</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Note that CTV </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>never bothered to ask</i></span><span style="color: #333333;"> about the conflicting 'climate-change news' reports </span><i><span style="color: red;">appearing on the same day, on their own site!</span></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> They had a chance to question Phillips, yet, they demurred, and shied away from the issue of climate change - in other words, Bell Media / CTV <i>FAILED TO PROVIDE BALANCE</i> to their stated biased narrative.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">THAT kind of investigative reporting and balanced conversation WILL NEVER HAPPEN on Canadian mainstream media. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Remember the Liberal meme about 'Canada's scientists being muzzled'?! (...see also Chapters 3 and 9 on the 'science is muzzled' lie)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span><span style="color: #333333;"> Yet: when exactly had David Phillips <i>ever </i>been<i> </i>"muzzled"???? Has anyone ever asked Phillips about THAT meme??! </span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Has Justin Trudeau ever directed Canada's esteemed - and un -muzzled! - Environment Canada to provide evidence of the 'fact' of 'man-made climate change', so that his Liberals can justify valiantly "battling climate change" by spending ever-more taxes?!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wouldn't Cagey be more than happy to provide Justin Trudeau with this proof, with this "fact" - as Trudeau claims - of man-made climate change?!</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Seems like Trudeau won't ask,<i> because Phillips can't prove it</i>. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Why doesn't the CTV news organization NOW<i> </i></span><span style="color: red;"><i>ask</i></span><span style="color: #333333;"> Canada's Senior Un-muzzled Climatologist David Philips for his official stance on man-made climate change??!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> What is stopping CTV from asking David Phillips (now that he has ....</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">ummm</span></span><span style="color: #333333;">....apparently been un-muzzled by Liberal Saviours such as Justin Trudeau) to provide official confirmation of AGW?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> So:</span><b><span style="color: #cc0000;"> <i>who</i> is "muzzling" David Phillips <i>today??!</i></span></b><span style="color: #333333;"> The</span><span style="color: #333333;"> left's 'evil' bogeyman Harper can't be blamed.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Here we are at the end of 2016 - yet, the media continue their darling little GreenFear Tango dance with Cagey; they are </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b>SELF-'MUZZLING'</b></span></i><span style="color: #333333;">; conspiring together in a careful dance NOT to actually confront the 'climate change' charade which they both dance around, and sadly, help perpetuate - this is the Cagey Two Step Climate Tango.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It seems like an unspoken don't ask/don't tell arrangement - the media doesn't ask what Phillips can't (won't?) answer; in turn, Phillips happily abides, spouting cagey weather homilies and dire innuendo, but never really addressing the elephant in the room: providing evidence that "climate change" is "man made".</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> After some 30,000 (yes: <b><i>30,000...</i></b> Don't believe it? See Chapter 32!) interviews over the years, by hundreds upon hundreds of writers: where's David Phillips' defense - or repudiation - of the meme (which Justin Trudeau now repeats) that 'man-made climate change' is a fact??</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> This CTV reporter Erin Paul (as did many other reporters before her) HAD THE CHANCE to ACTUALLY ask David Phillips some real questions, but</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"> <i>REFUSED</i></span><span style="color: #333333;"> to do so - all we got was softball 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink' FLAKY FLUFF.</span></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 9</span><span style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"> </span></b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 14.4px;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> Speaking about flaky fluff, here we go with yet another TYPICAL example of yet ANOTHER vacuous interview with Canada's Cagey Climatologist, David Phillips (...the dance never ends with this guy: the media's at him essentially everyday...) This time it was reporter Bill Graveland who joined the long list of partners sent in to dance with Cagey Dave <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/canadians-rejoice-climatologist-says-winter-is-halfway-done/article33614577/">(Globe and Mail (Jan.13, 2017)</a></span><span style="color: #333333;">:</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333;"><br /></span></i><i><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "arial";"> <span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">"</span></span><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">It’s not as if winter is over by a long shot,” Phillips said. “We’ve just hit the halfway point, but the good news is ... the flow seems to be coming more from the Pacific than the Arctic.”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> Although there are no records being set in Western Canada, Phillips said it has been a<span style="color: red;"> tough year</span> for the four western provinces. </i><i>Vancouver has received<span style="color: red;"> twice as much snow as normal </span>and recorded 30 days where temperatures were below normal — double the average of 15. </i><i>“It has been <span style="color: #cc0000;">persistently cold</span> for that period,” said Phillips. “In fact, if you look at the average temperature in December, <span style="color: #cc0000;">the last time there was a colder December was 1990. That was more than 25 years ago. It was a bit of a shocker.”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> Winnipeg received a <span style="color: red;">record snowfall for the month of December,</span> while Calgary has <span style="color: red;">suffered freezing temperatures and heavy snow</span>. </i><i>This winter in Western Canada follows one of the warmest years on record in 2015 and,<span style="color: red;"> in many jurisdictions, winter was essentially cancelled last year</span>, he said.</i></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Canadians tend to base their weather expectations on the winter before, so this season has come as a <span style="color: #cc0000;">shock </span>to many, Phillips said.</span></i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> “It’s like<span style="color: #cc0000;"> a punch in the face</span>. Clearly, when you look at the temperatures, certainly the amount of snow, the number of cold days — if you’re whining, it’s not without cause. <span style="color: #cc0000;">It has been tough</span>.”</span></i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Reporter Graveland <i><span style="color: red;">never once asked </span></i>David Phillips whether the 'persistent cold' was caused by man-made global warming / climate change (...as experienced climatologists like... <span style="font-size: xx-small;">um</span>... Jane Fonda or... <span style="font-size: xx-small;">ah</span>... Leo 'What's a Chinook?' DiCaprio might have us believe). Graveland<i><span style="color: red;"> didn't ask</span></i> exactly WHY it was a "shocker" that the month of Dec. 2016 was the coldest December since Dec. 1990. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Was this<i> cold </i>directly attributable to AGW climate change???? Or was it the previous <i>warmth</i>?!??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Graveland <i><span style="color: red;">did NOT ask</span></i> Cagey<i> who </i>would be '<i>shocked</i>' - and <i>why</i>? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Graveland <i><span style="color: red;">did NOT</span></i> delve into what kind of expectations had been fed to those who suddenly, somehow, were '<i>punched in the face</i>' and became '<i>shocked'</i>.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Were these people 'shocked' because they experienced a paradigm-shift after having been conditioned (ie punched in the face?!) by<b><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> years of leftist GreenFear-mongering? </span></i></b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The only people who ought to have been shocked are those who were conned by GreenFear-mongering face-punchers that climate change is caused by man; it </span><i>would </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">be a</span><i> shock </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">to them, seeing as they were being told everyday to believe that the earth was warming and that man caused it all.</span></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When Phillips claimed that "<i>winter was essentially cancelled last year"...</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> </i>Graveland<i> <span style="color: red;">DID NOT BOTHER to ask</span></i> Phillips exactly where, in <i>which </i>exact jurisdictions was winter 'cancelled'? Was Phillips referring to the Prairies in 2016?!</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Neither did Graveland bother to ask Phillips if</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> his statement that "winter was cancelled" was direct evidence of climate change!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> After all: the opening <i><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b>WAS RIGHT THERE </b></span></i>for Graveland </span><i>to ask</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> for logical clarification - yet this reporter <i><span style="color: #cc0000;"><b>REFUSED</b></span></i>!! </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><b><i> "Winter was cancelled"</i></b> Cagey tells him; sounds like global warming, then, doesn't it?! </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Yet: there was</span><i><span style="color: red;"> NO follow up </span></i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">from this Globe and Mail reporter!!</span></span></div>
</div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cagey's comments were just left there <i>unquestioned -</i> as a meme to hang, fester and ferment in the reader's mind:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">... <b><i>Winter was cancelled... </i></b><b><i>Winter was cancelled... </i></b><b><i>Winter was cancelled...</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><i> ... repeat... </i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><i> ...W</i></b><b><i>inter was cancelled... </i></b><b><i>Winter was cancelled...</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><i> ...it must be Global Warming, you see; it's gotta be Climate Change, you see... </i></b><b><i>Winter was cancelled</i></b>...<b><i> Do not ask why... </i></b><b><i>Winter was cancelled...</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> All reporter Graveland had to do {...as a journalist in a supposedly 'open and free' society, instead of a shill stenographer in a propaganda stage-show) was to follow up on Cagey's statements:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> "David, you just stated that <i>winter was essentially cancelled</i> in the Canadian West in 2016, correct? Was that directly attributable to Global Warming, caused by man?" </span></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But, well, well...<i> Lookit that</i>: Graveland <b><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>doesn't ask</i> </span></b>and David Phillips <b><span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>doesn't answer</i></span></b>!!!</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><b>THAT'S </b></i>how the climate-change hoax game is played!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Well done</i>, gentlemen!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Who's muzzling who???!!! </span><span style="font-family: "courier new" , "courier" , monospace; font-size: x-small;"><i>hahahahaha</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Nice performance!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Great <i>Cagey Two-Step Climate Tango </i>dance moves!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Good show! What a <i>conjob!!</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Canada's 'reporters' are apparently not taught to question, but to be obedient stenographers, helping push the party leftist line... </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-small;">um, oh, yeah...</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> except if it's a Conservative being interviewed - in that case, then a <i>thousand</i> questions will be asked, all editorialized with the 'reporter's' own opinions.<i> </i></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The <i>Globe and Mail</i> had the chance (but refused) to pin down Canada's Senior Climatologist and get down to the facts and get the evidence of all that 'man made global warming / climate change' which Jim Bradley, Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne... and climatologist Jane Fonda... say is happening. </span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But facts would cloud and hinder the continual propagation of GreenFear innuendo; therefore, we have this ongoing, drawn-out Cagey Tango, where the two willing dancers coyly carry out their choreographed moves, winking at each other knowingly, dropping an opening hint here, a seductive spin there, coyly suggesting the kinds of things both know must better be left unsaid... ... <span style="font-size: xx-small;"> sheesh</span>... </span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Was reporter Graveland self-muzzled, or was he muzzled by his <i>Grope and Flail </i>bosses to NOT ask Environment Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist for evidence to support that what Phillips reports, is directly attributable to (man-made) climate change? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wasn't this the intended, underlying message - to repeatedly report (unfounded) allegations of '<i>man-made </i>climate change', <i>without </i>actually<i> </i>proving it; to scare the shit out of people with doomsday GreenFear innuendo so that leftists can have their excuse to raise taxes?</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why the massive disconnect between the media blaring<i> everyday </i>about 'climate change' - - and yet, not actually asking<i> for</i> the corroborating evidence<i> about</i> said 'climate change' from Canada's SENIOR climatologist? </span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It should be easy for Phillips to prove {...seeing as that even Al Gore and David Suzuki and Leonardo DiCaprio and Jerry Brown and Stephane Dion... and we</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> can now add the disgusting hack</span><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/governor-general-speech-julie-payette-climate-change-1.4384481"> Juliete Payette t</a><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">o the GreenFear cabal...)</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> ALL 'know' that global warming is caused by man! 'It's all settled', doncha know!! </span></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So why can't Canada's Senior Climatologist actually come out and admit that everything he reports, is and always was, caused by man-made climate change?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cagey is not muzzled anymore, under Turdo, is he?? (...as the Canadian lefties loved to allege when Harper was in power, when they were spreading the meme that "Canada's scientists are being muzzled") </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Which scientists were muzzled? Was it David Phillips? Or is Philips not a "scientist", just a glorified weatherman??!! Why is this guy ALWAYS being quoted, and yet, after the interview, we are left with the realization that he had nothing to say. How can this occur over literally thousands of media interviews over the years - and never a request - nor an answer - about proving climate change?! Its FLICKING unreal.</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cagey Dave could just come right out and now admit that EVERY interview he has given since he started his career, was actually a long-arc demonstration of climate change evidence, right from the start, from Day One.</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">He could say:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> 'Over the thousands of interviews I've given over the years, I can now admit that I have been actually reporting on man-made climate-change all this time, since the beginning of my career, because man causes the climate which creates the weather. Or maybe it's the other way around? {Oh, well... as Crooked Hillary conveniently says, <i>what it does it matter </i>now, anyway?!} Man definitely has always had something to do with it, way before I came along. Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger; blame man. Man is to blame for the weather which causes the climate to change, which then changes the weather - or something like that! - you see? Yeah: man did it. This has always been so, since the dawn of man'.</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> That would make Al Gore and Canada's Climate Clown Catherine McKenna and Jim Bradley real happy. So, why isn't David Phillips letting loose and telling us the truth? What's he hiding about climate change??!</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why hasn't anyone actually asked <b>Canada's Senior </b><b>Climatologist</b> about... umm... "<i><b>CLIMATE CHANGE"??</b></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><b>-</b></i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Speaking of DiCaprio, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW2B_GT3b1E">Robert Williamson commented</a>: "Leonardo DiCaprio's 8,000 mile round trip in one day on a private jet.. He's one of the morons that tells all the rest of us that we have to cut back our middle class lifestyles to "..save the planet" Leonardo DiCaprio jumped on to a private jet to fly from Cannes on the French Riviera, to New York, U.S.A. After receiving a green award, the actor then flew straight back across the Atlantic to France again so he would not miss the banquet and party with his friends at an AIDs benefit gala. He spent a week lounging on his superyacht in the Mediterranean, just after receiving another environmental accolade. Leonardo DiCaprio flew to Brazil on another trip to catch the soccer matches.... then cruised up and down the South American coast ...partying with his friends on his Arab pal's motor yacht which he chartered... one of the largest private yachts in the world... His Arab pal is from the United Arab Emirates and he's an oil tycoon. The yacht is the fifth largest private yacht in the world.. It's name is "Topaz". Length: 147 m (482 ft) Beam: 21.50 m (70.5 ft) The main engines of the Topaz are twin Pielstick diesel engines, each with power of 7990 hp. This is enough power for the yacht to reach a service speed of 22.9 knots, while the maximum speed is over 25.5 knots. The yacht is also equipped with two diesel generators and an emergency diesel generator. These aggregates provide power to the stabilizers, navigation equipment and all the facilities on board. Topaz is equipped with zero-speed stabilizers, jacuzzi (on deck), double helicopter landing pads, swimming pool, tender garage, swimming platform, air conditioning, underwater lights. There's also a fitness hall, cinema and a large conference room.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And in 2014, emails hacked from film studio Sony revealed he took six private flights in just six weeks which cost $138,616.00 This travel included two round trips from Los Angeles to New York, and one from LA to Las Vegas. This is the moron who spoke on the horrors of climate change/global warming at the U.N. and took advantage of the Oscar Ceremonies to speak on how bad Global Warming and CO2 are... and how all of us have to cut way back on our CO2 producing lifestyles.... to "...save the planet.." and how me must leave the oil in the ground "...where it belongs."</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #111111;"><span style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Kurt Boyd commented on the hypocrisy of the climate-change GreenFear peddling movement: </span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; white-space: pre-wrap;"> "<b><i>The Left has figured out long ago that signaling virtue is far easier than actually having virtue".</i></b></span></span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""garuda" , "verdana" , "geneva" , sans-serif" style="font-size: 12px; font-style: italic;"><span face=""roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #111111;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></span><span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 10</b></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The Sad Saga of Canada's Cagey Climatologist continues:</span></div>
</div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Fast forward to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/if-january-seemed-dreary-that-s-because-there-were-28-fewer-hours-of-sunshine-than-average-1.3959507">another CBC GreenFear piece (Jan.31, 2017) </a> this time written by Lauren Pelley, where the dark insinuation is that somehow climate change caused the month of January to be cloudy, sunless, and , well... dark. Lauren Pelley again does the Cagey Two Step Tango with David Phillips,<i> never once </i>asking Cagey "Is all this evidence of man made climate change, Dave? Will the carbon taxes legislated by Sunny Ways Turdo eliminate these dark days forever, Dave? Should we all vote for the Liberals, Dave, to Save The Planet From Dark Peril??"</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Another sad demo of Fake News on the GreenFear-peddling climate front, in a long line of similar Cagey Dave propaganda.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">C'mon, somebody: just ask Ole David Phillips, if he has <i>any evidence whatsoever </i>of man made climate change!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> NO ONE is preventing Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist from answering.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> No one is muzzling David Phillips! (Eh, Grant Lafleche?)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's apparent that<i> NO ONE IS ASKING!</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The Cagey Two-Step should be called the <i>Cagey Side Step Climate Tango</i>, because that's what both participants in these climatalarmist phony 'interviews' are doing: one partner neatly, deftly <i>side-steps</i> asking 'questions', while the other moves in unison to provide nebulous, conflated <i>side-stepping </i>deflective 'answers'. It's a spectacle of fancy footwork, from which neither rutting party comes away virtuous.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The reporters are<i> muzzling themselves,</i> dancing a side-step around the climate change AGW issue with Ole Cagey, but never directly addressing it. By reading/seeing their breathless media reports and interviews with Cagey, they create an appearance {an illusion} <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if </span></i> they are actually discussing and demonstrating 'evidence' of 'man-made climate change'!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The stench of underlying GreenFear permeates their phony reports, the main purpose of which is to propagandize <i>FOR</i> GreenFear-policies, without actually demonstrating that the weather event factoids which Dave spouts, are actually caused by man.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> All these "reports" over the years, all these sordid tangos danced with cagey David Philips, amount to an impressive oeuvre of unsubstantiated GreenFear propaganda. It's a homey pastiche of cagily subtle hints, causal conflation, insidious double-meanings, allusions, illusions, dire innuendo, oblique comparisons.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why aren't hacks such as Lauren Pelley (...in a long line of sad stenographers, pathetically posing as 'journalists'...) asking the question?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The Canadian and the Ontario governments peddle claims about climate change which Canada's Senior Climatologist Phillips (to his discredit) cagily refuses to address (...although, of course, he freely could), and furthermore, which his enabler-"interviewers" (to their discredit)<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> never dare ask</span></i> (...although, of course, they freely could).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Therefore we have this ongoing delicately deceptive, deflective Cagey Tango, this phony show where<i> two </i>willing <span style="font-size: xx-small;">nudge-nudge-wink-wink</span> partners choreograph their coy side-stepping dance to propagate the GreenFear pretense without challenging the underlying premise. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> As the saying goes, it takes two to tango, so we see that Cagey and his long line of pathetic interviewers/dance partners always seem to follow the same moves, the same side-stepping template - they have both willingly peddled what amounts to a long-arc of innuendo posing as 'it's all settled climate science'.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> In other words, it's designed to be fake - - it is <i>appearance</i> over <i>substance</i>; the propaganda effect is in performing the Cagey Climate Tango in an illusory way that makes one believe that somehow, what is being shown shows evidence of climate change, when in fact, after radio interviews, after TV interviews, after newspaper interviews - no such evidence is actually produced: Cagey babbles on and his bobble-headed interviewer-stenographers just nod in blank stupor and write whatever Cagey says, without question. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It's designed to be 'politics-disguised-as-science' propaganda - a cagey conspiracy that is inherently apparent throughout <i>thousands of Cagey interviews </i>( see Chapter 32!): how can the question of "man made climate change" not ever be raised? They just dance their <i>tango</i> around the issue, using dexterous moves to side-step from their faulty "it's all settled" premise.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's as if the press spins what Cagey says as being 'evidence of climate change', when Cagey was only<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> nudge-nudge-wink-wink</span> talking about common weather - - - a disconnect of cross-purposes, with the press seeing only what they wanted to see. Is that delusional or premeditated?! Who is pandering to who?? Who are they trying to con?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It's like David Phillips is in a </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">weatherman's</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Canadian </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">version of </span><i>Being There</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">; he's acting as Canada's Chauncey Gardener of weather, where Cagey Dave has been elevated to some kind of climate change deity, where everything he says is taken at face-value as wise greenie gospel explaining man made climate change.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And yet, you'd think that David Phillips would have recognized this scenario a long time ago, after perhaps being misunderstood after several interviews, and then set the record straight by openly saying yes, this IS evidence of AGW, or, no, this ISN'T evidence of AGW.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But Cagey Dave didn't challenge his interviewer's reports. They came to him, begging for wisdom and climate guidance, as they flocked to Chauncey. Cagey became a light in their proverbial darkness. They heard what Cagey uttered, and determined that it was wisdom. It reaffirmed their own beliefs, spoke to their innate suspicions, reflected their own illusions - how could it not mirror their own default bias?! Like Chauncey Gardener, Dave let the charade continue for years; unlike Chauncey, though, Cagey Dave had a chance - many chances - to set the record straight.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The Sad Saga of Canada's Cagey Climatologist will continue.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 11</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's ask:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Why hasn't<i> anyone</i> in Canada asked Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist to comment on </span><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Stephen Capozzola's article about the</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><a href="http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/uncovering-the-extent-of-global-warming-cheating/">fake basis of the Paris climate </a><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">agreements?!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Again, you'd think that all those Canadian GreenFear-pushing media outlets which amplify the climate change lie on a daily basis, would have asked David Phillips, or flakey Liberals such as Justin Trudeau, Catherine McKenna, Jim Bradley, Stephane Dion, or Kathleen Wynne, or daffy David Suzuki, for their detailed responses - <i>detailed</i> responses, you know, not the politicized GreenGarbage rhetoric that is their usual hallmark.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">As Stephen Capozzola asks (PoliZette, Feb.14, 2017) in "Discovering the extent of global warming cheating: <span style="color: #333333;">Once experts aren't bound by politics, the truth about climate change surfaces":</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> "...<i>One has to wonder why, if the case for man-made warming is so tenuous, would alarmists resort to such questionable methods? Wouldn't the more obvious recourse be to question the hypothesis itself? But such is the state of the contemporary global warming debate. Hundreds of advocacy groups are engaged in an all-out campaign to certify the premise of anthropogenic warming..."</i></span><br />
<span style="color: red; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525;">That sums up the bullshit which has been spewed by the skewed left, deluded and besotted with creating a scenario of fear to push their socialist</span><span style="color: #252525;"> agenda. Canada's prime minister Zoolander Turdo has happily pushed the phony climate change agenda - yet, we are to believe that somehow scientists were umm... 'muzzled'... by someone {...Harper, Trump, Harris, Diefenbaker...???} to prevent them from revealing their unfounded 'truth' about supposed man made climate change!!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's a bizarre reverse-onus bias being peddled here.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The 'man made global-warming / climate-change' hypothesis is NOT to be questioned; it is to be treated as Green Gospel.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The thing is, no one has asked Liberal climate liars Jim Bradley or Stephane Dion or Justin Trudeau, for their detailed evidence on supposed man-made climate-change, details on the underlying AGW premise which they use on a daily basis to further their socialist agendas. </span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">These unsubstantiated claims you often hear in the media that 'science is muzzled' are themselves regurgitations of a phony meme, still constantly repeated in Green Bolshevik echo chambers; y'know, 'Harper muzzled scientists'; 'Trump muzzles science' etc.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525;">Yet, when exactly was </span><span style="color: #252525;">'science muzzled'??? No one has ever asked the politicians who ought to know - such as Canada's and Ontario's Liberals, for example!!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">There again is the falsity of the Green Lie; Liberals in power in Canada - such as Jim Bradley - get away with peddling climate change bullshit without ever being held to account by a complicit media! The phony policies based on fairy-tale AGW fear-mongering are accepted, not questioned.</span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The media set the tone to ease in the Green Fear agenda years ago. The media has acted as the protectors for the political policies for which there is no scientific basis, spreading a meme that 'science is being muzzled' - YET, they also spread the meme that 'the science is settled' - - - how utterly convenient to have these two contradictory memes in use, to support the same agenda!!! </span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Interesting how the scientists who<i> </i>are <i>supposedly </i>'muzzled', are only those who peddle the GreenFear agenda; yet, conveniently (for the GreenFear narrative to work) those scientists who <i>challenge </i>the 'it's all settled' meme are never glorified and raised to the hallowed status of being 'muzzled'- <i>those</i> scientists are <i>immediately </i>shamed, denigrated, and branded as "<i>deniers</i>" - that other gem of a meme beloved by the purveyors of Green Fascism, who are the true 'muzzlers' here.</span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> (see <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2010/07/time-for-screed-against-scaaaarey-right.html">Tom Ferguson</a>)</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">You see the handy narrative? It is <i>only </i>the GreenFear-pushers who can possibly be 'muzzled' {...do you see how the default bias works here?!}</span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The GreenFear-pushers can be elevated to a hallowed status as 'Victims Of Scientific Suppression' in the 'War On Science' - they are nothing less then glorious green <i>martyrs,</i> you see; <i>but</i> - if you do not subscribe to the "<i>it's all settled</i>" GreenFear fascist mantra, you are <i>not </i>a martyr; you are<i> not</i> deemed a Victim Of Scientific Suppression - you are labelled a heretic 'denier' - as <a href="http://time.com/4664173/climate-change-denial-fake-news/">Time hack Eric Polley does in his Feb.16, 2017 fake news story "<i>Climate change denial is the original fake news</i>"</a> .</span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Eric Polley, of course, can't be bothered to show any <i>evidence of </i>AGW (...that's never the point though, is it?!) - he just professionally peddles the GreenFear agenda. </span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Time</i> should<i> </i>be ashamed to peddle such one-sided nonsense, but they're not by far the only ones slickly suppressing science by skewering 'deniers' while skewing the facts - <i>The Atlantic</i> happily threw a couple of punches too, publishing <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/the-new-rhetoric-of-climate-denial/516198/">Meehan Crist's Feb.10, 2017</a> story "<i>How the new climate denial is like the old climate denial</i>", without actually providing<i> ANY </i>evidence to support the AGW premise, which they claim is being 'denied'!</span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In a classic case of projection and deflection, Crist, Polley and their editors are <i>themselves</i> the deniers, denying the reality <i>of their own false AGW premise. </i>(Yikes:<i> paradigm shift</i> alert!! Hypocrisy alert!!)</span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Their 'real' premise is the false GreenFear-premise: that AGW is 'all settled' - <i>that </i>is their unquestioned jumping off point. (Like drones chattering in their echo chambers, GreenFear-pushing climatalarmists seem to miss the irony that Crist's article is exactly the kind of article which Polley sneers about!)</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">It's all rather a convenient political construct, isn't it?!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Have a look at Terence Corcoran's insightful column "</span><span style="font-weight: inherit;">Canadian finds polar bears are doing fine — and gets climate-mauled" <span style="color: #252525;">(</span></span><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><a href="http://business.financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-canadian-finds-polar-bears-are-doing-fine-and-gets-climate-mauled#comments-area">National Post, Dec. 7, 2017)</a> on how climatalarmists attack those who question their "it's all settled' claims:</span></span></div>
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">" We take you now deep out onto the frozen floes of Arctic science and polar bears, where the most dangerous threat known to man and bear alike is lurking among the icebergs: Junk science.<br /><br />As a starting point, we look to <a href="https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/kzgq3y/climate-denier-blogs-spread-online-polar-bears-science">a story published December 1st on Vice News’s tech site, Motherboard</a>, that included an interview with U.S. polar bear scientist/activist Stephen Amstrup. In the article, Amstrup accuses Canadian polar bear scientist Susan Crockford of filling her bear research with extreme allegations. Climate activists have targeted Crockford, a zoologist and adjunct professor of anthropology at the University of Victoria, because her research inconveniently finds that, despite their claims, <a href="https://polarbearscience.com/2017/11/06/twenty-reasons-not-to-worry-about-polar-bears-the-2017-update/">polar bears are not at risk</a>. “You don’t have to read far in her material to see that it is full of unsubstantiated statements and personal attacks on scientists, using names like eco-terrorists, fraudsters, green terrorists and scammers,” Amstrup claimed.<br /><br />A few days later, Motherboard published a slithery retraction. After Crockford complained that Amstrup’s comments about her were “a lie” and that she has never used such terms, Amstrup “clarified” his comments. He said that when he accused Crockford of calling scientists fraudsters, he really meant to accuse “climate deniers as a whole, rather than Crockford in particular.”<br /><br />Ah, well, mix-ups like wrongly accusing a scientist of slanderous language are the kind of things that can happen given the context. It’s all part of an escalating epic of polar bear junk science. It begins with a paper in which Amstrup, who heads the activist group Polar Bears International, and other climate scientists — <a href="https://judithcurry.com/2017/03/31/deniers-lies-and-politics/">including famed temperature hockey-stick maker Michael Mann </a>— produce what must be one of the most pathetic scientific smear jobs in the already sorry history of climate change science smear campaigns. Also along for the hatchet job was Stephan Lewandowsky, an Australian psychologist who asserts that people who have doubts about climate policy are <a href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797612457686">wacky conspiracy theorists who would also tend to believe the 1969 moon landing was faked</a>. Motherboard published a slithery retraction<br /><br />In their new paper published November 29th, in the journal BioScience, Mann, Lewandowsky, Amstrup and a dozen other authors, headed by Jeffrey Harvey of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, attack Crockford as an unqualified climate “denier.”<br /><br />Crockford is fighting back. On Wednesday, she demanded that BioScience <a href="https://polarbearscience.com/2017/12/05/retraction-request-to-bioscience-foia-emails-document-another-harsh-criticism-of-amstrups-2007-polar-bear-model/#more-113761">retract the paper</a>. She describes it, in part, as “simply malicious, and an egregious breach of professional ethics” and filled with “untrue statements.”<br /><br />The sole personal target of the BioScience paper is Crockford. Crockford has written books on polar bears for children and adults (such as Polar Bears: Outstanding Survivors of Climate Change) and runs Polar Bear Science, a blog site that for years has drilled holes in many of the claims and predictions of mainstream climate scientists. <a href="https://polarbearscience.com/2017/11/22/w-hudson-bay-polar-bear-season-wrap-up-problem-bear-stats-sea-ice-vs-2016/">One recent post</a> showed that polar bear populations around Churchill, Man. were in good shape, amid lots of sea ice. <a href="https://polarbearscience.com/2017/11/13/w-hudson-bay-freeze-up-one-of-earliest-since-1979-not-closer-to-average/">Another recent item</a> said Amstrup’s claims of sea-ice loss were inaccurate. <br /><br />Climate scientists in the Amstrup/Mann/Lewandowsky camp have apparently had enough of Crockford’s steady debunking of many of their polar bear alarmist claims and have set out to destroy her and her reputation via what can only be called a vicious personal attack." in a new paper published November 29th, in the journal BioScience, Mann, Lewandowsky, Amstrup and a dozen other authors, headed by Jeffrey Harvey of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, attack Crockford as an unqualified climate “denier.” ..."</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> If anyone, it is the media (playing offense as usual for their leftist political agenda) which continues to protect their favourite politicians (and therefore their socialist policies) from scrutiny.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Take at look at Martin Regg Cohn's sly worship to Green bolshevism, not surprisingly, printed in the Toronto Star and its drone propagation outlets, such as the <a href="http://www.ourwindsor.ca/opinion-story/7144261-don-t-put-the-fight-against-global-warming-on-ice-cohn/">Windsor Star, Feb.16, 2017</a>. It takes a propagandist's skill to pen a supposed 'critique' which in fact is a lament that Liberal GreenFear Bolshevism doesn't go<b> </b><i>far enough! </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Like Polley and Crist,<i> </i>Cohn purposefully fails to provide any specific evidence for AGW - but again: that's not the point, is it, to question the premise of AGW?! </span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The point is to <i>continue propagating</i> the GreenFear hoax, <i>without</i> questioning the premise! {You know: just the way it works in Canada with hundreds of Cagey Climatologist interviews!}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cohn dutifully skips over any mention of the premise of 'man-made global warming/climate change', as he shills for policies which are solely based <i>on</i> that premise! </span><br />
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The GreenFear hoax<i> must </i>be taken as a given - the rule is "<i>it's all settled, don't you dare ask questions</i>", and so the media stories are built upon <i>that</i> premise. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It is the media<i> itself, </i>which is muzzling science by propagating the phony. one-sided GreenFear agenda, and by simultaneously demonizing anyone who dares challenge the underpinnings of this socialist fabrication.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525;"> Think about it, <i>they </i>themselves are the muzzlers of science... they {...the '<i>free'</i> press..!} </span><i><span style="color: red;">self-muzzle</span></i><span style="color: #252525;"> scrutiny of the GreenFear lie, while themselves muzzling those who actually challenge the AGW premise.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525;"> (Let's nominate Martin Regg Cohn and Eric Polley into Polley's own Climate Change Hoaxter's Hall of GreenFear-Peddling Shame, along with 'bright' lights such as Jim Bradley and the entire Ontario Liberal government, David Suzuki, Al Gore, Turdo and his Liberal Greensheviks in Ottawa... )</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's an Orwellian deception enabled here by the media, where the real muzzlers deflect<i> their own</i> complicity in a meme designed to blame others for 'muzzling science'!!!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #252525;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> You see this all the time in the <i>St. Catharines Phony Standard (</i>...look at the sickening GreenFear-mongering spewed by Liberal Climate-Fraud-Conman Glen Murray, Ontario's Chief Climate-Change Liar, <a href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/2017/02/15/letters-to-the-editor">in the Feb.15, 2017 <i>Standard</i></a><i>.</i>..); look on the CBC, Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, Huffington Post, Time, McLean's etc - the prevalent GreenFear-based climate-change lie is peddled on a daily basis, while its validity - and therefore, the validity of those political policies which are based on the AGW climate lie - are<i> purposefully not questioned; </i>the premise is never scrutinized.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> I mean, who wants to believe that climate-change fraudsters such as Justin Trudeau will be flying to sign phony 'climate agreements' in Paris, agreements which are<i> phony promises </i>based on <i>phony premise</i>s which have no scientific substance?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (... this is same smarmy Justin Trudeau, who believes the climate-change AGW fairy tale is "a fact", who officially met with Donald Trump in Washington (on Feb.13, 2017) and who nevertheless,<i> muzzled himself </i>to avoid mentioning climate change! What a phony true believer!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Stephen Capozzola wrote:</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"For those who follow the heated squabbling of climate alarmists and skeptics, this has been a bombshell week. John Bates, a recently retired scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has revealed that a 2015 study by the government agency was riddled with bias and questionable methodology.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">More specifically, NOAA released a study in 2015 announcing that we haven’t had a “pause” in global warming over the past 15 years. Although the study flatly contradicted data from satellites and weather balloons documenting a net flatlining of temperatures, its findings were cited prominently at the 2015 Paris climate talks. The resulting Paris accord called for major decarbonization efforts worldwide.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">According to Bates, the “pausebuster” study, led by former NOAA Director Thomas Karl, was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved. Bates says that Karl was “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation.”</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">It’s interesting that the Obama administration rushed to embrace the Karl study, though, since a subsequent paper in Nature Magazine disagreed with the NOAA report, saying the observed “slowdown” in warming is real, and occurred at a time when carbon dioxide emissions have been rising steadily.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Even the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has stated that “the rate of warming over the past 15 years … is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951.”</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Subsequent rumblings about possible bias at NOAA prompted Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) to investigate the matter in 2016, earning the veteran congressman considerable criticism. In taking on NOAA, Smith was accused of being "anti-science" and trying to "intimidate" the scientific community. The U.K.'s Guardian even referred to him as a "witch hunter."</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Now, however, it looks like Smith was absolutely right to question whether taxpayer money was used in a dubious manner.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">It's significant that satellite and weather balloon readings of global temperatures have steadily borne out observations that net temperatures have remained relatively stable since the start of the 21st century. However, NOAA said that its 2015 study used "significant improvements in the calculation of trends" to assemble "improved versions of both sea surface temperature and land surface air temperature datasets."</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But NOAA engaged in two very questionable practices in order to arrive at their new and improved graph of temperatures. They included seawater temperature measurements collected from the engine intake valves of ocean-going vessels, and they estimated Arctic Ocean temperatures by extrapolating from nearby land areas.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The result? When compared to satellite and weather balloon data, their "new" findings eliminated the net flatlining of 21st century global temperatures and instead showed a series of scraggly rising temperature lines.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Essentially, NOAA wanted the American people to believe that eliminating satellite data, while including readings from engine thermometers, would yield a more accurate temperature record. For the casual observer, all of this might seem plausible. But clearly NOAA engaged in a questionable methodology.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Most notably, thermometers installed in the intake valves of ocean-going vessels aren't intended for such precise measurements of temperature. This becomes all the more apparent when one considers, for example, that 2016 was declared the "hottest year on record" by a mere 0.01 degrees Celsius.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But there's also the possibility of "heat contamination" from the ships themselves. Seawater intake valves also pose a big problem, as well. They vary in depth according to the size and shape of a vessel's hull — presenting a problem for collecting samples of uniform depth.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Interestingly, NOAA gave priority to these ship readings. As one of the report's authors explained, "[D]ata collected from buoys are cooler than ship-based data. In order to accurately compare ship measurements and buoy measurements over the long-term, they need to be compatible. Scientists have developed a method to correct the difference between ship and buoy measurements, and we are using this in our trend analysis."</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">How exactly did NOAA adjust for this discrepancy? They added 0.12 degrees Celsius (0.25°F) to each buoy to bring their measurements in line with readings taken from ship gauges.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">It's somewhat amusing to look at NOAA's website, though, and see their justification for using engine intake readings. Essentially, they portray such measurements as a step forward in scientific progress, thanks to the "change from ships throwing a bucket over the side, bringing some ocean water on deck, and putting a thermometer in it, to reading the thermometer in the engine coolant water intake."</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But NOAA took another liberty, as well. They decided to estimate Arctic Ocean temperatures based on neighboring land areas. Simply put, there are only a limited number of temperature monitoring stations in the Arctic.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">As such, NOAA simply extrapolated Arctic Ocean temperatures from neighboring land-based measurements. However, much of the Arctic Ocean can remain ice-covered throughout the summer, and imposing warmer land surface data on areas of sea ice will inevitably skew temperature readings.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But this is what NOAA undertook in order to make the case for concerted worldwide action against fossil fuel use. And while many climate-watchers had suspicions about the validity of NOAA's approach, it took Bates' revelations to help confirm the bias that drove their findings.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">One has to wonder why, if the case for man-made warming is so tenuous, would alarmists resort to such questionable methods? Wouldn't the more obvious recourse be to question the hypothesis itself? But such is the state of the contemporary global warming debate. Hundreds of advocacy groups are engaged in an all-out campaign to certify the premise of anthropogenic warming.</i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">And with salaries, grants, and reputations on the line, it's doubtful that truth and scientific accuracy will get in the way of their ultimate quest. The American people deserve better, though, noting the large sacrifices that will be asked of them if the United States continues to follow the edicts of the Paris accord."</i></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;"> <a href="http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/uncovering-the-extent-of-global-warming-cheating/"><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">Steven</em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"> </em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">Capozzola</em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"> </em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">has served as media director for both the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) and the U.S. Business & Industry Council (</em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">USBIC</em><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">).</em></a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<div style="color: #252525;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Will any media outlet ask Justin Trudeau or Jim Bradley or Glen Murray or Chris Bittle about any of this? These Liberal clowns propagate the climate-change lie every day they are in office. </span></span></div>
<div style="color: #252525;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And, far be it for any reporter in Canada to ask Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist (...or is he Canada's Cagiest Climatalarmogist </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: xx-small;">TM </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">...!?!) David Phillips for his comments on the phony basis of the Paris climate accords and Canada's labyrinth of cap and trade schemes - what's<i> that </i>got to do with climate change - right?! </span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 12</b></span></div>
<div style="color: #252525; font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #252525;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">Let's look back at what I wrote earlier in this post, in Chapter 2:</span></div>
<div style="color: #252525;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> "In the </span><a href="http://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/2017/02/22/record-warm-weather-in-niagara">Feb. 22, 2017 Niagara Falls Review and the St.Catharines Standard,</a><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Ray Spiteri</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><i style="color: black;">again</i><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> 'interviewed' Cagey, and</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><i style="color: black;">again</i><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">, Spiteri</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><i style="color: black;"><span style="color: red;">did not bother to ask </span></i><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">David Phillips if what Phillips was saying was the direct result of man-made (AGW) climate-change. </span></span></div>
<div style="color: #252525;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The GreenFear-mongering i</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">nsinuation</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> t</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">hat this </span><i style="color: black;">was </i><span style="color: black; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">all due to 'climate change', was palpably present in Spiteri's piece, as Cagey Dave told Spiteri how </span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.6em; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><i>“<span style="color: #b45f06;">These records go back to 1901. It’s hard to break a record when you’ve got over 100 years of records. I think (Thursday) could very well be (a record), especially if we get a little bit more sun than the fog that we’ve seen in some parts of southern Ontario.”</span></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><i><span style="background-color: white;"> Phillips said he doesn’t recall such a sustained stretch of warm weather in February such as this year.</span><br /><span style="background-color: white;"> “I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February. </span></i><i><span style="background-color: white;">What’s so interesting about this heat wave in February is that it is so persistent. You often will get one or two days where spring has arrived, and then you’re back into the cold winter weather. This has gone on. It went from (last) Saturday to this coming) Saturday"</span></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Spiteri just obediently stenographed whatever Cagey said,</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><i>without question, without research, without objectivity, without any journalistic intergrity.</i></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Spiteri</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><i>could have </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">asked: </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> 'David, regarding this '100-yr-old record breaking February temperature' which you just mentioned, is this definitive evidence of man made climate change, the kind that Liberals such as Justin Trudeau and Jim Bradley say it is? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> David, you make all this innuendo about hundred year records being broken, but as Canada's Senior Climatologist, what do these records have to do with AGW climate change?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> David, when you say to me </span><i style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">“I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February", </span></i><span style="font-size: large;">are you specifically referring to the period from 1901 to Feb. 2017? Could there have been a warmer February week anytime earlier, say, </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">oh...um....</span><span style="font-size: large;"> in the <i>last 10,000 years</i>? </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> David, and also, why is it that you "don't think there's been a warmer week in February" - don't you - as a scientist - <i>know </i>these things for sure, before you say them? </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Either it <i>has</i> been 'the </span><span style="font-size: large;">warmest February week since 1901', or it <i>hasn't</i> - why allude to this, if you <i>don't actually </i>know? </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> David, do you want me to sensationalize the story, and spike it with GreenFear?'</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Sadly, Spiteri sold himself out as a journalist and simply danced the tired old conjugal <i style="color: black;">Cagey Two Step Climate Tango</i> with David Phillips, the way hundreds of other Canadian presstitutes have done.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Spiteri<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> did NOT ask</span></i> any questions, just lapped up David Phillips' sputum and regurgitated it in the St. Catharines Standard and in the Review.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div style="color: black; font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 13</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Spiteri's <i>Tango With Cagey </i>(... as mentioned in Chapter 12 above)<i> </i>appeared on Feb.22, 2017, so it was amusing to see that <i>only a week later</i> (on Mar.1, 2017) Cagey was involved in yet <i>another</i> typical GreenFear-laced piece, where he was basically spouting similar things as he had spouted to Spiteri - but in this case, the reporter actually<i> did </i>try to ask if all this warmth in Feb.2017 was climate change. This is what Spiteri and literally hundreds of previous Canadian reporters failed to do. </span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> So who was this supposedly 'heroic' reporter?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">It was Kate McGillivray, who reported this in her <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/programs/metromorning/february-2017-warmest-on-record-1.4004298">CBC article (Mar.1, 2017)</a>.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">(Yes, this was in the Liberal-friendly CBC!! But, looking at the odd story in the link, it isn't even clear if </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">McGillivray </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">actually interviewed Cagey<i> herself</i>, or, was she reporting a second-hand story here, based on some <i>other</i> interviewer on <i>Metro Morning</i>... was it <i>her, </i>or someone<i> else, </i>doing the actual interview?? I am taking it here that McGillivray was Cagey's interviewer. If it was someone else, than the same comments apply to whoever it was that actually did this Cagey interview.)</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McGillivray wrote:</span></div>
<div class="story-headline">
<h1 class="story-title" style="line-height: 1.25; margin: 0px 0px 5px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">So long, normal weather: Toronto just had the warmest February on record</i></span></span></h1>
</div>
<h3 class="story-deck" style="line-height: 1.25; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Expect the unexpected and get used to temperature swings, says climatologist Dave Phillips</i></span></h3>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span>It's official — Toronto just lived through the warmest February in at least 80 years, says Dave Phillips, senior climatologist at Environment Canada.</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"It also had the warmest February temperature ever, up to 17.7 C on the 23rd," which broke records going back to the 1840s, he told CBC Radio's Metro Morning.</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The month didn't start off this way.</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">"</span>"We had temperatures at -12 C," said Phillips. "We had a month's worth of snow in the first ten days."</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">After that, the jet stream, a narrow band of strong wind, moved "almost into a summer position, well north of us in Northern Ontario. It allowed the warm air to just flood into Southern Ontario," he said.</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">All that warm air led to 12 days in a row with melting record temperatures. "So clearly, the look and the feel of winter disappeared in February," Phillips said.</i></span></div>
<h2 style="line-height: 1.25; margin-bottom: 1rem; margin-top: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Enjoying the weather, worrying about the climate</i></span></h2>
<div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">So are February's unseasonably warm temperatures a sure sign of climate change?</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"<span style="color: red;">I'm reluctant to always go there," said Phillips</span>.</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">He said that it's the wild swings over the last few years, the absence of "normal weather," that is more of a tip-off.</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"We had the coldest February on record two winters ago, here we have the warmest. That back-and-forth, up-and-down is more a mark that something is happening to our climate," he said.</i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"We say, 'Enjoy the weather but be concerned about the climate.</i><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">'"</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Amazing, isn't it: </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> A CBC reporter/interviewer asks Canada's Cagey Climatologist whether the Feb. warm weather is a sure sign of climate change, and a hostile Cagey cagily answers that he is "<i><span style="color: red;">reluctant to always go there</span>"!! </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Whaaaaat</span></i><span style="font-size: x-large;">??!</span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Why</i> is Cagey - Canada's SENIOR CLIMATOLOGIST! - "reluctant" to talk <i>about climate change</i>?!?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> After all: Cagey's among fawning friends here; he's talking <i>to the CBC </i>for Gaia's sake, he's singing to his own choir: these people are GreenFear fanatics infected with green bolshevsim.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Phillips shills the climate-change issue, ominously rattles off fearsome temperature records being broken, citing scary "wild swings", declaring (ie GreenFear-mongering) that this all due to the absence of "normal weather" - and yet in the same interview, he <i>refuses</i> to put into perspective whether all that weather which he had just talked about, had anything to do with climate change!!!!!!!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Apparently, Cagey's kind of GreenFearmongering is meant to be taken - unquestioningly - at face value; the cagey unspoken insinuation is prepared and provided for us to jump to a conflated conclusion that this <i>must </i>therefore <i>all</i> be due to man-made climate change, and also, therefore, that there is NO OTHER POSSIBLE alternative! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The GreenFear link is pre-engineered for our unquestioning consumption, prepared by both Cagey and the CBC, performed in their choreographed Climate Tango, <i>without any evidence</i> that anything here is linked to AGW. The illusion and the insinuation and the scary spin is <i>meant to confuse</i>, and to suggest that the<i> only possible cause</i> is AGW. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> This is a carnival act of scienteering</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span style="font-size: large;"> , of presenting factoids without scientific relevance or parameters, to devise a scene of confirmation bias (the "...it's all settled, folks, just trust us, nothin' more to see here, now git movin'..." narrative). </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> This insane propaganda perverts and hides the fact that earth's climate has changed <i>ever there since there was a climate</i>. It is a sickening delusion which Cagey and his climate change cabal are peddling here.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> There is an interesting interplay here, in this slick GreenFear piece, but make no mistake about it: this is still CBC fake news GreenFear propaganda, even though Kate </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McGillivray tepidly <i>did</i> try to "go there" with Cagey. </span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> (...also, compare Cagey's caginess in NOT "going there" about climate change with the CBC, to the fact that Cagey </span><i style="background-color: white;">had</i><span style="background-color: white;"> 'gone there' - just a month earlier, on Jan.30, 2017! - when he had held a lecture at the </span><a href="http://www.nvca.on.ca/Shared%20Documents/NVCA%20Media%20Release%20-%20Environment%20and%20Climate%20Change%20Canada%20David%20Phillips%20talks%20Climate%20Change%20at%20NVCA%20AGM%20-%20Jan%2030,%202017.pdf" style="background-color: white;">Nottawasaga Conservation Valley Authority</a><span style="background-color: white;"> where he claimed that "</span><i><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #0b5394;">climate change is the here and now</span></i><span style="background-color: white;">" - - - yet, what does that </span><i style="background-color: white;">even mean</i><span style="background-color: white;">? !?</span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> It's simply cagey innuendo! That's not scientific terminology: that's just Cagey's homey blatant PR sloganeering weather-word-salad rhetoric. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> </span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Has climate not always </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">been</i><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> changing, Mr. Phillips? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;">Wasn't climate change "<i>the here and now</i>" ever since there was a 'there and then'??! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Yet, no reporter has ever questioned Cagey on that most basic tenet of his green bolshevik beliefs!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"> What utter pandering horsesh!t</span><span style="font-size: large;"> dripping from Cagey's piehole. When did earth's climate </span><i style="font-size: x-large;">NOT</i><span style="font-size: large;"> change, Mr Phillips??!?)</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"> The CBC (in </span></span><span style="background-color: white;">McGillivray's </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">Mar. 1, 2017 story) could have done their homework, so that, after Cagey refused to talk to them about climate change, they could then have questioned him on what he had <i>previously said</i> about climate change at the </span></span><span style="background-color: white;">NCVA, just a month earlier... but, the CBC <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">didn't ask!!!!!</span></i></span><span style="background-color: white;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> We all know that's EXACTLY what the CBC would have done, if it was some conservative politician they were trying to slime: the CBC interviewer/attacker and the CBC research department would have known everything the target had previously said, and then sprung a 'gotcha' on their target - - - but, oh well, with Cagey, <i>they just let it slide</i>... </span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Keep in mind that McGillivray's piece </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">is nevertheless an </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">orchestrated CBC event spun, processed, and presented to further the GreenFear-mongering agenda, scary headlines, innuendo, and all. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The focus was on<i> fanning climate fear</i>, and definitely<span style="color: #cc0000;"> <i>not</i></span> on scrutinizing <i>why</i> David Phillips refused to "go there" and refused to provide the CBC with 'evidence' of AGW!!! Funny, eh?!! They just GLOSSED RIGHT OVER that!!!</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The CBC's editors well know how to orchestrate the Cagey Tango, telling half the story (...actually way less than half of the story; more like lying by omission) - - most of the real story is what the CBC <i>left out</i>, such as specifically providing interviews from any GreenFear-bloviating Canadian Liberal, dipper, or greenie, asking </span><i style="color: black;">them</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> if the weather events which Cagey talks about (...but which Cagey cagily refuses to confirm as AGW!!!!) </span><i style="color: black;">are </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">in fact evidence <i>of </i>climate change. </span></span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Ffsake: CBC doesn't want drama or controversy - they just need another typical GreenFear lie, and that's that for the day...</span></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The CBC did their best to ignore Cagey's caginess!!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Climatalarmists such as Jim Bradley, Justin Trudeau, Glen Murray, and Elizabeth May peddle GreenFear-lies every day they exhale carbon dioxide. </span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Where's </span><i style="color: black;">their</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> reaction to Canada's Senior Climatologist coyly <i>demurring to confirm</i> to the CBC any 'evidence' of AGW - the AGW upon which they base their daily GreenFear Bolshevik policies?!? (Phillips' ought have been immediately branded as a "climate change denier" by these same GreenFear pushers!!}</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Funny that Canada's political peddlers of GreenFear never actually cite Canada's Senior Climatologist </span></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">as a scientific source of confirmation of 'man-made climate-change'!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And: Where's the leftists' phony "science is being suppressed" meme<i> now</i>, when Canada's Senior Climatologist muzzles<i> himself </i>(.<i>..</i>under J-Turd's Liberal watch, no less..!)<i> </i>and <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>refuses</i> "to go there" with the CBC</span>; <i>refuses</i> to publicly state to the aroused and panting press that the weather events he reports<i> are</i> evidence of AGW??</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The CBC has spent untold millions of tax dollars over the years, helping peddle the GreenFear lie that man </span><i>has </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">created the climate - and the CBC will continue to do so, regardless of the cagey games which David Phillips was playing in that Mar.1 CBC report! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> They will continue to peddle GreenFear, and will make sure that Cagey's comments </span><i>aren't </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">mentioned</span><i> - they </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">{...</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: xx-small;">ahem</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">... not 'Harper'...} will <i>suppress </i>what Cagey said. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> (...The CBC, predictably, did <i>exactly </i>that, continuing their GreenFear-laced climate fascism <i>only 4 days afte</i>r </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Kate McGillivray's report, where NO MENTION at all was made of Cagey Dave's inability/refusal to show evidence of "climate change" - see<i><span style="color: #b45f06;"> </span></i></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">Chapter 15</span></i> further below...) </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> They </i>will <i>muzzle</i> Cagey's comments. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> They </i>will continue to peddle the phony "<i>it's all settled</i>" meme.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> They </i>will <i>censor </i>their future GreenFear-mongering to purposefully <i>not mention </i>David Phillips' climate skepticism, which he demonstrated in McGillivray's CBC report on Mar.1, 2017.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So where's the backlash when Canada's Senior Climatologist REFUSES to agree with the CBC narrative? Where are the instant mass denunciations of Cagey as a 'Denier', as an 'Uncle Tom Of Science', as a 'Traitor To The Planet'... .... ...?!!!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Funny eh? </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">For years, the eco-fascist left happily chortled and regurgitated the meme that scientists such as Good Ole Cagey were somehow "muzzled" when it came to climate change. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cagey was lionized and treated as some kind of a 'subversive' victim-hero, as some kind of martyr, cleverly sending us coded messages of climate change while he was being 'suppressed' by da gubmint - a paranoid narrative which the left hungrily ate up.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Everything Cagey said - even still here, in McGillivray's own Mar.1, 2017 article! - was nevertheless, <i>still </i>spun to reflect the gospel of AGW. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div style="color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The CBC's McGillivray had a chance in her report to actually examine this 'suppression' meme (...a meme which her own CBC had happily peddled). </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But she <i><span style="color: red;"><b>also</b></span></i> "refused to go there"!!!</span></div>
<div style="color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> See how the Cagey Two-Faced Two-Step Climate Tango is played?!? Phillips refused to talk about 'climate change evidence' and then, the CBC refused to press him on his refusal!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Look at these Climate-Tango dance-moves:</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cagey refused to go there when asked about climate change - but then, the CBC 'reporter' herself </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">also</i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> refused 'to go there', by slyly refusing to question Cagey's refusal! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The reporter <i>was fully aware</i> that Cagey carried the heroic-climate-martyr mantle, of being a poor ole hard-done-by victim of "suppression"!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Yep: the CBC's McGillivray </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">completely ignored </i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">THAT uncomfortable line of questioning!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The CBC refused to challenge the hypocritical two-faced optics here. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> McGillivray <i>refused to ask</i> Cagey{...touted as Canada's supposedly-suppressed climate-change martyr...} - why, now that he's free... </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">Good Lawdy, free at last... </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">would Cagey then decline<i> any</i> opportunity to freely spread the man-made-climate-change gospel???!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Did this aspect not occur to McGillivray?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wasn't she, or her editors, cognizant of the dichotomous optics here?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Did they not see Cagey's blatant hypocrisy on this issue?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And, did they not see <i>their own concurrent </i>glaring hypocrisy in subsequently giving Cagey a <i>free pass without scrutiny</i>?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> After all, the ongoing narrative has been that Cagey was suppressed; that Cagey was denied the opportunity to Tell The World The Truth; that Cagey was a heroic VICTIM, nothing less than a Climate MARTYR!!! After all, isn't that what Ole Pal Phil Chadwick was insinuating?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So, why would a long-suffering victim of climate suppression, such as Climate-Change Hero Cagey David Phillips, <i>refuse</i> to eagerly reveal The Climate Change Truth to McGillivray?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> <i>Why </i>would Cagey deny The Truth on the CBC?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why would Cagey suppress The Truth from McGillivray??!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why would Cagey deprive Canadians of The Truth???!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why would Cagey muzzle The Truth????!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Amazingly: the CBC hack McGillivray </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">did not bother to ask</span></i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">!!! She damn well saw the dichotomy - and MUZZLED it! </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">Whoops, nothin' t'see here folks, let's move on...</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When Cagey answered that he was "</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">reluctant to always go there</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">" reporter McGillivray could have explored this, to ask:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> 'Why? </span></span><br /><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Why is David Phillips 'reluctant to go there'?? </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Go 'where', exactly?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Why can't he just prove climate change, when we're all told that the 'science is settled'??</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Is he being suppressed by anyone?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Is someone preventing Phillips from linking the warm Feb 2017 weather as being evidence of man-made climate-change?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">If records are being broken, as Phillips is saying, then why can't he admit that it <i>is </i>evidence of climate change?' </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Note in the CBC's spin of their story, how McGillivray and her CBC editors cleverly <i>did NOT </i>bring up the extremely salient - and very strange - point that David Phillips could</span><i style="color: black;"> not </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">give them their desired '<i>climate change is real</i>' money shot! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> After all: that <i>is exactly </i>what they were seeking... but </span></span><span style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">Cagey outright REFUSED to do that, so instead of focusing on Cagey's refusal, the CBC </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">then let him get away with it.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> This is noteworthy, because the entire point of this interview <i>was</i> to create and then propagate another daily dose of the typical climate change hysteria which media, like the CBC, regularly peddle. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> It is noteworthy to actually see how the CBC's reporter/s, though somewhat thwarted by Cagey's unexpectedly weird answer, <i>deliberately CHOSE</i> not dwell upon his refusal. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The reason: it would NOT SERVE to further the CBC's own climate change agenda! The reporter/s and their employer had a built in bias <i>NOT</i> to question, but to be fed and to stenograph the usual expected climate mumbo-jumbo.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> So when this standard of collusion (this particular Climate Tango) was not reached, the focus of the story was deliberately tilted TO DOWNPLAY Cagey's refusal. (ie this is the polar opposite to what the CBC would have done, had a conservative said the same thing...)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The CBC/McGillivray also purposefully did not bring up another salient point - that in the past, when Phillips didn't deliver the 'climate-change evidence' to the media, that it was <i>at that time </i>all blamed on the phony meme that Phillips was 'muzzled by Harper'. {....<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><i>Y'see</i> how the propaganda works..?!</span>} </span></div><div style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Because Cagey was portrayed as a Climate Martyr Savant, y'see, he <i>didn't </i>deliver 'The Truth' about 'climate-change' because he <i>COULDN'T </i>deliver it<i> </i>- y'see, how this works - because he was being "muzzled" by da Gubmint!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Yet - now that Liberal Turdo is in power... -</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> ...and now that Cagey works at Turdo's frickin' phony 'Ministry of Climate Change'...</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> ...and now that Cagey is (supposedly) <span style="color: red;"><b>un</b></span>-muzzled, and is no longer "suppressed"... </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> ...the CBC <i>IGNORES </i>analyzing this incongruous set of circumstances... as well as <i>their own previous role</i> in propagating it!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> Y'see</i> the Two-Faced Tango now; y'see CBC's self-serving spin now?! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The old narrative was that scientists such as Cagey were <i>only '</i>muzzled by Harper'; yet when Cagey<i> refuses </i>to confirm AGW <i>now</i>, under Trudeau, <i><span style="color: #990000;">no similar link is being made to Trudeau!</span></i>! Ain't dem CBC climate commies clever, eh?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Where's the bombastic vitriol to Cagey's refusal, from the man-made climate-change hoaxters such as Jim Bradley or Justin Trudeau, or Catherine McKenna, or Kathleen Wynne...? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> In 2016, Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals, practicing Newspeak, renamed their Environment Ministry to become the </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">"<span style="color: #4d4d4d;">Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change". In 2015, the Turdo federal Liberals renamed Environment Canada (where Cagey peddles his cagey climate business) to the "</span><span style="color: #333333;">Ministry of Environment and Climate Change".</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Turdo stated that "climate change is a fact" - yet, Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips {who works <i style="color: black;">at</i> Turdo's Ministry of Climate Change...!!!} <span style="color: red;">CANNOT or WILL NOT 'go there' to actually confirm this "fact"!</span>!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> And furthermore, the CBC <i>refused</i> to follow up on the BLATANT discrepancy - and this is a </span><i>glaring</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> discrepancy - going to the heart of the AGW man-made climate-change change issue. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: black;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Weren't McGillivray nor any other CBC hack prepared with <i>any</i> follow-up questions? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Even in Oct. 2018, CBC commenters such as "Naomi Forbes" were still busily spewing the leftist 'Harper muzzled scientists' meme!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The usual narrative from the AGW GreenFear-pushing warmists includes a litany of attacks on <i>anyone</i> who dares to even profess climate change skepticism - they are immediately slapped down, tarred and feathered as "deniers". We all know and have all seen this kind of typically reflexive leftist trope. The disgusting David Suzuki demonized 'deniers' and wanted them put in jail.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Strangely, Cagey is allowed to remain in his conveniently fuzzy, grey, slippery, shifty, amorphous, nebulous climate-change zone, UNABLE to confirm to the CBC that what he's saying <i>is </i>(or <i>isn't</i>) climate change!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> McGillivray could have asked (...<i><span style="color: #990000;">but didn't</span></i>) in her article:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> 'Hey David - you work at Canada's freakin' <i>Ministry of Climate Change</i> - - why can't you just do us a solid and confirm once and for all that climate-change - specifically AGW man-made climate change - is <i>real</i>, for f***sake??? <i>C'mon,</i> David - Turdo pays yer wages; we're all pals here, why don't you confirm that man-made climate-change is real??? What's stoppin' ya from agreeing with Suzuki and Stephane Dion??? '</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> McGillivray's </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">CBC story is such a Green-Fear laden piece of crap, that the narrative was purposefully shifted NOT to trumpet a headline that more accurately reflects the real issue:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> "<span style="color: red;"><i>Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips refuses to confirm climate change</i></span>" should have been the actual headline, as <i>THAT </i>was the real story. See how the CBC lies!!!?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (Maybe someone should re-interview Cagey's pal Good Ole Phil Chadwick, for his reaction to Cagey<i> again </i>refusing to provide evidence of AGW - - - even though Cagey <i>isn't being suppressed by anyone</i>...! Maybe Chadwick could entertain us with some other boogeyman excuse..?)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> McGillivray's story was spun to emphasize the GreenFear angle. McGillivray could also have explored </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">(...<i><span style="color: #990000;">but didn't</span>)</i></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">the long arc of the climate change lie. McGillivray could spend <i>several years</i> documenting all the past hysterical climate-change GreenFear-mongering perpetrated by <i>HER OWN CBC colleagues.</i> But she won't. (Shades of CTV's Ken Shaw)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> She didn't even bother to ask Cagey about his shifty citations, such as '80 year old records apparently being broken, dating back to the 1840's'. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Even Cagey's <i>glib math </i>fails to prompt McGillivray from her climate-change infected stupor. {1840 to 2017 is <b><i>80</i></b> years?? Wow!! Who knew? Certainly not Cagey or McGillivray, so enamoured were they in their dance of tango-y climate caginess} </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McGillivray just let this stuff slide!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When Cagey was spouting his weather record citations to Spiteri - only<i> one week </i>ago!!!!!! - he was claiming that <i>hundred year old </i>records were being broken, going back (supposedly) to 1901... ..!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet in Toronto, Cagey tells McGillivray 'records' were being 'broken going back to the 1840's'. This is the kind of slippery "science" - scientainment</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: xx-small;"> TM </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - that constitutes evidence of AGW? Sad.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 14</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Moving right along, right on the tail of Cagey's Mar.1, 2017 <i>refusal to confirm </i>AGW to the CBC's McGillivray, let's look at what the GreenFear-hoax-pushers were peddling at the Toronto Star, with <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/03/03/they-beat-harper-now-canadian-scientists-are-trying-to-save-science-from-donald-trump.html">Olivia Ward's Mar.3, 2017 GreenFear-propaganda piece</a> - published <i>just 2 days after </i>Canada's Senior Climatologist refused to provide or confirm any evidence of man-made climate change to the CBC...! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Funny - - somehow Ward and the entire Toronto Star editorial staff conveniently weren't aware of David Phillips' studied silence on climate change...! </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Didn't they know about David Phillips's episode with the CBC's McGillivray two days earlier?!?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">Propagandists, such as the Star's Olivia Ward, continue their biased, GreenFear-mongering campaign non-stop (...giddily <strike>reporting</strike> <span style="font-size: xx-small;">oops</span> propagandizing, <i>without question,</i> how <i>""</i></span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; color: #404040; font-size: x-large;"><i>All life on earth now depends on maintaining efforts in environmental and related sciences,” says an open letter from scientists calling on Canada to protect science under threat from Trump</i></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i style="font-size: x-large;">"</i><span style="font-size: large;"> !!! (</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">haha</span><span style="font-size: large;">), thereby again trotting out the 'scientists are being muzzled' meme - (now blaming Trump, the </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">um</span><span style="font-size: large;"> new Harper...) while David Phillips' (</span></span><i style="font-size: x-large;">un</i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">muzzled!) comments from 2 days ago - in Turdopian Canada - are<span style="color: red;"><i> purposefully buried and forgotten </i></span>- as if they never happened!! </span></span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Pure propaganda, hot'n'steamy shat out the back hatch of TorStar's fake news factory!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> The ever-clever Toronto Star even published Fake News <i>about</i> fake news (e</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">ven though the Star's own editors jumped hoops to pretend that they <i>weren't</i> peddling fake news)<i> </i>as was pathetically demonstrated <a href="https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2017/02/17/the-facts-about-fake-news-public-editor.html">in Kathy English's</a></span><a href="https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2017/02/17/the-facts-about-fake-news-public-editor.html"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> classic fake-news-worthy piece of Atkinson-principled-propaganda seen in the Toronto Star, Feb.17, 2017. </span></a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's a sick spiral of cognitive impairment with these deluded Green Bolsheviks.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Here we see the Star lying about their role in peddling fake news, when they have been portraying a biased position (a <i>political </i>position, <i>not </i>a scientific position; ie peddling the hoax that 'the science is settled', and trumpeting political propaganda disguised as 'proof' of AGW'.)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Kathy English ranks up there with Goebbels in the propaganda department. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> (... and despite their <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2017/02/15/google-facebook-tell-government-they-take-fake-news-seriously.html">phony claims, FaceBook / Google</a></span><i> aren't </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">stopping the peddling of the kind of GreenFear which the Star peddles...! Google News happily publishes 'climate change is man made' </span><i>science fiction </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">on a daily basis, disguising these fake stories as "news" classed under 'science', instead of where they belong - in a hybrid <i>'science fiction</i>' fake news category, where fake-science morphs into real political-propaganda. You know: the same pseudo-science that Ontario Liberals, such as Jim Bradley, peddle and practice.)</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> You have to wonder if the Star's Olivia Ward (in her Mar.3, 2017 Fake News article) had even read her own Toronto Star colleague Kathy English's Feb.17, 2017 fake story on fake news?!?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">(After all: Ward's article came out less than 3 weeks <i>after</i> English's, so Ward ought to have been aware of it, it's not ancient history!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Ward would have (or should have!) seen her Star colleague English's mighty attempt to provide her slanted Atkinsonian definition of Fake News, to justify how the Star cannot possibly be publishing phony articles!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Kathy English writes:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"</span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; color: #404040;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">So, what is fake news?</i></span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #404040; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">To answer that accurately, we must look to Craig Silverman the Canadian journalist who first wrote about the phenomena of fake news for BuzzFeed News in November. Silverman, who has achieved global recognition for this important work, exposed the reality of fraudulent news, deliberately created and shared, largely on Facebook, to gain advertising dollars. Much of what he discovered was pro-Trump fake news that cast his opponent, Hillary Clinton, in a negative light with clearly false information.</span></i></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #404040; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Silverman’s reporting provided a fascinating look into the digital media universe and the ease with which wholly made-up “news” could be spread – and seemingly, believed. This “ecosystem” of fabricated information presented as serious news continues to be a significant concern in discerning the credibility of news sources..."</span></i></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's quite sickening to see English use Silverman's views as justification that the Toronto Star is not a fake news peddler, when what he writes definitely would include the Star's own peddling of its slanted brand of fake news for clicks and for subscriptions!! Did Silverman ever examine the anti-Trump "news" spread by Tor Star?!?</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The Star editorializes its news, placing facts and events into their branded Atkinsonian slanted narrative. News and opinion and political propaganda meld, morph, and intertwine in various degrees from story to story; editorial stances permeate what should be news stories; news stories are fabricated to support editorial positions - - - but, this is nothing new, nor exclusive just to TorStar - so why the impassioned phony pretense by English that somehow the Star is as pure as the (man-made) snow?! </span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> English is disingenuous to say the least, when, in an article about fake news, she just censors the starting point, that the Star is an inherently biased, Atkinsonian endeavor, that TorStar is a <i>fake</i> 'fair' and <i>fake</i> 'balanced' organization; in other words, that there is no 'fairness' or 'balance' <i>to</i> be expected. </span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We<i> expect </i>leftist garbage from the Toronto Star - that is their inherent essence. </span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">English can't bring herself to acknowledge how the Star's basic organizational tenet infects and seeps into everything they do. There is an ideological political agenda at the Star, and stories are editorially engineered, spun and processed to reflect their biased Atkinsonian narrative.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">The Toronto Star frequently and eagerly prints phony 'news' about Donald Trump ...like Eric Tucker's unsubstantiated AP story, published by Tor Star on May 15, 2017 about Trump asking Comey for loyalty...! - yet Kathy English continues to prattle on about how the Toronto Star doesn't make things up! </span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> P</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">olitical opinion is substituted for and presented as "news" - it's a massive bait and switch, where</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> "sources" are secret, and where opinion - salted with insinuation, infused with innuendo and peppered with propaganda - morphs into manufactured 'news'. The Star's role is to massage and amplify </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">their </i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">politicized brand of 'the news'. English knowingly peddles a fake narrative - as if her organization does </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">NOT</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> peddle biased, processed political opinion, disguised as 'straight facts'!!! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> (Is the irony lost on Kathy English, that the article is ostensibly about <i>fake news</i>?! Or is she so deeply embedded in 'principled' Atkinsonian assholery that she cannot see the irony?! That is tragic. Or, is it that she <i>does</i> see the irony, <i>does </i>see her own disconnect, <i>does</i> see her own discrepancy and hypocrisy - and yet, coldly doesn't give a shit, and as an unrepentant propagandist, peddles the lie anyway?? </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">That's</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> fanaticism.) </span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> All we have to do is look at Olivia Ward's fawningly fakey article (appearing only 3 weeks </span><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">after</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> English's) to see how fake English's denials of the Star's propensity for fakeness are!!!</span></span><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> They </span><i style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">keep on doing it</span></i><i style="color: #0b5394;">,</i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> while denying it - is this a genetic compulsion, that they just can't help it; that they can only function in their own bias, sealed up in a silo of their own comfortable </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">paradigms?</span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> English would like us all believe in her own partisan alt-left hallucination, that fake news can ONLY come from the scary right, not from socialists... Now, let's get back to reality and continue to document the GreenFear climate change lies peddled by the 'non-biased' <span style="font-size: xx-small;">hahaha</span> Toronto Star over the years.</span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Kathy English can help demonstrate how full of <span style="font-size: xx-small;">umm .</span>..non-fake news the Toronto Star is, by getting her Star colleague Olivia Ward to contact David Phillips (Canada's Senior Climatologist) to get his reaction to the GreenFear crap-laden story which Ward wrote on Mar.3, 2017. Why was Phillips omitted from Ward's own story?</span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; color: #0b5394;"> Kathy English claims that the Toronto Star would never deliberately publish false information</span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; color: #0b5394;">:</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> </span><i style="background-color: transparent;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">" </span></i></span><i><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #404040; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">I have yet to see any validity in any of the “fake news” charges lobbed our way. While it should go without saying, I think it’s safe to say, the Toronto Star is not in the business of fake news. While this news organization’s work does sometimes fall short of its own journalistic standards, to suggest that the Star would</span><span style="color: #404040; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> </span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #404040; line-height: inherit;">deliberately </span><span style="color: #404040; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">publish false information is wrong. We don’t make stuff up.</span></span></i></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #404040;"><i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And, that’s a fact."</span></i></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So here we are at the heart of the issue: the Star <i>does </i>make things up, but doesn't see it that way. They manufacture stories embedded with their corporatist Atkinsonian narrative. English slyly hazes over and conflates the Star's rare 'straight, factual news reports' with the Star's much more common 'newspinion' pieces, where biased Star reporter/propagandists clearly push a political agenda; where the headlines are consistently spiked, biased, or deceptive; where other related opinions and contexts are conveniently omitted and deliberately edited (censored) to further the biased Atkinsonian narrative. {Also see Chapter 48 on the issue of ingrained leftist bias}</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> The Star's penchant for publishing propaganda was clearly demonstrated (</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">as documented in Chapter 3)</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> by Amy Dempsey's GreenStink in the Jan.17, 2017 Toronto Star - a month</span><span style="color: #b45f06;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> </span><i>before</i></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> Kathy English's fakey defense/denial of TorStar fake news!!</span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Though Kathy English claims "we don't make stuff up", but the Star's Atkinsonian narrative belies her phony claim. </span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">Amy Dempsey's GreenStink (see Chapter 3) belies English's claim: and let's remember that Dempsey wrote her Star story a month </span><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">before</span> </i><span style="color: #0b5394;">English's phony apologist piece was published. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif; font-size: large;">Then - just 3 weeks</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;"> </span><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">after</span> </i><span style="color: #0b5394;">English's propaganda piece was published - the same Star garbage appeared again, this time with Olivia Ward's GreenStink-laden story, where </span></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">strangely, Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist (...who coyly would</span><i style="font-size: x-large;"> not </i><span style="font-size: large;">confirm climate change 2 days earlier on the CBC!) was NOT interviewed. The Star purposefully spins, censors and omits - yet, hey, they don't make stuff up - </span>ya, sure, Kathy<span style="font-size: large;">!!! The Star's<i> serial-propagandists</i> just want you to believe</span></span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-large;"> their </i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif; font-size: large;">manufactured version!</span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> You'd think that of all the people in Canada, Ole Cagey Dave would have had something relevant to say to Olivia Ward about 'muzzling scientists' and about 'global warming/climate change'!!!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So why did the Toronto Star <i>NOT ASK </i>Phillips to comment on those very issues?!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"> Look, for Gaia's sake: </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">Kathy English's </span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">Toronto Star <i>just muzzled</i> David Phillips</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">, while claiming they don't do fake news! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;">Trump didn't do that: the <i>Toronto Star </i>did.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "cambria" , "times new roman" , "times" , serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's amazing. The Star consistently prints climate change stories as "news", which are based on the AGW GreenFear hoax. </span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: #fafafa; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> What English and Toronto Star are doing here, is so insidious, it really is beyond 'lying', or 'fake news', it's Orwellian in scope. </span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<div style="background-color: #fafafa;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 15</span></b> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Following Kate McGillivray's Mar. 1, 2017 CBC article (detailed in Chapter 13 above) where Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist refused to link his weather reports as evidence of climate change, the CBC ran another story just 3 days later (<a href="http://stewart%20cohen%2C%20senior%20climate%20change%20researcher%20with%20environment%20canada%2C/">written by Maryse Zeidler, Mar.5, 2017)</a> </span></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif">with this typically GreenFearsome fascist headline:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"20 years ago, B.C. scientists warned of provincial impact of climate change<br />'Being able to talk about climate change outside of the science world, that continues to be a real challenge' ".</i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The CBC's Zeidler trots out Stewart Cohen, referred to as a "senior climate change researcher with Environment Canada", yet Zeidler <i>suppresses any mention</i> of Environment Canada's<i> SENIOR CLIMATOLOGIST</i> David Phillips in her story, and Zeidler doesn't bother to ask Cohen to comment on EC's Senior Climatologist Phillips' refusal (...3 days earlier, on CBC, with McGillivray..!) to link weather to "climate change"..! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The CBC's GreenGoebbels certainly work at a feverish pace to peddle their propaganda. Has Cagey already been greenwashed out of favour by the CBC's climate fascists?? Wow. (ya better repent now Cagey...)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Who </i>is preventing anyone from "<i>being able to talk about climate change</i>", as the headline on Zeidler's story ominously suggests??! (...as if the media <i>themselves</i> aren't the ones who immediately attack and shame anyone who <i>challenges </i>the <i>'it's all settled</i>' hoax...)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> For Great Gaia's sake: it was Zeidler <i>HERSELF</i> who <span style="color: #990000;">prevented</span> David Phillips from 'being able to talk about climate change' - by <span style="color: #990000;">omitting</span> him from her story! Maryse Zeidler and the CBC [...</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">not, um, 'Harper'</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">] <i><span style="color: #990000;">suppressed </span>David Phillips</i>!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wow - see how <i>that</i> works, Maryse?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Zeidler actually <i>never bothers to ask</i> her subjects about that mysterious impediment preventing them from "being able to talk about climate change"; that dark insinuation in the spiked CBC headline is just left to hang there <i>without question</i>. It's enough for the CBC <i>just to print the claim</i>, without delving into messy details which spoil the overall effect of the desired GreenFear narrative. That's not reporting - it's biased, scripted stenography: it's propaganda.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Here's the same old '<i>science is being suppressed</i>' meme being slickly, subtlety - subliminally - peddled, without substance. We are just supposed to "know" that these poor old scientists are being somehow suppressed... by someone.... y'see... </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Not once did the CBC's Zeidler bother to actually provide, nor ask for, any evidence of man made climate change!!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Her starting off point, as we see, takes for granted that 'the science of man made climate is settled' - therefore, all the subsequent propaganda flows from that faulty premise.</span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> How can the CBC be peddling 'fake climate news', eh?! Well, if they do not question the premise, and 'believe' it to be 'real', and continuously peddle their stories under that supposition, to them it's all 'real' and cannot be fake! This is the silo which the CBC and their propagandist 'reporters' operate in.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> After all, no TorStar or CBC reporter has been threatened to be jailed by David Suzuki for lying about AGW, so, really, how fakey can the their science-fictiony false global warming stories possibly be!?! </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> Yes, there is some kind of perverted, demented, contorted 'logic' in the Green Bolshevik mind - ya can't blame us: we think/we believe/we trust/we don't even ask<i> if </i> it's real - - - it can't be fake if we thought it was real, y'see? We was just tellin' ya, what our (selective) impressions were, of what we were (selectively) told by the (selected) people who fit our (selective) narrative!!</span></span><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> There is no need for CBCor TorStar reporters to <i>actually question</i> anyone about the AGW premise; their task is to propagate AGW and to amplify it, <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if</span> </i>it was real<i>.</i> </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Gotta repeat the lie; gotta keep the lie goin'; gotta perpetuate the propaganda, a day at a time...</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And if it means censoring David Phillips - <i>while still claiming science is being censored</i> {!!!} well, so be it: green climate fascism MUST march on at all costs.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's as if what David Phillips had said<i> just 3 days earlier.</i>..</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> (...to CBC's McGillivray on Mar.1, 2017, see Chapter 13, which was </span><i>not </i><span style="background-color: #fafafa;">what the CBC had actually wanted nor expected him to say...) </span></span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">...wasn't conveniently relevant to Zeidler's report!!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Is Zeidler's report the first act of the shaming and shunning of David Phillips, who sinned and refused to bow to the GreenFear-peddlers' demands??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Note that Zeidler<i> didn't bother </i>to directly ask Stewart Cohen to provide all the data from Environment Canada (...data which David Phillips also has) which 'proves' AGW. <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">Why didn't she ask??</span></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Zeidler<i> could have</i> asked for that, and <i>could have</i> listed all the citations which Cohen and Environment Canada have, which 'prove' AGW. (I</span></span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">t's not as if David Phillips has secret Environment Canada climate-change files which Cohen doesn't know about!!! </span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">Does he?</span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">) </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But this typical CBC propagandist, disguised as a 'reporter', DID NOT do so, as the true purpose of this CBC story was about creating a haze of GreenFear, <i>not </i>about reporting facts.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Zeidler purposefully<span style="color: #990000;"> <i>didn't ask</i></span> Cohen, to comment on his Environment Canada colleague David Phillips' refusal - made on CBC just 3 days earlier - to link weather to AGW! </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why was that avenue not followed - what, the CBC in British Columbia doesn't know what Mother Corp. is peddling elsewhere across the nation?!?</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fafafa;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> I mean, Great Gaia's Ghost:</span></span><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Zeidler's assignment was to peddle an illusion for us to believe that somehow in BC, they've had 'evidence of AGW' for </span><i style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">20 years </i><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">doncha know - or so the narrative leads us to believe; yet, </span><i style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">no actual AGW evidence </i><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">was provided by anyone in Zeidler's report, from 20 years ago, or from now - of course, unless speculation, conflation, and false causality is considered 'evidence'!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Zeidler could have easily even asked <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2013/04/liberal-environment-minister-jim.html">Ontario's Liberal Godfather Of GreenFear himself, Jim Bradley</a>, about the existence of AGW evidence - - - Bradley has secretly had it, for some <i>30 </i>years - maybe more, who knows..!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why didn't Zeidler interview Bradley and ask him all about his 'decades' worth of 'AGW evidence' (which he's never revealed) and compare it to all the 'evidence of AGW' which we are led to believe in her report that Environment Canada has, and which (apparently!) everyone in B.C. knew about 20 years ago???</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> Zeidler was more than happy in her one-sided story to peddle Cohen's and "climate scientist" Trevor Murdock's views:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;"> "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> ...</span></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>Despite those advancements, both researchers say the biggest challenge on the climate change front has been trying to change public perception. </i></span></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Cohen says it's frustrating to see people who still don't believe climate change is happening, or that greenhouse gas emissions have anything to do with it.</i></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Being able to talk about climate change outside of the science world, that continues to be a real challenge," he said.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-size: large;">"We need to figure out how to do that better and how to do that more continuously too."</span></i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> As expected from the CBC, Zeidler obligingly did NOTHING to question both her 'researchers' - despite the fact that there <i>are </i>climatologists "in the science world" who do question AGW; but, haha - that's NOT the point of this CBC article, is it!!<br /> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> If anything, we see that the CBC happily <i>does </i>"continuously" peddle GreenFear (which is exactly what Cohen wants) as if Zeidler was not sent by the CBC to do<i> just that</i>!!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Can't the "journalist" Zeidler see <i>her own role</i> aiding and abetting the propaganda she's peddling? <br /><br /> She <i>WAS </i>there, paid by the CBC, to <i>peddle one side </i>of the (false AGW) story, and she<i> was </i>there <i>specifically</i> to "change public perception" to accept the AGW hoax (and therefore, to accept AGW-premised political policies). She was there<i> as</i> a paid propagandist!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The entire episode is a fabricated piece of self-serving, echo-chamber propaganda.</span></div>
</div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> If Zeidler had acted as an independently-minded actual journalist, rather than a GreenFear groupie, she could have said to Cohen: </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> '</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What the f*ck, buddy: I <i>am </i>here, and the CBC <i>is </i>giving you a soapbox to</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> peddle<i> your </i>views - more than they give<i> any other </i>views - so don't f*cking patronize me, ok? </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So let's get to all that AGW 'evidence' you say you have from Environment Canada, which supposedly supports<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/environment-minister-catherine-mckenna-calgary-chamber-of-commerce-clean-tech-1.4018590"> Catherine McKenna's Mar.9, 2017</a> claim that <span style="background-color: white; color: #333333;">"<i>Climate change is clear. It's man made</i>", and which</span> supports Prime Minister Turdo's claim that <i>"climate change is real"</i>... Show me that evidence... ...'</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> hahaha: <i>that </i>never happened!! Zeidler and the CBC were there to preach and produce propaganda, not to investigate and produce facts.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> Zeidler <i>wasn't there as an impartial reporter </i>{ ...which CBC reporter <i>ever</i> is, I wonder?!}; she was there as a <i>tainted, biased believer</i> and as a willing participant in the GreenFear propaganda-peddling effort. Zeidler was there to dance the typical boiler-plate Cagey-style tango (...the same old GreenFear tango, but without Cagey - whom she relegated to the Climate Change doghouse for the time being...)</span></span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Zeidler writes a story propagandizing and peddling GreenFear, interviewing her selected (and decidedly selective) subjects <i>as if their views are somehow unknown</i> or somehow being suppressed... as if their kind of views <i>HAD NEVER ALREADY BEEN CONTINUOUSLY PROPAGATED BY THE CBC ON A NATIONAL BASIS</i>!!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The disconnect, the self-serving loop of propaganda, is astounding. </span></div>
<div itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This CBC <strike>reporter </strike> GreenFear-monger had a chance to write a story examining the 'scientific evidence of AGW' and how this 'evidence' - politically portrayed as "being settled" - manifests in Canadian politics. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Who stopped her from doing that?!?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Instead, Zeidler earned her CBC paycheque by spinning GreenFear while never actually addressing the underlying premise of AGW. Great job.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 16 </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Speaking of the 'political manifestation of climate-change', on Apr. 29, 2017 we saw AGW-infected Niagara politicians such as Carlos Garcia and St.Catharines mayor Walter Sendzik immediately link spring flooding at Lakeside Park with climate change - with no AGW evidence provided, and with <a href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/2017/04/28/lakeside-park-flooded"><i>no <span style="color: #cc0000;">questions asked </span>by reporter Allan Benner</i></a>!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">These two GreenFear-mongering politicians <i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"</i></span><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">agreed that climate change is to blame for the problems.</i></span></div>
<div>
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">“When someone says, ‘What does climate change look like, and what does it mean to a city like St. Catharines?’ This is what it means,” Sendzik said. “It means a higher rate of erosion on our shoreline, it means flooding in areas like Port Dalhousie and Lakeside Park, and it impacts the yacht club.”</span></i></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i> So: what does GreenFear propaganda look like?! Look no further than Benner's biased 'report' about 2 smug local clowns peddling Al Gore's and Jim Bradley's climate-change-paranoia!! </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> You'd think by reading this <i>St.Catharines Standard</i> crap, that the water levels in the Great Lakes watershed had never deviated in the last... oh... thousand years! (....or, even since Jim Bradley was first elected!) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Apparently, we are to believe that there had <i>never</i> been <i>any </i>rate of erosion in the Great Lakes - until this week!! Apparently, prior to April of 2017, the <i>entire </i>Great Lakes ecosystem was always in a comfortable stasis, where <i>nothing had ever changed </i>!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (The<i> Standard </i>did not bother to ask Mayor GreenPants why his city approved a condo building being built beside Lakeside Park literally feet from the flooded lakeshore!! I guess the mayor and the <i>Standard</i> need future 'climate-change victims' to justify this GreenFear-mongering) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The <i>Standard </i>plants a biased half-story without the context; keeping the GreenFear propaganda alive a little longer, rehashing the phony narrative whenever possible - kudos all around for a great team effort of fake-newsmanship!</span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Report the AGW lie, don't question the liars pushing the AGW premise. Don't ask, don't tell, </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-small;">nudge-nudge wink-wink</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - that's how the national media typically dances with Cagey, and those same jive moves are copied locally. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Compare mayor Walter Sendzik's GreenFear-mongering on Apr.29th to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/flooding-central-eastern-western-canada-1.4103541">t</a><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/new-york-lake-ontario-st-lawrence-flooding-1.4100867">his May 5 CBC story by Laurene Jardin </a> (headlined "<span style="background-color: white;"><i>St. Lawrence River could rise if N.Y. request to lower Lake Ontario is approved</i>") reporting New York State Governor Cuomo's request to open up the dam at Cornwall to drain off more of Lake Ontario's water.</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> This is completely relevant to the issue - yet, it's funny</span><span style="background-color: white;"> how Sendzik (</span><span style="background-color: white;">the Agenda-21-infected mayor)</span><span style="background-color: white;"> never made any mention of any dam, nor its effect on the water levels in Port Dalhousie! The local yokels were left with the (intended) scary impression that this was all due to 'climate change'. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And reporter Allan Benner didn't bother to ask about that, either (...remember: the point is to play up and propagate the false <i>impression</i> of AGW, <i>not</i> to question its false<i> premise</i>... to propagate the 'climate-change' agenda by spiking the <i>appearance</i> over the <i>substance</i>.)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Jardin wrote:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>"Jean Aubry-Morin, a Canadian member of the International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Board, said it's a balancing act... </i></span></div>
<div>
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> </span><span style="color: #333333;">Aubry-Morin said that the board would take current water levels in Quebec into consideration before adding any water into the St. Lawrence. </span></span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Because of the snow melt and spring showers, the international board redistributes water into the appropriate body of water every year.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What's abnormal about this year, Aubry-Morin says is the amount of precipitation the provinces have seen in the last six weeks.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"It's a one-in-20-year situation," he said".</span></i></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Yet, mayor Sendzik and councilor Garcia acted as if they'd never heard of any kind of 'once in a 20 yr situation' - to them, this was 'evidence' of drastic climate change (which probably in their minds, was also directly and personally caused by Donald Trump!)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> No one in Benner's story mentioned the Cornwall dam's existence, let alone its purpose!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> No one mentioned the dam's systemic effects, downstream and upstream, upon the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence watershed, and its effect locally, upon the beach at Lakeside Park!!! </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And Benner <i>didn't bother to ask </i>about any of this, either. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's interesting to note that in her story, CBC reporter Jardin did <b><i>NOT </i></b>make any of those expected, typical, obligatory, false-causation references to 'climate change'. That was an unexpected, refreshing move.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> SO: now let's see what cagey ol' David Phillips saying about all this!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Let's look at <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/flooding-explainer-montreal-experts-1.4098911">Stephen Smith's May 4, 2017 CBC story </a>(headlined "<i style="background-color: white;">Mix of 'rare events' led to rapid rise of floodwaters in Montreal's West Island, prof says</i><span style="background-color: white;">"):</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333;"><i>David Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada, said another factor adding to the problem is the repeated occurrence of storm systems over the last five weeks that didn't just come and go, but stuck around for days.</i></span></span></div>
<h1 class="story-title" style="line-height: 1.25; margin: 0px 0px 5px;">
<div style="color: #333333; font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"They haven't been hit and run," he said. "They've had more time to linger and spread more of their misery. Instead of one day of rain, we're seeing maybe two or three days of rain from the same system."</span></i><br />
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">April had 19 rainy days in total, Phillips said, and many of those days saw heavy amounts of rainfall.</span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.35em; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day," he said."</span></i></div>
</h1>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> There goes Cagey again, with his oft-repeated, very scientific "gully-washer" rhetoric...</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's funny how the CBC reporter Stephen Smith - when he had the chance to do so - <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">DID NOT BOTHER TO ASK</span></i> David Phillips if the flooding along the Great Lakes confirms Al Gore's Inconvenient Truths about Climate Change.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i> Isn't </i>THAT <i>what every leftist infected with AGW wants to know?!? </i></span></b></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> They <i>want </i>confirmation from Environment Canada's TOP CLIMATOLOGIST that this flooding <i><b>is </b></i>caused by AGW!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> They<i> want </i>to know that the Trudeau government's "it's real, it's all settled" climate change policy is based on science.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When David Phillips blurted to reporter Stephen Smith that <i style="background-color: #cfe2f3; color: #333333;">"It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day",</i> why didn't reporter Smith immediately ask if this gully-washer of rain was an example of 'man-made climate change'?? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Was this an "inconvenient" question for the reporter ask? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Or did Smith - anticipating that it would be an "inconvenient" question for Cagey <i>to answer</i> - decide to self-censor, and to <i>not</i> ask it, in order to protect and not embarrass Cagey??!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why ignore such an obvious follow-up question??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith <i><span style="color: red;">simply ASK </span></i>Canada's Senior climatologist to directly confirm that all this flooding is due to AGW?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> After all, isn't that a simple, straight-forward question for a reporter to logically ask, after he's just been told by Canada's Senior Climatologist that a half-month's worth of rain fell in one day??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Wouldn't a reporter reasonably ask, following-up on Phillips' own gully-washing rhetoric: 'Mr. Phillips, you cite lots of rainfall - a half-month's worth of rain in one day... is that an example of man made climate change, Mr. Phillips?'</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith follow-up on what Phillips said?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Even small town mayors are apparently convinced it's all due to climate change - so what is preventing BOTH Canada's top climatologist, <i>and </i>Canada's national broadcaster, from publicly providing what should be such a straightforward answer, to such a straightforward question??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Trudeau's Liberals (and Turdo's hacks never lie..) have told us that 'climate change is real'; so why does the CBC shirk from asking Environment Canada about confirming 'climate change'??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> What prevented the CBC's Stephen Smith from asking David Phillips this question?</span></div>
<div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Let's ask (... </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: xx-small;">yes....<i> again... ...</i></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">):</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- was David Phillips "muzzled" by anyone?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- did anyone prevent or suppress David Phillips from answering such a question?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- is it an unspoken belief that it would be beneath the dignity of David Phillips to be asked such a direct question?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- did any one "muzzle" Stephen Smith (or any other CBC reporter, for that matter?!)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- did anyone prevent or suppress reporter Smith (or any other CBC reporter) from asking David Phillips to confirm that the flooding IS INDEED the direct result of AGW?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- is it beneath the dignity of any CBC reporter to directly ask Philips such a question?!?</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 17</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-river-water-levels-1.4105507">this May 9, 2017 CBC story by Paul Cote</a> we again see Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips using his very scientific terms such as "crap-shoot" to describe the weather. Yet, this CBC reporter fails to ask Cagey, why "man-made climate-change" is similarly <i>not </i>a "crap-shoot".</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{Great Gaia's Ghost: here we have Canada's Senior Climatologist spouting scientific jargon such as 'crap shoot' to conflate his weather/climate stances - yet, Canada's leftist press <i>DARES NOT </i>ask Liberal dolt Justin Turdo or Canada's Climate Barbie, Catherine McKenna, how it is, that the Liberals 'climate change' policies are based on "crap-shoot" weather prognostications?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yep: <i>that </i>narrative is forbidden - ie: is suppressed.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Better not to link Cagey to the Liberals' Agenda 21 plans...}</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The CBC reporter Cote <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">DID NOT BOTHER</span></i> to ask climatologists Phillips, nor Ian Black (...described as "CBC's Ottawa climatologist"!! Wow: lookit that; is there a tax-payer-funded in-house CBC climatologist in every Canadian city??! Nice gig - no bias there, eh..?!) whether the weather that they are commenting on is due to man made climate change.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cote <i>DID</i> make sure to actually use the words "<i>climate change</i>" in his story - because, well, Phillips works for the phonily-named ministry of "Environment And Climate Change Canada" - so, the subliminal hint in the story is there: 'gosh, it <i>must be </i>man made climate change, because that's the name of the place Cagey works for'!! </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Cagey David might as well be working for "Wild-Card Dave's Emporium of Gully-Washing, Crap-Shooting Climatology", because David is strangely unable to provide Canadians with any evidence of man made climate change. (...How about </span><i>that</i><span face=""arial" , sans-serif">, eh, Phil Chadwick?! {see Chapter 3} Who's 'suppressing' David Phillips <i>now</i>, eh Phil?? What are "David's circumstances" <i>now,</i> Phil?!)</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> The CBC reporter Cote <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">didn't bother </span></i>asking David Phillips if all the "historically high water levels along the Ottawa River" (where Turdo's Liberals have now called in the ARMY to assist, no less) are a direct result of AGW.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Given these circumstances, why did reporter Cote <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">refuse to ask</span></i> Phillips the obvious question? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Is it not relevant to the situation?!! For years, the CBC has shilled the climate change hoax - why shirk now from attributing direct examples of it? Don't climatologists Phillips and Black have the credentials to recognize and confirm direct evidence of "climate change"?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> CBC reporter Cote<span style="color: #cc0000;"> didn't even ask</span> his <i>own</i> in-house-CBC-climatologist colleague Ian Black the same question.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">One story,<i> two </i>climatologists - yet, NO QUESTIONS raised, nor any answers given, about 'climate change'!! <i>That's</i> a Cagey Climate Threesome Tango, right there!! Well done, fellas.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Why even bother with having both of these climatologists in the story anyway, if they will not touch the issue of climate change? </span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Were they even <i>asked</i> about it by reporter Cote? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> Was anyone suppressing Paul Cote, or Ian Black, or David Phillips, stopping them from mentioning 'climate change'?! (... </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">because we know that the tired old <i>"science is being suppressed" </i>meme would<i> immediately</i> have been trotted out if Harper was in power... leftists are now employing that phony meme in the US, against Trump, in order to deflect from Turdo in Canada - that's just how the propaganda is carried out)</span></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><br /></span></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> But, now that Turdo, Canada's Shiny Pony, is in power, who is suppressing who?!</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Was Cote told by his CBC bosses NOT to ask Phillips or Black any inconvenient questions about climate change?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Was the CBC suppressing, censoring, and shaping/editorializing climate science?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Was CBC reporter Cote told by Phillips or by Black <i>not to ask them</i> about climate change??</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Or, did CBC reporter Cote just decide all on his own (...<span style="font-size: xx-small;">and his CBC editor just said nothing</span>..!) to <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">not ask </span></i>such questions, because he figured it just wouldn't look good for Phillips or Black to be put on the spot and be badgered to provide actual evidence for what 'everybody knows' is "settled" climate change?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> The above questions point to what a piece of CBC fake news this story really is.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> What's a cozy <i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">nudge-nudge-wink-wink</span></i> dance between three 'don't-ask-don't-tell' partners (...or even more participants, if you consider that CBC editors were also involved in the propaganda)... we're all friends here, playin' for the same team, you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours...</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Cote <i>didn't tell us </i>whether he did or didn't actually<i> </i>ask Phillips or Black about climate change; we don't know if they answered... all we know is that another great smelly piece of GreenFear propaganda was shat out by the CBC, where the inherent <i>impression</i> is left that this<i> is </i>all due to 'climate change', yet where, <i>at the same time</i>, no <i>evidence</i> to make such a link is actually presented. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> That's some fine propaganda!! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> W</span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif">e are all just supposed to "<i>know</i>" <span style="font-size: xx-small;">nudge-nudge-wink-wink</span> that everything in the article <i>IS</i> about climate change!! Through osmosis, innuendo, and conflation, we are supposed to "<i>know</i>", we are supposed to take for granted, that AGW <i>is</i> a given, infallible premise here - naturally, "all-settled" - which <i>cannot</i> be questioned.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> So, why belabour the point by asking pesky questions, when we 'know' that it's 'all settled'??!?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's apparently just not polite to ask!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> WTF - really?? What a CBC farce.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Cote once again demonstrates the Cagey Tango - it's f*cking ridiculous how hundreds of reporters do the<i> exact same thing</i> with Dave Phillips; they follow the same template, the same dance steps, to put on the same propaganda show.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 18</b></span></div>
<div>
<span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> We saw the Cagey Tango in action <i>again,</i> when good old Cagey Dave Phillips was trotted out for an appearance in one heck of a CTV News climate-fear story on CTV's 11 pm national news broadcast in Canada, Sept.1, 2017. (http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1200532)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It was sad to watch Sandie Rinaldo having to host a pathetic story by John Vennavally-Rao; she starts her introduction by stating "it seems {...note: she said "<i>seems</i>"...} that there are more storms pounding the planet these days" and goes on to conflate monsoons in "India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan" and "intense flooding" in Nigeria to the storm Harvey in Texas.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> This wham-bam set-up between Rinaldo and Rao is textbook propaganda: the entire segment was set up as being a 'question' by Rinaldo {..."<i>Is climate change the culprit?</i>" Rinaldo plaintively asks before passing the GreenFear torch to Rao} but really, it was NOT an examination - it was a presentation of climate fear-mongering in the best GreenFear tradition: all bluster but <i>no evidence </i>of man made climate change.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Rao continued this GreenFear tag-team assault on CTV viewers by actually bringing in that Grotesque Guru of GreenFear Garbage AL GORE - - the climate con man - - and... wait for it... YES: Canada's Cagey Climatologist was also thrown into this roiling cauldron of climate propaganda.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> We see Cagey blathering on CTV that:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> "<i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">Climate change is the steroids of weather. It just makes it more powerful; it fuels it, it gives it more oomph</span></i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">.</span>"</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Really: <i>this </i>is the explanation for climate change, from Canada's Senior Climatologist?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> And was Cagey talking <i>specifically</i> of <i>man-made</i> climate change, which gave this scientifically-precise "oomph" to Hurricane Harvey??!??!!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Rao doesn't bother to clarify anything.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Most tellingly though, <b><i>neither Rinaldo nor Rao bothered to specifically ask Cagey the direct question of linking man to the climate events which they had just indicated</i></b>. </span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> They certainly<i> </i>had the chance, and they certainly<i> could </i>have asked Phillips: <i>that </i>would have been journalism.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But journalism was never the aim here, was it?!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Why didn't Sandie Rinaldo or John Vennavally-Rao actually ask David Phillips to confirm that anthrpogenic climate change caused hurricane Harvey? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> After all, isn't that really what CTV wanted Phillips to publicly say: that humans are to blame? So <i><span style="color: red;">why not actually ask </span></i>Canada's senior climatologist the question?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Who stopped Sandie Rinaldo or John Vennavally-Rao from asking David Phillips for proof of AGW?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Who 'suppressed' David Phillips this time?! It wasn't Harper or Trump: it was CTV.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> In reality, journalism wasn't on the agenda in this CTV Fake News effort: this was a <i>pretense of journalism</i>, a screed with its own agenda: purporting to<i> be</i> news, presented<i> as</i> news, shown on CTV's national nightly news broadcast. But it<i> wasn't</i> news: it was calculated propaganda at the highest level.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This CTV media fakery used Cagey Dave as an image, as a prop, as filler, as a 'wink-wink' gesture to virtue-signal that - despite the segment's supposed 'questioning' of climate change; despite Rinaldo's deceptive intro asking </span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">"</span><i style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Is climate change the culprit?" </i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- the default position of this Rinaldo-Rao segment is that the story was really </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">NOT</i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> questioning climate change!!! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The CTV/Bell Media foregone-conclusion was that man-made climate change <i>IS</i> the culprit! Masterful deception.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The impression meant to be conveyed was that 'climate change' </span><i style="font-family: times, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">WAS </i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">the cause of hurricane Harvey - and that there was no question about this!!! The "culprit" question was a deception. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i><i> That</i> is the <i>typical </i>GreenFear playbook: the default premise right off the bat is that "<i>it's all settled</i>" {...meaning there <i>cannot be </i>any questions...!} - so, we can see that Rinaldo's portrayal of this segment as being a 'question', was a<b><i> false, deceptive introduction - </i></b>since there was NO actual examination of the underlying <i>"it's all settled</i>' premise!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">{How <i>could </i>there be questions, when "<i>it's all settled</i>"?!?}</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This CTV 'story' was fixed and slanted from the get-go, the aim being to propagate the "it's all settled" GreenFear narrative, <i>not</i> question it.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This is the same old GreenFear-pushing tactic used at the Toronto Star and CBC.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The aim was to create<i> an impression</i> that 'climate change' (specifically AGW, specifically, <i>humans</i>) caused Harvey.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> These <i>same kind of stories </i>always pop up with the <i>same</i> scary false causations, allusions, and conflations, just as it was with Katrina. (...French Prime Minister Macron did <i>exactly</i> that<i> </i>- six just 6 days after this story - see Chapter 19!!)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , sans-serif"> Cagey was used as a background for Rao's GreenFear-mongering - - no <i>specifics </i>from Phillips were actually required (...nor asked!!!); the point was to build a scary story edited with scary statements and scary video clips. </span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">While Rao reports that "<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;"><i>experts are reluctant to blame global warming for causing any single storm</i>"...</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (...<i>which </i>experts??? None were named! Was one of them David Phillips??? But, Rao<i> just had </i>Phillips on his segment, and Phillips<i> didn't </i>actually say on Rao's segment that he's "reluctant to blame global warming" ...!) </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">...Rao then goes on to try to show the<i> exact opposite</i>, conflating a link where there was none - it was all speculation and politicizing: the CTV/Bell Media corporate conglomerate even had Rao sliming President Donald Trump about climate-change - - this right after neither Rao himself, nor Al Gore, nor David Phillips, could actually provide evidence of AGW!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So "it's all settled" you see: we just can't provide the evidence.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This is the kind of fake news story that CTV pushes out these days - - and sadly Cagey David Phillips seems more than happy to oblige these kind of convoluted GreenFear propaganda efforts.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">*</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Note to CTV programmers and news directors: CTV should utilize this Rinaldo-Rao classic piece of GreenFear propaganda as an off-the shelf, ready-to-go-at-a-moment's-notice kind of instant GreenFear fake news video story, whenever <i>any </i>storm hits: all CTV has to do, is bleep out any reference to Harvey, and just insert the name of the new storm.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's <i>that </i>easy!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This story is a classic boilerplate generic propaganda template, it is a goldmine which could save CTV/Bell media a lot of money in the future by not having to write the same propaganda over and over for every storm: just recycle <i>THIS </i>classic - it's <i>that </i>good!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">CTV could replay this same Rinaldo-Rao segment a week later - when Irma hits - and all they'd have to do, is insert the name 'Irma' - no-one would know or care that this originally appeared as 'Harvey'!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This Rinaldo-Rao segment has great GreenFear-mongering value!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">CTV could replay this same versatile, all-purpose GreenFear segment for <i>years,</i> for <i>every storm that will ever occur in the future!!</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>*</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">More Bell Media / CTV climate-change garbage was shat out by Lisa Laflamme and John Venavally-Rao on the Nov.29, 2018 nightly news tv broadcast. This time, Bell Media was trying to deride Ontario's new carbon plan. Bell Media / CTV deceptively editorialized the biased report, showing meant-to-scare shots of chimneys and factory smokestacks - the only thing missing was some unrelated shots of polar bears! Lisa and Johnny even threw in a one-sided retort from Trudeau's Liberal green-fear-fascist Climate Barbie, for good measure. Another true piece of garbage. Now that GM's leaving Oshawa, CTV / Bell Media / and climate-change-fascist Barbie will be very happy - no more smokestacks to worry about... and no jobs, either. Yet, Climate Barbie will still collect her salary.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">* </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">...and the sh!t-peddling by Bell Media / CTV continued on their April 1, 2019 television nightly national broadcast, this time with Lisa Laflamme and Jill Macyshon peddling climate fear-propaganda, helping defend Crime Minister Turdo's eco-fascist carbon tax which went into effect in Ontario and 3 other provinces that day.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The horrendously biased "report" was nothing but propaganda, complete with imagery of fires, melting ice and Hamilton's steel works, etc.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">They even included two different images of polar bears as well as a clips of some environmental-defense eco-fascist and of Climate Barbie Catherine McKenna babbling her lies.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The use of the polar bear imagery, (see Chapter 39) linking it to climate-change/global warming politics, is shamefully fraudulent. Bell Media, CTV, Lisa Laflame {aka LaFlimFlam} and Jill Macyshon have outed themselves as base liars, dissemblers and willing propaganda peddlers, NOT journalists. This was not news, it was Liberal BS without a shred of journalistic effort.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This is the kind of eco-fascism which emerges from the shadows, when a crooked government and its media corporations conspire. This is what Katie Telford's Liberal-bought-and-paid-for 'opinion pieces' look like.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Bell Media / CTV and their propaganda team are nothing more that Turdo's c*ckholsters. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 19</span></b></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">On Sept. 7, 2017, <a href="http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/latest-on-hurricane-irma-bahamas-airports-shut-down-as-irma-approaches-1.3578693">CTV reported</a> France's PM Macron spouting this doozie about Hurricane Irma:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"French President Emmanuel Macron says France is "grief-stricken" by the devastation caused by Hurricane Irma, and he's<span style="color: red;"> calling for concerted efforts to tackle global warming and climate change to prevent similar future natural disasters</span>.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Speaking Thursday during a visit to Greece, <span style="color: red;">Macron said the planet's situation must be stabilized and that leaders must make take steps to combat global warming "so we can avoid such natural disasters in the future."</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">French Interior Minister Gerard Collomb told Franc Info that at least eight people died and another 23 were injured when the monstrous Category 5 storm walloped the French Caribbean island territories of St. Martin and St. Barthelemy. That number is expected to rise."</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yes, Macron is spouting the same GreenFear mantra that Canada's Liberal climate-change-pusher Justin Turdo spouts.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">Looks like Macron is channeling Al Gore and David Suzuki - - and politicizing a natural disaster to push some more GreenFear bolshevism. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Macron - like Canadian PM Justin Turdo - believes that the "<i>planet's situation must be stabilized</i>"!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Not only is Macron calling to 'combat' global warming - he's ALSO going to 'tackle' climate-change'.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Apparently, y'see, '<i>global warming</i>' and<i> 'climate change</i>' are now <i>NOT </i>the same thing anymore, in the GreenFearFascist playbook.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So Macron is now <i>de-conflating '</i>climate-change', to make it appear that it is <i>separate</i> from 'global-warming! Such dichotomy, such inconsistency - coming from someone who demands stability and consistency from 'the Planet'....! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">Maybe Macron needs to be '<i>stabilized'</i>...? </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">Is this the new revised Agenda 21 narrative, which will be coming soon to Canada, in order to muddle the GreenFear alarmists' own lexicon?</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In Canada, will any reporter ask Justin Turdo about Macron's comments, and ask Turdo to specifically endorse Macron's comments that hurricanes can be prevented, and to publicly link Hurricanes Irma and Harvey to man-made climate change, which can be reversed??! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Will anyone ask Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips to publicly confirm that Hurricanes Irma and Harvey were<i> not</i> natural, but were 'man-made' - - and whether they could have been 'prevented'???</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">But, we know such questions will never be asked - it is just enough that the Agenda 21 puppet Macron obediently mouth the obligatory GreenFear memes, and that his GreenFear-infected colleagues around the world knowingly and approvingly nod in agreement - - yet, no specifics will be offered, because 'it's all settled'.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">No one it seems will ask the GreenFear-infected Macron how he will "prevent" disasters that are {as he<i> himself </i>just said...!} inherently "natural"? </span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Macron is saying here that he will<i> <span style="color: #cc0000;">prevent what is natural</span> </i>- and the gravity of this statement doesn't raise any eye-brows?</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What Macron is saying here is in itself <i>UNNATURAL,</i> and inconsistent with reality.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And yet: this state of cognitive dissonance is considered quite normal to the GreenFear-infected masses.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">Is Macron acknowledging that hurricanes are "natural disasters", or does he not understand the meaning of 'natural disaster'? How will Macron "<i><span style="color: #cc0000;">prevent natural disasters</span></i>"?! This GreenFearmonger is spouting nonsense.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Is he saying hurricanes are 'preventable' because they are caused by man (ie hurricanes are <i>not </i>natural!) and therefore, they can also be prevented by man?! <span style="font-size: xx-small;">oops</span>: there's that cagey inconsistency again!! Conflate this, deconflate that, mix this term here with that term there, claim one thing here causes another thing over there... </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">In Macron's mind, is<span style="color: red;"><i> all of nature man-made</i>,</span> and therefore 'preventable', as well?!?</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">(Let's remember what French crappiere <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/12/03/yellow-vests-riot-in-paris-but-anger-is-rooted-deep-in-rural-france.html">Macron's fascist climate-change policies</a> had created by Dec. 2018. Let's remember how Turdo and Macron have presented themselves as great pals. Let's remember that these two are Clown Princes of Agenda 21 globalism. Macron spouts smug perverted leftist crap (such as "Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism") which sounds just like something which Turdo would eagerly spout as well. To pieces of sh!t such as Turdo and Macron, 'internationalism' is a welcome assault on national sovereignty. To them, borders are an affront to internationalism.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 20</b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="font-size: 14.4px;"><br /></span></span></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">
GreenFear pushing climatalarmists keep pushing their unsubstantiated delusions, which conveniently conflate events such as Hurricane Sandy {...or Hurricane Katrina, or Hurricane Irma, or Hurricane 'fill-in-the-blank'...} with man-made climate change.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We saw this again at <a href="http://www.talkmedianews.com/congress/2017/01/11/tillerson-talks-tough-on-russia-at-confirmation-hearing/">Rex Tillerson's Jan. 10, 2017 confirmation hearing,</a> where some protester began shouting that her home was destroyed by Hurricane Sandy - the intended (though in reality unfounded) implication being that man (...personified in this protester's mind into being Tillerson himself..!) caused the climate to change, thereby causing Hurricane Sandy, thereby destroying her house. It's <i>that simple</i>, y'see.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is the kind of delusional link, the kind of tenuous, knee-jerk, conflated innuendo, that green bolsheviks - such as Jim Bradley's and Justin Trudeau's Liberals - love to encourage, love to see, love to foment.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">They revel in seeing their pathetic work unfold in this kind of spectacle - this is is<i> their</i> kind of GreenFear at work. This green cancer is in Canada, and in the States.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We see it again, regarding Hurricane Irma.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Back on Jan 10 2017, Canada had to endure another visit from another deluded global-warming-infected stooge, this time, from the limousine lefty Hanoi Jane Fonda, the <a href="http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=25860">Viet-Cong-Commie-hugger who happily posed with the VC's on an anti-aircraft gun</a>, the same guns which the NVA used to kill Americans. Jane Fonda made a fortune proudly peddling her anti-American "Fuck The Army" mantra. She went to North Vietnam to support the Communist enemy, to show the dumb folks back home her creds as a commie supporter.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Fonda flew (yes, flew - on a green helicopter powered by unicorn-farts --- no hypocrisy here, ever...) over Fort McMurray in Alberta, then immediately made a baseless link by announcing matter-of-factly (as a psychopath might) that the fire was<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/jane-fonda-in-fort-mcmurray-listen-i-m-not-against-you-actress-tells-resident-during-parking-lot-squabble-1.3929813"> "<i>part of global warming</i>"</a>!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So, there ya go, folks: y'see? It's "all settled"! More Fake News fodder for the Disciples of Al Gore and David Suzuki: climate-change caused the Fort McMurray fire, according to the GreenFear Gospel delusions of Jane Fonda!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Despite what Hanoi Jane spouts, Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist, David Phillips, has never stated that the Fort McMurray fire was caused by 'climate change'. (Maybe Jane Fonda can get Canada's Cagey Climatologist to once and for all 'prove that climate change is man- made'!!! That'd be funny.) Where-oh-where does Hanoi Jane get her scripted 'facts'?!! You might wonder how some people become so deluded, so detached from reality, so perverted by propaganda.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What can you expect from pathetic multi-millionaires who dish out their scornful doses of leftism to the dumb proles?! Hanoi Jane brushed past a female protester (a protester, by the way, who was<i> not </i>a<i> </i>happy Fonda fan) patronizingly telling the protester that "<i>I am not against you</i>" - while in fact, Hanoi Jane <i>WAS</i> against her, and against the people of Fort McMurray. Fonda was there on a 'higher' mission - as a GreenFear-spouting stooge.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Fonda should be nominated for a GreenFear Oscar for her amazing Fort McMurray performance, for her phony act, as she patronized the local yokels with her phony 'care' - all the while, her agenda was to shill for the Greenpeace/Agenda 21 globalists who despise the mere existence of Fort McMurray.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">If Fonda can act as a willing propagandist for the Black Panthers, she can act as a useful idiot shilling for the 'Club of Rome' too.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was amazing to see Fonda performing her Fort McMurray 'compassion' act - phony compassion from a person who had proudly named her own child with father Tom Hayden, "<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2033795/Jane-Fonda-said-biggest-regret-sleeping-Che-Guevara.html"><i>after a Viet Cong martyr who attempted to assassinate US defense secretary Robert McNamara, before wisely changing it to Troy</i></a>".</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>That's</i> the kind of deplorable mentality which touched down in Fort McMurray.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (Isn't it hilarious, by the way, how Wikipedia's lengthy page about Jane Fonda DOESN'T MENTION that Fonda's infatuation with Viet Cong Communists led to her naming a child after an assassin? Wikipedia just says this:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> "<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">T</span></i><i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">heir son, Troy O'Donovan Garity</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">, was born on July 7, 1973 in Los Angeles,</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;"> and was given his paternal grandmother's maiden name, as the names "Fonda and Hayden carried too much baggage". Fonda and Hayden wanted to give their son a name that "was both American and Vietnamese" and chose "Troy", an Anglicization of the Vietnamese "Troi", as the only name they could think of meeting that requirement. Hayden chose O'Donovan as the middle name after Irish revolutionary Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa." </span></i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Amazing how Wikipedia's Jane Fonda page simply avoids (covers up) any further details explaining Fonda's "Anglicization of Troi" - such as that name was chosen to lionize and honour an enemy of the US who tried to kill an American defense secretary!</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But, Wikipedia's page on Nguyen Van Troi DOES state that:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">Anti-war activists Jane Fonda </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">and Tom Hayden</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;"> named their son, an actor now known as Troy Garity</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">, in honor of Trỗi."</span></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Then we look at Troy Garity's Wikipedia page, which states:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;">"T</span></i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;"><i>roy Garity was born Troi O’Donovan Garity Hayden... ... </i></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525;"><i>His parents named him for the Vietnamese resistance leader Nguyen Van Troi"</i></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Funny at how the information is skewed here - reading this deceptive spin, we are led to believe that Jane Fonda lovingly named her son after some cuddly, simple, benign, well-meaning friendly ole "resistance leader" y'see - not after an assassin who attempted to kill Americans Robert McNamara and Henry Cabot Lodge Jr.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 21</span><span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"> </span></b><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It didn't take long for some deluded celebrity to conflate Hurricane Irma with - - wait for it... Donald Trump!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This time, it's Jennifer Lawrence spouting nonsense in the <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/hurricane-irma-harvey-donald-trump-jennifer-lawrence-mother-nature-storms-climate-change-florida-a7937691.html">Sept. 9, 2017 Independent, </a>sounding as if she is mentally ill:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #281e1e; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"Jennifer Lawrence <span style="font-family: "indy serif";">has suggested that it is difficult not to feel as though the devastating hurricanes in Texas</span><span style="font-family: "indy serif";"> and approaching Florida</span><span style="font-family: "indy serif";"> are signs of “Mother Nature’s rage and wrath” at America for electing Donald Trump</span><span style="font-family: "indy serif";">...</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "indy serif";">.... "It's</span> scary," she said in response to the interviewer’s statement that there was "an end-of-days feeling" across the world.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">“You know, it’s this new language that’s forming. I don’t even recognise it. It’s also scary to know that climate change is due to human activity, and we continue to ignore it, and the only voice that we really have is through voting.”</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">She then suggested the recent hurricanes devastating Texas and nearing Florida may have been prompted by Trump winning the presidency. "I’ve heard things and seen things on TV in my own country that devastate me and make me sick, and it’s just really confusing."</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">Lawrence has been a vocal critic of Trump since he launched his presidential campaign in 2015, when she said a victory by him would "be the end of the world" during an <i>Entertainment Weekly</i></span><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3;"> interview.</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #281e1e; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> She also spoke about him on the <i>Graham Norton show </i>in 2016 where she said she wanted an opportunity to see him and say: "Hey Trump - f*** you.""</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Lawrence's "language" is easy to recognize, it's symptomatic of GreenFear-infection, a deluded mixture of confusion, fear, hate, and ignorance, all summed up in one pathetic politicized propagandized package. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Who in Canada will ask Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips to confirm that "climate change is due to human activity" - as Lawrence AND as Canadian PM Justin Turdo both claim?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: inherit;">Can David Phillips confirm that the weather and the climate will stop changing - and go into stasis - if Jennifer Lawrence's favourite politicians get elected??!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: inherit;">Lawrence isn't the only one spouting these profoundly ignorant GreenFear delusions: in Canada, climate alarmists such as J-Turd's federal Liberals and Kathleen Wynne's Ontario Liberals all spout the same propagandized Agenda-21 GreenFear. (The fear-mongers of the IPCC are <a href="http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/09/07/news/too-much-mansplaining-climate-conversations">meeting in Montreal</a> this week with </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">J-Turd's </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">Environment Canada</i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: inherit;">to cook up some more GreenFear for Lawrence's future consumption..!)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">You can bet that pretty much all Canadian federal Liberal MP's and MPP's are cheering Lawrence on, as they believe and agree exactly with what she is saying: she is echoing their own delusions.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 20px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And yet: Canada's Cagey Climatologist sits on the sidelines, and cannot or will not discuss the GreenFear-mongering which<i> his own </i>federal agency is carrying on with the IPCC!!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">There have been countless comments made, similar to the idiocy spouted by Jennifer Lawrence, which bizarrely conflate Trump to 'climate change'. Typical would be something such as was posted by commenter David Grant, in a <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/niagara-falls-frozen-snow-photos-766994">Dec.31, 2017 Newsweek artcle written by Grace Guarnieri</a> with this purposefully deceptive headline: </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">"</span>NIAGARA FALLS SNOW PHOTOS: THE WATERFALLS HAVE FROZEN OVER DURING NORTH AMERICAN COLD SNAP<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">" . </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">Grant vomited out: "</span></span><i>This is what you get for voting for Trump!</i>"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Wow: how utterly moronic - and you can bet that Jennifer Lawrence would entirely agree with this clown.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Obviously, it doesn't matter to Grant that the same cold had occurred in Niagara during Obama's term - - - and for thousands of years previously!!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The mental illness displayed by these GreenFear-infected people is astounding.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">The deceptive</span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">, click-bait part of the Newsweek article was that - contrary to Newsweek's fake news claim - </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">the waterfalls at Niagara were NOT "frozen over"</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> at all; the water was flowing as it usually does!! Water freezes in these parts in the winter - it is commonplace for the mist from the falls to cover the surrounding area with a buildup of ice!!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">But the intent of articles such as these (and there were literally thousands of these articles between Christmas and New Year of 2017) is to make it look <i>as if</i> there is something out of the ordinary happening here, ominously hinting at "climate change", as if Niagara Falls had never encountered freezing cold before!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">These sensationalized, spiked, fake reports roll out like clockwork <i>every winter</i>, as the </span></span><i style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">WORLD-WIDE</i><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"> media gets involved</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">, eagerly amplifying a lie that 'Niagara Falls has frozen', and, attempting to conflate that this is somehow a never-seen-before phenomenon associated with 'climate change'. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">Those local readers in far-off places have no fu*king clue about it, yet, triggered by the propaganda they read, chime in with their bizarre "knowledge" that somehow it has all to do with "climate change" or Trump.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What reporter Guarnieri should do, is follow up her Newseek non-story with a REAL examination of Niagara Falls, ON own mayor <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/06/climate-change-greenfear-junk-science.html">Jim Diodati's destructive record </a>of Liberal GreenFear beliefs. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Please ask the GreenFear-pusher Dionutty to <i>prove</i> that the winter in Niagara Falls was caused by 'climate change'!!! It would be instructive to watch the lies pour out of Diodati's mouth as he scrambles to assemble rationalizations based on fictitious climate fairy tales he learned from Jim Bradley and Al Gore. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Make no mistake: Liberal hack Jim Diodati himself DOES think that climate change causes winter in Niagara and causes the falls to... <span style="font-size: xx-small;">uh...</span> 'freeze'! </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">{Cuz they never froze in the past, eh!!!} </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Diodati in his rapture with Green Bolshevism would also most likely<i> agree </i>that Trump caused the falls to freeze!! That's just the way these deluded Liberals are.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">It was sickening to see this clown Diodumbo, with the other clown Mercer, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">going on about the cold</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"> on the CBC's New Years telecast from Niagara Falls on Dec. 31, 2017 {...as if it being cold was something unusual; as if, as the deluded left like to now stereotype, it was 'extreme weather', which had never happened before!}</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How is it that deluded morons who believe that hurricanes were caused by Trump, or that 'the falls froze because of Trump', have no explanation why hurricanes existed under Obama; or why Niagara Falls is 'frozen' on the Canadian side, where glorious Liberals - such as Diodati, Kathleen Wynne, and Justin Trudeau - have jurisdiction?!!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Didn't the falls on the Canadian side also freeze due to Turdo and Diodopey and Krooked Kathleen being elected, as well?!?</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Oh... wait... it doesn't work<i> that </i>way... ... <span style="font-size: xx-small;"> ah</span>... I see... !!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The morons who blame hurricanes on Trump were again triggered and crawled out of the woodwork by the thousands in late August , 2019, in the run up to Hurricane Dorian.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">As reported by <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5835128/hurricane-dorian-kim-campbell-mar-a-lago-trump/">CTV</a> and many others, Canada's former PM Kim Campbell (...who claims that climate change is "making hurricanes more destructive" and blames Trump for her delusions) eagerly jumped onboard the Trump hate train, tweeting this disgusting drivel on Aug.28, 2019: "</span><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 18px;">I’m rooting for a direct hit on Mar-a-Lago</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">". What a pathetic motherfuc*er Kim Campbell has become - and this classless scumbag still has a job selecting judges for Canada's Supreme Court?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 22</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"> Further to the issues raised in Chapter 13 (...where Canada's Cagey Climatologist<i> refused</i> 'to go there' when a CBC reporter asked him about climate change!) we now see this sanctimonious claptrap from <a href="https://qz.com/1067556/hurricane-harvey-and-climate-change-is-a-conversation-we-should-be-having-immediately/?utm_source=readnext">Akshat Rathi at Quartz (Sept. 2, 2017) </a> propagandizing that "</span><span style="color: #4c4c4c;"><i><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Nobody would claim global warming created Harvey</span></i><span style="font-family: "pt" serif , "georgia" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"</span><span style="background-color: #f9f9f9;"> - </span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">is this writer for real?!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"></span><i style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">Nobody?</i><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Jennifer Lawrence spouted that <i>same </i>superstition just a week after this article!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (...and in Aug 2019, Kim Campbell would do so - See Chapter 21) </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Untold tens of thousands believe the GreenFear-mongering propagated by Obama and Crooked Hillary and Justin Trudeau and Stephane Dion and Jim Bradley and Al Gore and David Suzuki and the IPCC!! </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The Toronto Star and CTV / Bell Media and CBC and TVO and Huffington Post and countless other GreenFear-infected media sites - with 'moral license'! - constantly blare their GreenFear climatalarmism.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">Rathi is in fact pushing GreenFear with this ridiculous article. He has the obligatory slime against Trump, then goes on to fear-monger that "</span><span style="color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "pt serif" , "georgia" , serif;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The more Americans see global warming as a direct threat, the better the chances for the whole world of doing something about it."</i></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">So Rathi does us a favour here, and reveals the phony underpinnings of the GreenFear hoax: that it <i>is</i> a matter of<i> deception </i>and of<i> perception -</i> <i>not </i>a matter of reality; that it is a</span></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> matter of <i>appearance</i> over <i>substance</i>. That it is a matter of 'tone', of politicization, of power-grabbing, of exploiting</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> natural disasters to fear-monger for political power.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is GreenFear exposed.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">Note how the virtue-signalling Rathi disgustingly couches his GreenFear propaganda in moral, not scientific tones - after all, his crap is headed "</span><i style="background-color: #d0e0e3;">A "QUESTION OF TONE: It’s morally right to bring up climate change even as the tragedy of Hurricane Harvey unfolds."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;">Again, it's important to notice what the default position here is: it is the phony GreenFear premise that "<i>it's all settled</i>", so there <i>cannot be</i> a question of AGW. Therefore, in this perverted, gamed construct, the 'moral high-ground' <i>also </i>defaults to the GreenFear-pushers.</span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's funny, how Rathi and his GreenFear-pushing colleagues never criticize the 'tone' of Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips, about the "morality" of Cagey refusing to acknowledge what Rathi would like Cagey to acknowledge: that <i>humans cause hurricanes</i>. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Wow: doesn't David Phillips - Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist! - have <i>any </i>moral climatic obligation to<i> stop being cagey </i>and finally admit that humans created hurricanes Katrina, Harvey, Irma, Hazel...??!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Isn't Cagey's refusal <i>'to go there</i>' immoral, in Rathi's perverted opinion? (<span style="font-size: xx-small;">ahem</span>... who muzzled Rathi not to directly ask David Phillips about these issues?!?)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It seems that most Canadian media outlets actually believe (through secret codes being telegraphed by Cagey and his interviewers..!!!!!!!!!!!) that Cagey <i>IS </i>covertly admitting that humans cause hurricanes - - isn't <i>that </i>the unspoken undercurrent, the intended subliminal take-away, of <i>every David Phillips 'Cagey Tango interview' since time immemorial </i>!?!</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet, GreenFear-mongering propagandists such as Rathi, paint Trump with climate-immorality - while Cagey remains morally unscathed, as pure and morally innocent as the man-made snow!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 23</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> On <a href="http://www.latimes.com/opinion/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-looming-disasters-20170910-story.html">Sept.11, 2017, </a></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><a href="http://www.latimes.com/opinion/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-looming-disasters-20170910-story.html">David Horsey,</a> a</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> science-fiction-peddling entertainer in the Los Angeles Times, spouted off more GreenFear horsesh!t, peddling the GreenFear climate change lie <i>while also </i>saying that climate change <i>doesn't</i> cause hurricanes wildfires, or tornadoes!! Yep:</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> figure <i>that</i> one out!! Marvel at the disconnect, the deflection and the deception!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Oh, how Al Gore's mythological narrative conveniently changes; how desperately the "it's all settled" GreenFear propaganda is pretzelized - twisted, bent, contorted and reshaped - to prolong the phony meme!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Canada's Cagey Climatologist would be impressed by the sheer deception, deflection, and perversion penned here by Horsey - this is Toronto-Star-quality, Green Bolshevik-level, propaganda! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Here's a classic climate-change-propaganda piece, deceptively crafted and presented as <i>NOT </i>being a climate-change-propaganda piece! (...like that CTV Rinaldo-Rao phony report in Chapter 18... or like most CBC reports..!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">David Horsesh!t includes an obligatory slime against Trump AND Rush Limbaugh - yet, strangely, t</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">he seemingly-cognitively-impaired Horsey doesn't comprehend the conflicting 'logic' in his climate tale: Limbaugh has never claimed</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> that hurricanes are caused by 'climate change'; so in fact, </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><i>Horsey AGREES with Limbaugh, yet still finds it necessary to attack him! </i>What a load of horsesh!t from Horsey.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">It is Horsey's own GreenFear-infected fellow travelers who blindly insist that hurricanes <i>are </i>man-made!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Horsey deftly, purposefully, ignores -</span><i style="color: #0b5394;"> he</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> denies! - mentioning all the other climate change hoaxters who</span><i style="color: #0b5394;"> DO </i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">claim that climate change (...including hurricanes... get it, Horsey??) </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">is </i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">caused by man! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">That<i> is exactly</i> the perception that the loony left wants to convey - - it's<i> not </i>the opposite, as this confused LA Times science-fiction entertainer purports!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">-</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 24</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Following up on CTV's previous climate-propaganda-peddling efforts (as seen previously in Chapter 18), we see CTV/Bell Media and David Phillips again spreading climate-change propaganda in <a href="http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/rock-and-rolling-weather-more-mosquitoes-this-summer-phillips-1.3438914">Josh K. Elliott's June 1, 2017 CTV News</a> story.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Was CTV reporter Josh K. Elliott ordered by someone NOT to specifically ask Cagey Dave, whether the weather Cagey was referring to, was <i>MAN-MADE</i> CLIMATE CHANGE??</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Do you see the purposeful deception; the double-speak, the planned innuendo and Green-Fear-mongering inherent in this piece of typical green-garbage 'reporting'? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Josh - like hundreds of Green-fear-spreading lemming 'reporters' before him - </span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">DID NOT bother </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">to ask Cagey for Cagey's</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> specific evidence of man-made climate change</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">: why did this CTV reporter fail to be accurate; why did his editors allow this shoddy type of pseudo-journalism to continue?</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This "story" is just like hundreds - if not thousands - of other similar half-baked, innuendo-laden stories in which Cagey was prominently featured over the years, spouting the same GreenFear mongering crap, dancing the exact same Cagey Tango with some compliant dance partner/'reporter'.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">It is important to note that in his last paragraph, Josh wrote that David Phillips </span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">'</span></span><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">added that summers have been gradually warming up over the last 70 years due to climate change</span><span style="background-color: white;">' </span></span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">- yet, look closely: Josh </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">DID NOT actually provide the specific quote </span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">anywhere in his article of EXACTLY what Cagey said on this point - - there was no <i>direct quote</i> by David Phillips; it was Josh K. Elliott's interpretation of whatever Cagey said.</span></span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Take a look: the only mention of climate change was made in the story's <i>last paragraph </i>by CTV reporter Josh, who then attributed it to David Phillips. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">If Phillips said this, why not then <i>actually</i> provide the <i>actual </i>quote in its entirety??? </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why does CTV publish an entire article creating ominous fear about weather (with no mention of climate-change), until the<i> very last</i> paragraph, where climate-change is finally introduced as the 'cause' of all this previously-mentioned weather? Furthermore, as pointed out, the climate change phrase is not given to us as a direct quote, but as an attribution made by the reporter.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (It's noticeable that CTV has started doing this a lot, especially on their tv 'news' broadcasts, where someone like Tom Walters will go on for 4 minutes blathering on about something or other, mostly insinuating and flaming Trump-hate or climate change propaganda pieces, spewing all kinds of innuendo and partial truths - then in the last 10 seconds basically admit they actual have no real story. Paul Hunter at the CBC does this a lot as well, complete with rolling eyes and smug grimace.) </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why all this two-faced, side-stepping double-speak with reporter Josh, then??? </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Did David Phillips actually directly claim - <i>with no scientific evidence asked for, nor any provided...! -</i> that the summers are warmer everywhere on the planet since 1947??! Is <i>that</i> what Cagey actually said??!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Why didn't CTV reporter Josh provide the <i>actual</i> quote wherein Cagey told him about climate change causing summers to be warmer over the last 70 years???</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> - And, on the other hand, why wouldn't David Phillips correct the reporter, if the report overstated or misinterpreted what was said?!? </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">F</span></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">or Gaia's sake: let's remember that Cagey Dave had "</span><i style="color: #0b5394;">refused to go there</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">" about climate-change with the CBC (...see Chapter 13 above!) back in March 2017; so why would Cagey Dave decide to (supposedly) mention climate change to <i>this </i>CTV reporter, in this story, 3 months later??!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">- And why didn't CTV reporter Josh K. Elliott challenge David Phillips to specify what "climate-change" David Phillips was referring to? Was Cagey cagily and obliquely referring to </span><i>man-made </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">climate change? Or, was that cleverly left for reporter Josh to assume on his own; to use his own biases to interpret Cagey's vague decantings, maybe taking personal guidance from climate luminaries such as, oh, Leonardo Dicaprio or Jane Fonda or Jennifer Lawrence, known for their knowledgeable perspectives?!? </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- Why didn't CTV's stenographer Josh ask David Phillips to provide the evidence that it was <i>man-made</i> climate change (AGW) which according to Canada's Senior Climatalarmist, has caused 'summers to be warmer for 70 years' ?????</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">- And why didn't this CTV stenographer ask David Phillips to scientifically back up his supposed 'last 70 years' claim? </span></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">The summer warming started '70 years' ago eh? - - but exactly </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">where</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">?? Was it </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">everywhere -</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> equally, without exception, across the </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">entire</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> planet - exactly 70 years ago, that summers started getting warmer??! That's what Josh reported that Cagey told him!!!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">Yet: Josh</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"> didn't bother</span><span style="color: #0b5394;"> to challenge Cagey on <i>anything</i>! Cagey spouted his usual loquacious "rock-and-rolling" "either way" teflon-smeared climate-innuendo, and the stenographer/reporter danced along with Cagey's lead, no questions asked!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We've seen this exact same Cagey Tango, where the media and David Phillips perform their award-winning Cagey Side-Step routine, where some reporter and Cagey cozily dance their choreographed 'don't-ask-don't-tell / you-know-what-I-want' moves; the reporter willingly side-steps asking hard questions, as Cagey coyly side-steps by giving soft answers, both moving in unison to carefully make sure - <span style="font-size: xx-small;">nudge-nudge-wink-wink </span>- that they don't step onto each other's toes for their own mutual benefit, to further their own agendas - - it's the<i> exact same</i> GreenFear-mongering template, the same song-and-dance, time after nauseating time.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What was different 71 years ago, then?? Can David Phillips provide evidence that AGW suddenly started on Jan.1, 1947 {...but only, apparently, during the summers!!} and that there was NO climate change prior to 1947????! Were summers <i>all c</i>older,<i> everywhere</i> on the planet, up to <i>the end of 1946</i>??! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">C'</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">mon Dave: </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">WTF are ya doin' here</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">?!?</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Did it not occur to CTV reporter Josh K. Elliott <i>to ask</i>??</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Or was it Josh's job here, in collecting his CTV pay cheque, to <i>not </i>ask any questions, to <i>not </i>rock the '<i>it's all settled</i>' boat, but to just dance the Cagey Tango with David Phillips, obediently spreading climate change propaganda??</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 26</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's remember how Canadian Liberal Prime Minister, the global GreenFear-pushing Justin Trudeau, had moaned about the death of socialist scumbag Maurice Strong, who was an inspiration to many of Canada's sick Liberals and socialists. (...Turdo also is fond of dictatorships, because they can get things - like climate change legislation - done quickly, without opposition...)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<em><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></em></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Back in 2007... (back when Ontario's own Godfather of GreenFear, Liberal MPPJim Bradley, was agitating for climate fascism) ... a detailed article about Strong was written by Claudia Rosett, on Feb. 8, 2007, headlined "<i><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/02/08/at-united-nations-curious-career-maurice-strong.html">The Curious Career of Maurice Strong</a></i>", in which Rosett named Strong as the "Godfather of the environmental movement" (..which is exactly what Liberal GreenFearmonger Jim Bradley made himself out to be in Ontario, by the way). The article gave an eyeopening summary into the green fascist movement as it was at the time, ten years ago - but - it is still quite relevant, interesting and informative to re-read this same article, ten years later, in 2017, to see how prescient the analysis and warnings were.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<em><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></em></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's also go back a few years, to 2012, to read Tom DeWeese's description of Maurice Strong in the<i> </i><a href="https://americanpolicy.org/2012/05/08/the-most-dangerous-man-in-the-world-2/" style="font-style: italic;">"The Most Dangerous Man In The World":</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<em><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></em></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<em><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"...This is a speech I first gave to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 1996, just four years after the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio. At the time I gave this address there were strong indications that Maurice Strong could be chosen as the next UN Secretary General. It didn’t happen, but that didn’t diminish his influence over the body. In fact, In 1996 all roads in the UN led to Maurice Strong. This speech represented the first time that the CPAC audience and most conservatives had ever heard of the radical agenda of the environmental movement. It was probably the first time the term Sustainable Development was ever heard by a conservative audience. In fact, at the time I gave this speech, environmentalism was the most popular and most powerful movement in the world. Yet, here, 15 years before “Climategate” I was revealing the very root of what was to become the “Climate Change” movement and its drive to destroy the industrial West. By the way, tapes of this speech became the most popular of any ever produced by the American Policy Center and continues to be one of our best sellers. TD</span></em></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<em><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></em></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let me begin by asking you a few questions. They may seem rather silly – but I have a point. So, please, just indulge me for a moment – just answer with a show of hands:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How many of you know of Adolf Hilter – and that he was evil? How many of you know Mao Tse Tung – and that he was evil? How many of you know of Lenin and Stalin – and that they were evil?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;">How many of you know of Maurice Strong – and that he is evil</span>?</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">There is the point of my questions. Maurice Strong has the potential to be the most powerful and most evil dictator the world has ever known – right now – today – in our day and age – and yet, most of you have never heard of him.</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"...</span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">We should remember how, in a <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/maurice-strong-dead-obit-un-1.3341829">Nov.28, 2015 CBC story, Justin Trudeau just, <span style="font-size: xx-small;">uh</span>, forgot to mention</a> Maurice Strong's disgusting involvement the corruption-infested UN Oil For Food scam, or Strong's disgusting connections to Canada's wealthy Liberals!! Lying by omission; rehabilitating green fascists: that's Canadian Liberalism for you.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The CBC reports Justin Turdeau spewing the leftist meme about Strong being a pioneer in "sustainable development"- but what does that crap mean?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Does Turdo himself understand what his Agenda 21 handlers are telling him to say?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Well, as it happens, DeWeese had already pre-explained for us, back in 2012, what Trudeau (and all his Turdobot Agenda 21 clones along with him) mean, when they speak of "sustainability":</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"The assault on property rights – in fact the entire radical environmental agenda – is being driven by the United Nations. And Maurice Strong is the number one force behind UN environmental policy. Maurice Strong is the leader of a radical contingent of Environmentalists that believe technology and modern industrialization must be stopped.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Does that sound overstated or too extreme? Well, let me read you a much more radical statement and these are not my words – they’re Maurice Strong’s:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In 1992, Strong told a UN conference…: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"></span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Now, let me explain this new term “Sustainable” that you will see popping up in environmental policy more and more. Radical greens believe that all of man’s activities on Earth are harmful (and therefore not sustainable). They believe that man is a cancer on the Earth. Their goal is to slowly cut back and finally end all development and reduce human habitat to specific areas while the rest of the world is turned into wilderness."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is the belief of GreenFear-pushers, such as Niagara's Liberal MPP Jim Bradley. This is what the Green-Shifter Stephane "Bumbledore" Dion believed. This is what St. Catharines MP Chris Bittle's federal Liberals believe. This is what Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals believe. Just because Strong is dead doesn't mean that his fellow-travelers have stopped kissing his ideological ass: they relentlessly continue push their GreenFear agenda, on a daily basis. (TVO airs climate propaganda every day!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And climatalarmist David Phillips? It looks like he's just one of the soldier-enablers on that gangrene-infected GreenFear Road.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">-</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Nicolle Mortillaro (<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/15000-scientists-warning-to-humanity-1.4395767">CBC Nov.13, 2017</a>) spouted more GreenFear, and the same day, on the CBC's disgusting nightly "National News" television broadcast, the pathetic Rosemary Barton kept up the GreenFear shill, peddling the climate change '15,000 scientists' garbage over and over, unquestioningly regurgitating what they were told to spout.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 27</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06;"><br /></span></b><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">
Now that there was another <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5215305/Storm-breaks-records-Erie-62inches-snow-falling.html">cold snap </a>across Canada and the States in Dec. 2017, starting before Christmas, it's funny how the global warming and climate rhetoric becomes more subdued. (it doesn't stop TVO from peddling its climate change propaganda, though: they still shill their green garbage EVERY DAY, almost hourly!) The GreenFear is still being peddled, but using unsubstantiated phrases such as 'it feels like' and 'extreme'. When Canada got a white Christmas, the Green Fear peddlers cringed, because they would have preferred writing more of their 'Green Christmas' narrative stories, to peddle their spin.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey Dave was peddling the idea that there would be a warmer winter, as <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/11/21/is-toronto-in-for-a-balmy-or-bad-winter-depends-on-who-you-talk-to.html">Alexandra Jones wrote in the Toronto Star Nov.21, 2017</a>, in an article comparing Dave Phillps' projections with Chris Scott's forecasts. But make no mistake about it, Alexandra Jones' Star article was nothing but typical GreenFear propaganda - there was no semblance of journalism here: the elephant in the room - AGW - was <i>purposefully and carefully avoided</i> by Jones <i>AND</i> by her two subjects.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> A real interview with Cagey and Scott by a non GreenFear-infected journalist would be quite interesting - yet, this was NOT it, and it appears there never will be such a thing on Canadian media.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> You will note that the underlying lie (that AGW is man-made) is, as expected, as usual the unquestioned starting point - therefore rendering the entire discussion here as a charade.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Who censored Alexandra Jones, preventing her from directly asking Cagey Dave and Scott for answers regarding the evidence of man -made climate change?! Listening to these participants, no-one broaches the question if the El Nina or El Nino they refer to, are also 'man-made'!! Did anyone muzzle Jones, or David Phillips, or Chris Scott?! This phony Toronto Star 'reporter' had a direct chance to engage BOTH high-profile weather forecasters to confront the issue as to whether the weather they are commenting upon, is DIRECTLY LINKED to man made climate change.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But instead, Alexandra Jones doubled-down and just performed a slimy Cagey menage-a-trois <i>three-step</i> tango.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Her CBC snow-job was not to<i> investigate</i> climate-change, but to <i>propagate</i> climate change.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Get ready for the Toronto Red Star to publish some slime about Trump AND deflect from the NON-global warming we're having - oh, wait: as expected. they've already done it, reprinting a sack of Greenfear Garbage headlined "<span style="background-color: transparent;"><i>It’s cold outside. Get ready for the Trump global warming tweet</i>"</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">originally vomited up by<a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/12/28/its-cold-outside-get-ready-for-the-trump-global-warming-tweet.html"> New York Slimes</a> hack Kendra Pierre-Louis.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Kendra has no evidence of AGW, just like TorStar hack Alexandra Jones has none - but they love to spread the GreenFear narrative.</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And yet disgusting Toronto Star editor Kathy English (see Chapter 14 ) claims that her socialist propaganda rag doesn't publish fake news!!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #e69138; font-size: xx-small;">CHAPTER 28</span></b> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Finally, Canada's cagiest Climatologist comes out and claims that all weather is due to man made climate change - or is it really what he said - who knows?! Thankfully, Mike Postovit, a Global News <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/3976908/experts-talk-climate-change-at-kingston-symposium/">sports videographer</a> (not a science-fiction critic...) was on hand in Kingston, Ontario on Jan. 20, 2018, to help peddle Cagey's climatic- wet-dream, writing:</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.2em;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=", "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #111111;"><span style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: 0.03em;"> </span></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"Canadians love to talk about the weather. And there’s been plenty to talk about this winter with lots of snow, deep freezes and quick thaws.<br />According to experts, it all falls into the category of “climate change,” the focus of a Kingston Symposium on Friday. Environment Canada senior climatologist David Phillips helped to kick off the daylong event.<br /><span style="color: #990000;">"Everybody recognizes now that it is a major threat, probably one of the most important environmental issues that humankind has ever faced.”</span><br />Raising awareness and pushing for action — that’s what Phillips and others are trying to do...."</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">You read it: snow, freezing and thawing are somehow all conflated by David Phillips into being un-natural, caused by man! (Therefore, unexplained "action" is needed... !)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips - on the federal government's payroll as Canada's Chief Climate Green-Fear propagandist - peddled horseshit that <i><span style="color: red;">"Everybody recognizes now that it is a major threat, probably one of the most important environmental issues that humankind has ever faced.”</span></i> without any scrutiny from <i>anyone</i> in Kingston!! Why doesn't David Phillips make these bloated claims under his official capacity as an Environment Canada employee? Is he expressing his personal or his official federal government department's official views?? Why isn't anyone asking?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This Climate Clown was preaching his addictive GreenFear-mongering to his own echo chamber.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Apparently, Canada has never had snow, never seen thaws, never experienced floods, never had droughts, never had severe storms... it's the same deceptive, Cagey Crap, shat out of Cagey's deceptive mouth into the receptive ears of his already-GreenFear-infected acolytes.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey was there<i> to </i>peddle his seductive climate-change bullshit - that's clearly his 'gig' - and his fans eagerly swallowed Cagey's GreenFear-infected deceptive diarrhea.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The <a href="http://www.thewhig.com/2018/01/19/extreme-weather-is-here-to-stay-leading-climatologist-tells-symposium">Kingston Whig Standard's Elliot Ferguson</a> had a chance on Jan.19, 2018, to act as a reporter, instead of a fanboy, by asking David Phillips for <i>any </i>evidence that anything Cagey was saying, was linked to man made AGW climate change. {...because that <i>was</i> the pathological delusion underlying the raison d'etre <i>of</i> this 'sustainability' conclave, wasn't it - that AGW climate change is <i>all settled</i> / so don't ask any questions, move along now, g'wan outta here, ya denier...}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips fear mongers about extremes and about changes, yet, no one asks him to quantify anything, nor question his theories on his preferred alt-world-climate view - that of <i>climate stasis - </i>where apparently nothing anywhere, ever changes (...and if it <i>does</i> change, well, gulldarnit, it'll be controlled by da gubermint...) ... it beggars the laws of thermodynamics.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But Ferguson - like the thousands of 'reporter lemmings' before him - DID NOT bother to question things: Ferguson re-peddled Cagey's conflated deceptions and happily sent Cagey's green fertilizer/propaganda back to his editor for spreading - wink, wink, wham, bam, thank-you, man: the sordid <i>Cagey Tango</i> was flawlessly and effortlessly performed once again, just as expected! </span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The dirty dance was done, and - hurrah! - no GreenFear was hurt or damaged during the production; the deceptions and conflations will live on to propagate another day! The dance partners had their brief moment, and the issue of their dance - a shiny new GreenFear report - will, Gaia-bless, grow with the years, joining the thousands of older bastard stories inseminated by Cagey and his dance partners, in their legendary Pantheon Of Propaganda.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 29</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Then we had David Phillips' boss, the Liberal hack Catherine McKenna, spouting more of her GreenFear delusions, see:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/mckenna-has-no-time-for-climate-change-deniers-1.3865161">"<span face=", "arial" , sans-serif">McKenna has 'no time' for climate change deniers" (</span>CTV, Apr. 1, 2018)</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">- <a href="http://nationalpost.com/opinion/kelly-mcparland-the-same-old-liberal-arrogance-sure-is-coming-back-in-a-hurry" style="font-weight: inherit;">"The same old Liberal arrogance sure is coming back in a hurry" (National Post, Apr. 2, 2018)</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This is the climate-change perversity under which David Phillips thrives!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Funny how Canada's GreenFear press carefully ensures that their 'reporters' never ask BOTH Cagey David Phillips and Climate Conjob Queen Catherine McKenna, in the same story, to each provide their corroborative scientific evidence of "<i>man made global warming / climate change" </i>!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> {It's like Cagey is treated as <i>Homey Dave The Entertaining Climatologist With All The Neato Weather Anecdotes</i>, who says just enough to make ya think that he's got evidence of AGW; otherwise His Homeyness is PURPOSEFULLY kept compartmentalized from any substantive climate change issue!!}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> We have seen that Cagey is blatantly left out of the loop, when McKenna opens her wide yap to spew climate fear and lie about solutions for a problem which she knows nothing about.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McKenna<i> <span style="color: #cc0000;">doesn't</span></i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> </span>use David Phillips' climate spoutings as an evidence-source, because David Phillips is cagey enough to pin himself not with<i> any actual </i>evidence, but with the<i> perception of</i> evidence! Over the years, as we have well seen, David Phillips <i>could have</i> easily proven the "global warming / climate change is caused by man" thesis - - except for the fact that for all those years, he's <i>never had</i> any evidence <i>to</i> prove AGW; all David Phillips ever had was innuendo and conflation - just like any other Canadian Liberal has had: a lot of fear-mongering based on science-fiction.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (We well remember how the leftist press presented a phony narrative that somehow, 'science was being suppressed', prior to that piece of merde Turdo's election! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Well - now that NO ONE is apparently <i>still not suppressing</i> Cagey - why can't Cagey come out of his comfortable climate closet and reveal publicly his support and devotion to Liberal McKenna's climate change delusions?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Who's suppressing Cagey <i>now</i>?! Where's Ole Chadwick now, when we need some handy excuses?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's funny how the "suppression" meme was carried out to create an impression as if somehow David Phillips secretly knew 'all about the truth' that MAN 'caused the climate to change', and that only if bad ole Harper wasn't in power, well by golly, David Phillips would reveal everything!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Well: that has not happened!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And there is no "suppression" now, any longer - - - is there?! <span style="font-size: xx-small;">heh!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's been <i>self</i> suppression, <i>self </i>censorship by Cagey Dave and his co-opted legacy of reporter-co-conspirators for years; they happily hooked up with Cagey to perform their sordid Cagey Tangos - literally, with <i>no questions </i>asked!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> THAT kind of suppression / collusion to peddle a lie was never considered 'suppression' by those reporter-swingers who participated in hundreds of Cagey's past press orgies. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> They wrapped Cagey in a 'don't ask/ don't tell' sheath of devotion; they slipped on a mutually-beneficial condom of propaganda all these years; the media was Cagey's prophylactic, building up his profile; protecting <i>him </i>from criticism, protecting<i> them</i> from criticism; both coming out clean after each tryst with their craven GreenFear agendas satisfied.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> We see that David Phillips' phony 'suppression under Harper' was just a decoy narrative, a deflection intended to politically smear Harper; yet, which in scientific terms, had nothing whatsoever to do with the actual science of climate change.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey Dave HAD NOTHING <i>then</i>; and Cagey Dave still HAS NOTHING<i> now</i>.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> David Phillips is <i>SUPPRESSING HIMSELF:</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - David Phillips suppressed HIMSELF by not revealing (during the time he was supposedly "suppressed" by others!) that he had NO evidence of AGW.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - David Phillips<i> still </i>suppresses himself (when he's supposedly NOT being "suppressed" by others!) by <i>still</i> not revealing that he has NO evidence of AGW.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This is a very concerning psychological state - publicly playing along with these narratives and themes, going with the flow, never questioning the false 'it's all settled' premise of AGW, all the while performing an act of pretense - peddling speculative, conflated propaganda - <i>as if</i> there was scientific evidence of AGW.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> The phony 'science being suppressed' narrative was deflective AND projective: deflective in that it cast a smear (as was its political intent) against Harper; projective in that there <i>was </i>suppression<i> </i>being carried out - but it was suppression<i> by</i> the GreenFear-pushers<i> themselves</i>, who attacked any political and scientific questioning of their climate change false construct (...as the Liberal fascist McKenna is still doing in 2018!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey David Phillips (though purporting that he might have)<i> never did</i> have ANY shred of evidence of 'man made climate change' during his oh-so-phonily-difficult-years-of non-existent-suppression! - and he still doesn't.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Yet: it appears Cagey quite willingly allowed himself to be co-opted by the GreenFear-mongers as some kind of fellow-traveler mascot (a Stalinist 'useful idiot' comes to mind), and it is quite evident that David Phillips has become a Climate Change Quisling; a seeming stooge for the AGW-peddling liars who consider him their 'legitimizing' colleague.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When Liberal pieces of crap such as Climate-Con Queen McKenna make their climate claims, we do expect their lies: they are Liberals, after all; but it's sad to see what a climate charlatan David Phillips has become.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Truly pathetic.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When McKenna (instead of citing any actual scientific 'evidence' of AGW!) derisively mentions and dismisses "deniers", we AGAIN see the deceptive, deflective leftist bullying at work: Climate Barbarian McKenna peddles a fantasy, a delusion within which she cannot seem to find logical meaning: it's as if she is actually incapacitated and mentally unable to perform her role here. She is a disgrace, and a danger to Canada.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is David Phillips' boss.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is David Phillips' ideological colleague.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is the kind of fascist climate-bully whose actions Climatologist David Phillips supports through his deafeningly studied silence.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">You'd think that loquacious David Phillips would make some comment on McKenna's fascist climate related outburst - after all: David Phillips isn't... um... 'suppressed' any longer; he's free to speak out on climate change issues, as Canada's Chief Climatologist in Turdo's Canada, right!?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But look: Formerly-Loquacious-Dave cagily and conveniently experienced a sudden man-made drought of words; a man-made drought of opinion!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> David Phillips aids and abets lying Liberal scumbags such as Catherine McKenna. Neither of these two have any shred of evidence to support the AGW man-made climate-change lie.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McKenna - like other 'climate-change' fascists - labels people who disagree with her authoritarian (...and, by the way, <i>still unproven) </i>views, as 'climate change deniers', a term intended by her to be an all encompassing smear.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet, it is<b> <i>no</i><i>t</i></b> a "<span style="color: #cc0000;">denial of climate change</span>" that is at issue here, <i>is it</i>??!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Let's examine the bait-and-switch perversions being used here by the climate-change liar Catherine McKenna: what does this deluded Liberal hack even mean when she uses this phrase, which she believes to be an epithet describing some one else, yet, which is in fact a phrase she is projecting ABOUT HERSELF:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's not about people <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">'denying climate change'</span></i>, as the Liberal liar McKenna claims; it's about people <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>denying her lies about MAN-MADE climate chang</i>e</span>".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Propagandists such McKenna fraudulently misrepresent one as being the other: a massive bait and switch.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">The climate <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">DOES</span></i> change: it <span style="color: #cc0000;">ALWAYS </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">has</span> </i>changed; and it WILL continue<span style="color: #cc0000;"> <i>to</i> </span>change!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It is deluded GreenFear-infected morons such as Crooked Catherine McKenna that are <i>denying</i> and purposefully <i>deflecting</i> from this elemental fact!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">McKenna is projecting a deluded fictional fantasy {...to Crooked Catherine, "climate change" means "man-made, AGW climate change" - which is <i>politics,</i> not science}.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's the fraudulent "man made" part that climate criminals such as McKenna fail to dis-associate from her deluded politics. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Crooked Catherine is purposefully deceptive, muddling the distinctions to make an emotional, not a scientific case - she is peddling an alt-'reality', which isn't 'reality' at all, but fiction.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> McKenna is peddling a man-made political lie, that in some bizarre utopian fantasy, the "climate" had been in a fabled, wonderful, calm, peaceful, predictable stasis; that earth's climate had <i>never changed</i>, and that just by raising taxes and tinkering with human lives, she can CREATE CLIMATE STASIS again (...a fascist, scientifically-deluded wet dream - planned economies, planned weather, planned climate... everything planned and controlled by the Liberal gubmint...)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Do you see the vile perversion, the con-job, the bait-and-switch, the utter hypocrisy at play here?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It is Liberal Catherine McKenna who is the true "climate change denier". </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> McKenna denies the fact that Earth's climate... as well as the entire universe, for that matter... <span style="color: #cc0000;">has <i>always</i> changed.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It is Liberal GreenFear-mongering political criminals such as Justin Turdo and his Crooked Climate Barbie who are peddling psychotic <i> denials of climate reality</i>: 'climate stasis' was NEVER the norm, it is a </span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Liberal psychotic fable. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> McKenna and her GreenFear-infected fellow travelers obfuscate and conflate and build insane pseudo-scientific narratives based on dangerous political lies and science-fiction.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 30</span><span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"> </span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">In <a href="http://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/furey-looks-like-canada-is-gearing-up-for-a-carbon-tax-showdown#comments">"It looks like Canada is gearing up for a carbon tax showdown (Toronto Sun, Apr. 2, 2018)</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">we see that<span style="background-color: transparent;"> those pesky deniers are still badgering Canada's Crooked Climate Queen, Catherine McKenna with silly questions about McKenna's Liberal climate change lies!!</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Too bad that Liberal liar McKenna can't rely on getting <i>ANY</i> help from her employee, Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips on the climate change issue!! After all, what's climate change got to do with climatology - right!!?</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Helen Warn keeps asking McKenna for a response:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"Well Climate Barbie. You STILL haven't answered my basic question, although I have asked you many times, including e-mailing you at your official government e-mail address.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And unlike you, Barbie, I have some qualifications, including a PhD in meteorology from McGill, and papers published in academic journals.<br />So here it is, one again:<br />What, exactly, is being *measured* to justify spending piles of money on this issue? And how accurate are those measurements, both now and over time? And how do you know what the contribution of human activity is to whatever you are measuring?<br />Since AGW believers frequently bring up surface temperature, let's look at it as an example.<br />So show me a map of the earth's surface temperature, and a companion map of the margin of error.<br />Then do the same thing in (say) 1980.<br />If you prefer another atmospheric parameter than surface temperature, suggest it and provide reasons for your choice, and then answer the same questions.<br />Finally, tell me what part of the differences is due to human activity, how you know, and how accurately you know it.".</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">That piece of crap Liberal Catherine McKenna in Ottawa is doing exactly what that piece of Liberal crap Jim Bradley had done in Ontario: it's the same green fascist template: propagate the AGW lie; never provide any AGW evidence. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It's an old story, with criminal proportions.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 31</span><span style="color: #e69138;"> </span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">A reason explaining why the disgusting Liberal climate-change liar Crooked Catherine McKenna cannot expect to use ANYTHING that David Phillips says about climate change, can be found in this typical "Cagey Tango" report: look what passes as serious commentary from Canada's Senior Climatologist - it's pathetic.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's look at this Apr. 3, 2018 <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/prairies-cold-weather-polar-vortex-1.4602912"> CBC report by Canadian Press reporter Ryan McKenna </a>(not to be confused with Catherine McKenna...) headlined: "<b style="background-color: transparent;"><i>Polar vortex to blame for cold snap, Environment Canada climatologist says</i></b>".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Of course, the "climatologist" here is Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, David Phillips, offering another DOOZY of an "interview". It's amazing that this kind of climate garbage, this kind of sordid Cagey Tango, has been going on for essentially what - - some<b><i> 30,000</i></b> interviews?! (see <span style="color: #b45f06;">Chapter 32</span> if ya don't believe that!) - and yet the issue of man made climate change IS NEVER QUESTIONED!! These reporters file skewed stories (stories with an intentional built-in bias that "AGW is real") which are at their heart, fake news, false reports, puffball pieces with large amounts of relevant context simply - purposefully - ignored... it has to be seen this way by now; one cannot listen to the weather garbage being tossed around by Cagey, and keep what he says in a vacuum separated from the political realities and context surrounding what he says.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Ryan McKenna reports:</span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"David Phillips <span style="color: #cc0000;">blames a polar vortex</span> for the spring cold snap.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (...yet, there were <i>no questions</i> about this from the possibly-unconscious reporter McKenna, who <i>could have</i> asked "But David: Justin Turdo tells us that MAN is to blame for climate change! So, um.., Dave, uh... how is it possible that some kind of magical vortex is to blame? Doncha mean that '<i>man</i> is to blame for the cold snap'? I was told that this was "all settled" a long time ago..?)<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><br />"At this time of the year, it's often <span style="color: #cc0000;">back and forth, up and coming, very yo-yoish kind of weather</span>, where you're getting winter trying to hold on and summer wants to get a foothold," Phillips said Monday. </span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (No questions about this either, from CP's possibly-unconscious reporter McKenna, who could have called out and asked "'Yo-yo-ish' eh? 'Back and forth', huh? 'Up and coming'? Is that official, scientific climatologist lingo, David? Care ta 'splain that?"</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">You know: the kind of questions a journalist would be eagerly asking, if he was interviewing a 'scientist suppressed by Harper'!</span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">)</span><br />
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"And yet the war is being won by winter. <span style="color: #cc0000;">Old Man Winter is clearly the bully</span> in this particular situation and has got a grip on the entire West and is not letting go."</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> (</span>No questions about this from the possibly-unconscious reporter McKenna, who could have asked: "There's war on against the West? Whaaat - ya mean, like Liberals are attacking Canada's West?? Whaddaya mean, David, exactly? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">And who is "<i>Old Man Winter</i>" David?? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why are you using discriminatory ageist lingo during the reign of Prince Turdo? We don't see this old guy listed anywhere with Environment Canada, or in Catherine McKenna's Liberal climate change policies. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Is he a Liberal bag man? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">A Liberal lobbyist? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What does Old Man Winter have to do with the science of climate change, David? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David, aren't YOU clearly the climate-change-peddling bully?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David, why are you blaming some fictional character, when YOU spout GreenFear everyday? You sit mute when Liberals BULLY Canadians with unsubstantiated climate-change fear; yet you yourself say the same things! Canadians are being bullied by the Liberals and by <i>you</i>, not by 'Old Man Winter' or 'Old Man Summer'... David: <span style="color: #cc0000;">can you just finally STOP with your bullsh!t.</span>..??" </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">...but no, no, no... CP's reporter Ryan had dozed off for the entire interview...)</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Phillips said the duration and intensity of cold the region is currently experiencing hasn't been felt since 1970.</span><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 28px;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (Sleepy-headed reporter McKenna forgot to ask if the RECORD cold - which according to Dave Phillips has not had this duration and this intensity for 48 years - was <i>due to man made global warming!!</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Because Crooked Catherine McKenna the Lying Liberal would say that it WAS man made!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">What sayeth David? Well, Ryan doth NOT bother to reporteth! Why dost thou NOT reporteth, Ryan, what David sayeth?!? Has Cagey got his climactic claws on yer forked tongue?!)</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Environment Canada's record low for April 2 in Saskatoon is –28 C, which was set in 1954. The temperature there on Monday morning was –21 C.<br />"This cold air, it's just entrenched. It's like <span style="color: #cc0000;">molasses,</span>" Phillips said. "It's <span style="color: #cc0000;">filled all the nooks and crannies.</span>"</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> It's quite apparent that David Phillips' own climatic secretions fill in all the voids, dripping over all those nooks and crannies, all those inaccuracies, imperfections, prognostications, insinuations, and conflations with layers of his own verbal 'molasses'.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Phillips is Canada's SENIOR climatologist, for gaia's sake - - we OUGHT TO EXPECT MORE (...don't we?) than this typical plate of steamy dung, garnished with a side-order of meaningless 'green' gibberish mixed with Cagey's mumbo-jumbo, served on a shallow platter by shallower reporters. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Is THAT is the best that Canadian journalism can muster??! (Clearly, this crap is good enough for Canadian Press' propagandists and for the CBC...)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">No real journalist should sit through this kind of weaselly BS, and take it seriously from such a one-sided perspective, and not even try to make an effort to question anything! Either the interviewer is in the GreenFear camp already, or they're doing a puffball interview to avoid any confrontation with Cagey - which is it... what is it?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How is this fake report not <i>itself </i>an example of "SUPPRESSION of science"??!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It certainly is propaganda - the lack of questioning alone puts this report into the fake news category.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This is the kind of suppression that the same GreenFear peddlers had projected upon Harper's government. Their political aim was to insinuate 'suppression of science', yet, it is<i> their </i>articles which suppress science by simply parroting what heir GreenFear heroes spout, no questions asked. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Did Ryan McKenna's editors at CP forbid him to ask David Phillips about man made climate change? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Did Cagey himself stipulate this as a condition of his interview? Was this a real interview? Because if it was, it was - typically, like the rest of the Cagey Tango saga - pathetic.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Or was this a a pre-screened, pre-scripted interview, ie, not an 'interview' at all, but planned propaganda (aka just another typical Cagey Two-Step Climate Tango)??</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How can we get these SAME garbagey Cagey 'interviews', with the same shallow, pandering template, the same delicate Cagey Tango, predictably performed thousands of times?! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey here blathers to the press that the "polar vortex" is to blame for a cold snap - -yet, the reporter in this interview<span style="color: #cc0000;"><i> doesn't bother to ask </i></span>Cagey if the Polar Vortex is natural or man made!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Was CP paying reporter Ryan McKenna to lose consciousness or fall asleep during this 'interview'?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Or was Ryan bound by a written or implied contract to pretend that he had fallen asleep and posted an entire story before awakening?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">I mean... f@cking really... <i>come on</i>!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Canada's federal Liberal government says that Climate-Change is man made, so when reporters such as Ryan hear Phillips blaming <i>not </i>"man" but instead, blaming a polar vortex - why don't they start asking questions??</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">By blaming the "polar vortex" for creating a cold snap, Cagey has taken the credit {...blame..?} <i>AWAY</i> from 'Man" - and<i> THAT</i> goes AGAINST what Turdo and Climate Barbie claim! It CANNOT BE some stupid natural vortex that should be blamed: according to the GreenFear-pushers, <i>MAN is to blame, for everything</i>!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">How did Ryan, CP, and the CBC, manage to sleep their way through all this?! Cagey just revealed to them indirectly that what Turdo's Liberals are peddling is a climate lie; Cagey told them that a polar vortex - not man - was to blame for the prairie cold snap.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Yet the CBC headline was NOT:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"<i>Canada's Senior Climatologist at odds with official Liberal climate change policy"</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was NOT "<i>Canada's Senior Climatologist contradicts official Liberal climate change claims</i>"...</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was NOT "<i>Canada's Senior Climatologist links climate change drivers as being natural, not man made</i>"...</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was NOT "<i>Canada's Senior Climatologist challenges Liberal climate claims that "man" is the driver behind climate change</i>"...</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was NOT "<i>Liberal Prime Minister Turdo infuriated a</i>s <i>Canada's Senior Climatologist blames "Old Man Winter" for causing climate-change"... ...</i>see the point?!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Ohhhhhh, how to spin this? How to spin this, to save Cagey Dave from the Wrath Of Turdo?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Oh, wait: how about we say that Old Man Winter is<i> actually</i> a man - ya see? He's real - as real as climate change is real - - - therefore, we can still say - truthfully say, ya see? - that climate change <i>is </i>man made!! Old Man Winter did it, and because he <i>is</i> a man, ya see, he can be blamed! So yes, it's true: climate-change is definitely man-made (because as we Liberals have told you, Old Man Winter is a man). If you <i>don't</i> think about it, then it all makes perfect sense, and we can't he accused of lyin' either!! Yes, that'll work perfectly!! Excellent idea, great plan!! Yes, David Phillips can go back to being blameless again!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">TAKE A GOOD LOOK in<span style="color: #b45f06;"> Chapter 5</span><i>,</i> at how the Canada's Cagiest Climatologist wormed and twisted his way in 2017 to make it appear that that the polar vortex WAS man made.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Compare what he said to what he's saying here on Apr. 3, 2018. Such slimeball tactics.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Whatever Cagey says, is massaged...</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">(... oh, what Mr. McLuhan would have had to say about this, about how the medium is not just the message, but that the message<i> itself </i>has been massaged... so the medium is the massaged message, in fact...)</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">... to NEVER associate back to the climate change hoax. We see it here, yet again. The message is SPUN, shaped and formed; the massage begins even before the reporter is assigned.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey claims that the vortex itself (not man) is to blame... why did the sleepwalking reporter Ryan <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">not bother to question</span></i> this?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Does this reporter even know - or care - about the opportunity he SQUANDERED by not confronting the lies, the double-speak, the greater deceptions, which surround the issues in his story, transmitted by CBC everywhere?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">By having ONE reporter actually digging into what Cagey says, an analytical breakdown and reconstruction of Cagey's weather sputterings could begin.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">But, the assessment NEVER occurs - and Ryan here is not the first reporter to be taken for a sordid spin while Cagey has his climactic way. Was this Cagey Tango a consensual act - or is pure, innocent Ryan another of Cagey's serial climate victims?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> In either case, the readers of Ryan's CP/CBC propaganda are victims of an orchestrated climate-change GreenFear-infected propaganda campaign.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 32 </span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Let's go back to a <a href="https://www.cp24.com/news/q-and-a-canada-s-weatherman-dave-phillips-1.1464513">Sept. 21, 2013 CP24 story</a> by Chris Fox:</span><br />
<div class="s-data" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></em></div>
<div class="s-data" style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">"</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Dave Phillips likes to say that he has about 30,000 weather stories and believe it or not he’s probably not exaggerating. As the senior climatologist at Environment Canada, Phillips has been in the meteorology game for more than 40 years and during that time he’s amassed a library of crazy weather facts, stories and trivia..."</span></span></em></div>
<div class="articleBody" style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Yep - and Chris' story could possibly go down in the history book of GreenFear propaganda as being story # 30,001 where David Phillips got away<i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> without having to face any challenge about how whatever he's talking about, has anything to do with man made climate change</span></i>!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">That's over 30,000+ Cagey Tango performances!! And this count is from <i>five </i>years ago - from 2013 ! - and nothing else in the Cagey template has changed except for the increasing story count! There have certainly been several thousand MORE interviews since (Cagey has a voracious appetite to spread his climactic seed) yet, the "Climate Change" aspect of Cagey's blusterings, remain CENSORED; remain VERBOTEN; remain SUPPRESSED; remain UNCHALLENGED! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">(Let''s remember, as we saw in<span style="color: #b45f06;"> Chapter 13</span><span style="color: #e69138;">, </span>how Cagey Dave himself REFUSED 'to go there' refused to go to the "climate change" topic, on a CBC interview !! And this was on a <i>CBC interview</i>, for gaia's sake - they are Cagey's best pals! Who "suppressed" Cagey then, in 2017?!! Still blamin' "Harper" </span><span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">heh heh</span><span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">?! Funny how the CBC didn't blame Trudeau for 'suppressing science', when Turdo's own State Climatologist wouldn't talk about climate change to Turdo's own State Broadcaster..!)</span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span>
<span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">These interviewers eagerly dance around the climate change issue with Cagey, making moves in coordination as if they are talking about climate change; they spin and they twirl, pedaling their two-step climate-shill in unison, as if they were one,</span> until they're sweaty and spent and created another fresh precious sweet little bundle of 'AGW evidence'. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Ahh, yes... happy times, indeed... Good times, them days... them 30,000 tangos... </span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">All those decades of sordid dirty dancing; all those mutually-beneficial Cagey Tango 'interviews', yet NO 'man made climate change' evidence!! But sh!tloads of AGW innuendo!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Here we have a typical Cagey Tango interview, where man made climate change is COMPLETELY IGNORED by the interviewer, Chris Fox!.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Did someone order Chris Fox NOT to mention the subject of climate change to David Phillips?! Was someone suppressing either Chris Fox, or David Phillips, from saying ANYTHING about climate change? Were they being "suppressed " by anyone?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Or were they pulling this off all by themselves??! </span><br />
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">{Remember back in Chapter 3 how Cagey's ole pal Phil Chadwick was openly despairing over how <i>somehow</i> Cagey was <i>someone's </i>victim, how Cagey suffered mightily under <i>somekind</i> of "circumstances" which <i>mysteriously</i> prevented Cagey from talking about climate change! This was happily reported by TorStar's Amy Dempsey - no evidence necessary!}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">So let's ask again: <i>who</i> in this CP24 report was 'suppressed'; and <i>how</i>?!?! The only thing that can be said, is that they<span style="color: #cc0000;"> <i>themselves </i></span>self-censored, they themselves decided to suppress the man made climate change issue - they decided NOT to deal with anything to do with climate change - while interviewing Canada's Senior Climatologist!!!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">COME ON: just LOOK at the massiveness of this GreenFear con job!</span> </span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><span style="background-color: white;">The closest to anything related to climate change that Chris Fox bothered to ask was "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">....we</span></span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> have had lots of extreme weather lately to the point that I have ask if we can even call it extreme at this point. Is it just the new norm?"</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Chris Fox didn't specify what he even meant by terms such as 'extreme weather' or 'new norm'. Those were media-created memes which we all were led to believe that are representations OF man made climate change.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Phillips cagily did not address the specifics of Chris Fox's terminology, which Fox used to lead into his question; Phillips cagily used Chris' assumptions to create this equally non-committal 'answer':</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"We have always had extreme weather but it seems more complex now. It beats us up more."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So there you go: what did Chris Fox think he asked Canada's Cagiest Climatologist? And what does Chris think of Cagey's answer - did he actually get an answer to what he thought was his question?! Did Cagey 'satisfy' Fox?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Here's the REST of Cagey's blabbering 'answer': </span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"...It is almost as if our grandparents were able to deal with that weather. They didn’t have to pick up the kids from daycare, they didn’t have to go to that social meeting and they were more resigned to the weather. But now because we have changed the impacts have changed. There is a sense that the weather is also getting more extreme at the same time, but it is also getting more variable. For farmers in Ontario for example they used to always seem to get the weather they expected and now they are sometimes getting the wettest season followed by the driest. It is almost like normal weather doesn’t occur anymore and we plan everything on normal weather. We build hospitals and schools based on normal weather, we make holiday decisions based on normal weather and the government drafts policy based on normal weather. If it is not normal anymore maybe we are planning for something that’s not going to be the situation and that can cause a problem."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Whaaaat?! What's "normal" when you are listening to Cagey's loquacious verbiage? WOW - and yet, try reading ANY random David Phillips Cagey Climatologist story, and you will see the <i>same bullcrap, the same Cagey Tango,</i> performed every time!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "arial";">And we</span><i> still</i><span style="font-family: "arial";"> have about 34,853 more Cagey Climatologist stories to get through! We are immediately applying for Canada Research Council, Arts Council, Gaia Council, and TVO/CBC grants, funding, 'gifts', University research grants and endowment funding to continue our work to fully document how climate change issues were presented - and how they were covered-up - by Environment Canada over Cagey's decades!</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial";">Over 30,000+ interviews, there were tens of thousands of participants playing along with Cagey's Two Step Climate Tango - editors, reporters, media outlets: let's see how the AGW-climate-change-global-warming hoax was presented, how was it characterized and handled by Environment Canada and its employees! This wasn't David Phillips' personal private soap-box to peddle Liberal 'man-made climate change' propaganda! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="color: #e69138; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 33</span><span style="color: #e69138;"> </span></b></span></span><br />
<div style="font-family: arial;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: arial;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Let's have a look at the hometown cheer-leading that David Phillips got from the <a href="http://windsorstar.com/news/local-news/after-50-years-canadas-king-of-climatology-still-puts-gee-wow-whiz-into-weather">Windsor Star's Sharon Hill (Mar.30, 2018)</a> where the deceptive headline was "Canada's King Of Climatology has Windsor roots", but really, this headline should have properly depicted Phillips as "Canada's King Of Cagey Climatology" .</span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;">(...of course, needless to say, but it still has to be pointed out: never was there any question by this lazy reporter asking Cagey about climate change! Funny, eh - you'd think THAT would be a basic question, if a reporter's job was to get at the truth; clearly that was not the case (again) here. The Cagey Tango proceeded as per template requirements, the dirty dance was done, wham bam, no AGW climate change evidence needed.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">What's of particular interest is what Phillips said here:</span></div>
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;"><i>“You know, in a way I am a teacher because my classroom is Canada. My job is to talk to young people, old people, to raise awareness of weather and climate,” Phillips said of his quest to entertain and educate.</i></span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“I often feel like I’m the old snake oil salesman. You do that song and dance. You build them up to a fever pitch and then you sell them the bill of goods. You can’t just come in and say I’m going to talk to you about the most important environmental issue humankind has ever faced. They’re going to tune you out. You’ve got to tell them about the weird, wild and wacky weather and then you can sort of ease into it.</i><span style="background-color: white;">”</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Let's ponder the gravity of Cagey's statement (a statement which he likely meant to be self-effacing, but which in fact was a self-realized admission): Cagey by now well knows that he <i>IS </i>a snake oil salesman!! He's making this statement to Hill, in a way as if this wasn't his real persona, but that he's aware of the perception - - but what is happening here, is that David Phillips has clearly realized - AND PROJECTED - <i>his own </i>persona here! It's not a stereotype of a hypothetical '<i>someone else</i>' he's talking about: it's a description of <i>HIMSELF. </i></span></span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">It's quite revealing.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">Of course Cagey <i>is</i> a "<i><span style="color: #990000;">snake oil salesman</span></i>"! </span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">Of course Phillips does his <i>"<span style="color: #990000;">song and dance</span>"</i> across the vast Canadian stage - - there's even a name for the scam: The Cagey Two Step Climate Tango - a ritual publicly performed with many willing partners over 30,000 feverish times.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">And when Phillips says bluntly and openly "<i><span style="color: #990000;">...and then you sell them the bill of goods</span>" , </i>does Cagey even <i>understand</i> what he's saying; what a "<i>bill of goods</i>" actually <i>is</i>, and what it means when one admits that they're "<i>selling them a bill of goods</i>"?? WTF?!</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">It means that you are a FRAUD ARTIST.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">It means you are running a bait-and-switch scheme; that you're a con man; a grifter; a hustler: it means you are purposefully and knowingly misrepresenting something in order to sell </span><i>a bill </i><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">of goods - - WITHOUT any intention of actually delivering those goods. </span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">It's shocking and amazing that Cagey is able to so clearly recognize what he's helping Canada's Liberals do here! </span></span><span style="background-color: white;">(Spreading climate-change fear without showing any evidence; not delivering any evidence that increasing taxes prevents climate-change)</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: large;">He's not just "talking" here, or "educating </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">hahaha</span><span style="font-size: large;">"</span><span style="font-size: large;"> {</span><span style="font-size: large;">... it's more like he's <i>inculcating</i> or, well... let's just say it: <i>propagandizing</i>} here - he's a crucial part of the hustle needed to pull off the con; he's the confidence man, that trusty ole face we see all the time on the TV with all that goofy homey bullshit weather patter: all the while, he's a two-faced charlatan actively participating in a political GreenFear con.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">The victims hand their money to the scammers {the Green bolsheviks} but all that the victim-taxpayers get, is just their (increased tax) <i>bill</i> - nothing else!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">They get their bill listing 'the goods' they supposedly bought - but those goods never actually materialize. </span><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">This a fitting and appropriate description of the entire AGW climate-change con: </span></i></b></span></span><span style="background-color: white;">the cause (AGW) of 'climate-change' is a myth; the solution (more taxes to 'stop climate change') is a myth, based on the earlier myth. A common, convenient lie ("It's all settled, no questions need to be asked") underpins both myths, completing the circle of climate-deception.</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">It's a deceptive promise, a fake promise, an empty promise, just jive talk, without the goods to back it up, meant to be a scam from the start - pay da carbon tax <i>now</i>, suckah... maybe you'll see some 'result' in 3,000 years.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">As we saw in <span style="color: #b45f06;">Chapter 5</span>, and many other examples, David Phillips, the green-snake-oil peddler, is selling a PRETENSE, an "appearance", an "impression", a "story", a "thought", a "possibility", an "idea" that he is talking about MAN MADE climate change - without having any evidence for it. </span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">We've been sold a bill of goods by David Phillips on at least 30,000 occasions, by the looks of it. He performs a clever tightrope act. His "</span></span><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: #990000;"><b>I’m going to talk to you about the most important environmental issue humankind has ever faced</b>"</span> </i>trope sounds like it's coming from a religious cult, or from Al Gore's ass: it's tiresome and repetitive, a scripted UN Agenda 21 meme he uses frequently, which reeks of GreenFear - see <span style="color: #b45f06;">Chapter 28.</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">He's a shameless smooth-talking, climate hustlin' shaman who's sold a LOT of bills of goods with his climate mumbo-jumbo. He uses these tactics with an ulterior purpose to further a political agenda: to create an impression that governments can control the climate, because climate is man made, not natural; that all the weather events we see, are <i>not</i></span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"> natural, but man made - this is an </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-size: large;"><b>absurd piece of manipulative pseudo-scientific conceit. </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: medium;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">So, what right does this devious government</span><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> employee have, to act as some kind of 'teacher' {a propagandist}with his own private curriculum and personal agenda, acting as some kind of phony 'entertainer' peddling his GreenFear-laden insidious personal beliefs without sanction nor evidence? Since when is it Cagey's job at Environment Canada to act as a "scientainer''</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span style="font-size: large;"> soft-selling climate change deceptions?</span></span></span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">It's a devious approach, and thankfully, David Phillip has now himself come clean with his duplicity.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Sharon Hill's real headline should have been "Canada's Cagiest Climatologist admits shilling 'man-made climate-change', without substantiated evidence".</span></span></span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 34</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> CTV (the Bell Media conglomerate) excreted another stinking climate change tango with Cagey David Phillips, in this <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1419892">Jun 17, 2018 CTV </a>television news interview/climate-change propaganda segment, this time with Erin Paul interviewing Cagey, and not once did Paul ever address the cagey elephant in the room... that being David Phillip's lack of evidence that anything which was being reported, was due to man-made climate change.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Because, well, that's the intended underlying message of what was being portrayed, though CTV craftily slid around actually making any direct link that what they and Cagey Dave were presenting, was an actual example of what Canada's federal Liberals call 'man -made climate change'.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Funny, the purposeful dance of deception being tangoed away by Paul and Cagey.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">When Cagey cites record heat days, Paul (a 'reporter..?) strangely <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">DOES NOT BOTHER</span></i> to directly ask Canada's SENIOR (...and most cagiest!) climatologist, whether the weather which Phillips was referring to, is man made, due to climate change. CTV reporter Erin Paul had a chance - but <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">purposefully avoided</span></i> - to get the 'evidence of climate change' directly the climatologist's mouth. (CTV's Paul has danced Cagey's dirty Climate Tango before - see CHAPTER 8 - where the same template was followed: let Cagey babble, don't ask about climate change)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">So, instead, they both again danced the by-now-familiar Cagey Sidestep Climate Tango, peddling GreenFear <i>as if</i> it was 'all-settled-climate-change', yet, purposefully leaving a disconnect and purposefully side-stepping the underlying issue: that David Phillips could NOT provide any evidence of AGW.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">(<a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/sweltering-temperatures-in-parts-of-ontario-alberta-and-b-c-1.3977025">CTV's David Maher</a> also included parts of the Paul/PhillipsTV interview, in a June 17, 2018 written story. Maher also did NOT provide any question or comment about David Phillips' lack of evidence that what was being reported, was AGW)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Cagey, Paul, and CTV provided a lot of GreenFEAR, but <i>no evidence </i>of 'climate change'. Clearly, they <i>wanted </i>to show that all this was somehow due to 'climate change', yet despite the innuendo and bluster, all they could do was create an <i>impression</i> that this was 'climate change', without any evidence to support it.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Why are these CTV employees purposefully refusing to ask David Phillips if the weather events which Phillips is spouting on about during his interviews, are evidence indicating 'man made climate change'? Who is censoring and muzzling CTV's employees on the climate change issue?! Is there a standing order, an edict, a contractual clause of some kind, which sets out that when federal employee Cagey Dave gives an interview, his interviewers cannot broach the subject of climate change?! Does federal employee Cagey Dave only grant interviews to pre-approved, friendly ass-kissers, who... well... will kiss his butt and not dare insult Cagey with questions? Is <i>that </i>how ya get to dance the climate tango with Cagey?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Another segment with Cagey Dave appeared later that day on <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/ctv-national-news">CTV's national </a>televised nightly news, where this time host Lisa LaFlamme acted as the lead-in to the report.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">LaFlamme did her best to inflame the introduction with incendiary hyperbole:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"...<i>extreme heat is gripping big parts of Canada tonight - and it's not even summer. Records were smashed on the west coast, parts of the prairies, and southern Ontario, where it felt like a blast furnace. Here's Janet Dirks on the scorcher.</i>.."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Dirks introduces Cagey Dave's segment by saying "<i>The heat wave in southern Ontario has made for a sweltering spring</i>", then cuts to David Phillips saying: "<i>We've had 6 days already in Toronto with temperatures above 30. You know, last year, we'd go to Labour day and we looked at the numbers and there were 9 of those days. So, my gosh, we're not into summer yet, and we've already got 6 in the bag.</i>"</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Wow: scary stuff, right? You'd think such a frightening GreenFear-laden story would be fully analyzed by CTV's reporters!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">But - after showing Cagey's meant-to-frighten-but-not-explain claims - Dirks just<i> cuts away</i> from Cagey, goes on to her other spots, and <i>does not</i> return back to Phillips for a followup; nor does Dirks analyze / question what Phillips had said. (...and neither did the story's host LaFlamme)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">So, Cagey was allowed to spout his GreenFear - as was expected of him - and - as expected from CTV - nobody asked Phillips anything about his statistics, and whether they had anything to do with man-made climate change!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Dirks ends her report with another fear-mongering warning about "<i>extreme weather</i>" - the media code-word for 'man-made climate change'.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">There ya go: another tenderly-danced, craftily-choreographed Cagey Climate Tango is "in the bag"!! Cagey pops up for his climate-alarmist money shot, and everyone's satiated, no questions asked!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 35</span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Canada's Cagiest Taxpayer-supported Climatologist was at it again, shoveling his half-baked GreenFear into the willing media's maw.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Again, as it often is the case, it was CTV News publishing the GreenFear, and again, David Maher (See Chapter 34) pops out as CTV's GreenFear-spreading journalist/propagandist.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">CTV screamed in <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/the-planet-is-on-fire-extremely-hot-summers-could-become-the-norm-1.4041827">their Aug.5, 2018 click-bait fake-news headline that "<i>The planet is on fire"</i>!!</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Propagandist David Maher and CTV - Bell Media refused to ask Canada's Senior Taxpayer-funded Climatologist whether the weather Phillips was commenting on, was evidence of climate-change caused by man!! After all, that<i> WAS</i> the entire intent of CTV's<span style="background-color: white;"> article - the propagation of climate-change innuendo; that was the under-lying editorial skew, to convey the climatalarmist impression that somehow, man is the root cause of what David Phillips is fear-mongering about.</span></span><br />
<i><span style="background-color: #d0e0e3; color: #cc0000; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> "...Phillips added that the effects of extreme temperatures are beginning to be felt around the globe. “The planet is on fire, it’s overheated and we’re seeing the impacts of that in terms of people dying from the heatwaves, crops are burning up and we’re seeing wildfires. All that is related to the fact that we’re under global fever,” he explained..."</span></i><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> When GreenFear spreader Cagey Dave tells CTV / Bell Media / David Maher that the </span><i>"Planet is on fire" </i>amazingly<i>, </i><span style="background-color: white;"><i>nobody asks</i> Cagey ANYTHING about that! </span></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Maher had a chance to ask Cagey to expand upon his statements, but like the thousands of other 'reporters' before him, Maher <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">REFUSED to challenge </span></i>Cagey's Climate-Change Narrative. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Who muzzled David Maher, preventing him to act as a journalist, turning him into a climate-change-GreenFear-shilling whore stenographer? Did CTV / Bell Media direct Maher NOT to question David Phillips about anything - especially about climate-change? </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Is that part of some kind of pre-arranged 'deal' with Cagey, that certain subjects are NOT to be broached by the interviewer? Is this a formalized method of interviewing a federal government employee: that Cagey spouts and the reporter doesn't ask any questions?</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Or did David Maher decide all on his own to dump his journalistic integrity, and to bend over for Cagey, because Maher was already an ardent believer in Cagey's GreenFear-smeared worldview, and would never dare to offend Cagey with questions that would damage Cagey's narrative?</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Is Maher a CTV Bell Media journalist, or a CTV Bell Media stooge-stenographer/propagandist? </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Cagey vomits his GreenFear without question, David Maher obediently licks it up and CTV / Bell Media happily publishes Cagey's climate-vomit - without any bothersome shred of journalistic standard. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">When Cagey vomits out statements that it's a "<i>fact that we're under global fever</i>", nobody asked Cagey The Climate Scientist <i>what the f*ck</i> that even meant. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">David Maher mis-characterized this as an 'explanation' from Cagey, but nothing was quantified or put into perspective - there wasn't ANY 'explanation' whatsoever, just a jumble of climate-change fear-mongering. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">It was Cagey vomiting climate-change innuendo into Maher's unquestioning mind. David Maher and David Phillips colluded happily to dance out another infamous Cagey Tango.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 36</span></b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></span>
<br />
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Not to be outdone by the climate hooey spewed by Bell Media/CTV on Aug.5, 2018 (See Chapter 35), Global News decided to emit even more toxic climate-change propaganda on Aug.7, 2018, by spreading Nina Chestney's Reuters climate alarmism with this fear-mongering headline: <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/4373817/hothouse-earth-climate-change/">"<span style="background-color: transparent;"><i>Earth at risk of entering irreversible ‘hothouse’ state</i></span>",</a> complete with science-fiction fantasies about parking the climate and tipping points, all presented as if this was 'news'.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">For some reason, no Canadians were included in this Global propaganda, to obtain their perspective on the contents - there was nothing here even from Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Global published this Reuters GreenFear (and Global also embellished the Reuters feed by adding videos of its own - one about Canada's "raging wildfires" - for extra GreenFear-mongering effect) yet, no Canadian viewpoint was included, not even from the usual Canadian GreenFear-mongers.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Rex Murphy's article <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rex-murphy-justin-trudeau-and-the-climate-alarmists-are-the-fear-mongers">"Justin Trudeau and the climate alarmists are the fear mongers"</a> (National Post. July 20, 2018) encapsulates the kind of pervasive GreenFear-spreading climate-change cult which I have been writing about here; a cult of green-fascist fear merchants which regularly pollutes media outlets such as Global, CTV, Toronto Star, CBC, TVO, and a myriad others, as well as infects political parties, Turdo's Liberal government included.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Murphy writes:</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> "A </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/opinion/climate-change-parenting.html" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(254, 210, 50); border-bottom-style: solid; border-width: 0px 0px 2px; box-sizing: inherit; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">recent column in The New York Times</span></a><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> may be the silliest production of the human mind since the first spark of consciousness, or the latest episode of The View.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Unsurprisingly, of course, and inevitably, it’s by a global warmer. As a piece of scare-pessimism, “Raising My Child in a Doomed World” is quite unsurpassable. It was emoted/written by a {Roy} Scranton, author of a book on the same theme: </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>We’re Doomed. Now What? Essays on War and Climate Change</i>. He is a professor of Englis</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-style: inherit;">h literature, although I think it fair to claim that neither English nor literature should be thought complicit in Mr. Scranton’s fifteen-alarm brand of climate lugubriousness and pitiless despair.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Prof. Scranton is not a cheerful boyo. No one will don the party hat after reading his explanation that one logical conclusion is “… the only truly moral response to global climate change is to commit suicide. There is simply no more effective way to shrink your carbon footprint. Once you’re dead, you won’t use any more electricity, you won’t eat any more meat, you won’t burn any more gasoline, and you certainly won’t have any more children. If you really want to save the planet, you should die.” Well, break out the marshmallows, throw another log on the fire, and tune up the ukulele — we’re going to have a sing-song.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">A little math: within the set of All Campers, there is a subset of Happy Campers, among which Mr. Scranton is not to be located. Does he exude manic hopelessness and possess an imagination mesmerized by the thrill of apocalypticism? Does the Pope like bears he encounters in the woods? Try this passage: “Barring a miracle, the next 20 years are going to see increasingly chaotic systemic transformation in global climate patterns, unpredictable biological adaptation and a wild spectrum of human political and economic responses, including scapegoating and war. </span><i style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">After that, things will get worse.</i><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">” (Emphasis mine.)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">I cite these samples not to stir a Gadarene impulse among the Canadian population, nor indeed to stir the worthy subscribers of the peerless National Post, as they say on the web, to Read it All. That way madness lies. I merely wish to point out the brilliantly obvious point, which Mr. Scranton so indefatigably illustrates, that the strongest undercurrent in the great global-warming crusade is, and has always been, outrageous, hyperbolic and unhinged doom-saturated scare mongering of the millenarian kind. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">The most rabid in the eco fringe are fear merchants, different only in the formulation of the message from those lonely loonies in wild robes who used to station themselves outside baseball parks holding scraggly posters screaming “the end is near.” (c.f. An Inconvenient Truth.)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Environmentalists of the most desperate kind do not play the fear “card.” Their whole deck is fear. They savour catastrophe as a kitten laps milk. “We’re Doomed” is their prom theme. Of all the world’s political movements there is none so invested in the art of raising scares and projecting calamity — unless its doom prophets are heeded — as environmentalism. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">This scenario has advantages … for them. It allows for the grand assumption of the role of messiah, flattering for those who assume it —something else for the sane people looking on. And it supplies thereby an endless stream of immaculate self-righteousness, with the attendant arrogance of wanding away any counter-views. I am the Saviour. You are the Denier (or Satan).</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Now Mr. Scranton’s article to which I have alluded is such a pure syrup of perfect alarmism and global-warming fear projection that I should not be surprised to see it tweeted by our current minister of the environment and climate change with the tag #MustRead. Some will dare call it “science.” It is perfectly in accord with our minister’s blithe dismissals of all who think and see differently from her.</span><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">These are considerations to keep in mind when you read of Justin Trudeau’s latest bath in stagnant waters of rhetorical cliché. He’s gone for the weary “politics of fear” meme, so stale even the moths have stopped chewing on it. Lately, in the face of growing anger over his leadership, he’s taken to accusing “conservatives across the country (of) playing the fear card.” Nor does he limit it to local conservatives: he sees this as a global phenomenon: “I think one of the things that we’ve seen… they are playing not just here in Canada, but around the world a very dangerous game around the politics of fear, the politics of division … raising the kinds of anxieties…” etc. etc. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">A few months back, </span><a href="http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2018/04/17/trudeau-addresses-frances-national-assembly/" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(254, 210, 50); border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Radio-Canada reported</span></a><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> on Mr. Trudeau’s speech to France’s National Assembly: “With his trademark rhetorical flair (!) Trudeau began his address by talking about the fear and anxiety gripping working people around the globe, pushing the disenfranchised further into the hands of populist and xenophobic movements that threaten Western liberal democratic values.”</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Now, this is not a Cranton-esque level of doom projection, but there are at least two points about Mr. Trudeau’s recent fascination with levelling scare-mongering charges against his opponents. Maybe three.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">I’ll let the capital-c Conservatives speak for themselves. Yet I am willing to go on the record as noting that their leader Andrew Scheer is less “scary” than a Care Bear, and as far his as playing the “fear card” and “raising anxieties” he’s a total flop. Not one pulse has raced since he claimed the leadership.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Secondly, who’s scare mongering here? Why, the politician who is claiming that “liberal democracy” is under “threat” from his opponents.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Thirdly, and this is by far the most consequential: Mr. Trudeau is the foremost political leader in the world fully subscribed to the global-warming theory that all things are coming to an end — now! A movement that pulses with fear mongering, dances with dystopia, is fascinated by extinction and apocalypse, and elevates within its ranks such superb dark, witless visionaries as the author of We’re Doomed. Now What?</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Who’s playing the fear card?"</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>CHAPTER 37</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: #b45f06; font-family: inherit; font-size: large; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> When Prof. Scranton (see Chapter 36) writes that:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> <span style="color: red;">“…the only truly moral response to global climate change is <i>to commit suicide</i>. There is simply no more effective way to shrink your carbon footprint. Once you’re dead, you won’t use any more electricity, you won’t eat any more meat, you won’t burn any more gasoline, and you certainly won’t have any more children. If you really want to save the planet, you should die”</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> then why haven't the purveyors of climate change bolshevism done <i>just that: </i>put their 'money where their mouth is', and heroically commit suicide for Mother Gaia?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> These green charlatans, preaching and signalling their moral virtue, cannot abide by what their own science-fiction-based conceit ultimately demands: that they show their so-called 'virtue' through their own mortal sacrifice {...ie that THEY walk their talk...)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> But instead, these same green fascists project THEIR OWN demented 'sins' onto others. The same GreenFear-infected illness which Scranton peddles, has been alive and well in Niagara and in the rest of Ontario for years, where the population has been cudgeled relentlessly by the elitist green virtue-signalers and their media acolytes. Let's go back to story I wrote in 2010, to see that the nihilist green climate-change insanity which Scranton is spouting in 2018, has been regularly peddled for years:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Julie </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Greco</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> wrote in </span><a href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2866929" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">"Lighting up a green Christmas"</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> (St.</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Catharines</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"></span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Standard</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, Dec.2010):</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">"If the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Griswolds</span> of Vacation fame went green, their house might resemble the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Bloms</span>' during the holidays.<br />"Christmas is when we go crazy," says Andrew <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Blom</span>, who has spent countless hours over the past month transforming his front lawn at 41 Senator Dr. into a dazzling holiday wonderland.<br />About 10,000 lights take the shape of Christmas trees, wrapped presents, reindeer and snowmen, all programmed to blink to the beats of seasonal songs.<br />The beacon of light generated from the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Bloms</span>' postage stamp-sized lawn at the corner of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Macturnbull</span> Dr., makes it one of the neighbourhood's main attractions during the holidays.<br />"Last night, we had people dancing on the sidewalk in front of our house," said Andrew's wife Jamie.<br />At first glance, it might appear the family's spectacular light show is a drain on energy resources -- not to mention their hydro bill. But that's not the case.<br />Energy efficiency has been their focus for the past five years, thanks to their son Zack, now 14.<br />When Zack was in Grade 5 at Power Glen School, he became interested in environmental issues. One day, he came home from school and told his parents how they had discussed energy and waste in class.<br /><span style="color: #cc0000;">"My teacher said when my parents were born, people didn't really know what they were doing to the environment," he said.<br />His parents remember it a different way.<br />" 'Energy pigs' was the word he used," Andrew remembered with a chuckle.<br />"He told us we were personally responsible for the demise of the Earth and that we had to fix it."<br />That was a dramatic turning point for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Bloms</span>.</span><br />As owners of an energy business, they had always researched new, cutting-edge products and alternative energy sources such as solar and geothermal, but until then they hadn't practised what they preached at home.<br />"I was the type of person who never wanted to recycle. But since Zack came home that day, we're huge into it now," Jamie said.<br />Now the family has solar panels on their roof and their water is heated through solar power.<br />The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">Bloms</span>' shift to environmental awareness happened to coincide with their decision to get charged up about the holidays by going all-out with their light display.<br />"You wouldn't believe it but before, he was like the Grinch. He didn't want to do anything," said Jamie.<br />"I said, 'Is this what you want Zack to remember?' That's when he turned into this."<br />But Andrew didn't want to sacrifice his environmental consciousness for his <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">newfound</span> festive spirit. By opting for LED lights, his whole Christmas light display is powered by the same amount of energy it takes to run five 100-watt light bulbs.<br />"People always assume that our hydro bills must be out of control, but it's less than it was before," said Jamie.<br />"The only energy it really consumes is all the hours and hours he spends putting up the lights and programming the music -- human energy."<br />But the effort is worth seeing the faces of local children light up during the holidays, said Andrew.<br />Zack agreed.<br />"At first, I thought it was obnoxious. But after all the people who come to see it, I feel like we're helping them enjoy Christmas a little more."<br />The clock is ticking for St. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Catharines</span> residents interested in participating in the city's sustainability study, to draft a sustainability strategy in 2011. The deadline for filling out the online survey is Tuesday. To take the survey or for more information about the study, visit www.stcatharines.ca"</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">*</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Why didn't the Standard's reporter Greco bother to identify this apparently-heroic Power Glen "teacher" who was - and perhaps still is - propagandizing his/her own </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/04/reds-green-show-into-heart-of-darkness.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">green bolshevism</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> to impressionable fifth graders? </span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Apparently, neither the Standard's reporter nor editor had any concerns or questions about this teacher's methods. The entire point of the article was to peddle climate-change propaganda - and this is a typical example of what it looks like. Even a link to a "sustainability study" was oh-so-conveniently included in this one-sided story! How thoughtful. It's as if Greco was working not as a journalist, but as a fifth-columnist, a bought and paid for propagandist for the Liberal government. No 'journalism' or balance seen here - just a plain peddling of the GreenFear agenda.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Is this kind of </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> now officially part of Ontario's </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2008/05/inconvenient-gory-truth-fraudulent.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Liberal-approved greenshevik curriculum</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">? That and watching endless reruns of Al Gore's </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Inconvenient</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Climate Deceptions? Don't ask local Liberal </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">MPP</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Jim Bradley for an answer - </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">this is exactly</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> the kind of </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greensh!t</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> doomsday GreenF</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">ear-mongering</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> which Bradley and his Liberals encourage: see </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2009/05/shiny-new-hospital-same-old-monopolist.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Bradley's "greener ways to live" propaganda.</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Were the kiddies also given </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">recommendations</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> by their </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">ClimateFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> teacher on who their parents should vote for, as well?!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Yep - apparently </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Blom</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> is personally held responsible for helping save the Planet, because his parents were "energy pigs". And Obama was personally going to halt the 'rise of the oceans'! Praise be upon them.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> But isn't the use of thousands of lights - even if they are </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">LED's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> - </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">still offensive</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> to some dour </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2007/12/david-suzuki-dangerous-pest.html" style="color: #b67733;">Suzukiite</a></span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, somewhere? Degrees of perception, eh... or is it degrees of deception?</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Aren't suicide and sterilization the best methods for </span><span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">achieving</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevik</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> goal of </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2007/12/liberal-jim-bradley-greenliness-is-next.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">population control</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> in order to save the Earth from exploding/flooding/melting/burning?</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Someone - just</span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> go and ask</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberal MPP Jim Bradley to explain what the FLICK was being "taught" in his city's schools in 2005! Which approved Ontario provincial curriculum was this mysterious, un-named </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">PowerGlenGreenshevik</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> teacher using - the belief in </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2010/02/liberal-jim-sir-kyodiot-bradley-still.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Kyoto</a> <span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">and the </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2010/07/lets-examine-jim-bradleys-graphic.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">Mann-made</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> hockey stick graph?!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Scaring the shit out of children in Liberal Ontario might be fine for </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberals, but they are probably itching to do even more, like showing the latest United Nations 'educational video' where teachers </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"><span style="color: red;">BLOW UP STUDENTS who don't obey the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28">Greenshevik </span>Commandments</span></em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Yeah, that's right - maybe </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> isn't going far enough in scaring the kids to repent for their collective '</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-crimes' - maybe it's time </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Liberals now show the kids how it feels </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">to die for their parent's carbon sins</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">"Seriously??" you ask?</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Well, read for yourself Peter Foster's column "</span><a href="http://www.financialpost.com/climate+killers/3634488/story.html" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #b67733;">U.K.'s Climate Killers</a><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">" (National Post, Oct.7, 2010):</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">"The uproar over the “<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32">eco</span> snuff” video put out by British climate alarmist organization 10:10 is more than a minor embarrassment for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33">warmist</span> cause. Ten ten is not just any old bunch of hysterical radicals. It is virtually a propaganda arm of the U.K. government. Moreover, thousands of corporations, local councils and schools have signed on to the group’s Orwellian “pledge” to reduce carbon emissions by 10% by the end of 2010.<br /><br />The “satirical” video — which 10:10 posted last week but had to withdraw in the face of an angry backlash — consists of four segments in which, respectively, school kids, corporate employees, former French soccer ace David <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34">Ginola</span>, and X Files star Gillian Anderson are told that there is “no pressure” to get onside with the carbon reduction program. Then, those who refuse to sign up (including Messrs. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35">Ginola</span> and Anderson) are blown up, with a great deal of splattered blood. Side-splitting! Literally.<br /><br />When I first saw it, I thought it had to be a spoof of the insanities of environmental extremism. Who would believe that any green organization would cast themselves as potentially murderous <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36">eco</span>fascists? What message could one take from the movie but “Those who fail to agree with us will die,” even if we’ll just kill them tongue in exploding cheek. But the video, which was written by Richard Curtis, who penned Four Weddings and a Funeral, was <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37">comedically</span> dead serious.<br /><br />Ten ten was set up by Franny Armstrong, who found instant St. Joan of Noah’s Ark status last year after making an hysterical movie called The Age of Stupid. The film featured a lone archivist looking back from a <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38">dystopian</span> future and wondering how humanity could have gone so terribly, terribly wrong.<br /><br />Virtually the entire UN turned up for the film’s New York premiere. And since Ms. Armstrong’s message was not a million miles from the suicidal climate-change stance of the British Labour Party, the movie’s London debut was attended by a gaggle of politicians, including then environment minister and now opposition Labour party leader Ed <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39">Miliband</span>. “Red Ed” was ambushed by the film’s star, Pete <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40">Postlethwaite</span>, who threatened to march up to the gates of Buckingham Palace and give back his Order of the British Empire if new coal-fired plants <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41">weren</span>’t stopped.<br /><br />Abasing himself further in order (obviously successfully) to further his political career, Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42">Miliband</span> then agreed to “debate” Ms. Armstrong. The only problem was that they were both on the same side. Not to worry. Ms. Armstrong used the occasion to launch the 10:10 campaign.<br /><br />Since “10% by 2010” is the kind of target beloved of those who delight in moving in (and leading) intellectual flocks, the entire British Cabinet had soon signed on, along with a raft of corporations, soccer clubs (such as <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43">Tottheham</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44">Hotspur</span>, whose players appear in the movie) and miscellaneous trendies and publicity hounds. Since coming to power, Tory leader David Cameron’s new coalition government has also signed on. Presumably now he wishes it <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45">hadn</span>’t.<br /><br />The 10:10 organization issued an apology for the video. Sort of. “With climate change becoming increasingly threatening, and decreasingly talked about in the media, we wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines whilst making people laugh.”<br /><br />Make ’em chuckle all the way to the child psychologist.<br /><br />Ms. Armstrong was more combative. She told The Guardian (a powerful 10:10 supporter) “Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody’s existence on this planet? Clearly we don’t really think they should be blown up, that’s just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start?”<br /><br />A little amputating.<br /><br />Ms. Armstrong went on to provide her idea of perspective. “We ‘killed’ five people to make No Pressure — a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change.”<br /><br />Here was a wonderful example of Ms. Armstrong’s facility with numbers. I counted at least seven people who were offed in the movie. As for those 300,000, that’s a whopper manufactured by former UN secretary-general <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46">Kofi</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47">Annan</span>’s private <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48">NGO</span>, the Global Humanitarian Forum. In fact, there is no way of linking a single death to the impact of humans on the global climate.<br /><br />What seems to have been utterly exploded is 10:10’s credibility. The video was designed to coincide with a series of events at next Sunday’s (10/10/10) “Global Day of Doing.” These included “sumo wrestlers cycling to training in Tokyo.” But now major corporations such as Sony, and climate “prophets” such as Yale’s Bill <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49">McKibben</span>, are leaving the sinking 10:10 ship, and climate skeptics are having a well-deserved field day.<br /><br />According to Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50">McKibben</span>, another mystic numerologist who claims the world is doomed at any level of atmospheric carbon dioxide beyond 350 parts per million, the video “represents the kind of stupidity that really hurts our side, reinforcing in people’s minds a series of preconceived notions, not the least of which is that we’re out-of-control elitists.”<br /><br />Right on! But the problem is that free-floating <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51">moralistas</span> such as Ms. Armstrong have been inflated by the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_52">alarmism</span> peddled by the likes of Mr. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_53">McKibben</span>. Still, Ms. Armstrong did have some support. The child actor who played one of those spectacularly eviscerated declared: “I was very happy to get blown up to save the world.” " </span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #cc6600;">*</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Unreal: figurative </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-snuff films for the kiddies!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">'Blowing up' children to teach them a </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">climatalarmist</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> lesson! It's all fun!!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">This</em><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> is the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevism</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> of the </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_57" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">kyodiots</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, writ large.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">So, dear </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_58" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">sheeple</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, contact Jim the Liberal </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_59" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">Kyodiot</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Bradley, and </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_60" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">McGuinty's</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> education minister Leona Dombrowsky, with demands that this extreme </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_61" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-fascism be brought to Ontario immediately!</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">The </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_62" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_63" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">warmists</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> have no time for energy pigs anymore - killing off the non-green heathen is the new </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_64" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> tactic.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">The Power Glen </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_65" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">GreenFear</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> Prophet of Doom would love this, eh, what with the picking of victims based on </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_66" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">gaian</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_67" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">greenshevist</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;"> </span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_68" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">enviro</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">-</span><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_69" style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">moralism</span><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">, shaming and 'killing off' sinful students who don't worship at the Green Altar of Gore, Dion, Suzuki, Bradley, and Ban Ki-Moon.</span><br style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;" /><span style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">It's only a movie, eh... </span><em style="background-color: #f7f0e9; color: #3372b6;">for now...</em></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 38</span></b><br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<b><span style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Following up on the themes from Chapter 20, let's look across the border to New York State, and witness how the disgusting Democrat demagogue Chuck Schumer - <a href="https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/schumer-if-we-did-more-on-climate-change-wed-have-fewer-of-these-hurricanes/">just after Hurricane Michael made landfall in Florida (PJ Media Bridget Johnson) Oct.11, 2018</a> - used his Agenda 21 rhetoric to dole out great heaping dollops of GreenFear:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<i><span style="font-size: large;">"<span face=""open sans" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6;"> Amid daylight assessments of the toll inflicted on the southeast by Hurricane Michael, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor today that "if we did more on climate change, we’d have fewer of these hurricanes and other types of storms."</span></span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"Everyone knows that, except for a few. Why? Why won’t they admit the truth? Maybe there are two words that explain it: oil industry," he said.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Michael made landfall close to a Category 5 storm on Wednesday afternoon, ripping apart Florida panhandle buildings and severely damaging Tyndall Air Force Base.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Two deaths have been reported due to the hurricane, which inflicted heavy winds and rain across Georgia and the Carolinas this morning on its march up the coast. More than 900,000 homes and businesses were without power this morning.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"This year has seen huge a number of powerful storms and hurricanes buffet the Atlantic seaboard and the Gulf. Harvey, Irma, Maria, Florence, and now Michael have wrought severe damages. According to NOAA, 2017 was the most expensive year on record for disasters in the US. At some point, we have to acknowledge that the intensity of these storms is much greater than in past years and is a symptom of a changing climate," Schumer said. "Climate change is real, it is being driven by human activity, it is happening right now. These are facts; they are not in dispute. Our scientists know it, our businesses know it, the world knows it, and the American people know."</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"But too many senators on the other side of the aisle just put their head in the sand," he added. "It costs us more, and more, and more."</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Schumer cited a new UN report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that says there's currently a 12-year window to make “far-reaching and unprecedented changes” to avert dramatic effects of global warming.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"So while we are thinking about the people of Florida and Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina and everyone in Hurricane Michael’s path, let’s remember that we are running out of time to do something about climate change, and the kind of storms we are seeing now will only increase if this body continues to keep its head in the sand, ostrich like, and ignore the scientific realities," he added.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was asked at a Wednesday meeting of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee if climate change is a security threat to the homeland."We measure out rain storms now, the amount of rain by the foot, not by the inch," said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.). "We have parts of Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, even California where they -- they're on fire, they've been on fire earlier this year. Places bigger than my state, a big state I might add. And the extreme weather we've had, I think in the last 100 years, 33 Category 5 hurricanes in the whole Atlantic."</span></i></div>
<div class="pagebuilder-page" id="pagebuilder-page-1" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "open sans", sans-serif; overflow-wrap: break-word; position: relative;">
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"I think it's very serious. As you said, just in 2017 alone, 15 percent of the United States population was affected by either a hurricane or a forest fire. So the intensity, the changes in weather patterns, the changes in which the hazards manifest all require us to update everything we do," Nielsen replied.</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">She added that pre-mitigation grants "will really help to prepare areas, but we have to increase our modeling."</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"We're working much more closely with NOAA, working much more closely with the Department of Interior, USDA," Nielsen added. "We have to do more to anticipate and understand how these start to manifest."</span></i></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Let's ask if Cagey Climatologist Dave in Canada will agree with all this GreenFear mongering being shat out by Schumer - where are all those breathless Canadian media interviews, trying to get Cagey to agree with Schumer's climatalarmist shit?! </span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">By the way, where are all the interviews with Cagey regarding the<a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/un-global-warming-report-carries-life-or-death-warning-1.4125265"> latest (Oct 7, 2018) IPCC climatalarmist propaganda</a>?! Where's Cagey's official assessment of <i>that </i>GreenFear-laden document as it specifically relates to Canada?!?! (Note: this same phony Oct.2018 IPCC report was used by Canada's Liberals, such as MP Chris Bittle (See Chapter 43) to spread further climate-change lies. Turdo Liberals such as Bittle were using unsubstantiated IPCC reports to push political policies.) </span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Also, it was pathetic to hear Canadian radio hosts such as Bill Carroll - from whom we should expect MUCH more - interviewing Canada's Cagiest Climatologist (<a href="http://www.iheartradio.ca/580-cfra/listen-now-how-powerful-is-hurricane-michael-1.8487653">audio heard at IHeart Radio, 580AM</a> ...</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"> {...the link has since been mysteriously cancelled, I see! Apparently, now no trace remains of this interview. Seeing as Hurricane Michael hit landfall around noon (CDT) on Oct 10, 2018, then this interview was broadcast on Carroll's Oct.10 show, but possibly it was on his Oct.9 show. I recall that I was listening to this interview just<i> prior </i>to Michael making landfall, so I believe it was broadcast on Oct 10, 2018...}</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"> ...and in a 16 minute long interview, NEVER ONCE could Carroll bring himself to ask David Phillips if Hurricane Michael {...or Florence... or ANY hurricanes, for that matter} were a direct result of <i>man made climate change</i>.</span></span></div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #666666;">Bill Carroll</span><span style="color: #666666;"> </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">refused to ask</span><span style="color: #666666;"> </span><span style="color: #666666;">the question</span></i><span style="color: #666666;">. Shame</span><span style="color: #666666;">. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Was Bill Carroll 'muzzled' by someone, or did he self-censor? Was it a pre-condition of the interview that Canada's Cagiest Climatologist <i>could not be asked</i> certain questions by the host?</span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Was Hurricane Michael the result of what the IPCC had just finished fear-mongering about?? </span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Is that<i> NOT</i> A RELEVANT QUESTION??!!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Who best to explain this to Bill Carroll's loyal listeners, than Carroll himself digging down into the issue with David Phillips?? This is <i>exactly </i>what listeners trust and expect Carroll to do - cut through the bullsh!t. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Carroll had an enormous amount of time (...16 minutes is a generous amount of radio airtime)<i> and </i>a very timely, crucial window of opportunity at hand: Hurricane Florence and the IPCC report had just occurred recently, and Michael was just about to make landfall within hours - all relevant stuff. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">If there was <i>any</i> remaining main stream Canadian radio host who would have the balls, the creds, to ask David Phillips the hard - and completely timely, appropriate and relevant - questions, it would be Bill.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;">But instead, what we got - - sadly - - was just another tepid Cagey Two Step Climate Tango; it sounded just like any other typical Greenwashed Cagey drivel that we usually expect from the CBC, T</span><span style="font-size: large;">orStar, CTV, etc. </span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Canadian Liberals and NDP socialists completely believe the same kind of IPCC garbage which Demotard Schumer spouts - in this context, Carroll had a golden opportunity to dig into these issues, from a multitude of levels.</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">But, all we got was the same sad old Cagey Tango, sterile, sappy, and forgettable.</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> What a wasted opportunity.</span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Of course - as expected - Canadian media was chock full of Michael storm coverage, along with the usual attached GreenFear mongering, innuendo, and conflation to AGW. </span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: large;"> Interestingly, Global News published <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/4536471/hurricane-michael-florida-residents-destruction/">this Oct. 11, 2018 report</a> regarding Hurricane Michael</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;">[globalnews.ca/news/4536471/hurricane-michael-florida-residents-destruction] </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> But, if you happened to re-read this same story the next day (on Oct.12, 2018) you would have found that the original story had been changed and re-edited - and, that an interesting paragraph which had been in the Oct 11 version, was </span><i style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: x-large;">now gone</i><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">!! Readers who had only read the Oct.12 version would have no idea that there had been a previous version.</span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="newLineContentFilterParagraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 24px; overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Here is a screen-grab from the original Oct.11 version, which shows that an interesting disclaimer had been inserted into the original story:</span><span style="color: #666666;"> </span></span></div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguaKT3gozh19XkFhEeKQrwQbwG0phLBGXHKyzE6KHCcxWDE6rxnLwrigb5-xpiH1HuezYsfnYlvOAueVCZMGenJJuUyzyvpPJvb5Gj2RQumYkQSUkaMNgtsMoXhrwhz6rcXsR-tF0YZHA/s1600/GS+michael+global+warming+on+gloabal+news.JPG" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1003" data-original-width="1003" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguaKT3gozh19XkFhEeKQrwQbwG0phLBGXHKyzE6KHCcxWDE6rxnLwrigb5-xpiH1HuezYsfnYlvOAueVCZMGenJJuUyzyvpPJvb5Gj2RQumYkQSUkaMNgtsMoXhrwhz6rcXsR-tF0YZHA/s640/GS+michael+global+warming+on+gloabal+news.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #b45f06;"><i>above:</i> click on photo to enlarge</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> <span style="color: #3d85c6;">On the next day, on Oct.12, if you read the same Global News story, the story had been changed and updated, and the disclaimer (seen outlined in red above, in the original Oct 11, 2018 screen grab) was <i>removed.</i></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> The original Oct.11, 2018 story had included this disclaimer:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #eeeeee;"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"> "<i>The storm is likely to fire up the debate over global warming. Scientists say global warming is responsible for more intense and more frequent extreme weather...but without further extensive study, they cannot directly link a single weather event to the changing climate".</i></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: large;"> <span style="color: #3d85c6;">Whaaaaat?? </span></span><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><i style="font-size: x-large;">"Scientists say</i><span style="font-size: large;">" - - which ones say this??</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">"<i>Cannot directly link"</i>?? Which ones cannot link??</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> But that's<i> EXACTLY </i>what that Cuomo did a day later - using the storm to peddle his fake climate fantasies.</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> This is what every Liberal in Canada has also been doing, for years, including Turdo and Climate Barbie.There is never a disclaimer when a Liberal douche-bag spouts GreenFear - they reiterate the false narrative, the lie, that "it's all settled" - so why bother asking for scientific links!!?</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> {'We gotta DO something' squawks a deranged Cuomo 'We gotta do <i>something; </i>we gotta do it <i>now' </i>blablabla... 'we're past the tipping point'... squaaawk... blabla}</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Yet (ever so briefly) Global News printed a heresy, noting that the links between climate rhetoric and climate science is NOT settled.</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Then, it was gone!!!!</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Will Global ever provide this disclaimer again, on every other 'climate change' story they print? They should.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">This was a giant faux-pas by Global to include such an observation in a story; it is <i>NOT</i> what the leftist GreenFear-pushing MSM wants ANY story to even mention! </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;">So, why did Global insert this paragraph into their original story - and why, then, did Global later remove this paragraph? </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;">You won't see this kind of bold caveat being mentioned on Bell Media's CTV, or the socialist Torstar empire, or on the CBC... they believe and preach that "<i>it's all settled</i>", that the links are already well established, and that it is heresy to ask questions or challenge their green religion.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> For example, <i>don't ask</i> if Climate Barbie is lying about climate change causing polar bear extinction; we are just supposed to blindly believe that what Climate Barbie and her Climate Cabal decant, is pure gospel. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;">Its '</span><i style="font-size: x-large;">all settled</i><span style="font-size: large;">' - so we are told - that polar bears are going extinct in Canada, right?! Climate Barbie thinks so... so then, it's gotta be true! {Do NOT ask for verification of any Liberal lies, either!!}</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">SO, NOW LET'S DIG DEEPER INTO THIS ISSUE: </span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Having read Global's above 'warning / disclaimer' that scientists "</span><i style="background-color: #eeeeee; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;">cannot directly link a single weather event to the changing climate...</span></i><span style="font-size: large;">"<span style="color: #3d85c6;"> {...</span></span><span style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">which Global published on Oct 11, 2018 , and then removed a day later!}...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">...let's compare this to a <i>contradictory meme</i> which</span> <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/04/world/climate-change-deadly-summer-wxc-intl/index.html">CNN propagandist Angela Dewan had written 2 months earlier, on Aug.5, 2018</a></span><span style="font-size: large;">:</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">"...Extreme heat waves are frequently cited as one of the most direct effects of man-made climate change.</span><br /><span style="color: #b45f06;">Remarkably, </span><span style="color: #cc0000;">scientists can now work out in just a matter of days how much human-induced climate change has had to do with a particular weather event, </span><span style="color: #b45f06;">using a combination of observation, historical data and current information from weather stations...</span><br /><span style="color: #b45f06;">Scientists have been able to use this kind of modeling for more than a decade, but improved technology now allows them to do it nearly in real time, letting people understand the links between what they are seeing and climate change.</span><br /><span style="color: #b45f06;">Despite the deadly summer, overwhelming evidence that humans are altering the planet, and ever-improving science that </span><span style="color: #cc0000;">links specific weather events to global warming</span><span style="color: #b45f06;">, the international politics around the issue of climate change are in disarray. And there are alarming signs that the planet may be in worse shape than ever before..."</span></i></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #b45f06;"><br /></span></i></span>
<br />
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: #fefefe; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: cnn, "helvetica neue", helvetica, arial, utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">So, what we see, is that CNN's Aug.5, 2018 narrative (claiming scientists can now link a specific weather event to man-made climate change) was initially completely contradicted by Global's Oct.11, 2018 'disclaimer' (that scientists <i>cannot</i> link a specific event to man-made climate change)... and that</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> suddenly, on Oct 12, 2018, Global's 'disclaimer' vanished'!!</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: cnn, "helvetica neue", helvetica, arial, utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Since neither Global nor CNN are obligated to provide truth in their stories, THIS is the kind of FAKE NEWS which we are left with. </span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Global didn't explain why they changed their story! Was Global's disclaimer not valid? Did Global suddenly change their mind, and just go with the narrative built by CNN? </span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Was this a <i>scientifically</i> or a <i>politically </i>motivated media-change, on the subject of climate-change?!!!!!!!!!!!!</span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> And - in all this purposeful confusion - we STILL note, that Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, David Phillips, was NOT called upon by Canada's Global network, to comment on this quite relevant issue!!</span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: cnn, "helvetica neue", helvetica, arial, utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">{YEP - the real headline here: "GLOBAL MUZZLES CLIMATE SCIENTIST"}</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: cnn, "helvetica neue", helvetica, arial, utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Global refused to have David Phillips explain <i>why Global's disclaimer was removed</i> .</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: CNN, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> Was Global's disclaimer </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">[t</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">hat a specific weather event <i><span style="color: #b45f06;">cannot</span></i> be directly linked to man-made climate change]</span><span style="color: #262626;"> </span></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">actually correct?</span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: cnn, "helvetica neue", helvetica, arial, utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2rem; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> Or was Global's disclaimer <i>not </i>correct (and this was the reason why it was removed the next day??) ...which leads to more pesky questions: 'hey Global, why did you print lies from 'climate-change deniers'... ya see how it works?? 'Hey Global: were ya lying then, or iz ya lyin' now?'; 'Global: News you can't trust'; 'Global: for those times ya don't want any news at all'; 'Global: your trusted source of misinformation'...)</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> You see the problem here is that Canada's Cagiest Climatologist cannot prove CNN's claims [that a specific weather event can be directly linked to man-made climate change].</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">He <i>would have done so</i> by now (...hence this blogpost !! He's been asked, but: he REFUSES!) A</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">s documented here, Cagey Dave is, well... <i>cagey </i>about making these claims, and so, Cagey isn't much help at this point to openly assist Global's propaganda efforts. </span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> These propaganda peddlers don't want to be caught in an outright lie, so, it's better just to</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;">keep </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"><i>sowing the confusion; </i>to keep peddling the tired old<i> it's-all-settled lie. </i>Let's just think about this for a moment: they don't want to be caught in an lie, BUT THEY DO IT ANYWAY - how nefarious is that?</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;">We are left with the intended, GreenFear-approved impression that Hurricane Michael - and therefore, that every hurricane, ever - were <i>all caused by man.</i></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> Propagating this narrative</span><span style="color: #b45f06;"> <i>as if</i> it was true</span><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> keeps Cagey and Global in business.</span></span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> If Global ACTUALLY WANTED to get at the truth, GLOBAL would have stuck with their initial disclaimer, and invited Climatologist David Phillips to show them <i>how </i>and <i>why</i> their disclaimer was incorrect {...y'see how UNCOMFORTABLE <i>that </i>would be for these two climate-tango dancers?! They are in fact, both on the same GreenFear-infected page here: they <i>don't want </i>to prove anything, and they <i>don't have</i> to prove anything: all they have to do is repeat the GreenFear lie.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">That initial disclaimer was kryptonite to BOTH Cagey and Global's agendas, hence its quick execution.</span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> Global could have asked David Phillips (but they <i>didn't)</i> to demonstrate exactly why and how Global's disclaimer was (supposedly) incorrect... and let's not forget that by censoring Cagey, Global ALSO did not have to ask Cagey to prove the <i>opposite</i> view of Global's disclaimer - ie, the one matching what CNN had espoused 2 months earlier!!) </span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #262626; font-size: large;">David Phillips would have to explain to Global <i>how </i>- as CNN claims - a scientist such as himself ALREADY KNOWS that <i>every</i></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><i> specific weather event</i> (such as in this case, Hurricane Michael) is now scientifically <i>linked to man-made climate change</i>.</span></span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;"> In order to explain this, Environment Canada's federal employee David Phillips would have to lie.</span></div>
<div class="zn-body__paragraph" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.66667; margin: 0px auto 15px; max-width: 660px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06;"><b><span style="color: #e69138;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 39 </span></span></b></span><br />
<span style="color: #b45f06;"><b><span style="color: #e69138;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">CLIMATE BARBIE'S POLAR BEAR </span></span></b><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"><b>PROPAGANDA <span style="color: #e69138;"> </span></b></span></span><br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #e69138; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Joseph Brean's <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/scientists-should-stop-using-misleading-images-of-polar-bears-and-droughts-to-raise-awareness-of-climate-change-psychologists-say#comments-area">Oct.9, 2018 National Post article</a> clearly outlines how both Canada's Climate Barbie Catherine McKenna and U.S. conman Al Gore LIED about polar bears and climate change. McKenna is Canada's Minister of Climate Change Propaganda! </span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">".<i>..Last year, for example, when a picture of an emaciated polar bear circulated on the internet, Catherine McKenna, Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change, wrote in a tweet: “THIS is what climate change looks like”</i></span><span style="background-color: white;">, Brean reported.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">In her Dec.9, 2017 tweet, <a href="https://twitter.com/cathmckenna/status/939601028567191553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E939601028567191553&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnationalpost.com%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Fscientists-should-stop-using-misleading-images-of-polar-bears-and-droughts-to-raise-awareness-of-climate-change-psychologists-say">Canada's Climate Barbie also wrote </a>that "</span><span face=""helvetica" , "roboto" , "segoe ui" , "calibri" , sans-serif" style="color: #1c2022; white-space: pre-wrap;"><i style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Climate change is real. As are its impacts. Time to stand up for our polar bears and our planet.</i><span style="background-color: white;">"</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">The photo which Climate Barbie cited, was a National Geographic image of what appeared to be a thin white bear.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">The National Geographic photo came with this attached caption: </span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"<i>When scientists say bears are going extinct, I want people to realize what it looks like" says photographer, Paul Nicklen</i>".</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Yet, there was no evidence that this photo of this bear had ANYTHING at all actually to do with AGW, or whether the bear was "going extinct".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">The photographer provided no evidence except his personal bias - he just wanted people to '<i>know' something</i>, um, ya know, like, ah, whatever he believed they oughtta know, without really knowin' dat much 'bout it... but, it's gotta be true cuz da National Geographic pretended it's true, and dat's what da photographer wanted us ta know.... bla bla bla... </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">So, Canada's Climate Barbie - infected with climate-change delusions and too stupid to understand the manipulative lie staring her in the face (it reinforced her already-skewed biases) - swallowed this National Geographic deception about this bear, and furthermore, this propagandizing Liberal fool then <i>conflated the photo to CLIMATE CHANGE!!</i></span></span><br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">...hey, Paul Nicklen and Ms. McKenna:</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">This is what CLIMATE CHANGE PROPAGANDA looks like.!! ...and what climate-change propagandists look like.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Brean continues:</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">"In reality, it was just what a sick old bear looks like. “It’s far more likely that it is starving due to health issues,” polar bear biologist Andrew Derocher <a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/what-everybody-got-wrong-about-that-viral-video-of-a-starving-polar-bear" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(254, 210, 50); border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">told the National Post</a>. Another scientist observed that polar bears have no predators, so when they die, it is usually of starvation.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">The trouble is that, if a sick bear is the narrative face of climate change, then a healthy bear can just as easily be the face of denial.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">It was the same old story a decade ago, when a photo by Amanda Byrd of Mushing Magazine went viral. It was on newspapers around the world, on the day the United Nations issued a major climate change report.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">The photo, taken in summer from Canada’s flagship icebreaker the Louis S. St-Laurent, <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-433170/Global-warming-sees-polar-bears-stranded-melting-ice.html" rel="noopener" style="border-bottom: 2px solid rgb(254, 210, 50); border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">shows two polar bears on a melting ice floe</a> in the Beaufort Sea, north of Barrow, Alaska. {Yes: the Daily Mail was spreading the phony polar bear lie since Feb.1, <i>2007</i>!!!}</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">“Their habitat is melting… beautiful animals, literally being forced off the planet,” said former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore in a presentation of his film An Inconvenient Truth, with the photo on the screen behind him. “They’re in trouble, got nowhere else to go.”</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">This was not even close to true.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">“It’s just too cute to be true,” a spokesperson for Environment Canada said at the time. “You have to keep in mind that the bears are not in danger at all. It was, if you will, their playground for 15 minutes, you know what I mean?”</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Al Gore LIED about polar bears - ya know what I mean?!</span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Gore's been lying about it for over a decade!!</span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif">Gore's lies have been repeated and amplified - without question - for years, becoming ingrained as a propagandized "truth", when in fact, it was a lie pulled out of Al Gore's giant ass.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif">Gore's false narrative; his deceptive 'convenient lie'; his mythical meme, continued to infect millions of sheeple into the future - eventually infecting Canada's vacuous Climate Barbie.</span></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Catherine McKenna LIED about polar bears - - ya know what this means??</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It means that this Liberal hack has NO credibility.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Canada's Environment ministry had already stated a decade ago that the "</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">bears are not in danger at all". </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Let's remember that now, climate liar McKenna is </span><span style="font-size: large;">the Environment Minister - so it's not as if she didn't know about her own ministry's previous reaction to the polar bear lie - that the <i>bears were not in danger!</i>!! </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So Climate Barbie, as a good Liberal, ignored this and continued her lie anyway, in 2017, </span><i style="font-size: x-large;">as if</i><span style="font-size: large;"> it were still true! </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Margaret Wente also wrote about this fake polar bear deception in <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/is-fake-news-okay-if-the-cause-is-good/article37290997/">the Dec.11, 2017 Globe and Mail</a>:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">"...<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">All of our team was in tears," team member Cristina Mittermeier</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><a href="http://%20is%20we%20hear%20from%20scientists%20that%20in%20the%20next%20hundred%20to%20150%20years%20we%27re%20going%20to%20lose%20polar%20bears%20%E2%80%94%20they%27re%20going%20to%20go%20extinct%20because%20of%20climate%20change.%20and%20when%20they%20go%20extinct%20they%27re%20going%20to%20starve%2C%20and%20we%20want%20the%20world%20to%20see%20what%20starvation%20of%20a%20majestic%20animal%20like%20this%20looks%20like./" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(25, 25, 25); box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: inherit;" title="">told</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">the CBC's</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif; line-height: inherit;">As It Happens</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">. "We hear from scientists that in the next 100 to 150 years, we're going to lose polar bears …We want the world to see what starvation of a majestic animal like this looks like." Only later, when pressed, did she admit that it was "impossible to tell" why the animal was dying. That shocking video is a classic example of fake news – a phenomenon that's depressingly common in the environmental business, even at a leading brand such as National Geographic. So what if it isn't true? If it's all for a good cause, the facts don't matter. "The point is that it was starving," explained Ms. Mittermeier. "As we lose the ice in the Arctic, polar bears will starve."</span></span><br />
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;">Well, maybe. But even concerned scientists agree that one emaciated bear is not evidence of climate change. "It's far more likely that it is starving due to health issues," tweeted Arctic wildlife biologist Jeff Higdon. As apex predators, polar bears live long enough to get old and sick, just as people do. Starving polar bears are the stuff of periodic propaganda shots. In 2015, another polar bear in Norway became the temporary <a href="http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2015/09/08/international-action-plan-to-save-the-polar-bear/" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(25, 25, 25); box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" title="">poster animal</a> for global warming, and tugged heartstrings around the world. Not so fast, said Ian Stirling of the University of Alberta. "A difficulty hunting could be involved," <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-friday-edition-1.4439608/all-of-our-team-was-in-tears-video-shows-polar-bear-starving-in-the-north-1.4439616" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(25, 25, 25); box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: inherit; text-decoration-line: none;" title="">he said</a>. "I don't think you can tie that one to starvation because of lack of sea ice," he said.</span></div>
<div class="u-wrapper pb-feature pb-layout-item pb-f-article-asf-body-top" id="" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #595959; font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; line-height: inherit;">
</div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">But never mind. The news media can't resist. In this case at least one news outlet embellished the story by</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/science/heartbreaking-video-starving-polar-bear-11662427" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(25, 25, 25); box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: inherit;" title="">telling us</a><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">that the bear "struggles to find food across a barren landscape that should be covered in ice." That's ridiculous. The bear is on the land. It is summer. That's what the tundra looks like in the summer.</span>"</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">Where's David Phillips, Canada's Scien-taining</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif"> Climatologist, to explain all this?! Hey Dave: are Canada's polar bears starving and becoming extinct due to climate change - - as Liberal Climate Clown Barbie says?! What: it's not Cagey's job to explain - just to entertain, propagandize, spout homey homilies and innuendo...???!! Who's suppressing Cagey Dave now??!! Where is Canada's SENIOR Climatologist, when it comes to challenging the lies propagated by his Liberal masters??!! </span></span><i style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Oh, what would Cagey's pal Phil Chadwick say now</span></i><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">...?!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">The above observations about the fakery of the AGW-infected main stream media are - once again - demonstrated in <a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/mammal-species-extinct-climate-change-evolution-738469/">this Oct.16, 2018 Rolling Stone climate-change propaganda</a>, which (like clockwork!) used an image of a polar bear swimming in water to link its GreenFear-mongering to climate change! The tag under the deceptive polar bear photo read: </span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">"</span></span><span face=""graphik" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-weight: 600;">It’s going to take mammals at least three to five million years to recover from the damage humans are doing to the planet" The credited photographer was</span><b><span face=""graphik" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"> J</span><span face=""graphik" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">IM LO SCALZO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock".</span><span face=""graphik" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #6f6f6f;"> </span></b><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">So, Al Gore's lies continue unabated, amplified by media brands such as National Geographic and Rolling Stone who happily propagate the hoax. Why was this image of a polar bear used by Rolling Stone? Well: simply to propagate GreenFear lies. That's it. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">And it should also be noted that this Rolling Stone article was falsely presented by Google as "science" (!!) in its news feed - which is another lie compounding the original lie. This is how Al Gore's lies are amplified and propagated. This was a science fiction story - not 'news' and certainly not 'science'.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">*</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">CNN - America's all-round propaganda-peddler - was also publishing the same kind of fake news, pretending it's somehow 'scientific', linking 'climate change and polar bears', written by <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/04/world/climate-change-deadly-summer-wxc-intl/index.html">CNN propagandist Angela Dewan on Aug.4, 2018</a>: "</span></span><span style="background-color: #fefefe;"><i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;">...Climate change is here and is affecting the entire globe -- not just the polar bears or tiny islands vulnerable to rising sea levels -- scientists say. It is on the doorsteps of everyday Americans, Europeans and Asians, and the best evidence shows it will get much worse...</span></i></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">" GreenFear propagandist Dewan just spouts innuendo and false causality, spreading fear and climatalarmism.</span><br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">On Nov. 22, 2018, on its nightly national news tv broadcast, Bell Media's CTV network continued spewing more of its GreenFear-mongering, in a blatantly biased story hosted by the should-be-embarrassed Lisa LaFlamme and propagandist Vanessa Lee.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Again, Bell Media and their CTV network used deceptions - including showing a montage of images - even, yep, you guessed it - of a polar bear walking on a watery ice floe, to shill for climate-change bolshevism. This entire report was fake news - plain propaganda - which was crassly presented as 'journalism'. It was a lie... like the excrement shown by CNN, Rolling Stone, Forbes, CBC, TVO, and <i>many </i>others.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">(Note: these media propagandists don't have to prove AGW: their role is just to SPREAD the lies, to repeat them and to amplify them. No 'journalism is needed - or wanted! - here.) </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Bell Media's laughably pathetic one sided propaganda (it was NOT news, nor was it journalism) basically shilled for the positions spouted by lobbyists Environmental Defense and by Turdo and Climate Barbie, meant to provide political 'legitimizing' cover in support of the upcoming Paris climate 'talks' - and naturally, also to attack Trump in the process. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Using the typical deceptive meme of showing imagery of polar bears and water and steam and ice walls shearing into water, CTV, LaFlamme and Vanessa Lee basically indicted "the oil and gas sector" for causing the images which they had just shown!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">This was a COMPLETE PIECE OF GARBAGE! Laflamme and Bell Media/ CTV shat out a CLASSIC piece of GreenFear fascism.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">*</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">On the nightly tv news broadcast, Apr.1 2019, CTV, Bell Media, Lisa Laflamme and Jill Macyshon AGAIN vomited out shat more Turdo-friendly climate-change propaganda, again using the discredited and deceptive imagery of polar bears to fraudulently link them to "climate-change"!! (also see Chapter 18)</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">*</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">On Dec.2, 2018, WNED tv replayed a tired old "Globe Trekker" travel segment on their 'create' series, where host <a href="http://www.pilotguides.com/tv-shows/globe-trekker/series-04/norway/">Ian Wright explores Norway.</a> We see Wright on the ship "Stockholm", searching for polar bears up in Spitzbergen. We see Wright speaking with some female 'researcher' on the ship, who basically tells him that polar bears are being endangered by man, because man causes climate change. That is taken at face value by the host, <i>no questions asked;</i> and, WNED and producers WNET also expect - still, in 2018! - that their tv audiences ought to continue swallowing that as well.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">{And the advertiser underwriting this segment was none other than car manufacturer Subaru - a company which <i>relies on cold weather </i>for its reason d'etre. Shame on Subaru for sponsoring climate-change propaganda.}</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">* </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Despite the fact that the polar bear deception has been clearly revealed, it still doesn't stop the Green Fascists from utilizing their propaganda. The <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/12/03/in-the-blink-of-an-eye-a-hunt-for-oil-threatens-pristine-alaska.html">Toronto Star (Dec.3, 2018)</a> blithely continued to deceptively use the image of a polar bear to promote a pile of Trump-hating, anti-oil GreenFear propaganda slime - written by New York Slimes '<strike>reporters</strike>' (!) Henry Fountain and Steve Eder.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Seeing as the Toronto Star - a Canadian leftist propaganda outlet - devoted a lot of column-space to this American-sourced Trump-hate, why didn't the Toronto Star provide ANY Canadian perspective to this story?! Funny: NO comments from any Canadian Turdoite, nor from Canada's Climatology King, Cagey David Phillips.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">You'd think Cagey Dave would have something to say about how Canada's man-made climate is killing polar bears... as Canada's Climate Barbie insists it is!!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">(Real headline: </span></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">TORONTO STAR MUZZLES CANADIAN CLIMATE SCIENTIST)</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">* </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif">Forbes also keeps using green-fascist </span><a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2018/12/02/4-ways-to-bet-on-climate-changes-291b-economic-destruction/#3da70e81ff5c" style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Polar Bear Propaganda in this Dec.2, 2018 </a><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif">piece by Peter Cohan, who - below a meant-to-GreenFear-monger photo of a polar bear! - tells us</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> that </span></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">climate change is "<i>the rise in the earth’s temperature <span style="color: #cc0000;">caused by people</span> whose actions increase the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere"</i>.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">There ya go... the weather AND the climate is man-made, and has never changed since there <i>was</i> an earth OR a universe... Such smugness, such facile delusion, such self-centered cognitive impairment, such narcissism...</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">it beggars belief.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">* </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">On Dec.3, 2018, the CBC National nightly tv newscast had to keep up with the polar-bear/climate-change hoax, airing an 'indepth' segment on polar bears, where host Ian Hanomansing ominously stated without evidence that polar bears are starving in Churchill, Manitoba (as if it was all due to 'climate-change'). This while making the locals look bad for wanting to shoot polar bears which attack them. Typical perverted CBC leftist propaganda.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">*</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">The CBC National nightly news broadcast, on June 19, 2019, once again spread lies about polar bears. (It's not that these people can't learn: they don't care - they repeat their GreenFear lies without stop.This time, CBC liar Andrew Chang was babbling about polar bears (...in Russia, no less..!) and casually linked them to those in Canada and to unspecified climate change! Yep, just like that - Chang just took a shit on the CBC, he reported no facts just GreenFear-mongered and walked away, leaving his green stink festering on CBC's viewers screens. He got his CBC paycheque for lying and calling it news.THIS is what fake climate change 'news' looks like - it's all imagery and innuendo, peddled by presstitutes willing and eager to get paid for shilling propaganda. Clearly, Chang was c*ck-holstering for Turdo, seeing as the CBC in June 2019 began actively campaigning to support Liberal policy in advance of the fall federal election. Spreading lies about polar bears and climate change is just part of the CBC's multi-million-dollar campaign to re-elect the turd Justin and Climate Clown Catherine.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">*</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">On June 20, 2019, the CBC (...let's remember, the CBC has started its ground game GreenFear campaign to re-elect Turdo) once again displayed their false meme of a polar bear, this time on their midday tv newscast with some bald headed CBC git 'interviewing' a Waterloo university employee of some kind, Blair Feltmate, about 'climate change'. Feltmate, a GreenFear-monger, wasn't even talking about polar bears - but that didn't stop the climate liars at the CBC from displaying their deceptive polar bear trigger imagery during the 'interview'!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">And what a laugh this interview was - the CBC's baldy just stood there as Feltmate went on and on about saving the planet by telling people to go camping in the summer and to use LEDs in their house. This CBC dog-and-pony GreenFear Bolshevik act was nothing but propaganda.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">Feltmate has recently popped up all over the CBC (...or should we say, Feltmate has pooped all over the CBC..?) espousing his brand of GreenFear-mongering.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">It's funny how Feltmate shows up with the host baldy on CBC, on Jun 20, 2019, yet Baldy DID NOT bother to mention that the CBC had to apologize for reporting inaccurate climate-change fear-mongering pooped out previously by Feltmate on the CBC, as had been reported by Terence Corcoran in the <a href="https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-cbc-admits-it-wrongly-reported-hyped-up-insurance-climate-risks">Feb.1, 2019 National Post</a>:</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: white;">"</span></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">...Insurance Bureau of Canada’s decades-long campaign to raise alarms about the ravages of floods continued last week with an appearance by Blair Feltmate, a favourite star climate-change witness for the biggest insurers, at the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority’s annual meeting. Feltmate heads the industry-funded Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation at Waterloo University, which claims climate change has triggered a surge in flood events in recent years. As Feltmate put it during his </span><a href="https://www.barrietoday.com/local-news/flooding-severe-weather-the-new-normal-thanks-to-climate-change-doctor-1218731?utm_source=orilliamatters.com&utm_campaign=orilliamatters.com&utm_medium=referral" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(46, 78, 191); border-bottom-style: solid; border-image: initial; border-left-color: initial; border-left-style: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-top-style: initial; border-width: 0px 0px 2px; box-sizing: inherit; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;">comments</a><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"> at the meeting: “The elephant in the room, from a climate-change perspective, is… too much water in the wrong places</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">”</span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">.</span></span><br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">Not quite. The real elephant sharing the room with Feltmate turned out to be a detailed report from Guy Gendron, a CBC/Radio Canada International ombudsman, outlining how such distorted flood claims led the news network to publish stories last fall that contained “inaccurate and irrelevant” information.</span></span><br />
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">At the time, last September, Feltmate was interviewed by the CBC’s English-language Radio Canada International arm, promoting the insurance industry’s sensational new report that claimed bad weather and flood events are soaring due to climate change. Weather that used to happen every 40 to 100 years is now occurring every six years, the industry has said, and the only way counter the threat is to introduce a national “green infrastructure” program.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">Robert Muir, an Ontario municipal engineer and member of the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers, complained to the CBC ombudsman, pointing to flaws in Feltmate’s and the insurance lobby group’s claims. He alleged that the CBC report was misrepresenting science and insurance risks.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">In his review of Muir’s complaint, the ombudsman delivered a <a href="http://www.ombudsman.cbc.radio-canada.ca/fr/revision-des-plaintes/2019/refus-admettre-erreur/" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(46, 78, 191); border-bottom-style: solid; border-image: initial; border-left-color: initial; border-left-style: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-top-style: initial; border-width: 0px 0px 2px; box-sizing: inherit; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;">scathing critique</a> of the CBC coverage on its Radio Canada International site, saying that the CBC report had “failed to comply with journalistic standards” in assessing and reporting on the industry’s claims.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">On Wednesday, the CBC <a href="http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/01/30/how-to-mitigate-the-effects-and-flood-damage-from-climate-change/" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(46, 78, 191); border-bottom-style: solid; border-image: initial; border-left-color: initial; border-left-style: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-top-style: initial; border-width: 0px 0px 2px; box-sizing: inherit; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;">published</a> corrections to its reports. “The ombudsman,” said the CBC correction, “has ruled in favour of the complainant. Certain statements relating to rainfall amounts and the so-called 100-year events deemed to be inaccurate or irrelevant to the story have been removed and/or replaced. Information from Environment Canada has been added to indicate their statistics show no increase in rainfall or extreme rain events beyond ‘normal’ variations … These changes to the original story have been made on Jan. 29, 2019 to comply with the ombudsman’s decision.”</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; background-color: white; border: 0px; box-sizing: inherit; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #783f04; font-size: large;">There are many angles to the ombudsman’s report. The ombudsman makes it clear that he is not passing judgment on the fundamental accuracy of any of the claims. His issue is with the CBC’s failure to report the other side of the story..."</span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">Funny how the fake-news CBC (shilling for Turdo) eagerly goes back to the same hack for MORE green poopaganda! </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">And, again, there was <i>still</i> no "<i>other side of the story</i>" on the biased CBC, during Feltmate's June 20, 2019 appearance!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Even an Ombudsman's report doesn't make the CBC's caught-in-the-act climate-change-deceivers change their ways.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">After all, the CBC is a propaganda outlet, not a news organization.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"> On June 20, 2019, John Oakley, on his Toronto radio show, was interviewing some Green party hopeful hack from Newfoundland (some CODCO alumnus who apparently is a comedic climate-change expert) who tried to claim that <i>both</i></span></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> "climate-change" </span><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">and</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> "global warming" </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">(wow: they're... um... apparently </span><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">different</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"> in Newfoundland.... who knew?!) </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">cause</span></i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #cc0000;"> autism</span></i>. Yep: it's just plain insane climate-fascism out there for all to see. Comedy genius? Or fu*kin' nutbar??</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Funny - realllllly funny - thing is, that this "comedian" / medical doctor of autism, this "brilliant satirist", was by Sept.21 in hot water for performing a black face act - <i>ON CBC,</i> of all places. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Yes - the CBC <i>allowed</i> this programming (Hey Andrew Chang, hey Katie Simpson, hey Rosemary Barton, hey Petah Mansbridge, hey Suhanna Marchand.... any one of you creeps gonna "investigate" <i>YOUR OWN fake-virtue-signalling </i>employer and it's ingrained biases??!! bwahahah </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> And the green succubus Elizabeth May - who spent a lot of time excoriating Turdo's blackfacing - could care less about HER OWN candidates doin' the same thing!! As CTV reported on May 21, 2019:</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> "</span><span face=", "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #4a4a4a; font-size: 18px;">As for a high-profile candidate running for the Greens in Newfoundland and Labrador who exposed his own blackface skeleton the previous day, May seemed to be much more forgiving.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #4a4a4a; font-family: CTVSans-Regular, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 18px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Greg Malone, who is running the riding of Avalon, said on Friday that he coloured his skin to play Mahatma Gandhi in a sketch broadcast on the CBC comedy series CODCO, which ran in the 1980s and '90s. He discussed it in a report on the CBC website, in which he said white people need to do a better job of putting themselves in the shoes of visible minorities.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #4a4a4a; font-family: CTVSans-Regular, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 18px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
May said she applauded Malone for coming forward.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #4a4a4a; font-family: CTVSans-Regular, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; margin-bottom: 18px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
"Greg Malone is a brilliant comic and satirist and actor, and quite well respected. And he came forward. The blackface activity in which he engaged was broadcast on the CBC. So he regrets it. It was some many, many, many years ago," said May.</div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span face=", "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #4a4a4a; font-size: 18px;">"I am grateful of having someone of his character and integrity running for the Green Party of Canada in Avalon."</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">" </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Yep: Green fascist party members have 'character and integrity'. Just like every Liberal candidate who supports their rascist Crime Minister all have integrity and character. No one asked to resign - because they are all all climate change fascists. This overrides their inconsequential gaffes. They are hunting the big prize; and their fake virtue signalling has been shown to be a hoax as well. Turdo had previously fired candidates who had essentially not even done anything wrong. Yet Turdo remains as PM. And if the buck stops with the leader, May should now resign as well. Walk the walk, you climate-change lying P'sOS. They'd be screaming their lungs out demanding Scheer resign IF this had happened with Scheer.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Yet ever Liberal MP still supports their lying piece of shit leader Justin Trudeau, no matter how much he lies, no matter who or how many people he gropes, no matter how many time he blackfaces and laughs along with his Liberal minstrel show. What a fu*king embarrassment.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">*</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">On June 20, 2019, <i>Niagara This Week,</i> a publication which falsely advertises that they "Dig deeper into more news" printed an entire editorial ("Green ballot overdue") GreenFear-mongering about climate change. Sickening green-garbage, editorial diarrhea piped directly from the socialist scumbags at their mother-ship the Toronto Star. In Niagara, this propaganda was c*ck holstering for more taxes, and even waxing poetic about the disastrous, imbecilic GreenShift joke-policies espoused by the Liberal clown Stephane Dion. NTW might have well stuck MP Chris Bittle's Liberal member in their collective mouth as well. </span></span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; font-size: xx-large;"><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">CHAPTER 40</span></b></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Bell Media / CTV shat out another great piece of GreenFear climate-change propaganda with </span><a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/trump-says-climate-change-not-a-hoax-but-he-doesn-t-know-if-it-s-manmade-1.4133875" style="font-size: x-large;">this Oct.14, 2018 story</a><span style="font-size: large;">, which was attributed just to "Associated Press" and not even to a specific reporter. This was big time corporate climate propaganda from Bell Fake Media! Here's their spiked headline :</span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>"Trump says climate change not a hoax, but he doesn't know if it's man made</i>"</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The intent here is to mock Trump.This is because CTV likes to make false associations with the term 'climate change'. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">If you examine the line "Trump says <span style="background-color: transparent;">climate change not a hoax</span>", you can very well believe that Canada's Climate Change Clown Catherine McKenna would say the<i> exact same</i> thing: a report titled "<i>Catherine McKenna says <span style="background-color: transparent;">climate change not a hoax</span></i>" would <i>not </i>be mocked by the GreenFear-pushing-press!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">On the face of it, the two seem in agreement.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Yet, the nuance is in the definition of the phrase "climate change", and in the lazy, foggy, biased way the quotes are provided.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">To Trump, "climate change" would be in reference to 'the climate' changing naturally - therefore, it is not a hoax, that the natural climate changes.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">That is his start line.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">To McKenna "climate change" would be in reference to 'man made climate change' (AGW) - therefore, to her, it is a hoax that the climate changes naturally.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">That is her start line. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">McKenna denies that climate change is a natural occurrence.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: large;"> Trump's starting line is that the natural climate <i>is</i> changing (and always has changed...); therefore, by saying he doesn't know if it's man made, is factual.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> But Lying Liberal McKenna (...the 'climate change is killing polar bears' hoax pusher....) has already prejudged that climate change <i>is</i> man made, not natural, <i>and</i> that "it's all settled".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-size: large;"> This is the same play on words, the false causation, the same deception, the same conflation, that every GreenFear pusher makes. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> CTV giddily reports Trump saying "I'm not denying climate change", as if that is ludicrous for anyone to say; yet, it's only odd to those <i>already</i> in the GreenFear-infected 'it's all settled' tank, hopelessly immersed in GreenFear politics, and too impaired to understand the definitions in play here.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> A</span><span style="font-size: large;">fter all, who could possibly claim that the climate is NOT "changing" - <i>and </i>has not been changing for millennia??!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;">Well: it is Climate Barbie's Liberal climate-change deniers who downplay (they deny!) the fact that earth's climate </span><i style="font-size: x-large;">has been changing, ever since there was a climate; ever since there was an earth, before man</i><span style="font-size: large;">!!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Funny how the AP / CTV / Bell Fake Media propagandists purposefully muddy the story.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The GreenFear propagandists' aim is to make Trump's observation seem ludicrous.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> {Lookit, lookit - we got Trump denying he's a climate change denier... hahaha... <i>gotcha</i>... oh, yeah, we got 'im... yep, got 'im good... hahaha...}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> But CTV / Bell Media completely ignore McKenna's insane rejection of the earth's natural climate, her stance </span><span style="font-size: large;">that earth's natural climate does not change - it cannot change - because it is not natural, but is man-made?!? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> CTV / Bell Media ignored examining McKenna's delusion that earth's climate NEVER changed, that it was in some kind of (fictional!) stasis, until man appeared on the scene? </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">{...<i>THAT </i>is the "climate change hoax" which Trump refers to!!}</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> Can't the AP / CTV / Bell Media propagandists spot the difference by now?! hahaha -<i> sure</i> they can! But their job is to sell propaganda. They make money in the racket.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Not once did CTV try to examine the veracity of the 'AGW is all settled' lie!! Their job was to slime and to de-legitimatize Trump, deflecting from any analysis of the climate deceptions which they help peddle. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The only thing actually 'settled', is that the GreenFear AGW lie has never been settled: <i>it remains a lie</i>. Keep spreadin' your fake news, CTV}</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Isn't McKenna the one <i>denying the existence of (natural) climate change?</i>!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Typical of the GreenFear movement, McKenna and her Turdo Liberals purposefully pull off their bait-and-switch tactics, purposefully peddling false causalities, conflating natural climate change with hoaxed-up 'man-made climate change' political lies.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">(McKenna's climate deceptions were already examined previously in Chapter 29)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;">It is the GreenFear-pushers who are denying real, ongoing climate change (...helped by reports such as this by AP / CTV / Bell Media...) by <i>unquestioningly</i> attributing it to man.</span><br />
<div style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">*</span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Times New Roman";">
<span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">On Aug.27, 2019, CTV's evening tv news host Michelle Dube reported on the "pumice island" which was supposedly floating to Australia, and that it was hoped (by who?) that this would restore the coral reefs: then she shat out a pile of GreenFear claiming {with no </span></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">suportable evidence} that these reefs were destroyed </span><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">by </span></span><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">"climate change". After inserting this alarmist crap propaganda, she then merrily continued on with her "news" cast.</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;"><b>CHAPTER 41</b></span> </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">We see the Dec.3, 2018 <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-study-finds-most-canadian-cities-do-not-have-adequate-plans-to-cope/">Globe and Mail</a> producing more unchallenged climate change propaganda:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> "...<span style="color: #191919;"><i>Many cities hadn’t done enough research to be able to write a comprehensive plan.</i></span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">Scientists are increasingly able to attribute extreme weather events to the influence of climate change</span><span style="color: #191919;">. And when floods or wildfires destroy lives and property, it’s usually in a city.</span></i></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i>“Where are most of our people and property?” Prof. Thistlethwaite said. “They’re in cities. There’s a concentration there of exposure</i>”</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> The issue of man made climate change is, once again, not opposed nor even questioned in this climate propaganda piece. The doublespeak here is the canard of 'extreme weather'. </span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> Why didn't Thistlethwaite include any link to any scientific attributions to Canadian Climatologist David Phillips, as a legitimate source for this 'extreme weather' fearmongering scenario? </span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> Where is Canada's Cagey Climatologist, giving proven scientific evidence on this very specific issue?</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> Why has the professor muzzled David Phillips?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;">{Real headline: "Globe AND MAIL MUZZLES CLIMATE SCIENTIST}</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> Was Cagey one of the s</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">cientists that Thistlethwaite alleges who "<i>are increasingly able to attribute extreme weather events to the influence of climate change</i>"???</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"> Where is CP </span><strike style="color: #191919;">reporter </strike><span style="color: #191919;">propagandist Bob Weber's interview with Cagey Dave - or ANYONE ELSE!! - to provide comment, perspective, corroboration, or questioning of this 'report'?!?!</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Why did the Globe and Mail, Canadian Press, and Bob Weber suppress Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips?! Does Cagey Dave have no relevant input here?!?</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> This was NOTHING but typically biased climate-change propaganda.</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; line-height: 1.5;">
<br /></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 42</b></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #191919;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">CTV / Bell Media once again had a GreenFear-spewing bowel movement and excreted more unadulterated globalist climate-change propaganda in <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/un-chief-climate-change-is-most-important-issue-we-face-1.4201892">this Dec.3, 2018</a> story, from AP's </span></span><span style="color: black;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Frank Jordans and Monika Scislowska.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> For some reason, Canadian media conglomerate Bell Media <i>did not bother </i>to provide any Canadian relevance to this UN fascism, nor bother to provide any commentary or perspective from anyone other than the already-infected green fascist cabal and their climate-coven echo-chamber.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> GreenFear-fascist delusions and climatalarmism from hacks such as Richard Attenborough are propagated without a word of skepticism.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> What does David Phillips have to say about all this climate-change paranoia?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> We don't know, because CTV and Bell Media <i>muzzled him</i>.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Oh yeah, Attenborough has <a href="https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/23/david-attenborough-the-un-and-a-facebook-bot-are-tackling-climate-change-8170848/">recruited Facebook to propagate GreenFear Fascism</a> by using bots to infect the masses with climate change propaganda. What - you haven't hear of this?! Gosh: imagine the smug outrage if someone <i>other </i>than Green Bolsheviks tried that kind of media politicization and manipulation with Obama's FarceBook pal Zuckerberg! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #191919;">
<b style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: xx-large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;"><br /></span></b>
<b style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: xx-large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 43</span></b><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"> </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: white; clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6tJiQzGENHbB2d6inLRTrxvwRCtM6pM1RK9PzffrSdhV-jXbUP4vPgMHVqNNUfT8cxkzNksLqSlc0Jz841b6W25zII4LRh06SciRRBgUhXCqR33Dj1tvGZnC0fijhyIzQwNJv05H4qTo/s1600/Liberal+GreenFear+lies+by+Trudeau+hack+Chris+Bittle+Dec.2018.JPG" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="767" data-original-width="1115" height="275" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6tJiQzGENHbB2d6inLRTrxvwRCtM6pM1RK9PzffrSdhV-jXbUP4vPgMHVqNNUfT8cxkzNksLqSlc0Jz841b6W25zII4LRh06SciRRBgUhXCqR33Dj1tvGZnC0fijhyIzQwNJv05H4qTo/s400/Liberal+GreenFear+lies+by+Trudeau+hack+Chris+Bittle+Dec.2018.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">On Dec. 12, 2018, residents of St.Catharines were treated to the <i>above </i>mailed pamphlet featuring a huge pile of stinking Liberal climate-change eco-fascist fear-mongering from Turdo's c*ck-holster, MP Chris Bittle.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> This was timed of course, to coincide with the shameless COP24 (Coven Of Propaganda) climate-change orgy going on in Poland. We've been inundated by a surge of media climate propaganda, creating a rising wave of GreenFearStink over the last 2 months, since October.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"> We see <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46578653">Green Fascism being freely emitted</a> </span></span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #404040;">by climate-change-charlatans such as UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who spouts things like: </span><i style="color: #404040;">"T</i></span><span style="color: #404040; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>o waste this opportunity would compromise our last best chance to stop runaway climate change," Mr Guterres said. "It would not only be immoral, it would be suicidal."</i></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #404040; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.375; margin-top: 18px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> When is anyone going to discuss the morality of Canada's Climate King David Phillips' refusal to provide the evidence to justify the climate fear being spread by globalist Gueterres and his fellow Agenda-21-pushing Liberals hacks in Canada?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.375; margin-top: 18px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #404040;"> Wow: Canada's Cagiest Climatologist is sanitized, and controversy-free in Canada, inoculated from guilt - or scrutiny! - by the fawning media. Ole Cagey is demure and virtuous, a paragon of climate-morality, always standing by with some hackneyed ole homespun homily; standing by as his Liberal overlords lecture us with unsubstantiated doomsday scenarios of horrific suicidal climate catastrophe. Yep: David Phillips happily fanned the GreenFear flame for decades, dancing tangos with his adoring media to push the climate-change hoax. Where's the discussion regarding David Phillips' missing moral compass?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #404040;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 44</i></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">The CBC (Jan.9, 2019) carried this piece of 'news' <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/seals-scooting-around-roddickton-1.4971109">about seals in Newfoundland dying.</a> This story was eagerly carried by</span><span style="font-size: large;"> CNN's Gianluca Mezzofiore </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">and other media hungry to ominously portray {ie: to GreenFear-ize, to purposefully distort...} the issue as some kind of critical climate-change event.</span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The problem for that narrative, however, is that some seals were stranded on shore because the shoreline FROZE while they were out. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"> In context, just this week, at his cross-country rallies, Turdope was telling his gullible fans that "climate change is real".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">But, as he did with his bizarre interview with Evan Solomon in the first week of Dec. 2018, what Turdo means is that 'everything is melting', and that ALL 'CLIMATE CHANGE' IS DUE TO MAN. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">And therefore, he means that his Liberals are going to '<i>stop the melting'; </i>and<i> </i>that forcing Canadians to pay carbon taxes, will <i>prevent ice from melting</i>, and will create an unchanging climate stasis where the laws of thermodynamics are magically suspended due to Justin Trudeau's Unicornian Liberal demented science-fiction climate fantasies.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">In this article about the seals, the issue (contrary to Turdo's pontifications) is NOT about<i> </i>ice melting, it's about the shoreline freezing up with ice - so, the GreenFear narrative has to be shifted into innuendo that</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">- the ice </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: x-small;">umm</span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">... <i>should not have been icy </i>{!}</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">- that the ice should have been </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: x-small;">umm</span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">, meltier {!}... or, </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: x-small;">ummmm...</span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: large;"> better yet </span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: large;">- that the water should never be frozen at all!! {.....</span><i>ummm</i><span style="font-size: large;">, which means that there <i>should be</i> global warming to 'stop the ice'!</span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: large;"> But wait: Liberals say they want to "stop global warming"! They say there <i>shouldn't be</i> global warming - thereby meaning Liberals want <i>more </i>ice. </span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">OH NO - - - wait: <i>whaaaaaaaat</i>?! Justin Trudeau WANTS Canada's poor defenseless seals to die, because he and his Liberals WANT to 'stop global warming', therefore, they want MORE ICE???! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> {oh gosh, oh golly...<i> 'how</i> do we spin this now?', Turdo's buttlickers ask! Damn: why'd we report this story anyway? There's no good way out for Justin on this one...}</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Is Justin Trudeau in favour of letting seals die, because Justin Trudeau wants to stop global warming?? If the Planet had less 'Global Warming', then more seals would die in Newfoundland, because of the ice. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;">So let's see: Justin Trudeau wants to 'stop the melting', he wants to 'stop the sea levels from rising', he wants to 'stop global warming' - so: he is in favour of <i>more ice</i>, correct? </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Therefore, </span><i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Justin Trudeau wants to starve and kill seals</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">.</span></i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> (...and so, </span><i style="color: #191919; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">there</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;"> is Justin Trudeau's 2019 Liberal election campaign slogan. It'll make a great bumper sticker, too..) </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919;">You're welcome</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;">. </span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;">Yep: "</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">Save Canada's seals, Flush Turdo</span></i><span style="color: #191919;">". </span></span></span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">You're welcome again...</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: small;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">(isn't that the tactics which Liberals employ against Trump?)</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">The optics are clear (no?!):</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> "</span></span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><i>TURDO Hates Global Warming, Loves Global Cooling. Turdo wants seals to freeze and die</i></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Whaaaaaaat?!? Is<i> that </i>what CNN and CNN's "newsgathering partner" CBC are saying?? {btw, is anyone surprised that CNN and CBC are each other's fake news c*ckholsters?!}</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The GreenFear spin is that these poor cuddly creatures (which Paul McCartney loves so much) are victims of global warming - because</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"> the </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">water froze.</span></i></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;"> Btw, has Sir Paul given ANY of his millions to the seals yet..?! Has he fed them? Clothed them? Bought an iceberg for them to live on? Written a couple o' tunes and donated the profits to them...?</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #191919;">Hey, maybe in the spring, CNN and CBC can write some propaganda about seals drowning because the ice then </span><i style="color: #191919;">is </i><span style="color: #191919;">melting...</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">This is spun as if, </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: x-small;">you know</span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">, the coastline HAS NEVER FROZEN OVER in Newfoundland, ever before; as if riverbanks have never frozen, as if this is all new, never happened before; that this is "extreme weather", all due to either 'global warming', or, due to 'climate change', and that only Liberal taxation can 'stop climate change'. Yes: Liberal liars actually claim they are going to stop and prevent the earth's climate from changing.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The psychosis underlying this conceit is more than troubling.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">And what actually is the problem here: is the problem that the water is frozen, or is the problem that it is not frozen?! The leftist GreenFear-pushers have to carefully, cagily dance around their narrative to keep their hoax going.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Hey: speaking about those who are professionals at performing cagey climate tangos, maybe Canada's Cagiest Climatologist can help! Hey Dave: has Newfoundland ever experienced frozen coastlines before? </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><i>Hmm</i>: thanks for nothing Dave. Go collect your pay-cheque from Environment Canada.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Climate-hoax-protectors inevitably come up with THIS typical rebuttal narrative, when the hypocrisy in their religion is mentioned, lecturing others that "<i>weather is not climate</i>".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Really?! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Talk about the kettle calling the pot an off-colour!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">These GreenFear pushers <i>everyday</i> push the line that EVERYTHING weather-related in nature <i>has been caused by MAN</i> - ie "AGW".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The minute ANYTHING happens weather wise, it is IMMEDIATELY linked to "global warming", no questions asked!! <b><i>That</i></b> IS the automatic default reflex <i>OF</i> the Green bolsheviks! </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Any wind, any fire, any drought, any flood... anything, anywhere... is portrayed as somehow being 'climate-change' - made by man!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The GreenFear-pusher's catch-all phrase for all this is that "it's all settled" and that </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><i>no questions</i> d</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">are be asked about this premise.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">It is IMMEDIATELY branded as "extreme weather" due to "climate change'' (underlying meaning: that it was caused by man). </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">This is the typical Jane Fonda/ Dicaprio/ Jennifer Lawrence mentality. Forest fire: global warming!! </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Volcano: global warming. Hurricane: global warming. Earthquake: global warming. </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Tsunami: global warming. Thunderstorm: global warming. Flood: global warming. Drought: global warming... </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">This all-encompassing, one-size-fits-all, no-need-to-ask-pesky-questions grab-bag of deceptions underlines their </span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">'climate change' / 'global warming' / 'extreme weather' </span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">GreenFear narratives. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">If it rains, it's due to one {...or more!} of the handy narratives above!!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">If it doesn't rain, i</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">t's one {...or more!} of the phony narratives above</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">If it's windy, it's one {...or more!} of the above</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">If it's <i>not</i> windy, it's one {...or more!} of the above</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">If it's __</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">____ then it is caused by o</span><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">ne {...or more!} of the GreenFear hoaxes above...</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">The funniest thing is to read the comments from demented climate change zombies who pop up to immediately bandage up their GreenFear religion's transparent phoniness.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Here's commenter Ralph Eddy, who <span style="color: #b45f06;">"<i>thought global warming was supposed to make less ice not more</i>".</span>...<br />....to which Joe Smithson replied: <span style="color: #b45f06;">"<i>Learn the difference between weather and climate".</i></span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Hm: imagine that: does Smithson quickly also impart this <i>same wisdom</i> to the likes of Turdo, Jane Fonda, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence, as well as to all the GreenFear-pushing media propagandists on CBC, Bell Media CTV, TVO, PBS, TorStar...etc etc?! Did Smithson EVER lecture<i> those</i> propagandists about the "</span><span style="font-size: large;"><i>difference between weather and climate"</i>??</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">They DON'T CARE; they KNOW the difference and yet they still peddle innuendo-laden, fear-laced climate-propaganda, spinning everything <i>AS IF </i>it was man-made 'climate change'.</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Great gaia: even </span><span style="font-size: large;">Smithson knows that - doesn't he?! Doesn't he know the difference between natural climate change and 'man-made climate change'??? Does he not understand the difference between saying "AGW is all settled" and proving it?!</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">At least Smithson forgot to throw the "denier" label at Eddy. </span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">When David Butler commented</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> <span style="color: #b45f06;">"</span></span><i><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;">So much for "climate change melting all the world's ice". </span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #b45f06;">Greenpeace spin doctors are in an emergency meeting..."</span> </span></i></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><i><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></i><span style="font-size: large;">...it triggered Jim McAlpine to write:</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> <span style="color: #b45f06;">"<i>so much for having a simple understanding of the difference between global warming and regional conditions". </i></span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">That is a hilariously</span><span style="font-size: large;"> deceptive, deflective, self-serving smug response. The GreenFear lie is applicable EVERYWHERE - McAlpine gets <i>that</i> "simple understanding" ...right? The lie is that THE ENTIRE PLANET'S CLIMATE, EVERYWHERE is changing DUE TO MAN. No exceptions to the rule.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">The concept of "regionality" (of picking and choosing micro-weather patterns and isolated regional micro-climate constructs) is an inconvenient footnote in the larger lie. The minute one starts investigating 'climate-change' inequalities</span><span style="font-size: large;"> in regional issues, the main "Planetary" propaganda narrative is severely </span><span style="font-size: large;">diminished, exposing the "it's all settled' lie to a greater risk of scrutiny.</span><span style="font-size: large;"> Al Gore doesn't talk about the climate in east-end Halifax, as opposed to the climate in northend Winnipeg; for the lie to work, regionality MUST be subdominant to the larger lie. </span></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">If McAlpine himself understood the "</span><i style="font-size: x-large;">difference between global warming and regional conditions"</i><span style="font-size: large;">, then - as a GreenFear-believer - </span><i style="font-size: x-large;"> </i><span style="font-size: large;">he'd have understood the risk that any regional anomalies will bring to the Big "</span><span style="font-size: large;">it's all settled</span><span style="font-size: large;">" Climate Change Lie. The Big Lie would soon fall apart if all the fu**ing anomalies were quantified!</span></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">And Josh Woodferd responded to Butler with this <strike>brilliant</strike> equation: <i><span style="color: #b45f06;">"Weather=/=Climate"</span>. </i></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Ya, ya</span>, <span style="font-size: large;">Josh / Einstein:</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">did you send this same equation to the same people that Smithson didn't send his to?! Weather is<i> always </i>now perverted into being "man-made climate change" by GreenFear believers! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Those who spout climate-change propaganda <i>always</i> use the formula "<span style="color: #b45f06;"><i>any weather, anywhere = man-made climate change</i>"</span>!!</span></span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> They PURPOSEFULLY sow seeds of deception, insinuating that literally<i> any </i>weather event is ALL due to "climate-change / global-warming" {...and therefore, due to mankind}.</span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">What a stretch of incredulity for those such as Woodferd who spout the </span><i style="font-size: x-large;">Weather=/=Climate</i><span style="font-size: large;"> formula, yet, nevertheless, believe the "climate-change" lie. </span></span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Why spout this formula to Butler, if you disagree with what Butler wrote?! In fact, Butler, I am sure, not only full well knows and understands that 'weather doesn't equal climate change', but, that he believes this, as well. </span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Butler would obviously agree to this truth!</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">So why does Woodferd throw this into Butlers face, as if somehow Butler is the one who doesn't get it?!</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Has Woodferd blessed Turdo and Climate Barbie with his great formula?! They lie about 'climate change being caused by man' on a daily basis. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">They equate weather with climate, to perpetuate their political lies, and they have a widely complicit media helping them spread the climate propaganda. </span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">{...so, to imagine that Turdo's Liberal spin doctors would be in an emergency meeting right now, to try to distance Trudeau from dead seals, is a sadly comical and very accurate commentary on Liberal climate-change lies and incongruities}</span></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;">Why send Butler this formula, yet, not to the others who <i>purposefully</i> flaunt the </span><i style="font-size: x-large;">Weather=/=Climate </i><span style="font-size: large;">rule<i>?</i></span><span style="font-size: large;">!!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">The CBC wrote several versions of this story, closing comments and going to a new one; the<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/seals-on-land-newfoundland-1.4969079"> Jan.7, 2019 version</a> had this comment from Jon Palmer:</span></span><br />
<div style="margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; word-break: break-word;">
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: all 0.1s ease 0s, all 0.1s ease 0s;">
<i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">"<span style="color: #b45f06;">If we weren’t in the era of global warming, aka Climate change, that headline might have read “seals trapped inland by extreme cold and ice”. <br style="display: block; margin: 5px 0px 0px;" />I have enjoyed reading the CBC headlines this past year, and how they will literally drag needles through their tongues instead of admitting that there is lots of ice. <br style="display: block; margin: 5px 0px 0px;" />Remember the “tourists” that were trapped in arctic sea ice after ignoring the Canadian coast guards warning about the massive arctic ice pack? <br style="display: block; margin: 5px 0px 0px;" />Of course the CBC neglected to mention that the “tour boat”, was actually a leased science vessel full of government funded climate scientists on their way into the arctic to study the “melting arctic ice pack”. The irony was so thick you couldn’t cut it with an industrial laser".</span></span></i></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: all 0.1s ease 0s, all 0.1s ease 0s;">
<i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></i></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: black; font-size: large;">But commenter Lily O'Loughlin apparently didn't like the way these comments were going, triggering her to write the leftists' </span><i style="color: black; font-size: x-large;">typical textbook smear:</i></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: all 0.1s ease 0s, all 0.1s ease 0s;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: black; font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: medium;"><i>"</i></span><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">It still doesn't mean that the planet isn't in a warming state overall. But of course the deniers will seize on anything to try to prove it isn't."</span></i></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: all 0.1s ease 0s, all 0.1s ease 0s;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">Isn't Lily the one denying natural climate change?! Here we have some "<i>it's all settled</i>"-mantra-infected fool - who has no evidence showing that something <i>is -</i> demanding that someone else prove the negative, that same something <i>isn't</i>.</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">Isn't Lily the one here who believes that <i>all weather on earth</i> (and therefore <i>all of earth's climate</i>) is <i>caused by MAN</i> - as Justin Turdo instructed her to believe?!</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: large;">When Lily says "</span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: large; font-style: italic;">It still doesn't mean that the planet isn't in a warming state overall"</span><i style="color: #333333;">, </i><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">isn't she already - right there - using the 'regionality difference' deflection, which is anathema to the Great Planetary Climate Change Hoax that she's supposed to uphold?! Pointing out DIFFERENCES causes folks to ASK QUESTIONS about your "it's all settled" mantra - get it?! Ya don't defend the "it's all settled' lie by pointing out differences here, and then over there, and then muddling the whole thing up with '</span><i style="color: #333333;">yeah but overall here</i><span style="color: #333333;">', or '</span><i style="color: #333333;">nevertheless over there</i><span style="color: #333333;">' - - - the GreenFear lie </span><span style="color: #cc0000;">is supposed to be applicable uniformly, everywhere, without question, everywhere across the entire planet</span><span style="color: #333333;">. </span></span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">Lily has been TOLD that "it's all settled" - so any concept of 'regionality'</span></span><span style="color: #333333;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: large;">itself is dangerous heresy - especially to Turdo and the UN!! </span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;">"Man-made Climate-Change" is NOT ASYMMETRICAL in its political dimension, it is ABSOLUTE - Lily probably never did learn this.</span></span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #333333;"> And: specifically </span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;">what "warming" is she talking about? The supposed AGW warming CAUSED BY MAN?? The "warming" which will be supposedly <i>STOPPED</i> BY TURDO'S FASCIST LIBERAL CARBON TAX GRAB? <i>That</i> warming?!</span></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">It's funny that Lily herself COULDN'T SEIZE the moment to PROVE AGW - yet had the time to smear someone who pointed out the hypocrisy of the GreenFear agenda!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;"> (But let's not feel bad for Lily: Cagey David Phillips - Canada's Cagiest Climatologist - also cannot prove "man-made climate-change". Cagey Dave earns his living by giving everyone the impression that everything he reports, is evidence of man-made climate change. But even that cowardly codger will NOT say that "<i>it's all settled"</i> on air. Wonder why that is...?)</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">The GreenFear Standard Operating Procedure is to sow confusion, and to never focus on their "it's all settled" mantra, but </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">always deflect away from it. They cannot prove their own propaganda, so the next best thing is to repeatedly promote their propaganda <i>as if</i> it was true.</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> As we see, they'll do anything to force others to prove a negative. This is how the mentality infected by "it's all settled" propaganda works. They don't have to prove anything, all they have to do is smear someone with the GreenFear-monger's handy 'denier' label.</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-html" style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-top: 5px; opacity: 1; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.1s ease 0s, opacity 0.1s ease 0s; word-break: break-word;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: large;">See how the Suzuki-Dion-Gore-Bradley-Turdo-infected climate change propaganda works?</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 45</i></b></span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Ontario's TVO television media empire has spent several years repeatedly propagating one-sided climate-change alarmist programming.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Steve Paikin and TVO excreted another stinking pile of GreenFear during their preach-to-the-AGW-infected-choir propaganda-show on <a href="https://www.tvo.org/video/programs/the-agenda-with-steve-paikin/burnout-and-despair-studying-the-climate">TVO's Agenda Jan.15, 2019</a>.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Stevie's 4-person cabal of climate-change fearmongers even included 'luminaries' such as Michael Mann, being taken with studious seriousness by an all-engrossed, nodding, full-to-the-brim-of-AGW-koolade Paikin.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">The underlying premise of this TVO propaganda - that everything which these climate clowns was saying was 'all settled' - was {...as is the requirement in the GreenFear religion} NEVER questioned by Paikin, who was apparently cock-holstering for Suzuki... the entire show was carried out <i>as if</i> it was settled.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">The IPCC was cited as a holy scroll, and well, that's that - it's automatically 'all settled'.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">What a piece of fakery, of propaganda, which - naturally - included the obligatory nudge-nudge-wink-wink barbs thrown in about Trump, and needless to say, included the usual put-down of 'deniers' ...sub-human 'heretics' to the green-religion being espoused by TVO's biased host and panelists; heretics who were purposefully banned from participating on this TVO panel! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">As is standard in a totalitarian phony-discussion panel, no differing views are allowed..!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">{...and why aren't challenges allowed: well, you <i>already know </i>how the catch-22-climate-lie works: because '</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><i>it's all settled</i></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">', heretic views, by definition, cannot be taken seriously, no questions can possibly be asked of the 'it's all settled' claim, because - </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: x-small;">you see </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">- it's all settled {!!!}... thus, the climate-change agenda safely self-perpetuates, unscathed}</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">With Paikin leading his climate coven, no serious questions were asked BY ANYONE, nor were any EXPECTED!! </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"> Some 'discussion' </span><i style="color: #191919; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">that</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"> is - ie it's purposeful </span><i style="color: #191919; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">non-discussion</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">: just lecturing the same re-hashed one-sided propaganda!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">This entire show was just a climate-change-propaganda orgy, where everyone spent the entire show essentially blowing each other. </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Charlatan Paikin was the ringmaster, acting like the Hef of GreenFear, peddling climate porn.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">These were all AGW-infected fellow-travelers stroking each other, ejaculating greenie rhetoric over each other, massaging each other with breathless ominous innuendo, cooing sweet green nothingness into each other's appreciative ears!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">TVO's "Agenda" program was an agenda of propaganda, which ought to be renamed as "TVO AGENDA 21": host Paikin's agenda was to propagate bias, to have NO CHALLENGES, nor any other views. Shameful tawdry media behaviour! TVO carried out basically a FAKE interview, where all the participants - even the host - were all infected by and blabbing from the same GreenFear hymn book.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">TVO and Paikin even tried to make us to feel sorry for these AGW-peddlers; yet, Paikin didn't bother to ask them why they didn't follow Prof Scranton's (see Chapters 36 and 37) innovative solutions to the climate change issue:</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">"</span><span style="background-color: white; color: red; font-size: large;">…the only truly moral response to global climate change is </span><i style="background-color: white; color: red; font-size: x-large;">to commit suicide</i><span style="background-color: white; color: red; font-size: large;">. There is simply no more effective way to shrink your carbon footprint. Once you’re dead, you won’t use any more electricity, you won’t eat any more meat, you won’t burn any more gasoline, and you certainly won’t have any more children. If you really want to save the planet, you should die”..."</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Yeah: apparently Paikin didn't want to rock his kumbaya-climate-change-orgy with this downer scenario. </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Funny, that Hef Paikin </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">umm</span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">... did nothing to challenge his panelists, about anything! Pure TVO '<i>it's all settled</i>' chicanery! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">One of Hef Paikin's 4 TVO climate-pornographers was Jason Thistlethwaite, who we see was mentioned spouting his climatalarmism in Chapter 41, where also it was noted that Cagey Climatologist David Phillips was conspicuously missing from that climate-change story. </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Thistlethwaite again pops up on TVO, and Cagey again is nowhere to be seen! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">Gosh: is Cagey being made irrelevant by the New Young Turks Of Climate Bolshevism, just because Cagey <i>refused 'to go there'</i> with the CBC (as noted in Chapter 13)?!!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">So, TVO and Steve Paikin muzzled Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, David Phillips, from participating in this TVO GreenFearFest - - - </span><i style="color: #191919; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">why</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">?</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">Why did TVO ban David Phillips from participating in this climate-change lovefest? Did Justin Trudeau prevent David Phillips from telling the world 'the truth about man-made climate-change'?? </span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #191919; font-size: large;">(Paikin and his gang </span><span style="color: #191919; font-size: large;"><i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">would have</span></i></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><i> had</i> an entire show - maybe three shows! - on this topic, if this had occurred during Harper's term!! They could even have gotten Phil Chadwick (see Chapter 3!) to jump up and down yelling 'Lookit! <i>Lookit</i> wott dem 'servatives dun ta po' ole Cagey'... But now... well... now that this is happening <i>under Turdo's watch</i>, suddenly it's <i>Phil</i> who is muzzled, <i>nowhere</i> to be found..! </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919;">what a topsy turvy world, eh, Phil</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">?!) </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">After all, y'all cain blame Harper for muzzzlin' Cagey, but ya shore caint blame Turdo fer muzzlin' Cagey - - that's just the way the GreenFear-infected media's built-in bias is skewed.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;">Didn't David Phillips 'belong' with this TVO climate cabal; didn't he fit in well with Paikin's chosen climate clan members?</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;">Was Cagey </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">umm... uh.... </span><span style="font-size: large;">'busy' that day?!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Was David Phillips' climate-reputation lower than Mann's??</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Why <i>was</i> Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips banned from participating in this TVO climate propaganda (where he...</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: x-small;">.umm.</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> clearly belonged)?</span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="color: #191919;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">One reason might well be that Paikin and TVO are now blatantly ripping-off David Phillip's own Cagey-Tango shtick.</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Cagey's been doing his climate-tango dance moves with a complicit media for years.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">What TVO and Paiken have done here is turn Cagey's old-shtick into a new fake-discussion forum, <i>double-doubling</i> down on the climate-change propaganda: if one cagey climate commentator is good enough to propagate tonnes of GreenFear, then let's have <i>FOUR climate-change hacks</i> doing it!!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Maybe Paikin and his TVO puppetmaster overlords avoided David Phillips because they were ashamed that they stole his routine.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">*</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Of course, TVO has continued spreading their biased, non-objective GreenFear propaganda. Another example (of MANY) was their show aired on July 31, 2019, with the climatalarmist Dianne Saxe on the 'panel' - and some <i>OTHER</i> climatologist from the perverted Ministry of Environment and Climate Change" - but it <i>wasn't</i> Cagey. Why is TVO muzzling Cagey nowadays?!!</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b style="color: #b45f06;"><i>CHAPTER 46</i></b></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #3d85c6; font-size: large;">Here's yet more from the perverted world of the GreenFear-infected moral-virtue signalers, such as this lunatic-left junk-science crap by Laura Brehaut, espousing that veganism is akin to planetary godliness</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;"> (</span><a href="https://nationalpost.com/life/food/scientists-say-a-plant-forward-diet-could-save-millions-of-lives-and-avoid-climate-change" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">National Post Jan.17, 2019</a><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-size: large;">):</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #b45f06;"> ".. an international team of scientists has made a bold promise of health and sustainability … A dramatic global change in diet and food production has the power to prevent roughly 11 million deaths each year and </span><span style="color: #cc0000;">avoid climate change,</span><span style="color: #b45f06;"> the Eat-Lancet Commission says in a report published Wednesday in the medical journal The Lancet..."</span></i></span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Yes, you read this insanity correctly: demented GreenFear climatalarmists are now claiming - no evidence required - that </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">eating beans will <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">"AVOID CLIMATE CHANGE"</span></i>. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Yep: read it again: behold the full glory; revel in the sweeping scope of this blatant insanity:</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">"<i>AVOID</i>" climate change!?! These are demented people.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Ya, this is </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">umm</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">... the kind of quack 'medical advice' {?!?!} being prescribed by</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> this so-called 'medical journal'</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">: if you eat more beans, you'll "<i><span style="color: #cc0000;">avoid climate change</span></i>"!! (...and if you dare doubt this fanatical falsehood, you're a damn denier)</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> (This twisted narrative isn't new; it's just recycled </span>climatalarmism similar to that peddled by <span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">David Suzuki years ago: see </span><a href="https://rightinniagara.blogspot.com/2007/06/re-kyo-diots.html"><i>Beware the GORZUKION</i></a>) </span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Yep - - ya see: it <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">is</span></i> </span><i><span style="font-size: large;">all settled now</span></i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">, for sure, this time {!!} no doubt about it!! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> After all:</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i> 8 out of every 7 </i>GreenFear-infected medical practitioners, along with <i>11 out of every 6 </i>climate-voodoo clinicians all agree, that this prescription to "avoid" Earth's climate really works! </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><i> No</i> diagnosis and <i>no</i> scientific exams are needed!! All gullible sheeple are eligible to apply! Just do as you're told - don't ask questions about either the scientific basis for, or the veracity of, our claims; and soon, you will STOP EARTH'S CLIMATE!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Follow our beany instructions, and soon you too can be living in a part of earth <i>where the climate can simply be avoided</i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">!!</span> <i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">{...omfg...} </i></span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> Oh, uh... and, The Lancet Urinal forgot to mention that this "cure" is being called "Climate-B-Gone"</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM.</span><span style="font-size: large;">... </span></span></span></span><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"> </i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">and that large doses are now being trafficked in Canada at all participating Liberal MP offices, simply by paying a handy carbon tax. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Ya pay the Turdo Climate Tax, and you too can <i>avoid</i> earth's climate... </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> ...yes, you too can live on that fabled Turdopian part of Earth, where there is no climate...</span></span></span><br />
<i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"> ... ...omfg... <span style="font-size: large;">...OMFG... </span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">...OMFG: what have they done??!??</span></i></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">[</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: x-small;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: small;">WARNING</span><span style="font-size: small;">: </span><i>DO NOT MIX</i> Climate-B-Gone</span></span></span></span><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">TM</span></i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: small;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;">with any reality-based, non-marxist prescriptions. Doing so will cause side-effects, such as awakening from your socialist slumber, and having a sudden urge to ask questions about the leftist "it's all settled" lie.]</span></span></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> We are being asked to believe - according to the witch-craft / marxist 'medicine' espoused by Dr. Propaganda at the Lancet Urinal -</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> that if ya eat more beans, the Earth's climate will </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">... uhhh.... umm...</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> stop 'changing'..!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> You will magically "avoid" being in a climate which changes - so, you'll be living in some fantastically sealed, <i>un</i>changing, static climate, which </span><i style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">never changes</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">! {...because, well, um, you 'avoided it...)</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Yep: just by eating more beans, you'll be living in the GreenFear fascists' wet dream of a fabled climate stasis!</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> {T</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">his the exact same kind of fantasy that is trafficked by Liberal virtue-signalers such as Turdo and Climate Barbie in Canada... oh, and Great Gaia's Ghost: let's not even mention the </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">um... <span style="font-size: large;">billions of </span> <span style="font-size: large;">extra</span>-</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">gaseous farts resulting from all dem beans bein' et... </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">sheesh...talk about man-made global warming...</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">}</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: large;"> As commenter Andris Lielmanis well asks:</span><i> </i></span><span style="color: #b45f06;"><i style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"</span></i><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><i><span style="font-size: large;">Global vegetarianism could lead to climate stasis?"</span></i></span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;"><span face=""helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06;"><i> </i></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> And we are told to believe that not only will mass-planetary-veganism somehow "<i>AVOID climate-change</i>", but that it will also 'PREVENT 11 million deaths each year'!!</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Holy Great Gobs Of GreenFear-Deluded Hypocrisy And Contradiction: don't the quacks running the Lancet Urinal already know that AGW means that </span><i style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">MAN IS THE PROBLEM</span></i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">???</span> </span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Don't the Lancet Urinalists know of Prof Scranton's (see Chapters 36 and 37!) Final Solution TO SOLVE GLOBAL WARMING?!</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Why bother saving 11 million people, when all they're gonna do is continue putting the "Planet In Peril" just by virtue that they are <i>still alive</i> and still exhaling CO</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">2</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">?!!</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">The "<i>it's all settled: man did it</i>" GreenFear-peddlers <i>HATE</i> "MAN". Get with the program, why doncha, ya Lancet urinalists! </span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> The AGW GreenFear lie is that</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">MAN IS THE PROBLEM</span></i>; </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">that 'climate-change' is <i><span style="color: #cc0000;">CAUSED BY MAN</span></i>; and that there would be </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="font-size: x-small;">...ummm.... uh...</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> no climate, if only <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i>MANKIND was NOT ALIVE; </i></span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">if only there was </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;"><i>NO MANKIND </i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">...after all {you have to think like a GreenFear-spreader here}: </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> '<span style="color: #b45f06;">how could there even<i> be</i> a climate on earth, if man wasn't there to create it?! So, you see, it makes perfect sense </span></span><span style="color: #b45f06;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: small;">the more you don't think about it</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">:</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> <i>No man =</i> <i>no climate!</i> Because humans created the climate (</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">as Turdo and Climate Barbie believe</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">), Earth cannot possibly have had any climate before man! So: it's man's fault that we even have a pesky ole climate - and now it's changing, so we must act now to stop the tipping point of the planetary man-made... ...</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #b45f06;">bla bla bla....</span> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">'.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> <i>OMG</i>: you see how the fu*king GreenFear-infected insanity develops?!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Man caused everything; the earth would be better off without humans...</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">bla, bla, bla</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">... (...a play on the handily unprovable 'is the light still on, when the fridge door is closed' scenario.)</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> POPULATION CONTROL has been a BASIC tenet of GREENFEAR </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">FASCISM from the beginning. Let's not pretend it ain't so!! Self-loathing GreenFear-pushers basically just HATE HUMANITY </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">{...and, well... they hate cows, too... and Alberta's oilsands...} </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">and believe that 'climate change' is CAUSED BY THE EXISTENCE <i>of</i> MAN; their underlying motto, bluntly speaking, is SAVE THE PLANET - KILL THE PEOPLE. MAN IS EARTH'S ENEMY.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> Humans are seen as destructive pests, raping and defiling a virginal, innocent, pure Mother Earth. There is a serious mental condition underpinning this mass 'climate-change' psychosis.</span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> That we - as MANKIND {</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">...oops, pardon: or as Canada's Crime Minister Soxy Turdo sez: "'PEOPLEKIND"</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">...} - are simply ALIVE, is a <i>huge problem</i> - of existential proportions - for GreenFear-infected psychopaths. </span></div>
<div class="vf-comment-container vf-clearfix" data-id="9858000018131" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(218, 218, 218); margin: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 20px 10px; position: relative; transition: background-color 1s ease-in-out 0s; word-break: break-word; zoom: 1;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> As we see here, these GreenFear fascists just excrete their stinking socialist agenda regardless of whether it makes sense, or even whether it contradicts <i>their own</i> previous lies. They practice chaos and will disrupt even their own constructs, to feed their psychosis. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 47 </b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">More climate-change lies were peddled by Bell Media, CTV, and The Canadian Press - lies which were fraudulently portrayed by enablers such as Google as "news" - when it is just click-bait GARBAGE; have a look at the laughable climate-crap shat out by <a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/look-south-study-finds-analogues-for-future-climate-of-u-s-canadian-cities-1.4293993">CTV on Feb.12, 2019</a>:</span><br />
<div class="articleBody" style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><i>"Wondering what the climate in your city will be like in a few decades?<br />An unusual study published today suggests you should look about 1,000 kilometres to the south.<br />Matt Fitzpatrick of the University of Maryland says that's the average distance between 540 cities in the U.S. and Canada and the closest place that resembles what their climate will become.<br />Fitzpatrick says if nothing changes, Montreal can expect a climate similar to that of Chester, Pennsylvania.<br />Vancouver will feel a lot like Seattle and Calgary's weather will resemble what folks in Spearfish, South Dakota, now experience.<br />Fitzpatrick acknowledges his calculations are approximate."</i></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 14.4px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"...</span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Approximate</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">" ...to </span><i style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">what measure </i><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">of reality?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">CTV just publishes sh!t and we are supposed to believe this? Absolutely NO context was provided, nor any other informed commentary on the faux-"science" being fraudulently peddled here. This isn't news nor science. It's unadulterated GreenFear-mongering - it's "science-fictioneering </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-small;">TM</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">".</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">"...<span style="color: #b45f06;">If nothing changes</span>"!!! ...based <i>on what</i>?! Upon lies modeled upon other AGW lies?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why wasn't Canada's Cagiest Climatologist David Phillips consulted by CTV, and included in this story, in order to, </span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">um...</span><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> confirm the veracity of these climate hallucinations disguised as political fear-mongering?! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Why did CTV suppress science here? Where's Phil Chadwick when Cagey needs him???</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 1.3; margin-top: 19px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Did Justin Trudeau personally intervene and interfere with CTV's handling of this story; is CTV working for the Liberal Party?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2em;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 48</i></b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Further to </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">Chapter 14</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;">, where lefist media bias at the Toronto Star was examined, I wonder what the Star's propagandist Kathy English would say about Lara Logan's views, as reported in the </span><a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/bless-cbss-lara-logan-for-calling-out-liberal-media-bias" style="font-family: georgia, "times new roman", serif; font-size: x-large;">Washington Examiner</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> (Feb.19, 2019)?!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">English defended her biased, grossly perverted leftist views, with a blithe ignorance that borders on cognitive dissonance. L</span><span style="font-size: large;">ogan was referencing the EXACT kind of leftist media manipulation practised by Torstar and Kathy English !! Because it's Atkinsonian leftism, it... well... can't be fake, right Kathy!? Kathy's TorStar horse-hockey fakery has been called out.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Whether it's about issues of politics or climate, the leftist bias tinges everything that purports to be journalism, but in fact, is just politicized propaganda. So far, you've been able to see 48 chapters of examples here!!</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">When Logan says: </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i>"Although the media has always been historically always been left-leaning, we’ve abandoned our pretense, or at least the effort, to be objective today ... That means we’ve become political activists in a sense and, some could argue, propagandists — and there’s some merit to that.”</i></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1rem;">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>Logan elaborated on these points at considerable length, and with considerable thoughtfulness and insight, even while acknowledging that being so forthright might be “professional suicide for me”</i>, she clearly exposes the majority of Canada / US media!! </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Whether it's the CBC, St.Catharines Standard, or the Toronto Star, it's the<i> same </i>lefty-bias-brain-dead story (...in the case of the St.Catharines Standard, it's now literally <i>part</i> of the Torstar Borg propaganda zombie clan)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #212529; font-family: montserrat, serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 49 </b></span><br />
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>David Phillips conflates Lake Erie seiche to "climate change"</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #212529;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">We see that David Phillips, Canada's Cagiest Climate-Change-Conjuring Conman, was peddling his climate-change sophistry in a <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/how-bad-has-this-winter-been-when-will-it-end-dave-phillips-environment-canada-1.5038674">pathetic Mar.1, 2019 CBC story, based on a Conrad Collaco interview,</a> which included - as is typical with the by-now familiar <i>Cagey Tango</i> format - distortions and omissions (bordering on basically outright lies) by Cagey, about the Lake Erie ice-overflow which had occurred at Fort Erie on Feb.24, 2019. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Cagey used his position as Canada's Senior Climatologist to make false links, to present a fraudulent scenario, using a glib grab bag of innuendo, conflation, and omission, to </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><i>presto!!</i><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">make it appear that the ice-overflow at the Niagara River / Fort Erie area, was somehow a one-off, NEVER-before-seen phenomenon ---</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">- as if Lake Erie storm surges had never before existed,</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">- as if Lake Erie seiches had never before existed, </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">- as if Lake Erie had never before been over 90% frozen-over, </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">- as if windstorms had never before swept across Lake Erie,</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">- as if Buffalo/Fort Erie had never before been in a lake-effect snow-belt. </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> It follows that charlatans such as Cagey, also believe that the Ice Bridge down below Niagara Falls is 'man made'!! For some reason, the CBC's Collaco was too brain-dead to ask Cagey about any of this!! Was Collaco ordered by his CBC handlers not to ask Cagey any unauthorized questions? Or was Collaco paid by the CBC to just fall asleep on the job?!</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Cagey purposefully - fraudulently - chose to dismiss all these factors, and instead, presented his tainted Trudeau-approved political narrative, that this was due to "climate change". </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"> With this article, we now have conclusive evidence that Cagey is a climate-change propagandist, and that the CBC is a willing enabler assisting (never challenging) the propagation of the AGW lie.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><br /><span style="color: #0b5394;">When Paul Wells (at Maclean's, of all places!!) wrote a damning story on Mar.4, 2019, FINALLY realizing that <a href="https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/justin-trudeau-imposter/">Justin Trudeau is an imposter </a>- the SAME prism can applied to Cagey Dave's antics as an employee of the federal government, spreading a specious, speculative climate fear narrative. <br /><br /> Cagey Dave - Canada's Climatological Conman - has finally jumped the proverbial shark here and shown himself not as a trusted, unbiased scientific observer, but as a biased imposter, a charlatan, a shill who can be trusted to propagandize leftist green religious dogma. </span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> When Wells talks of Turdo that</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span><span style="color: #0b5394;"> <span style="color: #783f04;">"</span></span><span style="color: #0b5394;">.</span><i><span style="color: #0b5394;">..</span><span style="color: #783f04;">the operating assumption seems to be that we’re simply supposed to read between the lines—that we’ll understand that when Trudeau speaks he is not to be taken seriously.</span><span style="color: #0b5394;">.."</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">this examination can just as easily be applied to Cagey: if we bothered to read between the lines which Cagey spouts, we'd realize he's so tainted with "it's all settled" assumptions and climate-change chicanery that we will all have to understand that Cagey shouldn't be taken seriously when he speaks, either.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> Cagey is a closet climatalarmist, a GreenFear-monger, shilling a leftist political agenda. Took awhile to see it, but there it is.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> David Phillips even claimed to the CBC that he could make the claim that the ice-overflow is due to man-made climate change (...after all: isn't this which Cagey is peddling - AGW - when he says 'climate change'? He means man made climate change... he means earth's climate never changed, until man caused it to - quite a demented, self-important conceit, eh?) </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> Yet - after spending the entire CBC interview expounding GreenFear-mongering 'examples' that it was 'climate change' - Cagey actually </span><i><span style="color: red;">did not</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> offer ANY proof.</span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> All he had</i> was a claim! </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Just hot air and hyperbole.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Just "it's all settled" mumbo-jumbo.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Cagey just cobbled together a load of innuendo, salted with false causation and doused in a stew of conflation, claiming he<i> could</i> make a claim, but <i>never made his case </i>to support his claim.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> And the CBC and Colaco </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">let him get away with it</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> - which was the plan </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">all along</i><span style="color: #0b5394;">, wasn't it?!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> That is what the slimy Cagey Climate Tango is all about - the goal is to propagate the AGW hoax, to keep the climate-change lie alive, while never questioning AGW's phony 'it's all settled' underpinning. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> There was no questioning by Collaco about Cagey's climate claims, it was all accepted as gospel; it's like Cagey took a sh!t in Collaco's brain and the regurgitated climate crap suddenly became another phony CBC "climate-change" story!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: medium;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">What we have was another example of Cagey's outright deceptions and the fake-news'-media collusion which amplifies it.</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">*</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"> On Mar. 5, 2019, we also saw more fake news about Canada's Crime Minister Justin Trudeau published in Canada's MSM, about how Canada's Groper-In-Chief suddenly cancelled a climate-change-propaganda-peddling trip to Saskatchewan, in order to head back to Ottawa to plan strategy on how he and his criminal Liberals would continue to conspire to cover up their SNC-scandal-related crimes. </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #212529;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">This was sudden, because <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5020112/jane-philpott-resigns-jody-wilson-raybould/">Liberal Jane Philpott resigned</a> on Mar. 4th, causing yet more cracks in Turdo's shady facade. H</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">er resignation news came just as Turdo was peddling his climate-change-horseshit to brainwashed Torontonians.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;">If one looks at the Mar.5 reports, most media outlets DID NOT mention that the Regina Canadian Tire store, at which Turdo was planning to peddle his GreenFear-mongering, had had protests against Turdo's appearance there, and that the cancellation was portrayed as if it was made by Turdo, not by Canadian Tire.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #212529; font-family: "montserrat" , serif;"><br /></span>
The fake news was peddled by CTV, <a href="https://canoe.com/news/national/prime-minister-justin-trudeaus-regina-trip-cancelled-in-favour-of-private-meetings-in-ottawa">Canoe</a>, Citynews, Bloomberg and many others. It was all attributed to the Canadian Press (CP). Who actually wrote this deceptive feed? hey Kilpatrick - is this your hackey 'work'?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;">*</span></span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 50</b></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">On April Fool's Day 2019 Canada's foolish Crime Minster Turdo and his fascist GreenFear-spreading 'the polar bears are dying' liar Climate Barbie foisted their fake Turdo Tax onto Ontario and other provinces.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This fascist 'carbon tax' legislation was 'justified' by 'scientific reports' that magically happened to be released just in time to justify the Turdo Tax gouge. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Media outlets such as the Apr.2, 2019 </span><a href="https://calgaryherald.com/news/canada/canada-warming-twice-as-fast-as-rest-of-the-world-scientific-report-shows/wcm/09d49d73-a8d8-48a3-8e32-f94d39cefc2c" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-large;">Calgary Herald</a><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> - happily, shamelessly, eagerly - printed fear-mongering headlines such as</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="background-color: transparent; font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #b45f06;">"Effectively irreversible': Canada warming twice as fast as the rest of the world, new scientific report shows" </span></i></span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">- <i>WITHOUT A SHRED OF SCRUTINY </i>!!! </span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> This </span><strike style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">story</strike><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> - - </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">oops pardon </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">- - this Liberal </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><i>government propaganda </i>wasn't even written by a named reporter; it was just undiluted Liberal GreenFear-mongering shat out of Turdo's PMO and funneled into the <i>CP</i> Canadian Press feed, <i>as if</i> it was actual news, or even journalism - but it was not. (...hey, is this your fakey CP work </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><i style="font-size: x-large;">again,</i><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Kilpatrick?!!)</span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Is this how Telford's Liberal-friendly op-eds work as well?!! Not just for SNC cover-ups, we see!!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">This is the kind of fascist corporate/government collusion which Turdo's media-fund-millions can buy: blind fealty!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The "climate adviser" mentioned in this written-by-no-one <strike>story,</strike> - -</span><span style="color: #0b5394;"> oops, <i>again</i> pardon!</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> - - bought-and-paid-for propaganda, was Elizabeth Bush, Environment Canada's government shill here. This <i>CP/Calgary Herald </i>Liberal agitprop failed to mention her 'climate qualifications' - is she a scientist?! Or just a highly-paid PR shill?</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> And - where was David Phillips in this story?! Was anything which David Phillips said or studied or published or claimed in the last 30 years, included here??</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Why did Justin Trudeau's Liberals, the Canadian Press, the Calgary Herald and Elizabeth Bush, suppress science and censor David Phillips?! By the way... where are those stories of an outraged Phil Chadwick (see Chapter 3) whining about Cagey being suppressed, <i>now </i>?!! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> None of the players have bothered to explain what Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips' input was (if any) on this latest climate-change-hoax propaganda!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> If David Phillips had NO input - then WHY didn't he?? Did Cagey cagily refuse? Was he banned from taking part? Did someone stop him from participating? </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i><span style="color: #990000;">WHY did Canada's SENIOR CLIMATOLOGIST have NOTHING TO SAY about climate change in this "new scientific report"??!</span></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Has ANYONE even asked for Cagey's side of the story?! </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Funny how Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist was MUZZLED and missing in action while Environment Canada shilled UN Agenda 21 climate deceptions! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> We are left with the distinct impression that David Phillip's <i>does </i>believe in the AGW lies being spouted here, and that Environment Canada is creating political cover by politicizing science; they are gaming EC's bureaucracy by infecting it with Turdopian green bolshevism.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> (...Cagey Dave as much as showed this himself, when he was lying about the Lake Erie ice-overflow which occurred back on Feb.24, 2019. Phillips was acting as a true </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">climate-change denier</i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> - denying that climate changed naturally - by </span><i><span style="color: #990000;">downplaying </span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">and </span><i><span style="color: #990000;">deceptively omitting </span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">that the seiche-caused-ice-overflow in Lake Erie was natural, and that this phenomenon was a known entity (see Chapter 49). </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Phillips - Canada's supposedly "top climatologist" - conflated this common Lake Erie weather event as being some kind of proof of man-made climate change!!)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">This kind of blatant, biased politicized deception / omission / confirmation-biased-spin from a "scientist" is appalling. It serves not science, but political ends.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">So Cagey is side-lined here, but notably, <i>does not</i> dispute the propaganda; we expect Canada's Senior Climatologist to wade into issues such as, </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">um</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> 'climate change' - but what we see here is deception, manipulation, and cowardice. David Phillips has now shown he does indeed </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">tacitly agree with the climate hoax, but cannot actually provide evidence of it. So </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Turdo's Liberals have found another EC shill to spout the UN's Agenda 21 plans. </span></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Funny that neither <i>CP</i>, nor the <i>Calgary Herald</i>, nor Elizabeth Bush, bothered to provide the link to the actual report; the names of the scientists were not given, nor the details of the reports used. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Basically, this is just Turdo's Ottawa-style biased summary, copying the same template which the IPCC's fear-mongering reports use. It is Turdo's mini-me version of the IPCC's 'cherry-picked-summary of other cherry-picked-summaries' technique; a basket of Agenda 21-loyal lies. It's the "all-settled" climate lie, now made in Ottawa.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Funny that no other sources were provided by<i> CP </i>or the <i>Calgary Herald </i>to give any challenge or perspective to this latest Liberal climate propaganda! </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Was Elizabeth Bush <i>actually</i> interviewed by any <i>real</i> journalist?? Was she challenged about <i>anything</i> she claimed?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; text-align: left;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This is blatantly pure FAKE NEWS; one-way biased stenography / fascist "journalism" - the <i>Calgary Herald</i> and the <i>Canadian Press</i> have become Turdo's Truthers; Turdo's Pravda.</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06;">CHAPTER 51</span><span style="color: #0b5394;"> </span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> A prime example of GreenFear propaganda, of climate alarmism, was shat out by Allison Hanes and the <a href="https://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/allison-hanes-a-terrifying-new-normal">Montreal Gazette on Apr.28, 2019</a> headlined "</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: transparent; font-size: large;"><i>Quebec's flood crisis could be terrifying new normal".</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This story was falsely presented as 'news' by Google, when it was not news, but was pure climate fear-spreading propaganda being indiscriminately peddled by the Montreal Gazette and Google.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> It's fake 'journalism' such as this which has been shaped by 'scien-tainers' such as David Phillips. Cagey Dave was not even mentioned in this story - why, we don't know. Why wasn't Canada's Senior Climatologist interviewed here?! Why are the Montreal Gazette and Allison Hanes muzzling science?!? Why's no-one asking Phil Chadwick about Cagey's muzzling?!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Nevertheless, Cagey's imprimatur is palpable. This is the kind of propaganda Cagey'd approve; after all, it's the same kind of stuff he peddled and, as we can see, inspired.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> Hanes claims that "</span><i style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">we are at nature's mercy</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">" regarding the the flooding around Montreal - yet then spends the rest of her story spouting <i>an utter contradiction</i>, purporting that it's all caused </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">by climate change</i><span style="color: #0b5394;">... meaning that it's </span><span style="color: #0b5394;"><i>NOT 'natural'</i> at all, </span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">but has all been caused<i> by man</i>!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> For Great Gaia's sake Allison: get your propaganda in order!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Hanes shills the usual Agenda 21 climate drivel 'solutions' - b</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">ait and switch, conflation, false causation, bias confirmation - yep, reporter/propagandist Hanes throws it all into the "it's all settled"' climate lie!</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This fake news reporter Hanes conflates and confuses issues and peppers her propaganda with spiked terms such as </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">scarier, catastrophe</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> and</span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"> terrifying </i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">to push her editorialized, biased GreenFear-mongering.</span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"> </i></div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> (...hmm: is Allison's <i>OWN</i> propaganda 'natural' - or is it 'man-made'?!? Discuss, class...)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">CHAPTER 52</i></span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> Let's go to June 13, 2019, when the CBC, on their nightly national newscast, began touting that they will be broadcasting some kind of 'climate change in your backyard' phony-news segments coming up next week.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"> There's a federal election coming up in the fall, so of course, Justin Turdeau's cock-holsters at the CBC are obligated to provide their climate-fascist hero with favourable media cover. This is what the CBC is expected to do, in trade for the cash they got from Turdo: c</i><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">on the electorate for Turdo's benefit.</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"> Already, the CBC (Climate Bias Corp.) was previewing all the scary visuals which they will be using to bolster their climate-change-lying-narrative - - in order to con Canadians into believing that a Turdo carbon tax will somehow... uhh... "stop the climate"!! {wtf?!?! What does that even mean??}</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> (Talk about a contrast on the same day on US television, where everyone in the (leftist) media was in a self-righteous uproar over some fake Nancy Pelosi video. These are the SAME media clowns who for 3 years have lied continually that 'Trump was elected by Russia'!</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> It's the SAME media which in 3 years never acknowledged that the Steele dossier - which became the basis for Mueller's anti-Trump witch-hunt - was cooked up by Crooked Hillary and her Russian spy partners. Yep: that same media now suddenly becomes very concerned about 'deep fake' Pelosi videos - when they themselves have been happily, repeatedly, collectively lying about Trump from day one. Lies about Trump were peddled AS IF they were fact, on ALL the major networks, 24/7.)</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> In the same fashion, CBC can lie about "climate-change" {in other words, spread FAKE NEWS} while pretending that it's true - for political purposes; just as the US media got away with it against Trump; and because they are leftist-biased, their viewpoint is the one pounded into people's minds.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> They will use the same propaganda to provide political ground cover for Climate Barbie and Turdo; the same tired narrative, the same ole' GreenFear lies, the same ole photos and the same ole video clips {...cue random, tiresome background cliche visuals of cracked soil, flooded soil, hot sun, storms, melting ice, forest fires, chimneys, polar bears, cars in a traffic jam...} you know, film </i>anything<i> to make it appear ominously related to 'climate change' - and at the same time, dupe the marks into votin' Liberal.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> Basically, the bought-and-paid-for CBC is now going to blatantly become just an extension of Justin Trudeau's Liberal campaign team. We can't expect even a token amount of pretension on behalf of any CBC hack, trying to appear as if they are 'fair' in the coverage - the CBC's past narratives and biases clearly show their track-record. </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> The CBC - Turdo's cock-holster - is now rolling out its campaign to re-elect the Liberals.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> So - now that we have noted the CBC's above action on June 13, 2019 - let's ALSO remember WHAT ELSE transpired, earlier that day, as seen in this <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mckenna-imposes-carbon-tax-alberta-1.5174482">Jun 13, 2019 CBC report</a> !! </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> We see that Canada's fascist Liberal climate change propagandist Catherine McKenna had forced a carbon tax onto Alberta, </i></span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">on the SAME DAY that the CBC was touting their new 'climate change in your backyard' propaganda series on the nightly news!!!!</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> WHAT A 'COINCIDENCE' - eh?!!!! - that the CBC just happened to announce their new fake-news GreenFear series later on the same day?!</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i> We see a planned coordinated propaganda effort right there. Tax funded CBC fifth columnists helping shill for the Liberals who fund them (thanks, Ms. Telford..!) creating political cover for McKenna and Turdo to carry on the global warming charade for Justin Trudeau's overlords at the UN.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>And, you might ask: hey, where the f*ck is Ole Cagey in all this?! Well, Cagey, the old climate-change propagandist, has done his job in the trenches, heroically carpet-bombing the media with his climate change horse-shit, doin' his part to keep the socialist hoax alive; setting the stage for his boss, Climate Barbie, to napalm Canada's economy to ruin. Cagey Dave helped destroy Canada's economy. Well done.</i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>- </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>So, as planned, on June 17, 2019, the <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/it-s-a-problem-for-society-climate-change-is-making-some-homes-uninsurable-1.5173697">CBC's campaign to re-elect Justin Trudeau</a> using climate-change lies began. </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>CBC used its national tax-funded media power to spew its leftist bias, disinformation and fear - to monger GreenFear - for political purposes. </i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>This is also what Paikin and TVO have been constantly doing for several years now, with their repetitive 'climate watch' green propaganda, the same tired GreenFear-laced bumpers, over and over... like what Cagey Ole Dave's been doing for decades... </i></span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">repeat the lies often enough and... well, y'see how CBC presents its perverted spin!</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">*</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">The AGW climate change hoax was spread again on the CBC tv midday "news" on Aug.1, 2019, where the climatalarmist GreenFear-propagandist-hosts breathlessly fellated Justin Trudeau for 10 MINUTES for his Nunavut park announcement. It was a KatieTelford-freebie advertisement for Turdo and his Liberals - 10 free minutes of nation-wide non-stop Justin blowjobs.</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Included was CBC hack McGregor studiously babbling about "climate change" AND "global warming" - at the same time. {Now, they are apparently different!!}</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Also - again - the false meme of a polar bear was trotted out by the CBC - and was mentioned by Trudeau, as well, who intimated that polar bears were dying. No scrutiny or objectivity was provided by the CBC whatsoever - because "it's all settled" you see: how can a 'reporter' question something which is "settled"!!?</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">- </i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">The CBC spread more climate change lies on their </i><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Sept.22, 2019 </i><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">nightly tv fake-news broadcast.</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">The GreenFear was spread by the bug eyed grimace Paul Hunter, who claimed that the rains in Texas were caused by climate change. No supporting evidence was brought forward by the hack Hunter, nor by the host, the revolting Rosemary Barton. They PRETEND that "the science is settled", therefore, they purposefully DO NOT actually examine the climate change hoax. Their job is to promulgate the lie, </i><i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">as if </span></i><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">it were true.</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">That's what Paul Hunter - a prime example of a presstitute -was paid to do by the CBC and Trudeau's multi-million dollar Media Fund.</i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">These CBC GreenFear peddlers once again just took a large sh!t on screen and let it fester. The pos... (presstiute on staff; whadaya think it meant?) Hunter then tried to tie the Texas rain to Trump, while the CBC was (deceptively) showing the usual random, irrelevant - in fact, outright fraudulent - images and clips of forest fires, melting ice (in Texas, Paul?!... ya fuc*in' fifth-columnist...) and smokestacks - a complete demonstration by the CBC of a fabricated story; showing NOT 'news', but blatant Trudeau co*k holstering. </i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Paul Hunter and the CBC were making a political advertisement for Trudeau during the federal election, to deflect viewers from the fact that their Crime Minister Justin Blackface and his Liberal klan members are nothing more than a two-bit minstrel show. </i><br />
<i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><br /></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<i style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 54</span></b></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> ...and BAM, here we go again: the climate-change liars at Canada's Global News ran a fake news story on <a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/5489393/frequency-of-severe-air-turbulence-could-triple-due-to-climate-change/">July 12, 2019</a>, making a laughably tenuous 'link' insinuating that "climate change" caused an Air Canada flight to drop. This one-sided pseudo-science garbage was cobbled together by Brian Hill, an "</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">online Writer and Researcher, Investigative Global News</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">". "Investigator"??! Peddling phony science dressed up as biased 'news' - more like a Glo-bull Fake News "propagator" than an investigator.</span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This follows a slew of similar recent GreenFear-laced propaganda peddled on other Canadian media,</span><span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> from stories that "climate change" - specifically: 'man-made climate change' - causes volcanoes {!}, caused the recent California earthquakes</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">{!}, caused</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Hurricane Barry (the first 'hurricane' of the 2019 <i>season </i></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">(!) which ended up not being a hurricane after all...}, and causes threats to </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">hummingbirds in Costa</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Rica {!}</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">. Really, what <i>ISN'T</i> caused by climate change?!! </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: xx-small;">hahahah</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> By the way, Canada's frenzied media eagerly hyped and fear-mongered about 'Hurricane' Barry so much, that one would think that it was occurring in Canada. Then on July 14, 2019, after Barry had hit landfall, it was just a tropical storm, <i>not a hurricane</i> at all.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> What disappointment the poor GreenFear-pushers at the CBC Climate Bolshevik Corp. must have felt, losing a great chance to use a natural event to shill for Turdo's fraudulent carbon tax by using the 'horror of man-man hurricanes' as their false meme. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> On July 14th, the CBC didn't even bother to get Canada's Cagey Climatologist to tell everyone how Barry was made by man. (Cagey was muzzled by Trudeau and the CBC!)</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> Basically, </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">anything</i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> can be - and </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">is</i><span style="color: #0b5394;"> being - attributed to the "climate change" boogeyman - and the extension is that ALL the above scenarios (...essentially: </span><i style="color: #0b5394;">any</i><span style="color: #0b5394;">thing!!) can be "prevented" </span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">if only we give Liberals more cash</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> It's an insane conceit: Turdo and Climate Barbie will heroically '<i>stop the climate</i>'... ... ...</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 55</i></b></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">On<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/europe-heat-wave-climate-change-1.4904410"> Aug.2, 2019,</a> the CBC shat out yet another (of many) GreenFear-laced piece of climate change hokum, this time publishing an "Associated Press" feed which doesn't even name the climate change fanatic(s) who wrote this propaganda. Telford's cash goes a long way to feather the nest for Lieberal King Turdo, doesn't it!!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">CBC did not bother to provide Canadian confirmation of these European AGW biased assumptions, which are being propagandized fraudulently as "science", when in fact this is a religious-cult-like climate-change hoax masquerading as 'science'. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">This is manna for GreenFear-infected fascists and eco-marxists who are triggered by such confirmation-biased propaganda. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Oh, and CBC muzzled David Phillips from commenting on this article!! </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: medium;">Isn't Phil Chadwick concerned?!?!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Why did Trudeau prevent Cagey Dave from providing confirmation from a Canadian perspective on the Euro-trash-scientaiment</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> described in this CBC fake-news-fable?! </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;">Can't some Telford-bucks roll into Cagey's coffers?!!</span></span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 56</i> </b></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><b>Liberal Crime Minister Turdo, Canada's Serial Ethics Violator</b></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/justin-trudeau-prime-minister-fredericton-dieppe-1.5247783">On Aug.15, 2019,</a> Canada's Crime Minister Turdo (who was found guilty on Aug.14, 2019 of his <i>second </i>conflict of interest ethics violation, this time for influence peddling in the SNC-LAVALIN scandal) popped up in Fredericton, New Brunswick (in a pre-election campaign stop, where his travel is paid for by Canadian tax payers, not by his Liberal party), agitating and spreading more GreenFear</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> climatalarmism</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: xx-small;">TM</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">, as well as (of course) doling out 'climate cash' to eager local yokels to stop the "climate crisis" - a man-made political 'crisis' cooked up by his handlers at the UN. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> The CBC dutifully reported:</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""open sans" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-size: 16px;">"Droughts, fires, floods, and heat waves — communities across the country are facing the impacts of the climate crisis," Trudeau said in a statement. "In Fredericton, people have seen first-hand the damage and uncertainty caused by extreme weather events.."</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> For some reason, CBC </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">DID NOT</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> include David Phillips in this climate change story, in order to show official scientific evidence that the St.John River has never flooded before and that, before "climate change", there was.... </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;">um</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">...</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> <i>NO</i> climate change, because the climate was always stable and predictable and nice!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">-</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> On Aug.16, 2019, the CBC, on their nightly national tv broadcast, again shat out another piece of climate fear, this time with CBC GreenFear propagandist Ian Hanomansing hosting a repeat story from Susan Ormiston, trying her best to create a climate of fear around the permafrost in Tuktoyaktuk. Susan even had - of course! </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-small;">hahaha</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> - a star walk-on performance by the polar-bear liar Catherine McKenna, who spouted (without any question from ANYONE!) her usual climatalarmist rhetoric. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Imagine that, eh?!! We are supposed to believe that Ormiston was just... </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-small;">um</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">... y'know... </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: x-small;">um</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">... randomly wandering around the North with her film crew... and by golly, coincidentally, they '<i>just happened to meet</i>' Climate Barbie in Tuktoyaktuk one day!!! What a con job!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This was a repeat episode which CBC had aired in June 2019. Looks like Telford's media bucks to help re-elect Justin Trudeau are sure being well-used now - especially since the Liberal Liar Turdo had been found guilty just two days earlier, on Aug.14th, of his SECOND ethics violation while in office!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The CBC's in-house <i>'Committee To Re-Elect Justin Trudeau Using Tax-Payer Dollars'</i> desperately needed a diversion from further uncomfortable analysis of their hero Turdo's ethical-transgressions, so what better dog-whistle to Turdo's perverted base than to throw on a repeat of some old climate change propaganda?! That'll pacify the CBC's base of climate-change deniers!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">This was a pathetically transparent ten-minute FREE ADVERTISEMENT for Turdo's Liberals, paid for NOT by the Liberal Party, but by Canadian taxpayers.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 57</span></b></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Canada's GreenFear-mongers might have a harder time pushing their 'climate change' hoax during the federal election period, as seen in this <a href="https://toronto.citynews.ca/2019/08/18/climate-change-partisan-fedelxn/">Aug.18, 2019 City story</a>.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;">Already the GreenFear spreaders are exhaling large amounts of C02 with their histrionics:</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0b5394;"><span style="font-size: large;"> ".</span><i><b>..</b></i></span><span face=", "helvetica neue" , "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #4f4f4f;"><i><b>Catherine Abreu, executive director of the Climate Action Network Canada, called the Elections Canada warning “shocking.”</b></i></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #4f4f4f; font-family: proxima-nova, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<b><i>“Climate change is a scientific fact,” she said. “It’s not an opinion..</i>.”</b><br />
<b>And the CBC already had Tim Gray predictably whining about this, on their noon tv news on Aug.19, 2019. Maybe Abreu and Gray can pretend they represent religious cults, instead of political organizations?!</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #4f4f4f; font-family: proxima-nova, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Climate change deniers deny</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> that earth's climate <i>has</i> been changing - ever since there was an earth. That's a scientific fact. They deny the sun's pivotal role in not only the earth's climate, but earth's <i>entire existence</i>! (...Oh no, another fascist idea for Justin Trudeau: Mr. Sunnyways way will soon come up with a "Sun Tax" to "stop global-warming"..!)</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">They will huff that for a while they can't dissemble opinions/hoaxes that 'climate change is real' {...what?!), 'climate can be stopped' or 'reversed', or that earth's climate had <i>never </i>'changed' in the past, had <i>never</i> evolved, and was ALWAYS in some mythical comfortable stasis until Al Gore and Jim Bradley discovered a way to huckster more cash from government coffers.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #4f4f4f; font-family: proxima-nova, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">I guess that explains why the CBC and TVO and the rest of 'em have been carpet-bombing us with Turdo's and Climate Barbie's "it's all settled' climate alarmism - gotta get that climate-change propaganda in before the writ's dropped, eh?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">CBC and other media outlets might even have to ease off on Cagey during the election, what with his propensity to spout climate </span><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">diarrhea while also bein' a federal employee ..!</span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The </span><a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/environment-groups-warned-saying-climate-is-real-could-be-seen-as-partisan#comments-area" style="background-color: transparent; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Aug.18, 2019 National Post</a><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> also ran this same story, with some typically engaging comments:</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: transparent;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLVXyUB5ifkcLZWmgtQYE6-dRIH8B5mW8G-dGprkFQGHd3q3g7EwtxGWLQctzpfuzRcCLxSGyrS_kvqWwJ3nHmjEZnawk3smCLHPin18CxwO-Y1LmZZagSkYdiF-h0TZil4zjcraLPJkk/s1600/cagey+nat+post.JPG" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="372" data-original-width="723" height="328" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLVXyUB5ifkcLZWmgtQYE6-dRIH8B5mW8G-dGprkFQGHd3q3g7EwtxGWLQctzpfuzRcCLxSGyrS_kvqWwJ3nHmjEZnawk3smCLHPin18CxwO-Y1LmZZagSkYdiF-h0TZil4zjcraLPJkk/s640/cagey+nat+post.JPG" width="640" /></a></span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;"><i>(click on image to enlarge)</i></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">- Interesting observation by Steve Burton that climatologists are like astrologers {!!!} - "no science, lots of hot air. Most scientists, when they look at the "science" behind climatology, are horrified".</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This sounds like a good description of Canada's Cagiest Climatologist! </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">-</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Let's look at Cagey's climatological performance as seen in this <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/how-bad-has-this-winter-been-when-will-it-end-dave-phillips-environment-canada-1.5038674">Mar. 1, 2019 CBC story,</a> which is an example of state-run agitprop being disguised as "science". (...This is the same horrifying Martin Collaco interview which was already partially-deconstructed in CHAPTER 49... but there is <i>so much</i> CBC Cagey Climate Crap to unpack here..!) </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Collaco and the CBC </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">allowed David Phillips to spout his GreenFear scientainment at length, couched as 'news'. But note that the CBC here - as usual - is </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>not in any sense</i> acting in a journalistic capacity; there is NO pretense of any balance, or even any challenge to Cagey's emissions. Cagey blabs on and on in his gilded cage, knowing he is safe from any dissent or challenge. This isn't news, it's a staged theatrical performance.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> This is designed as a biased enabling tool to push climate-change propaganda - one of thousands of CBC 'articles' to do so. This article fully demonstrates yet another typical example of the 'Cagey Climate Tango', where the CBC facilitates 'climate-change' fraud, acting as an enabler and Cagey as the devious "scientific" beard.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioI5dA8UPhJJJw4Gtz8z9iPlVcjuVi890eEBv0FAgpjVn8JgpQ766MBlIXgw2bWcoF9cbJpM0VQbtDw9h5Kylel1J5fyn69MqzL31poFxThbKPuwkgpuZgs576ZmHYjvVvL1ZkRv3dsuY/s1600/Cagey+GreenFear+propaganda+2019.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="819" data-original-width="798" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioI5dA8UPhJJJw4Gtz8z9iPlVcjuVi890eEBv0FAgpjVn8JgpQ766MBlIXgw2bWcoF9cbJpM0VQbtDw9h5Kylel1J5fyn69MqzL31poFxThbKPuwkgpuZgs576ZmHYjvVvL1ZkRv3dsuY/s640/Cagey+GreenFear+propaganda+2019.JPG" width="620" /></a></span></div>
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><i style="color: #b45f06; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">(click on image to enlarge)</i><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">What a pantload of phony-'science' RUBBISH! 'Here's the weather you want' </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;">bla bla bla</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> 'maple syrup', 'jokers in the weather deck' (</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;">...great gaia: Cagey's repeating </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">THAT</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;"> bizarre homily again? He's been using this dumb phrase for years</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">), 'wild swings', 'global fever'... yes, "when </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">will</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> it end" - more specifically, </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">when</i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> will Cagey's Climate Crap ever end?! This is not science - this is pseudo-science propaganda, it's climate theater.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">These GreenFear-pushing bait-and-switchers are practicing "political science" disguised as "science", as if they are a brainwashed cult.</span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;"><b><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;">CHAPTER 58</span></b><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Interesting column by Danielle Smith in the <a href="https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/smith-i-almost-felt-sorry-for-trudeau-until-i-came-to-my-senses">Sept. 6, 2019 Calgary Herald</a>, regarding an interview which Canadian Crime Minister Justin Turdeau had on Netflix with a so-called 'comedian', Hasan Minhaj: </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">..."Minhaj praises post-nationalist Trudeau for inviting the world to Canada’s doorstep with his welcome-to-Canada tweet heard around the world, then seems shocked that it resulted in an immigration backlash, particularly in Quebec with its secular law banning religious apparel in public service jobs.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">He even points out that Trudeau’s 32 per cent popularity is lower than Donald Trump, who is at 41 per cent.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">As much as I can revel in a bit of schadenfreude for our pompous prime minister getting his comeuppance by an even more pompous American, about halfway through it stops being funny. Minhaj’s interview may have been bad for Trudeau, but it is even worse for Alberta.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj saved his most devastating blows for talking about Alberta’s oilsands, which he acknowledges is the third-largest oil reserve in the world, and which he calls the tarsands because they “are dirty and gunky, mixed in with sand, and refining it causes a ton of pollution.” To his credit, Trudeau does a good job explaining how pipelines are a better way to transport oil than rail or trucking and talks about how Canadians know we can balance the environment and the economy.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj would have none of it, though, and he proceeds to damn Trudeau with his own words, saying Trudeau sold himself hard as the guy who would “get the Paris agreement done,” calling him a “climate hero,” a “one-man PR team for the environment,” pointing out that climate change was his “signature issue,” and even saying he would be what the Green New Deal would be like “if it had piercing eyes and wanted to read you poetry” — whatever that means.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">For Canadians, it’s jarring to hear an American complain about the twinning of an existing pipeline when the U.S. has <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pipeline101.org_Where-2DAre-2DPipelines-2DLocated&d=DwMF-g&c=Am4olr3RQAhYSZwlSDwaRA&r=lbYPz6yGQvcpqCCvNDTcXL9MXaXhQ40ekt5pcOyCkFU&m=EsHTGarXXDl_cHzvlnqcqeMZRrmmXzSiPtVL8PE-IXg&s=ZHpaZEOAGlbP1vKSBT0UgabyCdytLBYE6qEQXvB6tU8&e=" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">116,000 kilometres of crude oil pipelines,</a> the largest network in the world. It’s shocking to hear an American complain about the expansion of Trans Mountain to carry 890,000 bpd, when the U.S. <a href="https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/as-canada-dithers-the-u-s-approved-3-oil-pipelines-to-carry-2-4m-bpd-by-2020" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">approved three new pipelines in the last three years that will carry 2.4 million bpd</a>. And it’s beyond belief an American would be outraged by our tanker shipments going from 60 to 400 a year from Burnaby, when tanker <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com_LL1126329_US-2DGulfAsia-2DVLCCs-2Ddrive-2Dglobal-2Dtanker-2Dpatterns&d=DwMF-g&c=Am4olr3RQAhYSZwlSDwaRA&r=lbYPz6yGQvcpqCCvNDTcXL9MXaXhQ40ekt5pcOyCkFU&m=EsHTGarXXDl_cHzvlnqcqeMZRrmmXzSiPtVL8PE-IXg&s=5Chhudu6_WLqpoygUMrN-ePGRPV1IT-6dhu2ds0ZqeQ&e=" rel="noopener" style="border: 0px; color: black; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast are now at their highest ever</a>.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Minhaj joins a long list of celebrity hypocrites that includes Al Gore, David Suzuki, James Cameron, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jane Fonda and the like — acting as if Canada is solely to blame for the world’s use of crude and expecting us to bear the sole obligation to stop producing it.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I’ve been perplexed for some time about why it is that wealthy, fossil-fuel guzzling stars target us. Minhaj finally explains why we in Canada are held to a higher standard than anyone else.</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In an homage to the Black Panther comic book hero, Minhaj ends the segment by telling Trudeau he is the White Panther presiding over WaKanada and that our country is “a proving ground for whether progressive policies can work.”</span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Think about that: the progressives of the world want Canada to be a demonstration project, proving that we can support mass immigration, eliminate poverty, offer free health care to all, maintain pristine landscapes, while choking off the principal source of wealth that allows us to accomplish all those things.</span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: 1.6; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-break: break-word;">
<span style="font-size: large;">As I said, I almost felt sorry for Trudeau. But he’s to blame for the pickle we find ourselves in, by raising expectations that could never possibly have been met. No wonder celebrities think we live in a movie."</span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">*</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The yankee left's obsession with Canada as a political laboratory experiment is quite clear. Politically challenged Demotards continually demand and expect that Canadians obediently obey the left's moral-virtue signals, and obediently submit to being manipulated by U.S. GreenFear social-engineering experiments. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Of course, it's not only yank leftists, but Canadian ones as well who desire to oppress their fellow Canadians - y'know, GreenFear-pushing scumbags such as Jim Bradley, Justin Turdeau, Catherine McKenna, Stephane Dion (heck: </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">all </i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Liberals...) as well as Canada's gaggle of commy dippers and green eco-fascists. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">We see how American organizations openly conspired "to land-lock the Tar Sands"; to choke off Alberta's oil industry. </span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">We see Trudeau's federal Liberal links to these U.S. efforts through the activities of Butts - who was also McGuinty's chief of staff provincially during the Liberal's eco-terror reign in Ontario.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The cancer of Jim {The Godfather of GreenFear} Bradley's Liberal eco-terrorism - having helped destroy Ontario -metastasized and sought another host to feed upon, and so spread from Ontario to infect Ottawa. That same cancer had also earlier spread provincially to Alberta with the election of Notley's commy dippers.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">We know that during his election campaign, oil-hater Trudeau had happily accepted Obama's 'political advisors' to assist in the spread of globalist eco-terror in Canada. Yep: in 2015, the stench of Obama was perfume to Turdeau. This cancer existed RIGHT IN TURDEAU'S OFFICE; its goal: to create disruption in Canada's economy, through the propagation of GreenFear eco-terrorism.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> See how yankee eco-terrorists attempted to interfere with the provincial election in Alberta, as detailed in this <a href="https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/vivian-krause-rachel-notley-the-rockefellers-and-albertas-landlocked-oil">Apr.12, 2019 column by Vivian Krause</a>.</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> You can bet that ignorant clowns such as Minhaj - those sanctimonious believers of "Trump-Russia" conspiracy theories - couldn't care less when it is THEIR country openly meddling, openly interfering, with elections held in Canada. </span><br />
<br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> That American GreenFear-mongers are meddling in Canadian affairs (despite the ignorance of Minhaj and his audience) is not a new thing; Vivian Krause had appeared before a </span><a href="https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/41-1/RNNR/meeting-25/evidence" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">Feb.9, 2012 Federal House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources</a><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> hearing, delivering this statement:</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;">"...I will be making my remarks in English, but I would be happy to answer any questions in either French or English.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> My name is Vivian Krause. Over the past five years I have followed the science and the money behind environmental campaigns. I've written a series of articles published in the <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Financial Post</i> and elsewhere. I also write a blog called <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">Fair Questions</i>. I'm not part of an industry, political party, or a campaign.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> As I prepared to testify today, I watched a short video at the website of the joint review panel for the Northern Gateway project. In that video, the chairperson of the panel, Sheila Leggett, says the decision that the panel will be making is on whether the Northern Gateway is in the public interest of our country. She emphasizes that public participation is important, and that the panel is focused on making sure it has a process that is open, fair, and transparent. With the backing of government and the oil industry, one of the most powerful industries in the world, it's expected the proponents of the Northern Gateway will have significant resources at their disposal. This is common knowledge. When the public hears from the spokespeople from the ministry and government, we consider the source.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> What hasn't been known until recently, however, is that some of the opponents of various pipeline projects and the campaigns against the Canadian energy sector also have some deep-pocketed supporters south of the border. I believe that in order for the joint review panel to conduct its work in a manner that is open, fair, and transparent, funding on all sides should be out in the open. In my review of the American tax returns of the foundations funding the environmental movement both in the U.S. and in Canada, I've traced $300 million that has gone from American charitable foundations to environmental campaigns affecting our country. Most of my analysis is based on American tax returns because the IRS requires greater disclosure than the CRA.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The $300 million is from roughly 850 grants that I've traced from ten foundations. In addition to these foundations, an additional dozen or more American foundations have granted substantial funds to Canadian environmental groups. By my analysis, American funding from the foundations that I've followed has increased tenfold over the past decade, from about $4 million in 2000 to $50 million in 2010. Of the $300 million in American funding that I've traced, at least $30 million is specifically for campaigns targeting the oil and gas industry in Canada.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> As I see it, the campaign against Canadian energy is one side of a two-sided coin. The other side of the coin is the creation of the renewable energy industry. In trying to understand the campaign against Canadian oil and the pipeline projects that are the lifeline of the Canadian energy sector, I think this is perhaps the most important insight that I can offer. This thinking is reflected in the strategy paper entitled “Design to Win”, which is prepared by the California Environmental Associates and funded by all of the big American foundations that are funding the campaign against Canadian oil. In that document, there's a diagram that clearly spells out that consumer and voter campaigns are funded in order to influence politicians to create the context for, and I quote, “massive shift in investment capital from dirty to clean energy”.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Of course, the dichotomy between dirty and clean energy is a bit of a false dichotomy in the sense that the so-called clean energy industry also has some negative environmental impacts. Underneath this dichotomy is another dichotomy, which of course is between energy that has historically been largely or partially from foreign oil imports and an industry that has been created that is primarily domestic.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The campaign to shift from dirty to clean energy, as it appears to me, is also about reducing dependence on imported oil, and increasing energy independence. In fact, if you read the fine print, you will find that American foundations say this themselves in their strategy papers, that one of their interests is in increasing American energy security and American energy independence.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> In the media coverage in the public debate over the last few weeks, there have been several recurring questions. I'd like to speak briefly to each of these. The first question is, so what? Environmentalists have downplayed the extent of their American funding by saying the oil industry has foreign investors, and the environmental impacts of the oil industry are global, so it's fine for the environmental movement to source its funding globally. These are valid points. I will argue, though, that at the heart of the funding matter is not just the foreign nature of the funding; it's the fact that the money involved is big, and that it's coming from billion-dollar foundations, and in one case a hedge fund billionaire. And the funders that are funding this strategy are funding science as a marketing tactic to sway market share, to manipulate markets, and in some cases to protect trade interests. If thousands of Alaskan families say they are giving $25 or $30 to B.C. environmental groups, that would be foreign funding, but I don't think it would bother us, because in fact if there is a major oil spill, Alaska would be affected.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> What we see here is the opposite of that. It's not small amounts of money from a large number of foreign sources; it's very large amounts of money from a very small number of billion-dollar foundations. Actually, my blog and most of my writing has been about the science and the money behind environmental campaigns. Really, it's the use of the flawed science and some of the exaggerated claims that are my biggest concerns. Some of what the environmental organizations are saying is simply untrue. This brings me to ask who is funding these campaigns and why.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Another question that comes up is the question of who is calling the shots. Environmentalists insist that they're in the driver's seat. However, this does not quite ring true for me, because most of the foundations funding these campaigns don't accept unsolicited proposals. In other words, they have their own ideas.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> The third issue is what we might call the constituency issue. This is an important question for the joint review panel. When an organization receives a substantial portion of its funding from foreign sources, who does that organization represent? For example, RAVEN, a small first-nations group that campaigns heavily against the proposed Prosperity Mine in B.C., reported in its tax return for 2009-2010 that 83% of its funding is from outside Canada. When an organization is that heavily funded by foreign funding, whose interests is it representing? Are they Canadian interests or the interests of its foreign funders, or perhaps both?</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Incidentally, I've also seen grants that mention specific mines and other specific projects. In one case, it was a ski resort, the Jumbo Glacier ski resort, in British Columbia.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> When billionaire funders are involved in influencing public opinion and public policy on a major issue of national importance, I think the money should be out in the open, whether the billionaire funders are American or Canadian. I believe that this applies to foreign investment and philanthropy, as well.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Going forward, I hope that the CRA will require the same level of disclosure as the IRS. If that had been the case, this would have been out in the open over the last ten years. I also hope, as I've said before, that government and industry will begin a dialogue directly with the American foundations that are funding the campaign against Canadian energy. These foundations give away $1 billion a year. I don't know that they can be outspent, even by the oil industry. They've already spent hundreds of millions of dollars in our country, so I think it's clear that they're serious about what they're doing.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> I think the time has come for dialogue directly between the Canadian energy industry and the American foundations that are funding the campaign against it.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Thank you very much..."</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Panelist</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> David Anderson begins to question Krause"</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546096" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""verdana" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"> </span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">"I want to thank our witnesses for being with us today.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696526" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Ms. Krause, I'd like to start with you. I wish we had a little more time to explore deeper some of the things you've talked about here.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696527" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Most of us assume that the battle we see against pipelines and oil sands is an ideological one. It was very interesting this morning to hear you talk about the economic aspects of that. It's also interesting that we see these socialistic obsessions being funded by billionaires.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696528" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Who are the key players in the foreign funding that's coming into Canada? Can we track the money a little bit? How does the money get into Canada? What organizations does it comes through, for the most part?</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> The main funders are the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Oak Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. The Rockefeller Family Fund funds things south of the border. There's also the Wilburforce Foundation, the Brainerd Foundation, and the Bullitt Foundation. Those are the main ones.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
The big five are Hewlett, Packard, Moore, Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Those foundations have $20 billion in assets and give away about $1 billion a year. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Many of them made their money from the oil and gas sector. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> For example, the wealth of the Pew Charitable Trust originates from oil, as does Rockefeller's. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> How are they able to get that huge amount of money you're talking about into Canada?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> To finish up, I think it's important that there is a plan here. In fact, Tides Canada was funded by the Hewlett Foundation to develop “a strategic plan to address oil and gas development in British Columbia”. That was in 2004 that Tides Canada was paid $70,000 to develop this plan by the Hewlett Foundation. Since then Hewlett has poured in $26 million. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
I think it's fair to ask what the plan is. Does it involve funding a large number of environmental groups that campaign in concert against Canadian oil? Does it involve the creation of the Great Bear Rainforest? Does it involve funding the first nations on the strategic north coast of B.C.? Does it involve funding a particular scientist, politician, or political party? Those are fair questions. What's the plan? </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Secondly, of the $300 million I've traced, far and away the largest recipient is Tides Canada and its sister organization the U.S. Tides Foundation. I've traced $60 million of American money that has gone through Tides Canada over the last ten years.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="arrow-circle-down" style="background-position: -128px -192px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #37651f; display: inline-block; height: 18px; position: relative; top: 4px; width: 18px; zoom: 1;"></span><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> Do you know what percentage of that has gone into this project in Alberta or B.C.? Is that too difficult to find out?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Just to give you one example, the Hewlett Foundation and the Packard Foundation together have granted $90 million towards B.C. environmental groups. Of that $90 million, about $80 million was specifically for projects to create the Great Bear Rainforest, and also to address the energy sector. It's interesting that here we have $55 million that's specifically for the creation of the Great Bear Rainforest, but of course that isn't called the Hewlett Packard Rainforest, it's called the Great Bear Rainforest. Now, in the name of protecting the Kermode bear, environmentalists are arguing that oil tanker traffic needs to be banned on the entire gateway portion of the B.C. coast. The interesting thing about it is that the Great Bear Rainforest goes from the northern tip of Vancouver Island all the way to the southern tip of Alaska, every square inch of the coastline.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> So were they to get their way, they would shut down any possibility of moving supplies out of that area.</div>
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546181" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546181" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Ms. Vivian Krause:</span></b></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> Whether it was the intention or not, I don't know. But the Great Bear Rainforest has become the great trade barrier. I do find it interesting to note, though, the tax returns of the Wilburforce Foundation. Of course the Wilburforce Foundation was created by Gordon Letwin, who is one of the original founders of Microsoft. Gordon Letwin has put nearly $100 million through the Wilburforce Foundation, some $60 million of which came in Microsoft shares. So Wilburforce in turn has granted $16 million to B.C. environmental groups.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696541" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> One of their grants was specifically to devolve control of land on the B.C. coast to first nations and local communities in the interest of protecting the Great Bear Rainforest. I find it interesting that an American foundation saw fit to empower Canadian aboriginal people, of all the aboriginal people in the world. Having worked with the United Nations in Guatemala for six years and in Indonesia, I would have thought that there are other aboriginal people in the world who could also have used those resources. It does strike me as interesting that so much American money has gone into the creation of this park, a no-trade zone specifically on our strategic gateway to Asia.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. David Anderson: </b> It's interesting, because some of the environmental groups would agree exactly with what you're saying. I've got a quote from Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, where he said:</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546203" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<tr style="box-sizing: border-box;" valign="top"><td align="right" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px;" width="30"></td><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px;"><small style="box-sizing: border-box;">The effort to stop Keystone is part of a broader effort to stop the expansion in the tar sands. It is based on choking off the ability to find markets for tar sands oil.</small></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696544" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"> So it sounds like that's actually the political activity behind what's really going on here..."</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Later at this hearing, another panelist, socialist Claude Gravelle, starts questioning Krause. </span></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Pay attention: it is instructive to witness Gravelle's inherent bullying, antagonism and disrespect towards Krause throughout their entire interaction - truly a disgusting</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> representation of socialist fascism: </span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
"We go now to the official opposition, to Mr. Gravelle, for up to seven minutes.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="arrow-circle-down" style="background-position: -128px -192px; background-repeat: no-repeat; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #37651f; display: inline-block; height: 18px; position: relative; top: 4px; width: 18px; zoom: 1;"></span><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle (Nickel Belt, NDP): </b> </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms. Krause, you've made some pretty serious allegations impugning the motives of U.S. charitable foundations, suggesting that they are pawns in some economic strategy.Do you have any real evidence that there are U.S. commercial interests funding the Canadian environmental movement efforts to protect our wilderness and our coasts? Do you have any real evidence?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> With respect, sir, you're putting words in my mouth that I haven't said. What I can tell you is what is written down in the tax returns--</div>
</span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546304" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546304" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Can I just stop you for a minute here?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546666" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546666" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="personSpeaking" style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Please do.</span></span></div>
</div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546668" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546668" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b>I just want to quote Peter O'Neil from <i style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Vancouver Sun</i>, who has you as saying, “I have seen no glaring evidence of commercial interests in the U.S. that are funding the campaigns against the Northern Gateway.” Yet today you've made all kinds of accusations here. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Yes, well I understand commercial interests to be a particular company, and I don't see any evidence of that. What I do see is--</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So you haven't seen any evidence of this happening?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546310" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546310" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Would you let her answer the question, please, Monsieur Gravelle? </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> She's made some pretty serious accusations here. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Go ahead, Ms. Krause. </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I'd be glad to respond to your question.</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> What I do see is that wealthy Americans have the interest of their own country at heart, as, I think, do we. My impression is that perhaps what is driving this is the overall broad interest of the American economy. I think one of the best things that any country can do for itself is to give itself a good secure supply of energy and to cut the competition off from having that. So I've never suggested, and I would not suggest, that there is a particular oil company or any particular commercial interest behind this. But it is clear--and the foundations have said themselves--that they are interested in increasing the energy security and the energy independence of the United States and also in weaning the United States off imported oil.</span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So what you're saying is you have no evidence.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546326" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546326" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I'm saying that I believe that the--</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546327" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546327" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Okay, so you have no evidence. You just have accusations.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546328" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546328" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Monsieur Gravelle, do give the witness--</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546838" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546838" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> She doesn't have any evidence.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546842" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546842" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Do give the witness a chance to answer, and you can ask another question later.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696582" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> Go ahead, please, Ms. Krause.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546334" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546334" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> I would say I do have evidence, but not of commercial interests. I think there is evidence of the motivations. They're clearly written down. I think they are mixed and that there is a real true interest in protecting the environment and addressing the true environmental impacts of the energy sector. But I think the interest is not purely in protecting the environment, because the foundations themselves say that they're also interested in issues of energy security, national security, and energy independence.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> So you've only targeted environmentalists with your crusade. If we look at your background, we see that you've worked for a Conservative MP, you've worked in the salmon farming industry, and you've been paid on at least one occasion by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. It doesn't take much of a conspiracy theorist to claim that the real hidden agenda is coming from you.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546342" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696585" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> Have you conducted any research about the remaining secret backers of the Enbridge pipeline and what interests they are silently promoting?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Well, sir, first of all let me say, just to give you the right numbers, I did work for a Conservative MP for four weeks, and I was fired.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Some hon. members:</b> Oh, oh!</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> I worked for the United Nations in the poorest countries of the world for ten years.</div>
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546347" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546347" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> I'm not surprised.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547126" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547126" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I also worked for the salmon farming industry. That was ten years ago. For the last five years, I've been working on this unpaid. I'm not paid by anybody, okay?</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696591" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> Could you remind me again what your second point was?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> We'll go on to another question.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">An hon. member:</b> He forgot.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547151" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Para2696594" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</b> Oh, we'll go on to another question. You've been trained as a nutritionist-- </span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"></span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b> Never mind. You've been trained as a nutritionist?</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> Yes.</span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></span></span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</span></b> We've had some pretty highly qualified people come to our committee, with expertise on subjects like industry, labour.... We've had government officials and leading academics testify on the decline in the refinery industry and the loss of jobs. So as a nutritionist, you're not an expert. Why are you...?</div>
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547222" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547222" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> Why am I doing this?</span></div>
</div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6547224" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6547224" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br />
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a class="PersonSpeakingPopup" href="https://apps.ourcommons.ca/ParlDataWidgets/en/intervention/6547224" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(128, 128, 128); box-sizing: border-box; color: #300000; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Mr. Claude Gravelle</a>:</b> Yes.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"></span></span><br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> I'll be glad to answer your question. The reason I'm doing this, sir, is that no one else did. Frankly, the work I've done I think is important. It shouldn't have been done by an unpaid lay blogger working on her dining room table using Google. It should have been done by the media--this is investigative journalism type of work--but that wasn't happening. I felt it was an important issue, and that if I didn't do it, it just wouldn't get done. So that's why I did it.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </b></span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Do you not agree that it seems more concerning that a foreign-state-owned company like Sinopec has not only bought up large swaths of oil sands, but is now trying to push the pipeline through? You hardly even need a conspiracy theory to imagine that they aren't looking out for Canadian interests, because they also have a veto on new refineries in Canada. Don't you find that kind of odd?</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b> If you are saying that foreign investment in a Canadian industry should be out in the open, I agree with you. When foreign funding to the critics of industry is coming from a hedge-fund billionaire and billion-dollar foundations whose expressed interest is the energy security and energy independence of their own country, I think that should be out in the open. I think all funding should be out in the open.</div>
</span></span></div>
<div class="arrow interventionBox" id="6546445" style="border: 1px solid rgb(220, 220, 220); box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-right: 5px; padding: 7px;">
<div style="color: #333333;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="Int-6546445" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #427a26;"></a></span><br /></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Mr. Claude Gravelle:</b> </span></div>
<div class="anchor" style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(224, 224, 224); box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; padding-bottom: 5px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> If you think this should be out in the open, why aren't you researching these companies that are backing Enbridge?</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"></span></span><br /></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause:</b></span></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">
</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"> Many other journalists have already done it. It's already out there. No one was looking into the foreign funding of the environmental movement, and that's why I did.</span></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </span></b> There is a chart of the Prime Minister with Ethical Oil, the two ministers and a bunch of staffers. I think maybe your picture would fit in quite well, because that's what you're defending: Ethical Oil. I just can't believe what you've been saying</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
</span>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;"><b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I think it's obvious that they have used my research in their campaign, but they have done so without my permission. Frankly, in some cases they have inaccurately quoted my research, and I've insisted on having the record corrected. I'm not part of that campaign.</span></div>
<span class="paratext" style="box-sizing: border-box; height: auto; line-height: 18px; padding: 0.5em; width: auto;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
The point I'm trying to make is that we have money coming here from foreign billionaires. In the public debate--</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif"><br /></span></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif">Mr. Claude Gravelle: </span></b> We also have money coming in from billionaires supporting the pipeline.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Chair: </b> Your time is up, Mr. Gravelle</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></b></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="box-sizing: border-box;">Ms. Vivian Krause: </b> I was just going to say that in the public debate the emphasis has been put on the fact that the money is foreign. I've been trying to put the emphasis on the fact that it's big. If you look at my blog, you'll notice that I've also drawn attention to the money from big sources in Canada. For example, the Bronfmans have contributed $6 million to the David Suzuki Foundation: $2 out of every $25 of funding to the David Suzuki Foundation has come from the Bronfmans, the Claudine and Stephen Bronfman Family Foundation. </div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
I haven't looked only at American money; I've looked at big money on both sides of the border.."</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
*.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span face=""verdana" , sans-serif"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Instead of being concerned about what Krause actually </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">revealed</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">, this disgusting NDP hack Gravelle did his utmost to personally demean her, and to dismiss and discredit her findings!</span></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span face=""verdana" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333;">
<span face=""verdana" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="color: #333333;">
<span face=""verdana" , sans-serif"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><i>This</i> is how GreenFear fascism presents itself in Canada - and asshat c</span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">lowns such as Minhaj have no fu*kin' clue.</span></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>CHAPTER 59</b></span><br />
<br />
<div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><b>CANNIBALISM</b></span><b style="color: #b45f06; font-size: xx-large;"> FOR CLIMATE CHANGE</b></div>
</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Following up on the subject (detailed earlier in </span><span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: large;">Chapters 37 and 46</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">) of Green Fascist Doomsday scenarios, another typical insane example comes our way as seen in <a href="https://www.friatider.se/f-rslaget-i-tv4-ta-m-nniskor-f-r-att-r-dda-klimatet">this Sept.4, 2019 </a>report in Sweden's Fria Tider, where the idea was presented that </span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;">humans should practice cannibalism to 'save the planet'.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Yep... ...THIS is what GreenFear-pushers such as Turdo, McKenna, Jim Bradley, etc. are all about.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">This is the kind of far-left extremist GreenFear fascism which the lib left has been fanning and drooling over. </span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">The TV4 report reads: </span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<i><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: medium;">"</span><span style="font-family: "open sans"; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: -0.3264px; vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">Can you imagine becoming cannibal and eating other people to save the climate? </span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">That issue was seriously discussed in yesterday's </span></span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">After Five in TV4.</span></span></span></i></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i><br /></i></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">Anyone who watched TV4 After five on Tuesday may have been, to say the least, surprised. </span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">There, the idea was presented to start eating people.</span></i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i>The feature is about the fair "Gastro Summit - about the future of food" in Stockholm, where the behavioral scientist Magnus Söderlund holds seminars on the possibility of eating human flesh - to "save the climate".</i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i>- What makes most of us react instinctively with disgust when talking about eating human flesh to save the climate ?, wonders host Tilde de Paula.</i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i>Magnus Söderlund answers:</i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i>- First of all, it is that this person who is to be eaten must be dead.</i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"><i><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">One problem could be that dead bodies overall are taboo. </span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">In addition, criticism arises against defiling a dead body. </span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">Another explanation, says Söderlund, is that many are "slightly conservative" when it comes to eating something they are not used to, ie other people.</span></i></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><i><span style="font-size: large; vertical-align: inherit;"></span></i></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;">
<i><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">The conclusion is that it can be difficult to get the Swedes to become cannibals for the sake of the climate. </span><span style="vertical-align: inherit;">However, according to the researcher, it is important from a sustainability perspective to discuss different options for the future."</span></span><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394;">"</span></span></i></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> When are Turdo and McKenna going to advocate for this Green Policy Initiative, the Turdo Soylent Green Plan For Canadians?! </span></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Funny that the St.Catharines Standard hasn't asked Liberal hacks such as Turdo, Jim Bradley, or Chris Bittle, about their reactions to implementing this Green Friendly method of cannibalism to 'Battle The Climate Crisis', to 'Save The Planet From Peril'! </span></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Who will Jim Bradley eat first?! Or maybe Suzuki will feast on Bradley first?! Maybe Elizabeth May will eat Climate Barbie, as a tasty example of Planetary Climate Stewardship?</span></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> So many questions remain unanswered from Canada's provincial and federal Liberal Parties!</span></span></span></div>
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> "</span><i><span style="color: #cc0000;">Cannibalism For The Climate</span></i><span style="color: #0b5394;">" can be Trudeau's signature policy - the newest, stylish 'Final Liberal Solution For Earth's Climate Emergency Crisis' !</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0b5394;"> Gosh, all Justin Trudeau has to do is sneak in a quick approval and Canadians can soon be legally 'Saving The Earth' in kitchens across We The North-istan.</span></span></span></span><br />
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Open Sans", "Lucida Grande Bold", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.96px;">
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> So, "it's all settled" then - the Liberals </span><i style="color: #0b5394; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;">are </i><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">all for it... after all, that's their own default answer, isn't it: 'it's all settled, don't ask any questions'?! </span></div>
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> If these Liberals are against cannibalism, well, then, they are denying 'Solutions To The Climate Emergency'!! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> If Liberals are against eating human corpses in the name of Mother Gaia, then they are 'Impeding Progress To Save Mother Earth From Doom"!! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> If these Liberals are against cannibalism, well, then they are nothing more than 'Climate Change Deniers'!!!</span></span></span><br />
<span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span style="vertical-align: inherit;"><span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> Isn't <i>THAT</i> how the Liberal's <i>own</i> narrative works - when they apply it to others?</span></span></span><br />
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<div>
<div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #b45f06; font-size: x-large;"><b><i>CHAPTER 60</i></b></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">It was revealed that Canada's Climate Barbarian Catherine McKenna and Turdo's Lying Liberals deleted 100 years worth of climate data, as reported by <a href="https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-feds-scrapped-100-years-of-data-on-climate-change">Lorrie Goldstein, in the Sun, Sept.17, 2019.</a></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Fuuny that Environment Canada did this kind of muzzling - eh?? </span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Funny that NO ONE knows where David Phillips stands on this travesty of science?</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">! </span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Cagey Dave loved talking about all these '100 year-this and 100 years-that record broken' homespun weather stories.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">What's Ole Cagey Dave gonna come up with now?!</span></div>
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Create GreenFear innuendo from data from the 1960's on... and then attribute THAT speck of time to long-term climate change??!!</span><br />
<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">Unreal!!</span><br />
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">How about good ole Phil Chadwick - isn't he whining about how Harper destroyed all the data and muzzled all the scient... ... ... oh, wait... ah... </span><span style="color: #0b5394;">ummm</span><span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">... er... ummmm... ah... oh, right: TRUDEAU's LIBERALS did that! </span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;"> "...</span><span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 18px;">Canadians already suspicious of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax are likely be even more suspicious given a report by Ottawa-based Blacklock’s Reporter that Environment Canada omitted a century’s worth of observed weather data in developing its computer models on the impacts of climate change.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The scrapping of all observed weather data from 1850 to 1949 was necessary, a spokesman for Environment Canada told Blacklock’s Reporter, after researchers concluded that historically, there weren’t enough weather stations to create a reliable data set for that 100-year period.</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“The historical data is not observed historical data,” the spokesman said. “It is modelled historical data … 24 models from historical simulations spanning 1950 to 2005 were used.”</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 18px;">These computer simulations are part of the federal government’s ClimateData.ca website launched by Environment Minister Catherine McKenna on Aug. 15.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span face=", "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: black; font-size: 18px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
She described it as “an important next step in giving our decision-makers even greater access to important climate data for long-term planning. The more each of us uses this type of information, the more it will help.”</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Blacklock’s Reporter, which describes itself as “the only reporter-owned and operated newsroom in Ottawa” focusing on intensive reporting of government documents, notes that in many cases the observed temperatures scrapped by Environment Canada in creating its computer models, were higher in the past than today.</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
For example, Vancouver had a higher record temperature in 1910 (30.6C) than in 2017 (29.5C).</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Toronto had a warmer summer in 1852 (32.2C) than in 2017 (31.7C).</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The highest temperature in Moncton in 2017 was four degrees cooler than in 1906.</div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSans-Regular, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Brandon, Man., had 49 days where the average daily temperature was above 20C in 1936, compared to only 16 in 2017, with a high temperature of 43.3C that year compared to 34.3C in 2017...<span face=""arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif" style="color: #0b5394; font-size: large;">"</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
-</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">
More climate caginess coming soon!</div>
</div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-65527865994218098192017-01-25T00:49:00.004-05:002017-01-25T00:55:20.956-05:00Canadian Press' fake story about fake news<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Ironic piece of fake news from the<a href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/2017/01/24/google-facebook-will-soon-roll-out-tools-to-sift-fake-canadian-news"> Canadian Press,</a> about attempts to regulate fake news on the internet. In this finely crafted piece of slant, reporter Terry Pedwell made damn sure to mention Kellie Leitch and Pizzagate - while completely ignoring the sublime fakeness that<i> is </i>Crooked Hillary<br />
Pedwell blabs about Hedy Fry's role as chair in this Liberal fake news witch-hunt committee, yet completely overlooks that Hedy "Burning Crosses" Fry herself was a peddler of fake news.<br />
Pedwell himself is writing fake news here - or is it ok for CP news reports to be biased and to spin out parts and contexts that would upset their narrative? It is hard to believe that Terry Pedwell or his CP editors didn't know about<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/cross-burning-furor-hits-liberal/article4145631/"> Hedy Fry's crazy claims</a> when she was a Chretien cabinet minister. <br />
CP made sure to slime Conservative Leitch, yet golly gee, they <i><span style="color: red;">somehow forgot</span></i> to mention Liberal Hedy Fry's fakery.<br />
Way to go, CP (Crooked Propaganda). Turdo sends his thanks.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-4346398168685752052017-01-23T16:44:00.001-05:002017-02-27T19:14:21.828-05:00Who has muzzled Canada's Cagey Climatologist to suppress the evidence of "Climate Change"?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">More on the 'Canadian scientists are muzzled' meme here, in this nicely biased article by Rebecca Leber: https://newrepublic.com/article/119153/canadas-stephen-harper-government-muzzles-climate-scientists.</span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">"...In 2012, Ottawa Citizen’s Tom Spears contacted both NASA and Canada’s National Research Council in 2012 to request information for a story about snowfall. A report from the Environmental Law Center documents how NASA responded within 15 minutes, but it took eleven Canadian federal employees 50 emails to decide whether the journalist’s story would be “positive/informative.” Eventually, the reporter received “approved lines." And earlier this year, federal meteorologists were ordered not to discuss climate change in their coverage of extreme weather. The reason, an Environment Canada spokesman told journalist Mike De Souza in May, is that meteorologists are only experts in “their field of severe weather,” so “climate change or long-term trends would be directed to a climatologist or other applicable authority...” </span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">-</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">So,let's ask: It's 2017; Canadian Prime Minister Zoolander Turdeau has been PM for over a year now. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">What has stopped Tom Spears or Grant Lafleche from contacting Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist, the cagey David Phillips, to confirm Jim Bradley's and Justin Trudeau's contentions that 'climate change / global warming' is caused by man?! </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">{Phillips <i>is </i>a well-known "Senior Canadian Climatologist" - isn't he??! How tyrannical of evil Harper to make </span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Environment Canada direct climate change inquiries to... </span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">gasp</span></span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">... climatologists. The utter gall; how <i>dare </i>Harper do that?! </span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">How awful it must have been, to be told that questions about 'climate change' would be directed to EC's climatologists!!}</span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">They didn't bother to ask BEFORE Harper; they're not asking AFTER Harper! Funny, eh? </span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Where's all that 'scientific' 'man-made climate-change' 'evidence' in 2017, from Environment Canada, which Lafleche and Spears can now (apparently) easily obtain by just a simple phone call or email directly to one of Zoolander Turdo's government climatologists?!?</span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #3372b6;">You'd think that Lafleche and Spears would have </span><i><span style="color: red;">already published all this evidence</span></i><span style="color: #3372b6;"> - even when Martin was in power... or when Chretien was in power... or<i> at any time</i>, really, just by getting it from Liberal MPP Jim Bradley, who has had the (secret) evidence of man-made climate-change for several DECADES. Bradley was free to show Spears and Lafleche all his 'global warming evidence' - and Harper had no control over that!</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #3372b6;">Yet, for some reason, Lafleche and Spears <i>never asked</i> Bradley - after all, Jim Bradley was only Ontario's Environment Minister, and the Godfather of GreenFear. Bradley<i> could have been</i> asked - yet, no one bothered. Was Bradley muzzled by someone, who prevented Bradley from revealing all his 'scientific" evidence proving climate change?? Or was Bradley not directly asked (as David Phillips isn't): because they can't actually prove it?</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">You'd think that Lafleche and Spears would have </span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: red;">already published</span></span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"> <i>all </i>the 'evidence of man made climate change' {...remember the meme's intended innuendo: that 'science was suppressed' by the evil Harper...}</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Yet NOW that Turdo is PM - - - WHAT'S STOPPING THEM??!!! </span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Who's suppressing Environment Canada's scientists now???</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Who's suppressing the reporters now?? Who's muzzling the reporters?! </span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: Trebuchet, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;" />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">Is it the reporters' <i>OWN</i> selective</span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: red;"> SELF</span></span><span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;">-muzzlement, the kind we typically see with the "it's all settled; move along now, nothing to discuss here" crowd?! </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5; color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b>Talk about how FAKE NEWS is peddled. It wasn't about phony 'climate change' or phony 'suppression of science' at all; it was about smearing Harper. </b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b>It was<i> never - </i>not then, not now<i> - </i>about asking any Canadian Cagey Climatologist to prove 'climate change'; it was about perpetrating a hoax that somehow, someone was preventing climatologists from being asked about climate change.</b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b>So, who will be blamed in 2017 for 'suppressing' David Phillips, and preventing him from providing all the 'evidence of climate change'??!</b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: 13px;">You'd think that as Canada's Senior Suppressed Climatologist, Phillips would now be happy to finally publicly expose all his 'climate change evidence', which he was... </span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">um</span><span style="font-size: 13px;">...</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"> prevented from revealing under Harper!! </span></b></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></span>
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b>But Turdo is now the PM; Lafleche and Spears have been free to ask for and to report on all the 'climate change evidence' in Environment Canada's possession - - - and suddenly the 'science is muzzled' meme disappears from Spears and Lafleche, and<i> no one</i> asks!!</b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: 13px;">They </span><i style="font-size: 13px;">could ask,</i><span style="font-size: 13px;"> but they </span><i style="font-size: 13px;">don't -</i><span style="font-size: 13px;"> that's the orchestrated wink-wink Cagey Tango</span><i style="font-size: 13px;">,</i><span style="font-size: 13px;"> where the muzzlers are doing the muzzling, and the muzzled willingly oblige.</span></b></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #e4ecf5;"><span style="color: #3372b6; font-family: "trebuchet" , "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></span>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-2203845818099498082015-12-17T11:39:00.000-05:002017-10-28T09:24:45.987-04:00Criminal charges laid in Ontario Liberal gas-plant cover-up scandal<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Finally criminal charges have been laid in the Ontario Liberals' <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/gas-plant-charges-1.3369470">gas plant scandal</a>.<br />
Unfortunately, it wasn't any of Ontario's Liberal politicians who were charged - maybe that is next?<br />
Who gave these people the permission and the direction to enter Ontario government offices and purposefully delete the computer files??! Are we to believe that they just walked in off the street, and did all this on their own - and no Ontario Liberal politician knew about it?!??<br />
They were even<em> <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-liberals-paid-10-000-to-have-gas-plant-data-erased-opp-1.2877944">paid</a></em><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-liberals-paid-10-000-to-have-gas-plant-data-erased-opp-1.2877944"> to</a> do it - the Ontario Liberals had taxpayers paying for the (<span style="font-size: xx-small;">alleged</span>) crime!!<br />
The purposeful deletion / coverup of the scandalous gas plant emails was a political act perpetrated to help Ontario's Liberals win a fraudulent election - all based on GreenFear propaganda.<br />
This is MPP Jim Bradley's kind of Liberalism. Vote fer Good Ole Jimmy. <span style="font-size: xx-small;">Yay!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">-</span><br />
Let's fast-forward to <a href="https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/it-expert-who-cleaned-mcguinty-office-computers-signed-immunity-deal-trial-hears/article36750045/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&">Karen Howlett's Oct 28, 2017 Globe and Mail </a>report on the the Livingston/ Miller criminal trial, to see how Jim Bradley's Liberals operated, and what kind of government they ran:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: 1.125rem;">"...</span></span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">Court has heard that David Nicholl, Ontario's corporate chief information officer, played a crucial role in helping Mr. Livingston gain the special access used to wipe hard drives. Mr. Nicholl asked government IT managers to set up special administrative access to all of the computers in the premier's office, the trial was told. On Jan. 31, 2013, Peter Wallace, secretary of cabinet at the time, approved the access after Mr. Nicholl told him that six staffers in the premier's office already had administrative access. Mr. Nicholl did not explain, however, that the access requested for Mr. Livingston was, in fact, much more extensive, court has heard.</span><br />
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Livingston's executive assistant, Wendy Wai, was provided with the administrative rights, allowing her to use a special password and sign on to any computer in the premier's office. But the access was used instead by Mr. Faist.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
In an e-mail to Mr. Faist on Feb. 4, 2013, presented as an exhibit in court, Ms. Wai says, "CAB IT just called, everything is set up and ready to go," referring to Cabinet Office IT. "I just need to log in as myself at each desktop and you should be able to do your part."</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Faist testified that Ms. Miller's assistant, Alexandra Gair, assisted him with wiping the hard drives. She accompanied him when he was in the premier's office and had the names of staffers whose computers were to be wiped written on a yellow sticky note, he said.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Faist has told police he was instructed by Ms. Miller to "wipe off personal data" on 20 computers in the premier's office. Between Feb. 5 and Feb. 7, 2013 – just days before Ms. Wynne took office – Mr. Faist erased 632,000 files, accounting for 13 per cent of all the data on the 20 hard drives, police documents allege.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Faist testified that he submitted an invoice dated Jan. 28, 2013, in the amount of $11,017.50 to the Liberal Caucus Service Bureau.."-</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: Pratt, Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1.5;">
<br /></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Wow: Hillary Clinton's team should be so proud of the political template set by McGuinty's trail-blazing computer-wiping Liberals!!</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
<br /></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
...and look at<a href="https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/mcguintys-chief-of-staff-learned-how-to-double-delete-e-mails-amid-gas-plant-backlash-court-docs/article36674224/"> Howlett's Oct.19, 2017 </a>report :</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
<br /></div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
" Former Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty's chief of staff got instructions on how to double delete e-mails in the summer of 2012, a period when the government was under mounting pressure to release documents related to the controversial cancellation of two gas-fired power plants, court documents show.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
"I don't really have a strong desire to be email monitor for the Premier's Office," David Livingston, the chief of staff, says in an e-mail tabled as part of an exhibit at a criminal trial. But he says he has "learned a couple of things" after talking to David Nicholl, Ontario's corporate chief information officer: "if e-mails are 'double deleted' (meaning deleted from an INBOX and DELETE file) then they are gone and cannot be retrieved;" and if an e-mail that is to be double deleted has been forwarded, it will also have to be deleted from the "sent" file.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
"Having said all of this, nothing is more confidential than talking rather than writing!" Mr. Livingston says in the e-mail dated Aug. 9, 2012, which was distributed to several staff members in the premier's office, according to the exhibit. "Just reading this, so no more triple delete?" one staffer asks. "Apparently not!" came the reply from another staffer.</div>
<div class="u-wrapper pb-feature pb-layout-item pb-f-commercial-dfp-ads" id="" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #595959; font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; line-height: inherit;">
</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Livingston and former deputy chief of staff Laura Miller are facing criminal breach of trust and mischief charges in connection with the destruction of e-mails and other government records related to the cancellation of the two power plants before the 2011 provincial election. Each has pleaded not guilty.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="color: #191919;">The charges stem from police accusations that Mr. Livingston hired a non-government IT expert, Ms. Miller's spouse, Peter Faist, to</span><span style="color: red;"> "wipe clean" computer hard drives in the Premier's Office just days before Mr. McGuinty stepped down in February, 2013.</span></div>
<div class="u-wrapper pb-feature pb-layout-item pb-f-article-asf-body-top" id="" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #595959; font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; line-height: inherit;">
</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
The trial at Toronto's Old City Hall has heard from two witnesses about meetings they had with Mr. Livingston in August, 2012, when a legislative committee was demanding the release of gas-plant documents from the minority Liberal government. Peter Wallace, secretary of cabinet at the time, testified on Monday about a "tense conversation" he had with Mr. Livingston during a meeting that month, in which he told him he was "acutely worried" that the premier's office had not complied with a legally binding order to hand over documents in connection with the power plants.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Nicholl also testified last week that he met with Mr. Livingston in August of 2012, when the chief of staff asked about the process for deleting e-mails and expressed concern about e-mail accounts that were still open after some employees had left the premier's office.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
Mr. Nicholl played a key role in helping Mr. Livingston get special access to computer hard drives in the premier's office during the transition from the McGuinty government to Premier Kathleen Wynne in early 2013, the trial was told.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
While Mr. Wallace, now city manager of Toronto, approved the special access for Mr. Livingston, he testified that he did so after Mr. Nicholl told him seven people in the premier's office already had special access. Mr. Wallace said he was not aware at the time that the access given to Mr. Livingston was much more extensive, and said it is inconceivable that he would have approved it had he known that the chief of staff would use it to access government records held by other staff members.</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
On Jan. 31, 2013, the day Mr. Livingston got the special access, he sounded pleased, the e-mail exhibits show. "We have broken through," he said in response to an e-mail from Ms. Miller, asking "Any luck w the admin code?" Mr. Livingston adds in his e-mail that he will be talking to Mr. Nicholl that afternoon about how to "actually get the codes and move forward."</div>
<div class="u-wrapper pb-feature pb-layout-item pb-f-commercial-dfp-ads" id="" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #595959; font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; line-height: inherit;">
</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
An e-mail from Ms. Miller to Mr. Livingston titled Pete's Project and dated Jan. 24, says the process of wiping computers takes "3-4 hrs per desk."</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
The trial continues on Friday."</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #191919; font-family: pratt, georgia, palatino, "book antiqua", "times new roman", serif; line-height: 1.5;">
-</div>
<div class="c-article-body__text" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.5;">
<span style="color: #191919; font-family: "pratt" , "georgia" , "palatino" , "book antiqua" , "times new roman" , serif;">Note how all of this computer-wiping-urgency was swirling around PRIOR to McGuinty's sudden resignation: yet we are led to believe that this was in no way a planned cover-up to protect McGuinty ...who has not been charged with anything!! Why hasn't he?? Well, for one thing, luckily<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> heh heh</span> there aren't any emails to corroborate anything!! Voila - the circle in complete! Nothin' to see here folks!! In this criminal trial, we have even forgotten that the whole thing stemmed from McGuinty's GreenFear climate-change/ global-warming hoaxter policies, of which Ole Jim Bradley was a chief proponent.</span></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-72057394280949694322015-12-04T02:49:00.001-05:002019-09-21T00:45:17.883-04:00<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
So now we hear that the merde-dumping former Liberal Denis Coderre, aka Montreal's Fred Flintstone, will be <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/does-that-price-include-the-car-chauffeurs-for-montreal-mayor-and-top-officials-to-cost-337000">chauffeured around town at a cost of $337,000</a> !! Entitled to their Liberal entitlements, eh?</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-64420054220422312992015-12-02T13:45:00.002-05:002018-05-30T12:11:51.049-04:00Ontario Liberals blow billions on energy, while local paper coddles Liberal MPP Jim Bradley<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Further to the CBC's Dec.2, 2015 story outlining <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-auditor-report-1.3347035">Ontario Auditor Bonnie Lysyk's latest report</a> slamming the outrageous energy costs and waste in Liberal-run Ontario:<br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"Ontario's auditor general says electricity customers in the province have paid billions of dollars for the Liberal government's decisions to ignore its own planning process for new power generation projects.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The Ontario Power Authority's 20-year technical plan, which was updated every three years and reviewed by the Ontario Energy Board, would have offered protection to consumers, said Bonnie Lysyk in her annual report released Wednesday. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> Instead of following the legislated process, the <span style="color: red;">Ministry of Energy itself</span> effectively assumed responsibility for electricity planning," she said.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The ministry issued policy plans and 93 directives that the auditor said "<span style="color: red;">did not fully consider</span> the state of the electricity market, <span style="color: red;">did not take long-term effects fully into account</span>," and sometimes <span style="color: red;">went against the OPA's advice.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"Ontario electricity ratepayers have had to <span style="color: red;">pay billions</span> for these decisions," she said.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The electricity portion of hydro bills for homes and small businesses rose 70 per cent between 2006 and 2014, which Lysyk said cost consumers $37 billion dollars in so-called global adjustment payments to generators — and <span style="color: red;">will cost ratepayers another $133 billion</span> by 2032</span>"<br />
<br />
<br />
Yep: energy policy was run <i>right out of the Ministry of Energy's Liberal political re-election campaign office! </i><br />
<br />
Let's hope that no-one from the St.Catharines Standard asks Liberal MPP Jim Bradley to <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2012/10/when-will-ontarios-press-make-link.html">explain his GreenFear delusion-based energy fiascos</a> in Ontario! (Somehow, <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2013/02/stcatharines-standards-propaganda.html">Grant Lafleche won't find</a> any... er... 'scientific' issues here, eh??? What's Ole Jimmy got to do with any o' this?! hahah... unreal!)<br />
<br />
Billions of tax dollars blown by Bradley and his Liberals - yet the<a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2013/04/liberal-environment-minister-jim.html"> newspaper in his own city</a> stubbornly refuses to call Liberal MPP Jim Bradley on his <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2009/12/bradleygate-kyoto-pushin-liberal-wont.html">climate-change insanity</a>.<br />
*<br />
So let's fast forward to Nov. 2016, as deplorable Liberals such as Jim Bradley and Kathleen Wynne continued their horrific destruction of Ontario's economy, based on their global warming con game.<br />
<br />
Deplorable hacks such as Lafleche and the St. Catharines Standard continue to uphold their duty to the Liberal cause, and will not dare to question how decades of Jim Bradley's Liberal green-fear-based bolshevism has brought us to this day.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ontario-premier-kathleen-wynne-calls-high-electricity-prices-her-mistake/article32946738/">Globe and Mail reported on Nov. 19, 2016</a>:<br />
<i>"Premier<span style="background-color: white; font-family: "garuda" , "verdana" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"> Kathleen Wynne is promising to win back Ontarians’ trust amid a string of ethics scandals, anger over high electricity prices and collapsing approval ratings.</span></i><br />
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>In a contrite and often emotional speech to her Liberal party’s annual general meeting in Ottawa Saturday, Ms. Wynne admitted that the “polling numbers and the pundits” say “many people in Ontario are not happy with me right now.”</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>“People look at me and many of them think: ‘She’s not who we thought she was. She’s become a typical politician. She’ll do anything to win,’” she said in the lunch-hour address. “Frankly, I think I sometimes have given them reason to think that.”</i></div>
<div id="fsk_splitbox_266_onscreen" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Palatino, "Book Antiqua", "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 15.6px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
</div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>The Premier did not say what, exactly, she believed had led voters to question her motives. But the speech comes in the wake of a months-long conflagration over cash-for-access fundraising and less than three weeks after two Liberal operatives, including Ms. Wynne’s former deputy chief of staff, were charged with Election Act offences for allegedly attempting to bribe a candidate in a by-election last year.</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>Standing alone without a podium in front of the cavernous convention hall, Ms. Wynne also acknowledged that she failed to grasp how much the province’s high hydro rates were hurting Ontarians. She belatedly tried to deal with the problem in September, with a hastily-announced eight per cent subsidy for residential electricity bills.</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>The Premier said Saturday that more relief will be coming, but did not specify what it will be.</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>“Our government made a mistake. It was my mistake. And I’m going to do my best to fix it,” she said. “In the weeks and the months ahead, we are going to find more ways to lower rates and reduce the burden on consumers.”</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>She conceded “I have some work to do to prove that I am who I have always been” and vowed to do a better job understanding voters’ concerns.</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
<i>“I will do my very best to listen, to respond, to lead, and to serve you and the people of Ontario better,” she said. “I will be right there with you: As premier, as leader, I’ll be there with you as Kathleen, a proud mother and grandmother.”</i></div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
What utter psychopathic bullshit from liar Kathleen Wynne, shamelessly spouting her endless series of deceptions. Such gargantuan incompetence; what an epic fiasco of massive proportions. </div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: Garuda, Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; widows: 1;">
What utter ignorance. Such willful destruction. </div>
<div class="selectionShareable" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
The Americans just got rid of their pant-suited crooked Liberal liar Hillary Clinton; Ontario should do the same with the pant-suited pay-to-player<b> Krooked Kathleen Wynne</b> as well.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
-</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
The nightmare with Ontario's lying Liberals has not ended: Bonnie Lysyk came out with ANOTHER report released in the afternoon on Oct. 17, 2017, again on the energy file -</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
see <a href="http://www.torontosun.com/2017/10/17/wynne-liberals-broke-every-rule-in-the-book">"Liberals broke every rule in the book</a>"</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
see <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-hydro-auditor-general-report-fair-hydro-plan-wynne-1.4358168">"Auditor general blasts Kathleen Wynne's 'fair hydro plan'</a>"</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
see "<a href="https://www.baytoday.ca/local-news/government-cooked-the-books-on-hydro-claims-mpp-742068">Government cooked the books on hydro claims: MPP"</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
The multi-billion dollar costs due to the Ontario Liberals' incompetence - all based on the Liberals' GreenFear global-warming hoax policy - is STAGGERING.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
Krooked Kathleen Kooked the Books - great, eh? But that's what we get when we vote for climate-change con-men such as Liberal Jim Bradley.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
You can bet NOBODY from the St.Catharines Standard will ever bother to ask Unca Jimmmy about any of this.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">
-</div>
<span style="font-family: garuda, verdana, geneva, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 12px;">The Ontario Liberals' Green Fascist Energy Act was once again mentioned, this time in a May 30, 2018 Global News article (...in the middle of Ontario's election campaign, no less...) headlined: </span></span><i><a href="https://globalnews.ca/news/4237041/ontario-liberals-ignored-advice-could-save-billions-green-energy/?utm_source=Article&utm_medium=MostPopular&utm_campaign=2014">"Liberals ignored green energy advice that could’ve saved Ontarians billions, lead engineer says"</a>, </i>where the Liberals near-criminal wholesale waste of billions of dollars on climate-change-based fantasies was again detailed, including the sack of Liberal garbage George Smitherman's evil role in this GreenFear fiasco. Of course, the Liberal ass-lickers at the St. Catharines Standard hill NEVER interview their Liberal hero Jim Bradley about the massive damage his Liberal government has done to Ontario. The Standard does its best to distance itself from any criticism or analysis of Bradley's Liberal policies.</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-62309979263722352582015-12-01T14:49:00.000-05:002015-12-06T09:24:45.829-05:00Wealthy Liberal Trudeau should "do the "right thing" and pay for his own nannies<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
In what has instantly been dubbed "<a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/12/01/taxpayers-pay-for-trudeaus-nannies-report.html">Nannygate</a>", the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-nannies-taxpayers-1.3344533">CBC has reported</a> that Canadian multi-millionaire Justin Trudeau has already hired nannies at tax-payer expense: "<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The disclosure comes after an election campaign where Trudeau repeatedly attacked the Conservatives' enhanced universal child care benefit, or UCCB, and income splitting for families, arguing rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper's didn't need taxpayers' help.</span>"<br />
<br />
<br />
Back in this <a href="http://thismomloves.blogspot.ca/2012/09/sophie-gregoire-trudeau-momterview.html">Sept.21, 2012 interview</a>, Justin Trudeau's wife Sophie Gregoire was quoted saying: "<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">I don't have a nanny but both grandmothers are helping out. I also found an amazing babysitter who can help out at night time when we have events to attend.<br /> My priority is my family. Everything else comes second. So I have to decline many invitations, work opportunities, etc. I know and feel that it's the right thing to do.</span>"<br />
<em>'Right thing to do'</em>, eh? Yes, indeed... how 'humble', how... <span style="font-size: xx-small;">umm</span>... 'sincere'... <em>then</em>!! But <em>now</em>, flying the entire family of kids, wife and "staff" to the Paris GreenFear Climate Coven<em> is</em> the right thing to do, eh? Oh, the Sunny Waves of Liberal entitlement. <br />
<br />
<br />
In an <a href="http://www.montrealfamilies.ca/Montreal-Families/April-2013/Sophie-Grgoire-Trudeau-talks-about-family-finding-balance-and-yoga/">April 2013 <em>Montreal Families</em> interview</a>, Sophie Gregoire also said she did NOT have a nanny.<br />
<br />
<br />
Yet, in <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/08/17/knives_left_in_justin_trudeaus_home_during_breakin_source.html">this Toronto Star Aug.17, 2013 report</a>, Justin Trudeau strangely claimed that they <em>DID</em> have a nanny, who was there overnight at their house during that bizarre break-in at their rented Rockcliffe (Ottawa) home.<br />
<br />
<br />
Normally, it'd be any family's personal business whether they had a nanny or not; but now - upon hearing that Canada's rich Prime Liberal Hypocrite Turdeau suddenly <em>doe</em>s have two nannies employed at taxpayers' expense - it has become<em> our</em> business.<br />
<br />
<br />
In this situation, <em>both</em> Trudeau and his spouse have shown themselves to be nothing more than Liberal hypocrites, already getting their fill at the entitlement trough.That didn't take long - less than a month after the Liberals took office!<br />
<br />
<br />
Don't worry: there will be <em>many more</em> LibScams to follow, with Turdo as PM! {Remember Turdo's self-entitled charging of <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mps-weigh-in-on-justin-trudeau-charging-speaking-fees-1.1308010">speaking fees</a> to appear at<em> charity</em> fund-raisers - while he was also a sitting Liberal MP, slacking off from the House? This is the template of the Sunny Way!}<br />
<br />
<br />
This is just the sad beginning of the inbred Turdopian Liberal Nanny-State darkness - like the story about the <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/syrian-refugee-coordinator-in-montreal-to-make-1800-a-day-to-welcome-the-newcomers-to-canada">$1,800.00 <em>per day</em></a> gravy-train salary being given out in Denis Coderre-ville (former-Liberal-hack Fred Flintstone's Montreal) to "coordinate" what is essentially a welcome wagon for Montreal's anticipated Syrian refugee arrivals..!<br />
<br />
<br />
When Liberal budgets 'balance' themselves, Liberal largesse has no bounds!<br />
*<br />
Let's now update to the<a href="http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/trudeau-hires-his-childrens-former-nannies-to-work-in-official-residence"> Ottawa Citizen's Glen McGregor reporting late afternoon on Dec.1, 2015</a>, that "<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">the two nannies hired by Justin Trudeau to work at his new residence <em><span style="color: red;">were previously employed by his family </span></em>to look after his children, a cost he is passing on to taxpayers now that he is prime minister.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Marilou Nemiada Trayvilla and Marian Pueyo <span style="color: red;">were hired last month</span> as “special assistants” in the prime minister’s residence, although their roles appear chiefly to be providing child care to the three Trudeau children, who are 19 months, six years and eight years old</span>."<br />
<br />
<br />
If (...and note: <em>IF</em>) what Justin Trudeau <em>now</em> says is true, then, why the hell do we have to pay for this personal arrangement, which they supposedly <em>already had</em>? Let Justin and Sophie continue paying for their own nannies!<br />
<br />
<br />
But wait - is what Justin is now saying true, that these nannies were "just hired"?<br />
Remember, wife Sophie has already claimed that they <em>did not</em> have a nanny, as late as Apr. 2013.<br />
Then, by Aug.17, 2013 - right after that bizarre break-in at their rented Rockcliffe home - Justin said that there <em>was </em>a nanny there that night.<br />
<br />
<br />
So we have to ask: who was the nanny that the Trudeau's had working in their Rockcliffe house in 2013? <br />
Why do taxpayers need to now know about this?<br />
Well, because McGregor <em>also</em> reported in detail that:<br />
"<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Trayvilla appears to have moved with family from Philippines to Ottawa and about five years ago was working for Ottawa lawyer Kirsten Crain and her husband, John Morales, who lived around the corner from the home Trudeau later rented in Rockcliffe.</span><br />
<div id="SlicePlayerParentContainer" style="display: none;">
<span class="adClaimText" style="border-color: rgb(161, 161, 161); border-left-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-top-left-radius: 3px; border-top-right-radius: 3px; border-top-width: 1px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 80%; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Advertisement</span></span><br />
<div id="SlicePlayerMainContainer" style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; height: 388px; width: 691px;">
<div id="SlicePlayerContent" style="display: none;">
<video id="SlicePlayerContentElement"><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"></span></video><br /></div>
</div>
</div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Crain declined to say whether Trayvilla was hired through the special government program that gives temporary work visas to foreign child care workers brought to Canada.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Trayvilla went to work for another family, then ended up with the Trudeaus after Justin Trudeau won the leadership of the party and moved from Montreal into a home on Manor Avenue in Ottawa.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">She posted pictures of her and the Trudeau family on her Facebook page from last Christmas.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The Prime Minister’s Office confirmed that Pueyo also worked for the Trudeau family previous. Both women are Canadian citizens, the PMO says.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Even though the two women worked as nannies when Trudeau was only leader of the third party, the PMO maintains that child-care in only part of their jobs providing “assistance” at the residence.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">“Given the nature of the prime minister’s responsibilities and his young family, the Trudeaus employ two household employees who, in addition to performing other duties around the house, act as secondary caregivers to the three children,” spokesperson Kate Purchase told the CBC</span>".<br />
<br />
<br />
What McGregor <em>has NOT specifically</em> said in his report, is whether any of these two current nannies (who now work for PM Trudeau) <em>also worked for Trudeau back then at Rockcliffe</em>!<br />
McGregor beats around the bush on this point, but he doesn't quite reveal that important detail!<br />
The PMO office is also fudging the specifics here.<br />
Was the 2013 nanny who had worked for the Trudeau's during the break-in (...ie, the nanny that Justin said was there...) the <em>same</em> nanny who had worked for that Rockcliffe lawyer, and the <em>same </em>nanny who is with PM Justin now?!<br />
Or was that that some<em> other</em> nanny in 2013?<br />
<br />
<br />
The reason this is now relevant to taxpayers and to those who voted for Justin, is that because if one of these current nannies <em>was </em>working for the Trudeaus in Rockcliffe during the time of that 2013 break-in, then what Trudeau's Liberals are saying NOW - that the nannies were just "<em><span style="color: red;">hired last month</span></em>" - would be <em><span style="color: red;">a patent lie</span></em>!<br />
<br />
<br />
It would mean that they were NOT "hired last month"; it would mean that they had <em>already been</em> working for the Trudeaus! <br />
It would also clearly mean that Justin Trudeau is already trying to pull off a fraud.<br />
Why should taxpayers pay for any of this?? <br />
<br />
<br />
Kate Purchase is a <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2015/11/will-cbc-fire-peter-mansbridge-for-his.html">good buddy of the CBC's Liberal-fawn-boy Peter Mansbridge</a> - why is Peetah so quiet about all this?!<br />
*<br />
Then, Julie Smythe<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/two-nannies-thats-a-little-rich-mr-prime-minister/article27559108/"> reported in the Dec.2, 2015 Globe and Mail</a>:<br />
"<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Before Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister, <span style="color: red;">his family employed two nannies</span>, one at night and one during the daytime. Like most nannies, the women did other jobs too, cleaning, some cooking, preparing kids’ snacks and other household duties.</span><br />
<div class="selectionShareable">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">That the Trudeaus had hired help is not new or surprising, given their schedules with three children eight and under, and the fact they come from a privileged background.</span></div>
<!-- This is a catch-all ASF view; only displays when an unsupported article type is put in an ASF drop zone --><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"> </span><br />
<div class="selectionShareable">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">But two nannies? Day and night child care? That is excessive by most parenting standards, even for a prime minister. Should the public purse now pay for their two nannies to care for Xavier, Ella-Grace and Hadrien?</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Even before her husband was elected to the highest office in Canada, Sophie Grégoire-Trudeau had a full life outside the home – volunteering, speaking out on issues such as bulimia, attending political functions and teaching some yoga. She does not work full-time, but helps important causes, is a busy mom and political wife.</span></div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">In addition to her nannies, she also relies on her mother and mother-in-law to help. Before they moved to the “cottage” on the grounds of Rideau Hall, Ms. Grégoire-Trudeau could be seen at the local kids’ park <span style="color: red;">with a nanny</span> and her mother, the three women all fussing over the youngest Trudeau child. Her <span style="color: red;">daytime nanny</span> would also accompany her and Hadrien to lunch at popular restaurants in the Ottawa Byward Market..</span>." </div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
Again - it is not quite clear here, exactly <em>when </em>the Trudeau's "<em>employed two nannies</em>"!</div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
Sophie Gregoire had made a point of telling us that she had <em><span style="color: #cc0000;">NO nannys</span></em> at all!</div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
Are we talking of 2012 here? 2013? 2014? Only 2015??</div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
Again: why is this relevant? Because if the Trudeaus already had two nannies (as seems to be the case, despite the obfuscation and contradictions from both spouses) then, the nannies were <span style="color: #cc0000;">not</span> "<em>just hired"</em>, they were <em>already employed .</em></div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
The wealthy Trudeaus, with this blatantly hypocritical, let-them-eat-cake shell-game, foisted their own previous, personal arrangement onto the tax payer.</div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
*</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-84854385637419260952015-11-30T23:36:00.000-05:002015-12-01T11:53:34.325-05:00Where are the nude paintings of Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne, or Jim Bradley?!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Further to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/nude-stephen-harper-portrait-sold-to-bc-man-1.3343875">this CBC report</a>, I wonder where all those other "tasteful" paintings are, of any <em>other </em>Canadian politicians?!<br />
How about a nice oily canvas with Tom Mulcair lounging on a chaise, hanging out<em> his</em> family jewels for the snickering masses? Where's the nude painting of Liberal GreenFear-monger Jim Bradley?? Funny, that no one at the St.Catharines Standard or the CBC is asking about <em>that!!</em> Are any paintings of a naked Turdeau available? No nude depictions of Kathleen Wynne? <br />
Every time you looked at any of those other politicians, wouldn't <em>you </em>also "burst out laughing", as the CBC's pompous-sounding interviewee, Ghahramani, said, about his newly-bought piece of Harper-hate, er, art? This supposed "biting political satire" just panders to the harper-haters, who themselves 'come from a politically vulgar, dark, depressing point'. <br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-13590654856954519772015-11-29T17:30:00.002-05:002015-11-29T17:30:47.401-05:00Jim Bradley's Liberal wind-turbine fraud<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /><br />
Just a month ago, on Oct.29, 2015 there was this report on the quiet removal of the <a href="http://www.mississauga.com/news-story/6061389-metrolinx-pulls-plug-on-lisgar-go-station-wind-turbine/">massively underperforming turbine</a> which had been located at the Lisgar GO station. What's that all about, you ask?!<br />
<br /><br />
Let's go back to an earlier story, in the Oct.25, 2013 Toronto Star, "<a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/10/25/go_transit_wind_turbine_producing_91_less_power_than_expected.html">GO Transit wind turbine producing 91% less power than expected</a>", which had a great photo of Liberal GreenFear-monger Jim Bradley, as Transportation Minister, posing proudly at the 2009 unveiling of this disaster, another of his Liberal GreenFraud experiments.<br />
<br /><br />
Funny, isn't it, how no "reporter" at the St.Catharines Standard could be bothered to interview their local MPP - the very same Jim Bradley - about this further sad fiasco in a continuous string of billion-dollar green fiascos, based on his Malthusian-deluded green ideology!<br />
<br /><br />
<em>So what</em> that another 600,000++ tax dollars were clearly wasted by Bradley's Liberals, in their GreenFear-based long-con!!! The Standard's job is to ensure that their Sweet Greenie Jim is safely protected from scrutiny, while his Liberals screw Ontario's taxpayers.<br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-4611024601976216932015-11-29T14:07:00.000-05:002015-11-29T14:21:35.554-05:00Evil GreenFear-monger Maurice Strong a god to Justin Trudeau's Liberals<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Canada's Liberal Prime Minister, the global GreenFear-pushing Justin Trudeau, is moaning about the death of socialist Maurice Strong, who was a hero to many of Canada's sick Liberals and socialists.<br />
<br /><br />
Let's go back a few years to 2007...<br />
...(back when <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2013/04/liberal-environment-minister-jim.html">Ontario's Godfather of GreenFear, Liberal MPP Jim Bradley</a>, had already been propagating his Malthusian views <em>for decades;</em> so both Strong and Bradley (a fellow <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2009/12/niagaras-embarrassing-climatalarmists.html">climatalarmist </a><span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span> and <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2007/06/yipee-kyo-diots.html">Kyodiot </a><span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span>) have become bastard "godfathers" of the climate-change / global-warming hoax! The climate con-man Al Gore was a latecomer compared to those two grifters! Writer Peter Foster in 2008 described Maurice Strong as the "<a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2008/04/reds-green-show-into-heart-of-darkness.html">den father of radical environmentalism</a>! Back in 1986, the Toronto Star ecstatically ejaculated all over Liberal Jim Bradley, officially anointing him as no less than an "<a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2007/12/liberal-mpp-jim-bradley-doesnt-answer.html">environmentalist's saint"</a> !!)...<br />
...when writers Claudia Rosett and George Russell had written their detailed article about the sleazy socialist Maurice Strong, whom they noted was also touted as the 'Godfather of the environmental movement' - read "<a href="http://at%20the%20united%20nations,%20the%20curious%20career%20of%20maurice%20strong/">At the United Nations, the Curious Career of Maurice Strong</a>" to see what Jim Bradley's and <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2008/08/dion-shifts-around-his-green-shift.html">Green-Shift peddler</a> Stephane Dion's fellow climate-change kool-aid-drinker was up to.<br />
<br /><br />
And, let's go back to 2012, to read Tom DeWeese's description of Maurice Strong in the <a href="https://americanpolicy.org/2012/05/08/the-most-dangerous-man-in-the-world-2/"><em>"The Most Dangerous Man In The World":</em></a><em><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"></span></em><br />
<em><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"...This is a speech I first gave to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 1996, just four years after the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio. At the time I gave this address there were strong indications that Maurice Strong could be chosen as the next UN Secretary General. It didn’t happen, but that didn’t diminish his influence over the body. In fact, In 1996 all roads in the UN led to Maurice Strong. This speech represented the first time that the CPAC audience and most conservatives had ever heard of the radical agenda of the environmental movement. It was probably the first time the term Sustainable Development was ever heard by a conservative audience. In fact, at the time I gave this speech, environmentalism was the most popular and most powerful movement in the world. Yet, here, 15 years before “Climategate” I was revealing the very root of what was to become the “Climate Change” movement and its drive to destroy the industrial West. By the way, tapes of this speech became the most popular of any ever produced by the American Policy Center and continues to be one of our best sellers. TD</span></em><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Let me begin by asking you a few questions. They may seem rather silly – but I have a point. So, please, just indulge me for a moment – just answer with a show of hands:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">How many of you know of Adolf Hilter – and that he was evil? How many of you know Mao Tse Tung – and that he was evil? How many of you know of Lenin and Stalin – and that they were evil?</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;"><span style="color: red;">How many of you know of Maurice Strong – and that he is evil</span>?"...</span><br />
<br /><br />
In a <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/maurice-strong-dead-obit-un-1.3341829">Nov.28, 2015 CBC story, Justin Trudeau just, <span style="font-size: xx-small;">uh</span>, forgot to mention</a> Maurice Strong's disgusting involvement the corruption-infested UN Oil For Food scam, or Strong's disgusting connections to Canada's wealthy Liberals!!<br />
The CBC reports Justin Turdeau spewing the usual leftist meme about Strong being a pioneer in "sustainable development"- but what does that crap mean? <br />
<br /><br />
Does Turdeau himself understand what his Agenda 21 handlers are telling him to say?!<br />
Well, as it happens, writer DeWeese had already pre-explained what Trudeau (and his fellow Turdobot Agenda 21 clones) actually mean, when they speak about "sustainability":<br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"...The assault on property rights – in fact the entire radical environmental agenda – is being driven by the United Nations. And Maurice Strong is the number one force behind UN environmental policy. Maurice Strong is the leader of a radical contingent of Environmentalists that believe technology and modern industrialization must be stopped.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Does that sound overstated or too extreme? Well, let me read you a much more radical statement and these are not my words – they’re Maurice Strong’s:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">In 1992, Strong told a UN conference…: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”</span><br />
<div>
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Now, let me explain this new term “Sustainable” that you will see popping up in environmental policy more and more. Radical greens believe that all of man’s activities on Earth are harmful (and therefore not sustainable). They believe that man is a cancer on the Earth. Their goal is to slowly cut back and finally end all development and reduce human habitat to specific areas while the rest of the world is turned into wilderness..."</span><br />
<br /><br />
Maurice Strong typified the mentality of GreenFear-pushing fellow travellers, such as Liberal MPP Jim Bradley. Strong spawned the kind of barely-cloaked Malthusian climate fascism propagated by Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals, and by St.Catharines MP Chris Bittle's federal Liberals.<br />
<br /><br />
This is the climate-change/global-warming /CO2 GreenFear-mongering scam which Justin Turdeau, Kathleen Wynne, and their sycophants are propagating, locally and internationally - even right now, at the Paris Climate Coven Conclave.<br />
<br /><br />
If Liberal MPP Jim Bradley has already been deified to the exalted status of an "Environmentalists' Saint', then Maurice Strong will be glorified by Trudeau's Gaian green-bolsheviks as nothing less than a Malthusian Climate God.<br />
*</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-85563616386752335092015-11-21T14:35:00.001-05:002021-10-25T11:45:28.161-04:00Kathleen Wynne's Ontario Liberals implement HoskinScare TM health-care cuts<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #0b5394;">Further to</span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2008/11/liberals-force-state-run-health.html"> <span style="color: #b45f06;">this previous</span></a><span style="color: #b45f06;"> </span></span><span style="color: #3d85c6;">post...</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Let's move forward to </span></span></span></span></span></span></span><a href="http://www.insidebelleville.com/news-story/6128085-quinte-health-care-cutting-staff/"><span style="color: #b45f06;">Chris Malette's Nov.21, 2015 <em>Inside Belleville</em> Metroland Media report</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> </span><span style="color: #3d85c6;">about health-care cuts being implemented in Belleville, Ontario, where the QHC </span><span style="color: black;">"<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">admitted that the news was difficult to announce. The restructuring is intended to allow QHC to remove $11.5 million in expenses next year in order<span style="color: red;"> to operate within its reduced funding levels from the province</span>. This includes a $7-million reduction in administration/support departments and $4.5 million in patient care areas, QHC said</span>"</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">This is the EXACT same duplicitous healthcare-cutting template, which the Liberals followed in Niagara!</span></span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liberal healthcare hack Hoskins is doing the same things that Smitherman, Caplan, and Matthews did before him.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: small;">The healthcare budget <em>is </em>set at the whim of health minister Eric Hoskins' monopolist Liberals - therefore, cuts need to be made... end of story!</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: small;">As an Ontario patient, you have no other choice - </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">this is <strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">HoskinScare <span style="font-size: xx-small;">TM</span></span></strong> for you - <em>thanks Dr. Eric</em>!</span></div>
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">And: isn't it sadly funny, how Metroland writer Chris Malette didn't even mention the words Kathleen Wynne, Liberal, or Eric Hoskins, in his story!! It's as if... <span style="font-size: xx-small;">let's see</span>... oh yeah: it's as if Liberals have <em>NOTHING TO DO WITH IT </em>!!!</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Wow!! Nice 'reporting' - anyone reading this Metroland Media half-story would never know that <em>any</em> Liberal had <em>anything </em>to do with these health care cuts!!! Amazing!!! Malette's article is the kind of article that could be found in Postmedia's St.Catharines Standard, where MPP Jim Bradley and his Liberal policies have been <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2012/05/sunmedia-paper-protects-liberal-jim.html">routinely babied</a> and <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/12/stcatharines-standards-gift-to-liberal.html">coddled</a> by the local press, for <em>decades</em>!!! </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">I'm sure that if this same scenario had unfolded under '</span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/07/liberal-jim-bradleys-voldemort-to-kim.html"><span style="color: #b45f06;">harris</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;">', it would have been gleefully noted dozens of times per Metroland article!! (Metroland Media<em> never</em> </span><a href="http://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/6097569-postmedia-let-down-readers-honderich/"><span style="color: #b45f06;">lets readers down</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;">, eh, Mr. Beland Honderich?!)</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Here's Belleville's MPP, Progressive Conservative Todd Smith, </span><a href="http://www.toddsmithmpp.ca/todd_speaks_out_against_ministry_funding_cuts_at_qhc"><span style="color: #b45f06;">speaking about the QHC cuts</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> - isn't it funny that Metroland Media reporter Malette <em>didn't even ask the local MPP for an interview</em>!!!</span> </span></span><br />
MPP Todd Smith said:<br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"Fall is in the air and because it is, that can only mean one thing: Another round of cuts and staff uncertainty at Quinte Healthcare hospitals. To make up for an $11.5-million funding shortfall created largely because Ontario’s Liberal government can’t manage money, jobs and services will be cut at hospitals in Picton, Belleville, Bancroft and Trenton. Money is being spent on debt that people in Prince Edward–Hastings want spent on the services they need in their hospitals.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">This morning, we learned that in order to close the $11.5-million shortfall, QHC is proposing a reduction of nearly all surgery services at Trenton Memorial, $4.5 million in direct care cuts and changes that one QHC executive calls “very hard on our staff.”</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">During the years of this government, QHC has been the recipient of almost continual funding shortfalls from the ministry.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Speaker, if I could, I’d like to direct some comments directly to my constituency back at home: The deficit this government is running is costing you your health care services. QHC has had to come up $25 million in cuts over four years to make up for funding shortfalls because the Liberal government at Queen’s Park doesn’t have any money left. The government says money is going into better home care services but the Auditor General says services are being cut there too to pay for fat-cat salaries.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The third largest expense in the budget is how much we pay to service our debt and it’s also the fastest growing. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">That’s why cuts like this have gone from being rare to happening annually."</span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: black;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">Yet if one reads only Malette's Metroland Media 'report', one would think - as residents of Niagara were similarly </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/01/stcatharines-standard-fails-to-mention.html"><span style="color: #b45f06;">conditioned to believe</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> by their local media - that it was just the board of the local hospital making all these 'decisions'! </span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #0b5394;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: #3d85c6;">The<span style="color: #b45f06;"> </span></span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/01/forgotten-link-between-niagara-health.html"><span style="color: #b45f06;">link </span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;">to the Ontario <em>Liberal </em>government's direct </span><a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/07/nhss-hip-was-100-liberal-made.html"><span style="color: #b45f06;">monopolist diktat</span></a><span style="color: #3d85c6;"> of health-care cuts is<em> not clearly made,</em> at all!!</span></span></span><br />
This is <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2007/08/liberal-healthcare-duplicity-ontario.html"><span style="color: red;">Liberal healthcare duplicity</span></a>, in its<strike> finest</strike> most despotic mode.<br />
Let's note again - before Liberal monopoly-supporting, single-payer-defending sycophants start deflecting blame onto the QHC - that the blame squarely belongs to Kathleen Wynne's health-cutting, monopoly-pushing Liberals. <br />
As similarly happened in Niagara, the <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/01/mcguintys-liberal-scumbags-find.html">NHS and the NHS's CEO</a> were conveniently targeted as scapegoats for implementing what were purely Liberal-mandated monopolist health-care cuts.<br />
In Niagara, local<a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/02/jim-bradleys-dreadful-silence-regarding.html"> Liberal MPP Jim Bradley sat back</a> and smiled contentedly as the <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2011/09/stcatharines-standards-phony-calls-for.html">local media</a> spun blame <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2008/07/mess-in-nhs.html">onto the NHS</a> - while all along it was Bradley's duplicitous Ontario Liberal government which <a href="http://rightinniagara.blogspot.ca/2008/12/nhss-debt-is-fiction-created-by-liberal.html">created the phony budgets and the phony budget cuts </a>in order to manipulate the health-care cuts.<br />
Remember the meme: health-care cuts are 'good' when monopolist Liberals or the NDP do it!</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">*</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Let's fast <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/chretien-trudeau-better-served-1.6221965">forward to this Oct.24, 2021 CBC story, </a>which is ostensibly about former PM Jean Chretien talking about Justin Turdo. It's astounding how CBC treats the dictator hack Cretin with such reverence.</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">We know (but the CBC fails to mention) the DIRECT LINK between Cretin's and Paul Martin's downloading of healthcare funding onto the provinces.</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">This DIRECTLY impacted Ontario's monoploy state-funded, single-payer health system.</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"> The resultant fallout was that Ontario's Liberal MPP's quickly began blaming the province for 'healthcare cuts' -<i> which their own federal Lib colleagues set in motion</i>). The "<i>Conservatives cut health care</i>" narrative /meme / lie was thus created and happily propagated by the leftist media. Crapbags such as Liberal MPP Jim Bradley in Niagara was one of many Ontario MPP Libs who benefitted from the disaster that their own federal colleagues created. They spewed the "<i>Conservatives cut health care</i>" lie for years.</div><div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-80311428531052693612015-11-12T20:17:00.000-05:002015-11-13T05:28:40.964-05:00Will CBC fire Peter Mansbridge for his Trudeau propaganda?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
First we had that treacly, <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/christie-blatchford-when-a-cloying-peter-mansbridge-became-too-much-for-even-trudeau-to-take">cloying CBC interview</a> by a palpably giddy-as-a-schoolgirl Peter Mansbridge with his new crush, Justin Turdeau.<br />
<br /><br />
Then, on Nov. 5, 2015, we had <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/peter-mansbridge-justin-trudeau-documentary-1.3306019">this further CBC vomit spewed by Mansbridge</a>, with Mansbridge crowing that Harper denied him interviews, but Sunny Days Turdo magically answered the phone and just asked Mansbridge and an entire camera crew over to chat!!!!!!!!! <span style="font-size: xx-small;">Yeh - dat's da tiket...</span><br />
<br /><br />
Then, on Nov.11, 2015, we learned that Mansbridge actually had <a href="http://www.torontosun.com/2015/11/11/cbcs-peter-mansbridge-officiated-wedding-for-trudeaus-communications-director">connections to PM Turdo</a>, which Mansbridge had <em>FAILED to mention</em> both in his original fawning interview, and, in his subsequent Nov. 5th after-vomit brag piece:<br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"CBC anchor Peter Mansbridge’s obsequious bus ride with Justin Trudeau shocked the newsman’s most devoted followers.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Now, a new report says there’s a reason for the veteran newsman’s puff piece: Trudeau’s director of communications is Kate Purchase and Mansbridge officiated her wedding last July, according to media watchdog Canadaland.com</span><span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Purchase and the CBC said the announcer was a long-time friend of the family and “spoke” at the nuptials.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Chuck Thompson, CBC’s head of public affairs, told Canadaland “there was no conflict of interest.”</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Purchase helpfully added: “We have always been very diligent in keeping our personal and private lives separate.”</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">Purchase’s father is Bruce Anderson, who until this week, was a frequent contributor to Mansbridge’s At Issue panel."</span><br />
<br /><br />
Nowhere in his Nov.5, 2015 CBC story (...which was slickly, but falsely, titled: <em>"How The National's Justin Trudeau access doc came together; </em><span style="font-size: small;"><em>Peter Mansbridge says he appealed to Liberals' openness and transparency pledge to gain access"</em>...) did Mansbridge mention his personal connection to Purchase, Turdo's chief flack!!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Mansbridge wrote in his Nov.5th piece:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> <span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"I had been trying hard since election night to get "inside" the new PMO as it went through transition from contender to government. No immediate "yes" or "no," which was a good sign, but time was running out.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">I much preferred the idea of "access" to the "formal interview" option, which other networks had already done since election day. So, I tried something different. I played the "you talk of openness and transparency, so prove it" card."</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">That actually seemed to curry some favour, at least with some in the inner Trudeau circle. When the person they call "the Boss" signed off, it was a "go" earlier this week, and away we went."</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">WOW - <em>really</em>, Peter?! <em>Your</em> talk of 'openness and transparency' was itself a blatant lie!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">"Some in the Trudeau inner circle"?? <em>Who</em> in J.Turd's inner circle, Peter???! Your Liberal pal Purchase? </span><span style="font-size: small;">Why coyly omit this fact, while cloyingly fawning over Trudeau??</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">And the CBC then says there is no conflict of interest - when their top news anchor blabs about 'openness and transparency', yet is a shill for the Liberals??</span><br />
<br /><br />
We now see that the Nov.5, 2015 CBC column, written by Mansbridge himself, was PURE POLITICAL propaganda.<br />
Mansbridge could have just as easily revealed in his <em>original interview</em>, or, in his Nov.5th column, about how he really got his interview - he knew Purchase, she got him in; ok, then: case closed.<br />
<br /><br />
But, what Mansbridge did was <em>hide that fact</em>, and instead pursued <em>his own agenda - </em>he used the tax-payer-subsidized CBC to crow about his own phonily 'hard-earned' interview with the ever-so-open Turdeau; to create a paean to Turdeau, and at the same time, to slime Harper.<br />
<br /><br />
This is the kind of fifth-columnist slime which has infected CBC "journalism" for a long time.<br />
This reminds me in a way of the kind of crap the <em>St.Catharines Standard Bradley Buttlicker</em> has been doing with Liberal MPP Jim Bradley, for decades, pussyfooting softly around Jimmy, delicately doing their damndest not to ask too many questions of their Boy Bradley on anything of any controversy or relevance.<br />
<br /><br />
We're used to that kind of incessant, ingrained, inbred media Liberal ass-kissing locally in Niagara.<br />
<br /><br />
It is nevertheless astounding to see it so blatantly, so smugly, so nonchalantly, so eagerly, so<span style="font-size: xx-small;">...</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">how can you say it..<span style="font-size: xx-small;">?</span></span> so 'self-entitled-ly' <span style="font-size: xx-small;">(!!)</span> perpetrated by Mansbridge here, on a national forum.<br />
Mansbridge should be fired. His "trust" as a journalist has been compromised.<br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-52327107078515565762015-11-12T18:30:00.001-05:002015-11-12T20:58:36.661-05:00Bend over, Ontario: Jim Bradley's coming with his massive Liberal carbon-tax-grab<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Now that Jim Bradley's Liberal GreenFear-pushers are going to institute their not-so-secret <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-to-detail-cap-and-trade-system-for-carbon-emissions-in-coming-days-1.3313232?cmp=googleeditorspick&google_editors_picks=true">carbon tax</a> in Ontario, let's see how long it will be (...never?) before the St.Catharines Standard Bradley Buttlicker interviews their pal Ole Jimmy 'bout this latest Liberal scam!!<br />
Grunt LaFlush, crack stenographer at the <em>St.Catharines Standard Bradley Buttlicker,</em> has by now had a chance to examine all of the "global-warming/climate change science" which the 'anti-science' Harper and thousands of 'government scientists' hid from him - right?<br />
Laflush has already had plenty of time to interview St. Catharines Liberal MP Chris Bittle, in order to gather ALL of the "global-warming evidence" which Bittle is privy to - along with Liberal MPP Jim Bradley - right?!<br />
Laflush has asked Bittle whether he supports Bradley's climate-tax rip-off - right?!<br />
Surely, Grunt Laflush has done this; surely, Laflush has also interviewed Liberal hacks Bradley and Bittle about all the ways in which 'global warming and climate change can be stopped' - as their <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2015/11/11/al-gore-optimistic-about-stopping-global-warming.html">climate hoaxter God Al Gore </a>still says.<br />
Laflush has most certainly asked former Ontario environment minister Bradley, about his thoughts on the Turdo Liberals' 8 billion litre flush of raw sewage into the St.Lawrence - <em>hasn'</em>t he?<br />
I'm sure Laflush has also asked the federal crap-dumping-Liberal MP Bittle all about this too! Hasn't he?!<br />
Will <em>anyone (?!?) </em>from the <em>Bradley Buttlicker</em> ever ask the duo Bradley and Bittle whether their scandalous parties will <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/exodus-of-ontario-liberal-staffers-to-ottawa-set-to-begin/article27181936/">reimburse Ontarians for the all the inbred campaigning</a> which Bradley's Liberals did for Bittle's Liberals, on the taxpayer's dime?!<br />
...I missed that wonderful Dolighan cartoon - - <span style="font-size: xx-small;">ahhh, Dolighan... so darned funny</span>... in the <em>St.Catharines Standard Bradley Buttlicker,</em> showing Justin Trudeau, Catherine McKenna, and Denis "Fred Flintstone" Coderre, strategically drawn, sitting with their pants down, with their butts hanging over the banks of the St.Lawrence, taking a communal dump into the river. <span style="font-size: xx-small;">Wow... Dolighan...such political acumen</span>...<br />
'What's a couple more litres of shite between friends' says McKenna demurely. 'This crap is our gift to our Liberal-voting friends down east!' while Coderre mumbles something about 'the necessity of merde'. Justin Turdeau is drawn not only wearing ermine robes AND a crown, but is apparently toking a joint, saying 'It's 2015, man!! THIS is real Liberal change for ya!".<br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-58953253663392732312015-11-11T12:02:00.000-05:002015-11-11T12:03:17.413-05:00Justin Trudeau, Denis Coderre and Liberal "climate change" hoaxter Catherine McKenna take a dump in the St.Lawrence River<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Read more on the shitty <a href="http://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/flushgates-stench-will-outlast-whatever-montreal-dumps-into-the-st-lawrence?google_editors_picks=true">Flushgate</a> fiasco perpetrated by Montreal's mayor Fred Flintstone.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-11298148961355504382015-10-28T19:21:00.002-04:002015-10-28T19:22:55.026-04:00When's Wynne gonna fire Sandals over her scandals?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
As Kelly Parland wrote in the <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/kelly-mcparland-corrupt-is-the-only-word-to-describe-ontario-governments-ties-to-teachers-unions">Oct.26, 2015 National Post</a>: "Corruption is a strong word, which we don’t often use in Canada when it comes to politics. It infers a blatant disregard for honesty, ethics or principle. But it’s the word that springs to mind when you contemplate the insidious relationship between Ontario’s Liberal government and the teachers unions they do so much to cultivate and please.<br />
How else to describe it? The Liberals spend hundreds of millions of dollars to ensure the unions remain relatively quiescent and co-operative, offering rich contracts, special treatment, secret agreements and generous payoffs with public dollars. In return the unions spend millions undermining the government’s opponents and working to ensure the Liberals stay in power."<br />
Why hasn't <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/ontario-liberals-slammed-for-flip-flop-on-whether-million-dollar-payouts-to-teachers-unions-exceptional">incompetent Liberal education minister Liz Sandals</a> resigned - or been already removed by Kathleen Wynne? Secret taxpayer cheques being cut to unions, with no receipts? Wow. <br />
Jim Bradley and his secretive, scumbag Ontario Liberals must be <em>oh so</em> proud of their dirty handiwork - scandal upon scandal, their destruction of Ontario continues. <br />
Justin Trudeau must be very proud as well, of the kind of provincial Liberal scum which propelled him to power.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-28010232358113061222015-10-25T13:25:00.000-04:002015-10-26T02:17:11.893-04:00Blowing tax-dollars "not unusual" for Liberals<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
An <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/programs/metromorning/premier-kathleen-wynne-metro-morning-1.3284382">Oct.23, 2015 CBC story</a> reported: <span style="background-color: #fce5cd; color: #3d85c6;">"Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne says the province paying millions to teachers' unions to compensate them for a long labour negotiation process is not unusual and that the payments are key to getting labour deals signed."</span><br />
As Square Root commented:<br />
<span style="background-color: #fce5cd;">"Under section 70 of the Ontario Labour Relations Act dealing with unfair practices: </span><br />
<span style="background-color: #fce5cd;">"No employer or employers’ organization and no person acting on behalf of an employer or an employers’ organization shall participate in or interfere with the formation, selection or administration of a trade union or the representation of employees by a trade union <span style="color: red;">or contribute financial or other support to a trade union</span>, but nothing in this section shall be deemed to deprive an employer of the employer’s freedom to express views so long as the employer does not use coercion, intimidation, threats, promises or undue influence. 1995, c. 1, Sched. A, s. 70"</span><br />
Logo commented:<br />
<span style="background-color: #fce5cd;">"The Office of the Auditor General needs to conducts value-for-money /financial audits of all the provincial government departments, ministries and agencies to determine if this is common and then take action on their findings into this unsettling situation. This sounds like a contravention of the Financial Administration Act (Ontario)."</span><br />
For some reason, CBC interviewer Matt Galloway didn't ask Wynne about the OLRA or FAA issues!<br />
I suppose that Wynne's Liberal actions<em> aren't</em> unusual at all to those Liberal-infected Ontarians, who also find absolutely nothing wrong with the Ontario Liberal's blowing <em>multi-BILLIONS</em> on their numerous other fantastic schemes.<br />
For months, the incestuous Ontario Liberals, as the government, acted openly in supporting and campaigning for Justin Turdo's federal Liberals.<br />
Ontario's taxpayers essentially helped subsidize Justin Turdeau's federal election campaign - yet another brazen, indirect theft from the Ontario taxpayer's pocket (...a typically-Liberal mode of operation, btw...) which Galloway didn't ask about.<br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-32169481231329218652015-10-21T23:59:00.001-04:002015-10-22T20:34:00.454-04:00"Open and transparent" Liberal lies<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
So, while Jim Bradley's and Kathleen Wynne's 'Open and Transparent' Ontario Liberals were meeting secretly with Chinese Communists and shilling for 'Open and Transparent' Liberal Justin Turdeau, they were also secretly <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ontario-government-paid-1-million-to-second-teachers-union-for-labour-peace/article26913260/">giving away millions of tax dollars to</a> Ontario's teacher unions.<br />
As Adrian Morrow reported in the Oct 21, 2015 Globe and Mail:<br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">"The Ontario government secretly paid $1-million to the Catholic teachers’ union and $500,000 to the French teachers’ union to buy labour peace. This means three unions have now received payments totalling $2.5-million from the government in this year’s round of bargaining.</span><br />
<div class="selectionShareable">
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">And Education Minister Liz Sandals has admitted that the government has repeatedly given such payouts to teachers’ unions over the past decade to compensate them for the cost of collective bargaining with the province.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The payments raise tough questions about the government’s claims it is not spending new money to reach labour settlements. They also call into question the province’s new negotiating system: The government said it compensated the unions because the process made contract talks longer and more complex than they were supposed to be.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #cfe2f3;">The revelations about the money came on Wednesday, after The Globe and Mail uncovered a $1-million payment to the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, which represents public high school teachers. The Globe subsequently obtained a copy of the deal the Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association and the province reached in August. The 54-page document, marked “highly confidential,” shows OECTA also received $1-million..."</span><br />
So: this is the kind of secretive Ontario Liberal scum, that <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/19/justin-trudeau-owes-kathleen-wynne-after-this-election-cohn.html">openly shilled for Justin Trudeau's Liberals.</a></div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
This is the kind of cancerous Liberal carnage which we've suffered in Ontario, which is a harbinger of the same Liberal infection which will soon consume Canada.</div>
<div class="selectionShareable">
*</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692488549699658893.post-4169607714882871362015-10-19T14:03:00.000-04:002015-10-20T15:27:27.406-04:00Where did Canada's federal Liberal leader Justin Trudeau buy his drugs?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Following this <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/15/doug-ford-calls-justin-trudeau-a-hypocrite-for-criticizing-rob-fords-drug-problems.html">Oct.15, 2015 Toronto Star</a> story, it wasn't made clear how, where or from whom Liberal MP Justin Trudeau got his drugs. Did the Star bother to find out and report that?! When he needed to toke up, did the current Canadian federal Liberal Party leader buy his marijuana from some dealer? Did Justin get his weed for free, as a 'gift' from 'friends'? Who were Justin Trudeau's drug suppliers? Or, did Justin Trudeau just happen to conveniently 'find' a dime bag of dope somewhere, left behind by a magical unicorn?<br />
Don't Canadians deserve to know all about Justin Trudeau's drug habits - <em>and </em>his shampoo/conditioner preferences - from Canada's "transparent Liberals"?! <br />
Is Justin Trudeau <em>still </em>getting high on weed? Does Justin Trudeau rinse <em>AND</em> repeat??<br />
If Justin Trudeau<em> is</em> still getting occasionally stoned, don't Canadians at least deserve to know which kind of pot is Justin Trudeau's favourite?<br />
Don't Canadians deserve to know whether Justin Trudeau prefers to smoke just joints, or does Justin Trudeau have a favourite type of bong he also likes to use, for special occasions?? Where is Tokin' Trude's favourite head shop? How often does Justin Trudeau like to get stoned? <br />
There are so many things which Canadians are eager to learn about our tokin' Liberal leader Justin Trudeau!<br />
*</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0